期刊論文1. | Schweller, Randall、Priess, David(1997)。A Tale of Two Realisms: Expanding the Institutions Debate。Mershon International Studies Review,41(1),6-8。 |
2. | 甘逸驊(20071000)。歐盟「柔性強權」身份認同的建構與批判。問題與研究,46(4),1-25。 延伸查詢 |
3. | Lebow, Richard N.(200407)。Constructive Realism。International Studies Review,6(2),346-348。 |
4. | Mattern, Janice Bially(2004)。Power in Realist-Constructivist Research。International Studies Review,6(2),343-346。 |
5. | Wendt, Alexander(200312)。Why a World State is Inevitable?。European Journal of International Relations,9(4),491-542。 |
6. | Legro, Jeffrey W.、Moravcsik, Andrew(1999)。Is Anybody Still a Realist?。International Security,24(2),5-55。 |
7. | 盧業中(20011200)。主要國際關係理論中新現實主義、新自由制度主義與建構主義之比較研究。中山人文社會科學期刊,9(2)=21,21-52。 延伸查詢 |
8. | Wendt, Alexander E.(1994)。Collective Identity Formation and The International State。American Political Science Review,88(2),384-396。 |
9. | Glaser, Charles L.(1994)。Realists as Optimists: Cooperation as Self-Help。International Security,19(3),50-90。 |
10. | 鄭端耀(19971200)。國際關係「新自由制度主義」理論之評析。問題與研究,36(12),1-22+72。 延伸查詢 |
11. | Mearsheimer, John J.(1994)。The False Promise of International Institutions。International Security,19(3),5-49。 |
12. | 蔡育岱、譚偉恩(20080300)。從「國家」到「個人」:人類安全概念之分析。問題與研究,47(1),151-188。 延伸查詢 |
13. | 甘逸驊(20060900)。歐洲安全與防衛政策的軍事層面:歐盟的全球戰略地位。問題與研究,45(5),111-136。 延伸查詢 |
14. | 鄭端耀(20030300)。國際關係攻勢與守勢現實主義理論爭辯之評析。問題與研究,42(2),1-21。 延伸查詢 |
15. | Wede Boese(1999)。NATO Ministers Skeptical of U. S.NMD Plans。Arms Control Today,29(8),21。 |
16. | Wyn Q. Bowen(2001)。Missile Defense and the Transatlantic Security Relationship。International Affairs,77(3),485-507。 |
17. | 蔡育岱、譚偉恩(200801)。雙胞胎或連體嬰:論安全研究與和平研究之關聯性。國際關係學報,25,77-118。 延伸查詢 |
18. | Holsti, K. J.(1986)。The Horsemen of the Apocalypse: At the Gates, Detoured, or Retreating?。International Studies Quarterly,30(4),356。 |
19. | Andreas Hasenclever、Peter Mayer、Volker Rittberger(2000)。Integrating Theories of International Regimes。Review of International Studies,26(1),10。 |
20. | Patrick Morgan(2003)。NATO and European Security: The Creative Use of an International Organization。Journal of Strategic Studies,26(3),49-74。 |
21. | J. Samuel Barkin(200407)。Realist Constructivism and Realist-Constructivism。International Studies Review,6(2),348-352。 |
22. | 莫大華(200703)。探索國際關係理論的建橋計畫:理性主義與建構主義的理論綜合。政治科學論叢,31,175-215。 延伸查詢 |
23. | Patrick Jackson、Daniel Nexon(200407)。Constructivist Realism or Realist-Constructivism?。International Studies Review,6(2),337-341。 |
24. | Jennifer Sterling-Folker(200407)。Realist-Constructivism and Morality。International Studies Review,6(2),341-343。 |
25. | J. Samuel Barkin(200407)。Realist Constructivism and Realist-Constructivism。International Studies Review,6(2),348-352。 |
其他1. | Ronald Kadish(20010719)。Ballistic Missile Defense Program,http://www.fas.org/spp/starwars/program/ news01/kadish_sasc_2001.pdf., 2001/07/19。 |
2. | Hildreth, Steven A.,Carl Ek(2008)。Long-Range Ballistic Missile Defense in Europe,http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/weapons/RL34051.pdf., 2008/06/13。 |
3. | Peter Baker。NATO to Endorse U.S. Missile-Defense Plan,http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2008/04/03/ST200804030 1626.html., 2008/04/03。 |
4. | John Kruzel。Putin Offers to Cooperate with U1S. on Missile Defense,http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle1aspx? id = 46615.。 |
5. | Matt Spetalnick and Oleg Shchedrov。Putin Makes New Offer to Bush on Missile plan,http://www.reuters.com /article/latestCrisis/idUSN02367661。 |
6. | Putin: Withdrawal from CFE Treaty is our response to NATO,http://www.regnum.ru/english/918641.html., 2007/11/21。 |
7. | Bush and Putin Fail to Resolve Differences on Missile Defense,http://124.9.0.200/international/europe/2008/04/07/150675/Bush%2Dand.htm., 2008/04/07。 |
8. | (20080722)。Missile Defense Plan Directed at Rogue Nations, Not Russia,http://www.america.gov/st/peacesec-english/2008/July/200807221049rdela uqsapid0.2564.html., 2008/07/22。 |
9. | Each Party shall, in exercising its national sovereignty, have the right to withdraw from this Treaty if it decides that extraordinary events related to the subject matter of this Treaty have jeopardized its supreme interests,http://www.asil.org/insights/insigh70.htm。 |
10. | (20011214)。U.S. quits ABM treaty,http://archives.cnn.com/2001/ALLPOLITICS/12/13/rec.bush.abm/, 2001/12/14。 |
11. | The Department of State and Agency for International Development(20070507)。Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2007 to 2012。 |
12. | (20070305),http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/0,1518,469828-2,00.html, 2007/03/05。 |
13. | Sally McNamara(20080404)。NATO Backs Washington’s Missile Defense Plans: A Victory for U.S. Diplomacy,http://www.heritage.org/Research/Europe/upload/wm_1884.pdf, 2008/04/04。 |
14. | (20070328)。Missile Defense and Europe,Washington, DC。,http://fpc.state.gov/82329.htm, 2007/03/28。 |
15. | Robert Kagan(20080811)。Putin Makes His Move。 |
16. | Ariel Cohen(20080811)。The Russian-Georgian War: A Challenge for the U.S. and the World。 |
17. | Nadia Mushtaq Abbasi。Security Issues Between the US and EU Within NATO,http://www.issi.org.pk/journal/2000_files/no_4/article/9a.htm。 |
18. | Camille Grand(2000)。Missile Defense: The View from the Other Side of the Atlantic,http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2000_09/grandsept00。 |
19. | (20021121)。Prague Summit Declaration,http://www.nato.int/docu/pr/2002/p02-127e.htm。 |
20. | Steven Erlanger,Steven Lee Myers(20080404)。NATO Endorses Europe Missile Shield,http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/04/world/europe/04nato.html, 2008/04/04。 |
21. | (20090917)。Missile Defence in Europe: Pie in the sky,http://www.economist.com/world/europe/displayStory.cfm?story_id=14480416, 2009/09/17。 |
22. | Paul Kerr(2006)。Russia, Iran Sign Deal to Fuel Bushehr Reactor,http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2006_11/RussiaIran。 |
23. | Timeline: Iran Nuclear Crisis,http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,211517,00.html, 2006/08/08。 |
24. | (20080727)。No Talks on Suspension Made in Geneva: Spokesman,http://eupolitics.einnews.com/news/eu-iran-nuclear-talks, 2008/07/27。 |
25. | 張沛元,陳成良(20090918)。東歐飛彈防禦系統 美放棄部署。 延伸查詢 |
26. | Gerald Cupchik(20010407)。Constructivist Realism: An Ontology that Encompasses Positivist and Constructivist Approaches to the Social Sciences,http://nbnresolvingde/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs010177。 |