臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：失衡的承諾：著作權法責任避風港規範之立法政策評析
書刊名：國立臺灣大學法學論叢
作者：李治安 引用關係
作者(外文)：Lee, Jyh-an
出版日期：2014
卷期：43:1
頁次：頁143-207
主題關鍵詞：網路服務提供者；避風港；安全港；通知-移除；三振條款；合理使用；私部門執法；Internet service provider；ISP；Safe harbor；Notice-and-takedown；Three-strike provision；Fair use；Private enforcement of law
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:7
  • 共同引用共同引用:70
  • 點閱點閱:31
我國著作權法於2009年增訂第六章之一「網路服務提供者之民事免責事由」，建立網路服務提供者之責任避風港，對於相關業者及網路產業造成重大影響，該次修法主要參考美國著作權法，立法目的係為降低網路服務提供者之訴訟風險，以利網路產業之整體發展。本文採取比較法之研究方法，並觀察我國現行著作權法之法律責任體系，以重新檢視避風港規範之立法政策，透過對於避風港規範的立法模式分析，凸顯網路時代的特殊規範模式與政策思維。此外，藉由深入剖析避風港規範及其與合理使用政策之間的關聯，本文點出著作權法第六章之一在政策上可能造成之失衡現象，並於立法層次建議未來著作權法可能之修正方向，以妥適平衡著作權人、網路服務提供者及網路服務使用者之三方利益。
Taiwan Copyright Law was amended in 2009, transplanting the safe harbor regime for Internet service providers (ISPs) primarily from the United States Copyright Law. The legislative intend of this amendment is to benefit the Internet industry by reducing ISPs' legal risk caused by users' infringing activities. This Article first examines the safe harbor rules in Taiwan Copyright Law from a comparative law perspective. Then it explores ISPs' civil and criminal liabilities for users' infringing activities and their relationship with current safe harbor rules. By illustrating the characteristics of the ISP safe harbor legislation, this Article provides a number of policy implications of digital copyright law and Internet law. Moreover, this Article provides several legislative proposals on ISP safe harbor rules to balance different interests of copyright owners, ISPs, and their users.
期刊論文
1.李治安(20120900)。著作權法中的灰姑娘：利用人地位之探討。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，41(3)，931-979。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.沈宗倫(20100100)。對於我國著作權法關於網路服務提供者民事責任豁免立法之初步評析。中正財經法學，1，257-293+295-298。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.林利芝(20101201)。責任避風港適用之研究--以學術網路為例。臺灣法學雜誌，165，11-42。  延伸查詢new window
4.林利芝(20120400)。影音網站著作權侵害與過濾機制衍生爭議之研究。東吳法律學報，23(4)，89-124。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.姚信安(20111200)。論我國著作權網路服務提供者責任規範之發展與實踐。科技法學評論，8(2)，167-218。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.孫式文(20110700)。隱喻與數位文化：由傳播與價值批判的角度省思。新聞學研究，108，141-181。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.陳思廷(20120500)。法國著作權網路侵權三振法制之解析。智慧財產權，161，32-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.馮震宇(20121200)。從間接侵權責任與三振條款立法看ISP責任之商榷。月旦民商法雜誌，38，5-22。  延伸查詢new window
9.馮震宇(20120815)。數位環境下著作權侵害之認定及相關案例研討。臺灣法學雜誌，206，41-67。  延伸查詢new window
10.劉孔中(20131200)。著作權法宏觀修法之比較研究。智慧財產評論，11(2)，1-56。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.劉靜怡(20110500)。網路內容管制與言論自由--以網路中介者的角色為討論重心。月旦法學，192，63-80。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.盧彥如(20120815)。電腦科技與著作權侵害問題之探討。臺灣法學雜誌，206，68-88。  延伸查詢new window
13.Armstrong, T. K.(2006)。Digital rights management and the process of fair use。Harvard Journal of Law & Technology，20(1)，49-121。  new window
14.Band, J.、Schruers, M.(2002)。Safe harbors against the liability hurricane: The Communications Decency Act and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act。Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal，20(2)，295-320。  new window
15.Burk, Dan L.(2011)。Toward an epistemology of ISP secondary liability。Philosophy & Technology，24(4)，437-454。  new window
16.Concepcion, Cattleya M.(2010)。Beyond the lens of Lenz: Looking to protect fair use during the safe harbor process under the DMCA。George Mason Law Review，18(1)，219-244。  new window
17.Cutler, J. E.(2011)。Parties to no closer to reconciling 13-year-old DMCA without stakeholder needs。Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal，81，611-613。  new window
18.de Beer, J.、Clemmer, C. D.(2009)。Global trends in online copyright enforcement: A non-neutral role for network intermediaries?。Jurimetrics: The Journal of Law, Science, and Technology，49(4)，375-409。  new window
19.Elkin-Koren, Niva(2005)。Making technology visible: Liability of Internet service providers for peer-to-peer traffic。New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy，9(1)，15-74。  new window
20.Fairfield, J. A. T.(2009)。The god paradox。Boston University Law Review，89(3)，1017-1068。  new window
21.Frieden, R.(2008)。Internet packet sniffing and its impact on the network neutrality debate and the balance of power between intellectual property creators and consumers。Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal，18(3)，633-675。  new window
22.Giblin, R.(2008)。A bit liable? A guide to navigating the U.S. secondary liability patchwork。Santa Clara Computer and High Technology Law Journal，25(1)，7-50。  new window
23.Ginsburg, J. C.(2008)。Separating the Sony sheep from the Grokster goats: Reckoning the future business plans for copyright-dependent technology entrepreneurs。Arizona Law Review，50(2)，577-610。  new window
24.Hamdani, A.(2003)。Gatekeeper liability。Southern California Law Review，77(1)，53-122。  new window
25.Koss, J.(2010)。Protecting free speech for unequivocal fair users: Rethinking our interpretation of the 512(f) Misrepresentation Clause。Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal，28(1)，149-174。  new window
26.Kraakman, R. H.(1986)。Gatekeepers: The anatomy of a third party enforcement strategy。Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization，2(1)，53-104。  new window
27.Leary, B.(2012)。Safe harbor startups: Liability rulemaking under DMCA。New York University Law Review，87(4)，1135-1171。  new window
28.Lee, J. -A.、Liu, C. -Y.(2012)。Forbidden city enclosed by the great firewall: The law and power of Internet filtering in China。Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology，13(1)，125-151。  new window
29.Lee, J. -A.(2010)。Organizing the unorganized: The role of nonprofit organizations in the commons communities。Jurimetrics Journal，50(3)，275-327。  new window
30.Lee, J. -A.(2013)。Searching for Internet freedom in China: A case study on Google’s China experience。Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal，31(2)，405-434。  new window
31.Loren, Lydia Pallas(2011)。Deterring abuse of the copyright takedown regime by taking misrepresentation claims seriously。Wake Forest Law Review，46(4)，745-782。  new window
32.Mann, R. J.、Belzley, S.(2005)。The promises of Internet intermediary liability。William and Mary Law Review，47(1)，239-307。  new window
33.Miller, J. M.(2010)。Fair use through the lenz of § 512(c) of the DMCA: A preemptive defense to a premature remedy?。Iowa Law Review，95(5)，1697-1729。  new window
34.Mtima, L.(2009)。Whom the gods would destroy: Why Congress prioritized copyright protection over Internet privacy in passing the Digital Millennium Copyright Act。Rutgers Law Review，61(3)，627-704。  new window
35.Pollack, M.(2006)。Rebalancing section 512 to protect fair users from herds of mice--trampling elephants, or a little due process is not such a dangerous thing。Santa Clara Computer and High Technology Law Journal，22(3)，547-576。  new window
36.Scott, Mike(2006)。Safe harbors under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act。New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy，9(1)，99-166。  new window
37.Seltzer, Wendy(2010)。Free speech unmoored in copyright's safe harbor: Chilling effects of the DMCA on the First Amendment。Harvard Journal of Law & Technology，24(1)，171-232。  new window
38.Urban, J. M.、Quilter, L.(2006)。Efficient process or “chilling effects”? Takedown notices under section 512 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act。Santa Clara Computer and High Technology Law Journal，22(4)，621-693。  new window
39.Wright, C. S.(2000)。Actual versus legal control: Reading vicarious liability for copyright infringement into the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998。Washington Law Review，75(3)，1005-1036。  new window
40.Yen, Alfred C.(2000)。Internet service provider liability for subscriber copyright infringement, enterprise liability, and the First Amendment。Georgetown Law Journal，88(6)，1833-1889。  new window
41.王怡蘋(20091000)。著作權法關於網路服務提供者之民事免責規範。月旦法學，173，25-41。new window  延伸查詢new window
42.李治安(20120400)。合理使用誰的著作？--論合理使用與出處明示之關聯。政大法學評論，126，357-403。new window  延伸查詢new window
43.姚信安(20110100)。從美國法角度探討我國著作權民事間接侵權責任相類制度。中正財經法學，2，139-201。new window  延伸查詢new window
44.馮震宇(20070600)。部落格也會侵害著作權？--網路服務提供者責任限制規範下的部落格責任。萬國法律，153，14-26。  延伸查詢new window
45.馮震宇、胡心蘭(20071200)。從間接侵權責任論著作權法P2P責任立法之商榷。月旦法學，151，203-218。new window  延伸查詢new window
46.楊仁壽(19900200)。論權利濫用禁止原則之適用。法令月刊，41(2)，5-8。new window  延伸查詢new window
47.葉志良(20120100)。著作權法三振條款制度對著作權平衡保護的影響。資訊社會研究，22，79-115。new window  延伸查詢new window
48.Bridy, Annemarie(2010)。Graduated response and the turn to private ordering in online copyright enforcement。Oregon Law Review，89(1)，81-132。  new window
49.Lee, Edward(2009)。Decoding the DMCA safe harbors。Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts，32(3)，233-270。  new window
50.Lemley, Mark A.(2007)。Rationalizing Internet safe harbors。Journal on Telecommunications & High Technology Law，6(1)，101-120。  new window
51.Lichtman, Douglas、Landes, William(2003)。Indirect liability for copyright infringement: An economic perspective。Harvard Journal of Law & Technology，16(2)，395-410。  new window
52.Samuelson, Pamela、Members of the CPP(2010)。The Copyright Principles Project: Directions For Reform。Berkeley Technology Law Journal，25(3)，1175-1246。  new window
53.Wu, Timothy(2004)。Copyright's communications policy。Michigan Law Review，103(2)，278-366。  new window
54.李治安(20100800)。當法律漫步在雲端。法學新論，25，49-65。new window  延伸查詢new window
55.Wu, Timothy(2003)。Network Neutrality,Broadband Discrimination。Journal of Telecommunications and High Technology Law，2(1)，141-176。  new window
56.Liu, J. P.(2004)。Regulatory copyright law。North Carolina Law Review，83(1)，87-166。  new window
57.Leval, Pierre N.(1990)。Toward a Fair Use Standard。Harvard Law Review，103(5)，1105-1136。  new window
58.劉靜怡(20120900)。網路中立性原則和言論自由：美國法制的發展。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，41(3)，795-876。new window  延伸查詢new window
59.賴文智(20080800)。我國網路服務提供者責任限制立法所涉相關議題簡介。律師雜誌，347，16-27。  延伸查詢new window
60.黃銘傑(19990700)。解碼、破碼與公平競爭秩序。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，28(4)，129-166。new window  延伸查詢new window
61.李治安(20060400)。關於數位匯流的基本管制問題。科技法學評論，3(1)，163-201。new window  延伸查詢new window
62.章忠信(20091000)。二○○九年新修正著作權法簡析--網路服務提供者之責任限制。月旦法學，173，5-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Ginsburg, J. C.、Gorman, R. A.(2012)。Copyright law。Washington, D.C.：Federal Judicial Center。  new window
2.Goldstein, P.(2005)。Goldstein on copyright。New York, NY：Aspen。  new window
3.Lehman, B. A.、Brown, Ronald H.(1995)。Intellectual property and the national information infrastructure: The report of the working group on intellectual property rights。U.S. Dep't of Commerce。  new window
4.Nimmer, Melville B.、Nimmer, David(1997)。Nimmer on copyright。New York, NY：Matthew Bender。  new window
5.Goldsmith, Jack、Wu, Tim(2006)。Who controls the Internet?: Illusions of a borderless world。New York, NY：Oxford University Press。  new window
6.Kaplan, Benjamin(1967)。An Unhurried view of copyright。Columbia University Press。  new window
7.Patry, William(2009)。Moral Panics and the Copyright Wars。New York, NY：Oxford University Press。  new window
8.Patterson, Lyman Ray(1968)。Copyright in historical perspective。Vanderbilt University Press。  new window
9.Lessig, Lawrence(2004)。Free culture: How big media uses technology and the law to lock down culture and control creativity。New York, NY：Penguin Press。  new window
10.van Schewick, B.(2010)。Internet architecture and innovation。Cambridge, MA：MIT Press。  new window
11.劉孔中(2007)。智慧財產權法制的關鍵革新。臺北：元照。  延伸查詢new window
12.Lessig, Lawrence(2001)。The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World。Random House, Inc.。  new window
其他
1.Wu, T.(20061026)。Does YouTube really have legal problems，http://www.slate.com/id/2152264。  new window
2.章忠信(2007)。立法院提案修法遏止網路檔案分享軟體之提供，http://www.copyrightnote.org/crnote/bbs.php?board=4&act=read&id=161。  延伸查詢new window
3.經濟部智慧財產局(2013)。著作權法網路服務提供者ISP民事免責事由Q＆A，http://www.tipo.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=207031&ctNode=7193&mp=1。  延伸查詢new window
4.Abrams, D.(20100317)。More chilling than the DMCA-Automated takedowns，http://www.chillingeffects.org/weather.cgi?WeatherID=634。  new window
5.Ahmed, S.(20091015)。Fast Internet access becomes a legal right in Finland，http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/10/15/finland.internet.rights/index.html。  new window
6.Albanesius, C.(20090327)。Comcast, others deny ‘Three Strikes’ piracy plan，http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2343977,00.asp。  new window
7.Business Software Alliance。BSA position on appropriate measures to deter online piracy of content，http://www.bsa.org/country/Public% 20Policy/online-content-piracy.aspx。  new window
8.CBC(20091118)。Spain makes broadband a universal right，http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2009/11/18/spain-universal-broadbandaccess。  new window
9.Electronic Frontier Foundation(2009)。RIAA v. The people: Five years later，http://www.eff.org/wp/riaa-v-people-years-later。  new window
10.McBride, Sarah，Smith, Ethan(20081219)。Music industry to abandon mass suits，http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122966038836021137.html。  new window
11.Sandoval, G.(20090325)。AT&T exec: ISP will never terminate service on RIAA’s word，http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-10204514-93.html。  new window
圖書論文
1.黃銘傑(2011)。日本著作權法合理使用規範之現況及修法議論。著作權合理使用規範之現在與未來。臺北：元照。  延伸查詢new window
2.Lee, J. -A.(2012)。Filtering online content in China。Computer-mediated communication across culture。Hershey, PA：IGI Global。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：328（臺灣：322，外國：6） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2241491 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68042337
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上