:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:董事之忠實義務----以企業併購法制為中心
作者:陳介山
作者(外文):Cheih-Shan Chen
校院名稱:國立中正大學
系所名稱:法律學研究所
指導教授:謝哲勝
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2004
主題關鍵詞:誠實信用原則董事忠實義務董事注意義務董事忠誠義務公司治理準合併併購商業判斷法則principle of good faithfiduciary duty of directorduty of care of directorduty of loyalty of directorcorporate governancede facto mergermergerbusiness judgment rule
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:106
  成功地企業併購可使企業整合、擴大市場、組織再造,增加國際競爭力,在內外環境的迫切需求下,我國分別於九十一年二月六日公布企業併購法,旋於九十三年五月五日對部分條文為文字上的修正;另外在九十年十一月大量修正公司法中的股份有限公司合併與分割;然此項修法是否已完整架構出企業併購法制內容是本文首要關心者。
  任何企業進行企業併購的靈魂人物──公司董事,在進行併購時若能善盡其應有的注意義務與忠誠義務,不僅可使公司以最小的代理成本,取得最大效果的併購績效,甚且可以確保股東、債權人的權利與員工、社區的福祉;相反地,若未能善盡注意義務則公司將反受併購之害,尤有甚者,濫用其權限,掠取公司資產,損害少數股東和債權人的權利,並傷及員工、社區福祉。本文擬深入了解董事忠實義務之內容,然認為對於忠實關係的本質宜先深入研究並以「誠信原則」做為忠實關係當事人所嚴格遵循的法律原則,並確信唯有在誠實信用原則可以明確貫徹,才能確保忠實關係當事人的公平與正義。據此,本文參考美國學者與實務,對於誠實信用原則之解釋與判決、代理法整編中,有關忠實義務人如何在忠實關係履行其忠實義務,美國模範商業公司法、公司治理原與實務之判例(決)建構出一套可與我國文化背景相容之民事忠實義務與董事忠實義務;並介紹美國模範商公司法1984年與1999年企業併購法制的立法體制做為我國未來修法之參考,尤其深入介紹美國實務上就董事於企業併購時是否善盡董事忠實義務之審查標準。
本文研究的基本架構的原始想法是,希望以企業併購法制為經,而以董事忠實義務為緯,融合成一篇以企業併購法制為骨架,以忠實義務為血脈的文章,期能全面地、有體系地寫出企業併購的法律規範。本文共分十章,以下簡述之。
第一章  緒論
  為因應加入WTO後,整體產業結構的改變,產、官、學與外國友人咸認為企業須進行體質改善,而企業併購是多數可選擇政策之一,然須先有一套完整企業併購法制以資配合;乃興起研究企業併購法制之動機,兼探討企業進行併購時,董事應盡忠實義務,以期全面且完整地建構合理企業併購法制,並可有效地監控董事執行職務,達到使產業得以發展、國家總體競爭力可以提昇之目的。據此乃於本章敘述本文之研究動機、目的、研究範圍、研究方法、相關論文回顧、研究架構與流程。
  第二章  董事忠實義務之概說
  本章先釐清董事之地位應是公司對內執行業務、對外代表公司;而後分別就我國與美國法律或實務上不同公司種類加以說明。董事忠實義務之內容,包括注意義務與忠誠義務,我國與英美兩種法律的規定如何,本文以圖示說明之,並進一步將其在公司併購中之重要性為簡要說明。
  第三章  誠實信用原則
  忠實關係的當事人之一方因信賴他方而賦予代為執行事務之權限,受託人須無私地盡一己之力,善盡善良管理人之注意處理事務,就此民事法律關係的帝王條款「誠信原則」,是忠實關係當事人必需嚴格遵循的法律原則。本章是對誠信原則的研究,了解其意義與淵源,與其所派生之法律具體原則、本質、功能後,具體地對個案適用誠信原則的標準,並說明其法律效力與其功能之關係,期可公平、合理地以誠信原則,有效地適用於系爭案例,達到應有的公平與正義,且可使每個個案皆能符合誠信原則,而導引出法律的一致性,甚至在該類型案例中創設出各項法則,以達成法律的安定性。
  第四章  忠實關係與忠實義務
  本章對忠實關係意義、產生原因與特性,先作初步說明,再進一步探討法律規範忠實關係之必要性後,詳細說明忠實關係義務人之忠實義務的內容,與違反忠實義務的救濟。
  第五章  公司治理與董事忠實義務
  從宏觀觀點,公司治理攸關國家整體競爭力,從微觀觀點,則是企業存續、成長的充分條件;而治理對象即是如何有效規範董事執行職務。本章對公司治理之意義、目的、類型、特性與應有方向說明後,再就德國的三層制之公司治理法律機制與日本、英美、大陸與我國加以介紹後,更進一步闡明董事忠實義務與公司治理之關係與法律規定,並檢討我國公司法的缺失並提出建議。
  第六章  董事注意義務
  董事與公司間之法律關係,係代表關係,並以授權為內容,故有關忠實關係之本質與原始之內在基礎,便需要以民法所規範授權關係為勞務給付之相關規定,來處理當事人間之爭議,因此以民法做為公司董事之補充法律,可以彌補公司法規定之不足。
  本章先釐清董事之地位與種後,董事忠實義務內容,包括注意義務與忠誠義務,本文先概略加以比較我國與英、美法後,並就美國實務上對董事注意義務發展出之商業判斷法則與監督注意詳加介紹,尤其是德拉瓦州為能保障外部董因違反注意義務所生之民事責任的免責規定、費用、開支的補償進一步討論與說明;至於董事的民事責任保險只略為提及,進而討論我國法的缺失並試圖提出建議。
  第七章  董事忠誠義務
  董事忠誠義務是董事忠實義務之一,本章對忠誠義務之意義與規範之必要性加以說明,並對我國法為初步討論後,詳加介紹美國模範商業公司法與德拉瓦州公司法之現行規定與歷次修法,並加以比較;尤其多方介紹其豐富的判例(決),針對因利害衝突所生忠誠義務的合法化程序規定,詳加討論並提出建議。
  第八章  企業併購法制
  本章介紹企業併購之意義、範圍與作用,並以經濟分析方法,說明企業併購的經濟因素與理想模型,藉以提供立法機關於架構有關企業併購之立法體例參考,其中並比較美國立法體例,對九十一年一月十五日,經立法院三讀之企業併購法加以簡略說明後,檢討其立法體例上的得失,而後更進一步對企業併購的實體規範與程序規範深入說明。
  第九章  企業併購時董事忠實義務
  本章係融合第二章至第四章忠實關係的忠實義務與企業併購行為中「董事的忠實義務」之特有內容,分別是出售公司控制權、平等對待普通股東、平等對待特別股東、公司債權人之保障與員工權益的保障、買回「內部人」股份與經理兼併時,董事應有忠實義務的行為規範。
  第十章  結論
Successful merger can make the corporation integration, expanding market and organization recreated. Thereafter it can increase international competition. For the necessity of resolving the outside and inside pressure, the Business Merger and Acquisitions Law was enacted in 6 Feb. 2002 in Taiwan and not too long was amended literally in 5 May 2004. Legislative also amended Corporate Law referring to merger / consolidation and division. We do care whether the enactment and amendment, however, are entirely and properly provided the contents of merger and acquisition.
The main person proceeds the merger — corporate director — can discharge his duty of care and duty of loyalty well. The corporation can get the most optional operation performance with the minimum agency cost, moreover are able to protect the rights of stockholders and creditors as well as the welfare of community. If he doesn’t charge his duty with prudent care, the corporation will be damaged, moreover he abuse his discretion to predator corporate assets and deprive the rights of minority shareholder and creditor as well as the welfare of community. In this thesis, I may indulge in making a research about the contents of the director’s fiduciary duties, especially while proceeding in merger. It is to understand what is the nature and functions of fiduciary relationship and has to know the principle of good faith shall be strictly followed in while the fiduciary discharge his obligations. They will be fair and just, if the fiduciary has done his work with good faith. This thesis, therefore, refers to the Anglo-Americans scholar and judicial opinions about the interpretation and decision of the principle of good faith. It also discusses the restatement of agency pertaining to the fiduciary how to discharge his fiduciary duties, Model Business Corporation Act, the principles of corporate governance and judicial decisions. The propose of this thesis is to create the civil fiduciary relationship and director’s fiduciary duties and introduce the statutes of 1984 and 1999 Model Business Corporate Act pertaining to the merger / consolidation and acquisitions, and specially discuss how the Anglo-American judicial decision to test whether the directors has discharge their obligations when they proceed the activities of merger. This research intends to be as the reference while we intend to amend the relevant law in the future.
The structure of this thesis intends to discuss business merger and acquisition on the one hand and make research about director’s fiduciary duties on the other hand. It is able to integrate as the contents of merger are the body and the contents of fiduciary duties are the blood.
There are ten chapters in the thesis:
Chapter one: Introduction
For matching the consequence of joining WTO and changing of the structure of enterprise, the enterprise businessmen official, scholars and foreign friends all think that the entire business shall totally change their structure. The merger and acquisition is one of the main alternations. It, however, has to a perfect merger law to match the necessity. This is the motive for me to make the research concerning the Business Merger / Consolidation and Acquisition Law and discuss how the directors to discharge their duties while they are proceeding the activity of merger.
The purpose of this thesis is to make the enterprise proceeds merger effectively and protect the rights of consbitwency. It therefore promotes the ability of whole competition. This chapter discusses the motive, purpose, sphere, methodology, references, structure and process of research.
Chapter two: The general scrip of director’s fiduciary duty
At the beginning, I discuss the position of director. The director manage the corporation’s inter affair and represent the corporation to the third person. I also discuss the kinds of director, the contents of director’s fiduciary duties including duty of care and duty of loyalty with the comparison of Anglo-American and Taiwan. This comparison expresses in picture. Finally I discuss the importance of directors proceed the merger simply.
Chapter three: The principle of good faith
One party of the fiduciary relationship delegates the power to do his affairs because he relies on the fiduciary. He shall discharge his duty with selflessness and perform his duty with prudent care. The empire clause--the principle of good faith─is the most important legal principle that should be kept in fiduciary’s mind.
This chapter studies the principle of good faith. We understand its definition, origin and the legal substantial principles, nature and functions that deviate from it. We also intend to know substantially how the standard of principle of good faith apply to case and demonstrate to relationship between the function and legal effect. The purpose to know the above materials are to use the principle of good faith apply to related cases effectively and let the case fair and justice.
Chapter four: Fiduciary relationship and fiduciary obligations
We first demonstrate the definition, reason and character of fiduciary relationship. Second, express the necessity of regulating the fiduciary relationship by law. We further study the contents of the obligations of fiduciary and the legal effect against the fiduciary’s obligations.
Chapter five: Corporate governance and director’s fiduciary duties
Corporate governance does care of the whole competition of nation generally. It also does care of the duration and progress of corporation individually. This chapter discusses the definition, purpose, kinds, character and its necessary functions. It next compares the three tier of corporate of Germany with the two ties of corporate governance of Japan, Anglo-American, Mainland China and Taiwan. It further explains the relation and statutes between the director’s obligation and corporate governance. Finally it discusses the defects of corporation law in Taiwan and provides recommendations.
Chapter six: The director’s duty of care
The relationship between director and corporation is the relationship of representative and having delegation of power. It therefore entitled to the basis of fiduciary relationship and should be regulated the conflicts under the service contract in civil law. Civil law can supply the deficiency of the corporate law.
The first section discusses the regulation of director’s duty of care in Taiwan. The section demonstrates the business judgment rule and duty of investigation. The fifth section discusses the limited liability of director and indemnification and advance for expense. The last section examines the deficiency of corporate law in Taiwan and provides recommendations.
Chapter seven: The director’s duty of loyalty
The director’s duty of loyalty is one of director’s fiduciary duties. This chapter first explains the definition of director’s duty of loyalty and discusses the necessity of regulation. It next discuss the provisions in Taiwan and Model Business corporate Law as well as the Delaware General Corporate Law with comparison. This chapter also introduces abundant, decisions in American. It discusses how to be legalized when there are conflicts of interests and provide recommendations.
Chapter eight: Business merger and acquisition
This chapter introduces the definition sphere and function of business merger / consolidation and acquisition. It next discusses the elements and ideal model of merger with the method of economic analysis. It further introduces the amendment of Model Business Corporate Law concerning merger and acquisition in Chapter 11, 12, 13. It further explains the Business Merger / Consolidation and Acquisition Law in 15 Jan. 2002. Simplify and examines is defects.
Chapter nine: The director’s fiduciary duty while proceeding merger and acquisition.
This chapter integrates the contents of fiduciary duty of fiduciary from Chapter 2 to chapter 4 and when the directors are proceed business merger and acquisition, he should have to discharge his fiduciary duties. It specially discusses selling corporate controlling powers, treating common stockholders equally, treating special stockholders equally the protection of creditors and employees, buying back “internal persons” and mange leveraged merger the director’s shall have strict duty of loyalty.
Chapter ten: Conclusion
參考文獻
一、中文部分
(一)書籍 (依作者姓氏筆劃順序排列)
1.大陸公司法,中國法制出版社出版,一九九九年十月。
2.方嘉麟,信託法之理論與實務,月旦出版,民國八十七年一月。
3.方嘉麟,中美兼併制度之比較──會計處理,公司兼併與集團企業,
政大法學叢書(三十四),月旦出版,民國八十三年四月。
4.六法全書-商事法,保成出版,民國八十二年二月。
5.王甲乙、楊建華、鄭健才著,民事訴訟法,三民總經銷,民國八十九年。
6.王文宇,論董事與公司間交易之規範,編入公司與企業法制中,元照出版,民國八十九年五月。new window
7.王文宇,從財產權觀點論保障財產權的方法式──以財產法與補償法則為中心,收錄在民商法理論與經濟分析,元照出版,民國八十九年五月。new window
8.王文宇,論衍生性金融商品之法律問題,收錄在民法理論與經濟分析,元照出版,民國八十九年五月。new window
9.王文宇,公司企業法制,元照出版,民國八十九年五月。
10.王文宇,從「公司管控」之觀點論如何加強董事權責,公司與企業法制,元照出版,民國八十九年五月。new window
11.王文宇,論董事與公司間交易之規範,公司與企業法制,元照出版,民國八十九年五月。new window
12.王文宇,定暫時狀態假處分與公司經營權之爭奪,利於公司與企業法制,元照出版,民國八十九年年五月。new window
13.王亦平,馬強,王軼合著,公司法理與併購運作,人民法院出版社出版,二○○一年三月。
14.王伯琦,自然法之復興與概念邏輯,編入王伯琦法學論著集,三民出版,民國八十八年一月。new window
15.王伯琦,論概念法學,編入王伯琦法學論著集,三民出版,民國八十八年一月。new window
16. 王保樹,崔勤之著,公司法原理,社會科學文獻出版社出版,二○○一年二月。
17.王泰升,公開發行公司法制,蔚理法律出版,民國七十八年七月。
18.王新,秦芳華著,公司法,人民法院出版社出版,二○○○年一月。
19.王新,秦芳華合著,公司法,人民法院出版社出版,徐學虎主編,商法系列叢書之二,西元二○○○年十月。
20.王澤鑑,民法實例研習──民法總則,作者自刊,民國九十年十月。
21.王澤鑑,民法債編總論第二冊──不當得利,作者自刊,三民經銷,民國八十年十月。
22.王澤鑑,法律思維與民法實例,作者自刊,民國八十九年九月。
23.王澤鑑,物之瑕疵擔保責任,不完全給付與同時履行抗辯,民法學說與判例研究(六),作者自刊,民國七十九年。new window
24.王澤鑑,契約上的不作為義務,民法學說與判例研究,第八冊,作者自刊,民國八十年三月。new window
25.王澤鑑,侵權行為法,第一冊,作者自刊,民國八十七年九月。
26.王澤鑑,雇主未為勞工辦理加入勞工保險之民事責任,民法學說與判例研究(二),作者自刊,民國七十八年。new window
27.王澤鑑,債法原理,第一冊,作者自刊,民國九十年三月。
28.王澤鑑,權利失效,編入民法學說與判例研究(二),作者自刊,民國八十年十月。new window
29.王澤鑑,締約上之過失,民法學說與判例研究(一),作者自刊,民國八十年十月。new window
30.王澤鑑,契約責任與侵權責任之競合,民法學說與判例研究,第一冊,作者自刊,民國六十四年。new window
31.王澤鑑,商品製造者責任與純經濟上損失,民法學說與案例研究,第八冊,民法物權編修正草案(初稿),保成出版,民國八十二年六月。new window
32.末永敏和著,金洪玉譯,現代日本公司法,人民法院出版社出版,二○○○年九月。
33.末永敏和著,金洪玉譯,現代日本商法,人民法院出版社出版,二○○○年九月。
34.史尚寬,債法各論,作者自刊,民國六十二年十月。
35.史尚寬,債法總論,作者自刊,民國六十一年三月。
36.史尚寬,債法總論,作者自刊,民國六十四年四月。
37.行政院消費者保護委員會編,消費者保護法判決函釋彙編(一),編者印行,民國八十七年。
38.行政院消費者保護委員會編,消費者保護法判決函釋彙編(二),編者印行,民國八十九年十月。
39.李哲松,吳日煥譯,韓國公司法,中國政法大學出版社,二○○○年一月。
40.李模,民法總則之理論與實用,作者自刊,民國六十七年十二月。
41.杜景林、餐諶譯,德國股份法、德國有限責任公司法、德國公司改組法、德國參與決定法,中國政法大學出版社出版,二○○○年一月。
42.杜景林、盧諶譯,德國公司改組法,中國政法大學出版社出版,二○○○年一月。
43.吳光明,證券交易法論,三民出版,民國九十三年四月。
44.吳庚,行政法之理論與實用,作者自刊,民國八十八年。new window
45.吳秉祐,論關係企業不合常規之經營,輔仁大學法律學研究所碩士論文,作者自刊,民國八十八年。
46.何孝元,誠實信用原則與衡平法,三民出版,民國七十五年九月。new window
47.余雪明,外部董事與投資人保護,收錄於:馬漢寶教授七秩慶論文集──法律與當代社會,永然文化出版,民國八十五年。
48.法務通訊社編,侵權行為損害賠償案例選輯,編者印行,民國七十年。
49.林哲彥,公司合併之研究──以合併契約之效力及債權之保護為中心,文化大學法律研究所碩士論文,民國八十九年。
50.林國全,劉連煜,股東會書面投票制度與證券集中保管,元照出版,民國八十八年十二月。
51.林誠二,民法理論與問題研究,中興大學法學叢書,興大發行,瑞興出版,民國八十年。
52.武憶舟,公司法論,作者自刊,民國八十七年。
53.邱聰智,民法債編通則,作者自刊,民國七十九年八月。
54.邱聰智,債法各論中一冊,作者自刊,民國八十五年十月。
55.洪文瀾,民法債編通則釋義,文光出版,民國四十八年。
56.洪遜欣,中國民法總則,作者自刊,民國六十五年一月。
57.施啟揚,民法總則,作者自刊,民國八十八年九月。
58.施啟揚,契約的訂定與履行,正中出版,民國六十八年七月。
59.柯芳枝,公司法論,三民出版,民國八十二年十月。
60.柯芳枝,公司法論,三民出版,民國八十五年八月。
61.柯芳枝,法國公司法上公司分割制度之研究,收在公司法專題研究,作者自刊,民國六十七年。
62.孫森焱,民法債編總論,作者自刊,民國六十八年九月。
63.徐培元,股份有限公司內部監控研究──以董事、監察人為中心,臺北大學法律學系博士論文,九十一年七月。new window
64.許復效,董事信託義務之研究──以注意義務為中心,中原大學,財經法律學系碩士論文,民國九十一年六月。
65.理律法律事務所,「公司法制有關併購、換股機制調整與修正」研究報告,行政院經濟建設委員會委託,民國九十年。
66.張令慧,公司購併法律問題之研究──中美兩國對兩階段式公司併購之法律制度的比較,東吳大學法律研究所碩士論文,民國八十一年。
67.陶百川、王澤鑑、劉宗榮、葛克昌編纂,最新綜合六書,三民出版,民國八十八年十一月。
68.陳春山,公司董事的義務與責任,學林文化出版,民國八十九年九月。
69.陳春山,企業管控與投資人保護──金融改革之路,元照出版,民國八十九年五月。new window
70.陳紀綱、林辰彥、梁開天主編,最新活頁綜合六法審判實務──民法類第一冊,大追蹤雜誌社出版,民國七十五年。
71.陳紀綱、林辰彥、梁開天,最新活頁綜合六法審判實務──民法類第三冊,大追蹤雜誌社出版,民國七十五年。
72.陳忠五主編,學林分科六法----民法,學林文化出版,民國八十九年三月。
73.陳肇鴻,由經濟觀點論董事之行為規範與責任制度,臺灣大學碩士論文,民國八十九年。
74.馮震宇,了解營業秘密法----營業秘密法的理論與實務,永然文化出版,民國八十六年七月。new window
75.黃宗樂監修,保成六法全書編輯委員會編輯,六法全書──商事法,保成出版,民國八十二年二月。
76.黃宗樂監修,保成六法全書編輯委員會編輯,六法全書──民法,保成出版,民國八十七年三月。
77.黃昭元、蔡茂寅、陳忠五、林鈺雄主編,綜合小六法,學林文化出版,民國九十二年三月。
78.黃茂榮,民法判解之理論體係:民法總則,作者自刊,民國六十八年三月。
79.黃茂榮主編,民法裁判百選,月旦出版,民國八十二年。
80.黃學海、王少春、馬樺,企業法、公司法案例精選精析,法律出版社出版,一九九四年四月。
81.最高法院判例編輯委員會,最高法院判例要旨(上),最高法院出版,民國七十八年。
82.最高法院法律叢書委員會,中華民國五十九年至七十四年最高法院民事裁判專輯,最高法院出版,民國七十六年。
83.詹文馨,債之關係上之附隨義務,台大法律學研究所碩士論文,民國七十八年。
84.詹森林,私法自治原則之理論與實務,編入民事法理與判決研究,作者自刊,翰蘆經銷,民國八十七年。new window
85.詹森林,定型化契約最近實務發展與評析,收載於消費者保護研究(七),消費者保護委員會出版,民國九十年五月。
86.廖大穎,論交易持股制度──另類的財務操作與企業結合,證券市場與股份制度論,元照出版,民國八十八年。new window
87.鄭玉波,民法實用:債之通則,三民出版,民國六十五年十一月。new window
88.鄭玉波,民法總則,三民出版,民國六十八年。
89.劉宗榮,定型化契約論文專輯,三民出版,民國八十二年九月。
90.蔡章麟,論誠實信用的原則──私法上誠實信用原則及其運用,社會科學論叢,第一至二輯,臺大法學院出版,民國三十九至四十年。
91.劉連煜,公司經營者之裁量權與公司社會責任──「其他利害關係人條款」之檢討,載於公司監控與公司社會責任,三民出版,民國八十四年九月。new window
92.劉連煜譯,美國模範商業公司法,五南出版,民國八十三年二月。
93.劉連煜,公司法理論與判決研究(一),作者自刊,民國八十六年十一月。new window
94.劉連煜,公司監控與公司社會責任,三民出版,民國八十四年九月。new window
95.劉連煜主編,證券管理法令選錄--附重要實務見解,元照出版,民國八十八年九月。
96.劉渝生,王志誠,洪秀芬,林克敬,羅國華,公司法修正議題論文集,神州圖書出版,民國九十一年。
97.鮑相生等主編,最新中華人民共和國公司法實務大全,法律出版社出版,一九九四年二月。
98.賴英照,關係企業法律問題及立法草案之研究,收錄在公司法論文集,財團法人中華民國證券市場發展基金會編印,民國七十五年九月。new window
99.賴源河,公司法問題研究(一),政大法學叢書,第十四輯,三民經售,民國七十一年。new window
100.賴源河、王志誠,現代信託法論,五南出版,民國八十六年。new window
101.賴源河等合著,新修正公司法解析,元照出版,民國九十一年十月。
102.謝哲勝,法律的經濟分析淺介,收錄在,財產法專題研究,三民出版,民國八十四年五月。new window
103.謝哲勝,懲罰性賠償,收錄於氏著財產法專題研究(二),元照出版,民國八十八年。new window
104.謝哲勝,信託法的信託概念之釐清,收錄於氏著財產法專題研究(三),元照總經銷,民國九十一年。new window
105.謝哲勝,信託法總論,元照出版,民國九十二年六月。
106.謝孟瑤,行政法上之誠實信用原則,編入誠仲模主編,行政法之一般法律原則,三民出版,民國八十六年七月。
107.戴炎輝,戴東雄合著,中國親屬法,作者自刊,民國九十年五月。
108.戴修瓚,民法債編總論(下),三民出版,民國六十七年十一月。
109.蘇俊雄,契約原理及其實用,中華出版,民國五十八年十月。
110.顧經儀、黃來紀著,公司法比較研究,澳門基金會出版,一九九八年二月。
(二)期刊 (依作者姓氏筆劃順序排列)
1.方嘉麟,關係企業專章管制控制力濫用之法律問題(一)──自我國傳統監控模式論專章設計之架構與缺憾,政大法學評論,第六十三期,民國八十九年六月,第二百七十一頁至三百二十一頁。new window
2.王文宇,公司分割法制之研究──兼論金融控股公司法草案之分割規定,月旦法學,第七十三期,民國九十年六月,第六十至七十六頁。new window
3.王文宇,企業併購法總評,月旦法學,第八十三期,民國九十一年四月,第七十至八十五頁。
4.王文宇,我國公司法購併法制之檢討與建議──兼論金融機構合併法,月旦法學,第六十八期,民國九十年一月,第二十四至四十五頁。
5.王文宇,法人股東、法人代表與公司間三方法律關係之定位,台灣本土法學,第十四期,民國八十九年九月,第一百零二至一百零七頁。
6.王文宇,信託法原理與商業信託法制,臺大法學論叢,第二十九卷二期,民國八十九年一月,第三百零九至四百十六頁。new window
7.王文宇,從公司治理論董監事法制之改革,台灣本土法學,第三十四期,民國九十一年五月,第九十九至一百十六頁。
8.王志誠,公司分割之立法取向與課題,月旦法學,第七十六期,民國九十年九月,第一百五十九至一百八十頁。
9.王志誠,企業併購法制之基礎構造,中正大學法學集刊,第四期,民國九十年四月,第九十一至一百三十八頁。new window
10.王志誠,企業組織再造法制之適用與檢討──金融法與企業法之交錯與接軌,月旦法學,第八十五期,民國九十一年六月,第一百十九至一百三十六頁。
11.王志誠,我國企業併購法制之檢討與展望,集保月刊,第六十八期,民國八十八年七月,第三至十九頁。
12.王志誠,美國公司經營機關之改造與啟發──兼論我國引進外部董事制度之基本課題,證券暨期貨管理,第十六卷第十一期,民國八十七年十一月,第一至二十一頁。
13.王惠玲,事業單位改組轉讓問題之採討,律師雜誌,第二一九期,民國八十六年十二月,第四十三至五十頁。
14.中國時報社論,民國八十九年九月八日。
15.立法院公報,第九十卷第五十一期(第三一八五期),院會紀錄,民國九十年十一月三日。
16.杜怡靜,企業組織再造與公司分割制度──以日本公司分割制度之研究為中心,月旦法學,第八十一期,民國九十一年二月,第一百三十七至一百五十一頁。
17.李福隆,論證券投資信託事業之忠實義務與利益衝突,月旦法學,第八十九期,民國九十一年十月,第一百七十五至一百九十頁。
18.何思湘,美國安隆公司倒閉事件對我國相關立法之啟示(一),會計研究月刊,第一九九期,民國九十一年六月,第十七至二十八頁。
19.何思湘,美國安隆公司倒閉事件對我國相關立法之啟示(二),會計研究月刊,第二○○期,民國九十一年七月,第一百零五至一百十六頁。
20.林仁光,公司合併與收購之法律規範,萬國法律,第一○五期,民國八十八年六月,第二十三至四十頁。
21.林仁光,論公司合併及其他變更營運政策之重大行為與少數股東股份收買請求權之行使,東吳法律學報,第十一卷第二期,民國八十八年五月,第一百零三至一百五十二頁。new window
22.林仁光,銀行併購之規範,律師雜誌,第二五二期,民國八十九年九月,第六十三至九十三頁。
23.林江峰,我國銀行合併法律問題之研析,經社法制論叢,第二十五期,民國八十九年一月,第六十三至九十三頁。
24.林美惠,締約上過失及其諸類型之探討──附論民法增訂第二四五條之一,月旦法學,第八十七期,民國九十一年八月,第一百四十九至一百六十八頁。
25.林進富,公司併購之現行法令規範,月旦法學,第六十八期,民國九十年一月,第八十四至九十八頁。
26.林誠二,由個案論債法上之情事變更原則之適用,中興法學,第二卷第一期,民國六十年七月,第八十一至八十七頁。new window
27.林誠二,再論誠實信用原則與權利濫用禁止原則之機能──最高法院八十八年度臺上字第二八一九號判決評釋,台灣本土法學,第二十二期,民國九十年五月,第三十六至六十一頁。
28.林誠二,情事變更原則之再探討,台灣本土法學,第十二期,民國八十九年七月,第五十七至七十六頁。
29.林誠二,論附隨義務之不履行與契約之解除,中興法學,第十八期,民國七十一年三月,第二百四十五至二百五十三頁。new window
30.林嬋娟、林囿成,由安隆案看分析師過度樂觀預測之後果,會計研究月刊,第一百九十七期,民國九十一年四月,第二十至二十五頁。
31.許智誠,營業秘密之法律地位及保護概況,經社法制論叢,創刊號,民國七十七年一月,第一百九十九至二百十六頁。
32.姜世明,德國自由業者民事責任加重之法理基礎,法律評論,第六十六卷第七至第九期合刊(第一三三九期),民國八十九年九月,第二至十五頁。
33.柯菊,股份有限公司股東之股份收買請求權,法令月刊,第二十八卷第五期,民國六十六年五月,第十七至二十頁。new window
34.柯菊,股份有限公司股東之代表訴訟,社會科學論叢,第二十二期,民國六十二年九月,第三百四十七至三百六十九頁。
35.范曉玲,公司治理及財務審計之新紀元──二○○二年美國證券交易Sarbanes-Oxley法案簡介,月旦法學,第八十九期,民國九十一年十月,第二百六十七至二百七十四頁。
36.范曉玲、王元勳,過失所致之純綷經濟上損失(上)--從律師、會計師責任談起,月旦法學,第二十六期,民國八十六年七月,第九十五至一百零一頁。
37.姚志明,誠信原則,月旦法學,第七十六期,民國九十年九月,第一百零九至一百二十一頁。
38.孫森焱,王澤鑑主持,張正雄記錄,誠信原則與附隨義務──民法研究會第二十三次學術研討會記錄,法學叢刊,第四十六卷第四期(第一百八十四期),民國九十年十月,第一百三十五至第一百六十一頁。new window
39.馬維麟,給付不完全制度──我國最高法院歷年來判決之檢討與分析,法學叢刊,第四十二卷第三期(第一百六十七期),民國八十六年七月,第七十七至一百零三頁。new window
40.財團法人中華民國證券暨期貨市場發展基金會,九十年十二月,東霖投顧研究部,企業透過「公司治理」營運更健全,經濟日報,九十一年八月二十五日,第十二版。
41.梁宇賢,股份有限公司機關之內部治理──以機關間組織體制之管控為主題,月旦法學,第九十一期,民國九十一年十二月,第一百三十二至一百三十九頁。new window
42.許美麗,控制與從屬公司(關係企業)之股東代位訴訟,政大法學評論,第六十三期,民國八十九年六月,第四百零一至四百四十五頁。new window
43.張忠謀,「公司法管控研討會」報告,知識經濟社會推動委員會民國九十年六月十八日主辦,經濟日報,民國九十一年八月三十一日,第五版。
44.陳文河,上市公司外部董事及監察人行使職權成效之研究,證交資料,第四五六期,民國八十九年四月,第一至十四頁。
45.陳介山,論資產收購,中正法學集刊,第八期,民國九十一年七月,第一百九十一至二百二十八頁。new window
46.陳俊仁,Corporate Governance─A Comparative Analysis of Taiwan and the United States(美國與臺灣之公司監督機制的比較),華岡法粹,第二十六期,民國八十七年十二月,第一百八十五至二百二十四頁。
47.陳錦隆,會計師查核簽證財務報表之民事責任(上),會計研究月刊,第一百七十一期,民國八十九年二月,第九十九至一百零五頁。
48.曾宛如,公司外部監督之分析,臺大法學論叢,第三十一卷第一期,民國九十一年一月,第一百四十七至二百十三頁。new window
49.曾宛如,董事忠實義務之內涵及適用疑義──評析新修正公司法第二十三條第一項,台灣本土法學,第三十八期,民國九十一年九月,第五十一至六十六頁。new window
50.曾昭懿、吳佳慧,霸菱事件之分析與檢討,證券管理,第十三卷第七期,民國八十四年七月,第三十二至四十五頁。
51.黃得豐,銀行與信用合作社合併問題之探討,金融財務,第五期,民國八十九年一月,第二十一至二十九頁。
52.黃越欽,權利濫用與惡意抗辯權,政大法學評論,第七期,民國六十一年十二月,第九十九至一百二十四頁。new window
53.黃銘傑,公司監控與監察人制度改革論──超越「獨立董事」之迷思,臺大法學論叢,第二十九卷第四期,民國八十九年七月,第一百五十九至二百零八頁。new window
54.黃銘傑,交义持股 v. s. 公司監控,臺大法學論叢,第三十卷第一期,民國九十年一月,第二百零一至二百四十七頁。
55.黃銘傑,企業併購法之檢討與省思(上),月旦法學,第九十六期,民國九十二年五月,第二百十九至二百三十六頁。new window
56.黃銘傑,企業併購法之檢討與省思(下),月旦法學,第九十七期,民國九十二年六月,第二百零三至二百十六頁。new window
57.黃銘傑,從安隆(Enron)案看我國會計師民事責任之現狀,月旦法學,第八十五期,民國九十一年六月,第一百零五至一百十八頁。
58.黃銘傑,新修正公司法解析──股份有限公司法:監察人,月旦法學,第八十期,民國九十一年一月,第一百十三至一百十七頁。
59.黃馨慧,企業購併與勞動契約,律師雜誌,第二五二期,民國八十九年九月,第一百一十至一百十七頁。
60.跨越一百,萬國法律百期系列研討會:以勞資關係為中心座談會,萬國法律,第一○三期,民國八十八年二月。
61.楊仁壽,論權利濫用禁止原則之適用,法令月刊,第四十一卷第二期,民國七十九年二月,第五至八頁。new window
62.經濟日報,民國九十一年七月二十九日,第一版。
63.廖大穎,銀行法制之變革──淺論銀行法修正草案的重要課題,月旦法學,第六十六期,民國八十九年十一月,第七十五至八十九頁。
64.廖大穎,論關係企業的內部監控與股東權之保護──兼評完全控股的一人公司制度,經社法制論叢,第三十一期,民國九十二年元月,第三十一至六十九頁。
65.詹文凱,企業併購對於勞動契約之影響,月旦法學,第八十三期,民國九十一年四月,第八十六至九十一頁。
66.蔡麗玲,亞洲金融風暴與企業管控問題,證券暨期貨管理,第十八卷第三期,民國八十九年三月,第十五至二十六頁。
67.劉承愚,金融機構合併之法律問題,金融財務,第五期,民國八十九年一月,第三十一至四十頁。
68.劉連煜,超越企業所有與企業經營分離原則──強制機構投資人分散持股規定的檢討,政大法學評論,第五十二期,民國八十三年十二月,第四百十一至四百二十一頁。new window
69.劉連煜,健全獨立董監事與公司治理之法制研究──公司自治、外部監控與政府規制之交錯,月旦法學,第九十四期,民國九十二年三月,第一百三十一至一百五十四頁。
70.劉連煜,讓與主要部分營業或財產之判斷基準,台灣本土法學,第二十九期,民國九十年十二月,第一百十四至一百二十一頁。
71.劉紹樑,我國公司法制的迷思與挑戰──以公司法與金融法規修正為中心〔座談會〕,月旦法學,第八十四期,民國九十一年五月,第二百零三至二百四十頁。
72.劉興善,從信賴關係談受託人、受任人、法人代表及公司負責人之注意義務(概要),政大法學評論,第五十七期,民國八十六年六月,第四百二十五至四百二十八頁。
73.賴源河,論主管機關對公司業務及財務之監督(下),服務業報導,第四十二期,民國八十二年十二月,第三至二十三頁。
74.賴源河,論股份有限公司董事之地位與性質,臺大法學論叢,第九十一卷第一至二期,民國六十九年六月,第二百十三頁至二百二十六頁。new window
75.蕭長瑞,銀行企業之整合與跨業併購,律師雜誌,第二五二期,民國八十九年九月,第五至十六頁。
76.謝易宏,企業併購的法律成本與風險,中原財經法學,第五期,民國八十九年七月,第三百八十三至四百零五頁。new window
77.謝易宏,企業整合與跨業併購法律問題之研究─以「銀行業」與「證券業」間之整合為例,律師雜誌,第二五二期,民國八十九年九月,第二十三至六十二頁。
78.謝哲勝,忠實關係與忠實義務,月旦法學,第七十期,民國九十年三月,第一百二十七至一百四十頁。
79.謝哲勝,受託人權利義務及責任,月旦法學,第六十五期,民國八十九年十月,第一百十四至一百三十六頁。
80.薛明玲、蔡朝安,從資訊揭露看公司治理,月旦法學,第九十六期,民國九十二年五月,第三百三十五至三百四十三頁。
81.羅怡德,美國公司法中董事所負之「忠實義務」之研究,輔仁法學,第九期,民國七十九年六月,第二百十三至二百四十二頁。new window
二、英文部分
(一) Books (依作者姓氏字母順序排列)
1.3E. Farnsworth, Contracts, 1990.
2.Adams, Edwand S. & Matheson, John H., Corporations and Other Business Associations: Statutes, Rules and Forms, West Group, 1999.
3.Alces, Peter A., The Law of Fraudulent Transactions, Warren, Gorham & Lamont, 1989 (Supp. 1994).
4.American Bar Association, Model Business Corporation Act Annotated, 3rd ed. 1997.
5.American Bar Foundation, Model Business Corporation Act Annotated, Vol. 2, West Publishing, 1971.
6.American Bar Association, Model Business Corporation Act, Official Text with Official: Comment and Statute Cross- References Revised through 2002.
7.American Bar Association on Committee on Corporation Laws, Model Business Corporation Act Annotation Vol.Ⅲ, 3rd ed., Supp. 1996.
8.American Law Institute, Principles of Corporate Governance: Analysis and Recommendations, American Law Institute Publishers, 1994.
9.American Law Institute, 2 principles of Corporate Governance: Analysis and Recommendations, American Law Institute Publishers, 1994.
10.Aristotle: The Nicomachean Echics, H. Rackham Translated, Loeb Classical Library, 1934.
11.Aronson, R. H., Professional Responsibility, 1980.
12.Atiyah, An Introduction to the Law of Contract, 5th ed. 1995.
13.Bachholg, Rogene A., Business Environment and Public Policy Implications for Management and Strategy, Prentice Hall, Inc., 1992.
14.Bailey, Liability of Corporate officers and Directors, Vo1. 1, 1998 (Supp. 2001).
15.Balotti, I. R. Franklin & Finkelstein, Jesse A., The Delaware Law of Corporations and Business Organization F-1, 3rd ed. 1998.
16.Bauman, Jeffrey D., Corporations and Other Business Associate, Statutes, Rules and Forms, West Group, 2002.
17.Bauman, Jeffrey D.; Weiss, Elliott J.; Palmiter, Alan R., Corporations Law and Policy: Material and Problem, Thomson West Publishing, 5th ed. 2003.
18.Berle, Adolf A., Tr. and Means, Gardiner C., The Modern Corporation and Private Property, Rev. ed. 1968.
19.Black’s Law Dictionary, West Group, 6th ed. 1991.
20.Black’s Law Dictionary, West Group, 7th ed. 2000.
21.Block, Dennis J., Nancy E. Barton, Stephen A. Radin, The Business Judgment Rule-Fiduciary Duties of Corporate Directors, 5th ed., Aspen Law & Business, 1998 (Supp. 2002).
22.Bodenheimer, Edgar, Jurtsprudence: the Philosophy and Method of the Law, rev. ed. Har. Pub. Press, 1924.
23.Burns, Indiana Statutes Annotated: Title 23, Lexis Law Publishing, 1999.
24.Carney, William J., Mergers and Acquisitions ---- Cases and Materials, Found. Press, 2000.
25.Carney, William J., Controlling Management Opportunism in the Market for Corporate Control: An Agency Cost Model, 1988.
26.Cheffins, Brian R., Company Law: Theory, Structure and Operation, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1997.
27.Claessens, Stijn, et al., Exproprication of Minority Shareholders: Evidence from East Asia, Working Paper, 1999.
28.Clark, Robert Charles, Corporate Law, Aspens Law & Business, 1986.
29.Coase, Ronald, The Firm, The Market, and The Law, paperback edition, The University of Chicago Press, 1990.
30.Cohen, Precontractual Duties and Good Faith in Contract Law, in: Beatson / Friedman (ed.), Good Faith and Fault in Contract Law, 1995.
31.Coleman, Jules L., Market Morals and the Law, 1988.
32.Cooley, Thomas M., Cooley on Torts, 4th ed. 1932.
33.Copelland, Thomas E. & Weston, J. Fred, Financial Theory and Corporate Policy, Reading, Mass. Addision--Wesley, 1983.
34.Davis, Keith and Blomstrom, Robert, Business and Society: Environment and Responsibility, New York : McGraw-Hill, 3rd ed. 1963.
35.Daivis, Paul L., Gower’s Principles of Modern Company Law, London : Sweet & Maxwell, 6th ed., 1997.
36.Demott, Deborah A., Fiduciary Obligation, Agency and Partnership ---- Duties Ongoing Business Relationships, West Publishing Co., 1991.
37.Easterbrook, Frank H. and Fischel, Daniel, The Economic Structure of Corporate Law, paperback edition, Harvard University Press, 1998.
38.Eisenberg, Melvin A., The Structure of the Corporation: A legal Analysis, Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1976.
39.Epstein, Marc J.; Spalding, Albert D., The Accountant’s Guide to Legal Liability and Ethic, Richard D. Irwin Inc., 1993.
40.Farrar, John H. and Hannigan, Brenda M., Farrar’s Company Law, 4th ed., 1998.
41.Fletcher, Cyclopedia Corporation, Vol. 3, West Group, Rev. Volume, 2002.
42.Folk, Ernest; Ward, L. Rodman, Jr. and Welch, Edward P., Folk on the Delaware Corporation Law § 1.54 4, 3rd ed., 1998.
43.Gevurtz, Frankklin A., Corporation Law: Hornbook Series, West Publishing Group, 2000.
44.Giuffa, Robert J., Jr., Investment Bankers Fairness Opinion in Corporate Control Transactions, 1986.
45.Green, W., Palmer’s Company Law, Sweet & Maxwell, 1992.
46.Hamilton, Robert W. & Macey, Jonathan R., Corporations Including Partnerships and Limited Liability Company: Cases and Materials, West Group, 2003.
47.Harry G. Henr & John R. Alexander, Law of Corporations and Other Business Enterprises §235, 3rd ed., 1983.
48.Henn, Harry G., John R. Alexander, Law of Corporations, 3rd ed., West Publishing Co., 1983 (Supp.1986).
49.Henn, Harry G., Corporations: Cases and Material, 1974.
50.Hopt, Klaus J., Hideki Kanda, Mark J. Roe, Eddy Wymeersch and Stefan Prigge, (editor), Comparative Corporate Governance, Oxford University Press, 1998.
51.Keeton, W. Page et. al., Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts, 5th ed., 1984.
52.Klein, William A. & John c. Coffee, Jr., Business Organization and Finance, Legal and Economic Principles, Foundation Press, 6th ed.1996.
53.Kneppes, William E. & Bailey, Dan A., Liability of Corporate offices and Directors Vol. 1, 1996.
54.McKendrick, Ewan (ed.), Commercial Aspects of Trusts and Fiduciary Obligations, Clarendon Press Oxford, 1992.
55.Model Business Corporation Act Annotated, Vol. II, Prentice Hall Law & Business, 1994.
56.Model Business Corporation Act Annotated, Vol. III, Prentice Hall Law & Business, Supp. 1994.
57.O’Kelley Thompson, Corporations and Other Business Associations: Cases and Materials, Aspen Publishers, 4th ed., 2003.
58.O’Kelley, Charles R. T. & Thompson, Robert B., Corporations and Other Business Associations; Selected Statutes, Ruler, and Forms, Aspen Law & Business, 2001.
59.O’Neal, F. Hodge & Thompson, Robert B., O’Neal’s Oppession of Minority Shareholder, 3rd ed. 1994 (Supp. 2002).
60.Patfield, Fiona M. (ed.), Perspective on company Law, Kluwer Law International, 1995.
61.Posner, Richard A., Economic Analysis of Law, 4th ed. 1992.
62.Posner, Richard A., Economic Analysis of Law, Little Brown and Company, 1986.
63.Posner, Richard A., Economic Analysis of Law, Aspen Law & Business, 5th ed. 1998.
64.Pound, Roscoe, Social Control Through Law, New Haven, 1954.
65.Purdon’s, Pennsylvania Consolidated Statutes Annotated: Title 15 Corporations and Unincorporated Associated §1904, West Publishing Co., 1995 (Supp. 2003).
66.Punder’s, Pennsylvannia Consolidated Statutes Annotated: Title 15, Corporation and Uncorporated Association, West Publishing Co., 1995.
67.Reuschlein, Harold Gill & Gregory, William A., The Law of Agency and Partnership, West Publishing Co., 1990.
68.Reuschlein, Harold Gill & Gregory, William A., Agency and Partnership, 1978.
69.Robert D. Rosenbaun & Michael E. Korens, Trends in Institutional Shareholder Activism: What the Institutional Are Doing Today, in Institutional Investors: Passive Fiduciaries to Activist Owners, 1990.
70.Romano, Roberta (ed.), Foundations of Corporate Law, Oxford, 1993.
71.Roscoe, The Task of Law, Lolly Penn., 1944.
72.Rotunda, Ronold D., Professional Responsibility, West Group, 5th ed. 2001.
73.Rounds, Charles E., Jr., Loring A Trustee’s Handbook, 2003.
74.Scott & Fratcher, The Law of Trust, 2003.
75.Seavey, Warren A., Law of Agency: Handbook Series, West Publishing Co., 1964.
76.Selected Corporation and Partnership Statutes, Rules and Forms, West Publishing Co., 1987.
77.Seligman, Joel, Corporations: Cases and Materials, Little Brown and Company, 2nd printing 1995.
78.Solomon, Lewis D.; Schwartz, Donald E.; Bauman, Jeffrey D., Corporations Law and Policy, West Publishing Co., 2nd ed. 1998.
79.Solomon, Lewis D.; Schwartz, Donald E.; Bauman, Jeffrey D. & Weiss, Elliott J., Corporations Law and Policy: Material and Problems, West Group, 4th ed. 1998.
80.Steffen, Roscoe T.&David, Thomas R., Agency-Partnership: Cases and Material, West publishing Co., 1980.
81.Stone, Christopher; Hoffman, W. and Moore, J., Why Shouldn’t Corporation Be Socially Responsible, 2nd ed. 1990.
82.Uniform Commercial Code: 1999 official Text with Comment, West Group, 1999.
83.Westevle, Dale A., The Law of Merger, Acquisition, and Reorganization, West Publishing Co., 1991.
84.White, James J. & Summers, Robert S., Uniform Commercial Code, West Group, 2000.
85.Wickins, Robert, Professional Liability, Hong Kong University Press, 2nd ed. 1991.
86.Wolfran, Charles W., Modern Legal Ethics, Cambridge Publish, 1986.
(二)Periodicals (依作者姓氏字母順序排列)
1.ABA Committee on Corporate Laws, Guide Line for Directors: Planning for and Responding to Unsolicited Tender Offers, 41 Bus. Law. 209 (1985).
2.Alchian, Amen A. and Demsetz, Harold Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization, 62 Am.Eco.Rev.777 (1972).
3.Alces & Dorr, A Critical Analysis of New Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, 1985 U. Ill. L. Rev. 527.
4.American Bar Association Committee on Corporate Laws, Changes in the Model Business Corporation Act ---- Amendments Pertaining Indemnification and Advance for Expense, 49 Bus. Law 741 (1994).
5.American Bar Association; Committee on Corporation Laws, Changes in the Model Business Corporation Act. Fundamental Changes, 54 Bus. Law 685 (1999).
6.American Bar Association, Committee of Corporate Law, Guide Line for the Unaffiliated Director of the Controlled Corporation, 44 Bus. Law 211 (1989).
7.Andersen, Eric G., Good Faith in the Enforcement of Contract, 73 Iowa L. Rev. 299 (1988).
8.Arsht & Codified Standard — Safe Harbor But Charted Channel: A Response, 35 Bus. Law ix (1980).
9.Ayres, Ian, Making a Difference: The Contratual Contributions of Easterbrook and Fischel, 59 U. Chi. L. Rev.1391 (1992).
10.Bahls, Steven C., Resolving Shareholder Dissension: Selection of the Appropriate Equitable Remedy; 15 J. Corp. L. 285 (1990).
11.Baird, Douglas G. & Jackson, Thomas H., Fraudulent Conveyance and its Proper Domain, 38 Vand. L. Rev. 829 (1985).
12.Ballantine, Henry Winthrop, Questions of Policy in Drafting a Modern Corporation Law, 19 Calif. L. Rev. 465 (1931).
13.Bebckchuck, Lucian Arye, The Debate on Contractual Freedom in Corporation Law, 89 Calum. L. Rev. 1395 (1989).
14.Bebckchuck, Lucian Ayre, Limiting Contractural Freedom in Corporate Law: The Desirable Constraintson Charter Amendments, 102 Harv. L. Rev. 549 (1984).
15.Bebchuk, Lucian Arye & Kahan, Marcel, Fairness Opinions: How fair are they and what can be done about it? 1989 Duhe L. J. 27.
16.Bergert, Michael, The Corporate Opportunity Doctrine and Outside Business Interests, 56 U. Chi. L. Rev. 827 (1989).
17.Beveridge, Norwood P., Jr, The Corporate Director’s Duty of Care: Riddles Usely Expounded, 24 Suffolk U.L. Ken. 923 (1990).
18.Beveridge, Norwood P., Jr., Does a Corporate’s Board of Directors owe a Fiduciary Duty to us Creditors? 25 St. Mary’s L.T. 589 (1994).
19.Bishop, Joseph W., Jr., Sitting Ducks and Decoy Ducks: New Trends in the Indemnification of Corporate Directors and Officers, 77 Yale L. J. 1078 (1968).
20.Bishop, Joseph W., Jr., The Law of Corporate officer and Director: Indemnification and Insurance 16.02, 1981 (Supp. 1997).
21.Bishop, Joseph W., Jr. and Prentice, D. D., Some Legal and Economic Aspects of Fiduciary Remuration, 46 M. L. R. 289 (1983).
22.Bjerre, Carl Samuel, Evaluting the New Director Exculpation Statutes, 73 Corn. L. Rev. 786 (1988).
23.Black, Bernard S., The Value of Institutional Investor Monitoring: The Empirical Evidence, 39 UCLA Rev. 895 (1992).
24.Black, Bernard and Kraakman, Reinier, A self-Enforcing Model of Corporate Law, 109 Harv. L. Rev. 1911 (1996).
25.Block, Dennis J. & Hoff, Jonathon M., Reliance on Fairness Opinions, N. Y. L. J. June 16, 1994.
26.Blumberger, Philip I., The Continuity of the Enterprise Doctrine: Corporate Successor ship, 110 Fla. J. Int’l. L. 365 (1996).
27.Booth, Richard A., Minority Discounts and Control Presium in Appraisal Proceedings, 57 Bus. Law 127 (2001).
28.Bowers, Helen M., Fairness Opinion and The Business Judgment Rule: An Empirical Investigation of Jorget Firm use of Fairness Opinions, 96 N.W.U.L. Rev. 567 (2002).
29.Braucher, The Legislate History of Uniform Commercial Code, 58 Colum. L. Rev. 812 (1958).
30.Brood, Easter& Fischell, Corporate Control Transaction, 91 Yale L. J. 699 (1982).
31.Brudney, Victor and Clark, Robert Charles, A New Look at Corporate Opportunities, 94 Harv. L. Rev. 997(1981).
32.Burton, Breach of Contract and the Common Law Duty to Perform in Good Faith, 94 Harv. L. Rev. 372.
33.Burton, Steven J., Good Faith Performance of a Contract within Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code, 67 Iowa L. Rev. 18 (1981).
34.Burton, Steven J. & Anderson, Eric G., The World of a Contract, 75 Iowa. L. Rev. 861 (1990).
35.The Business Judgment Rule and the Trans Union Case, 40 Bus. Law 1437 (1985).
36.Butler, Henry N. and Ribstien, Larry E. Opting, Out of Fiduciary Duties: A Response to the Anti-Contractarians, 65 Wash. L. Rev. 1 (1990).
37.Buying Out Insurgent Shareholders with Corporate Funds, 70 Yale L. J. 308 (1960).
38.Carney, William J., Fundamental Corporate Changes, Minority Shareholders and Business Purpose, 1980 A.B. Found. Res. J. 69 (1980).
39.Carney, William J., Two Tier tender Offers and Share Repellents. A. No. 2 Midland Corporate Finance Journal 48 (1986).
40.Carney, William J., Shareholder Coordination Costs, Shark Repellents, and Take-out Merger: The Case Against Fiduciary duties, 1983 Am. B. Found. Res. J. 341.
41.Cary, William L., Federalism and Corporate Law: Reflections Upon Delaware, 83 Yale L. J. 663, (1974).
42.Chaitman, The Equitable Subordination of Bank Claims, 39 Bus. Law. 1561 (1984).
43.Change in the Model Business Corporation Act — Amendments Pertaining to Electric Filings / Standards of Conduct and Standard of Liability for Directors, 53 Bus. Law 157 (1997).
44.Changes in the Model Business Corporate Act ----Amendment to Financial Porvisions, 34 Bus. Law 1867 (1979).
45.Chazen, Fairness Form a Financial Point of View in Acquisitions of Public Companies: Is “Third Party Sale Value” the Appropriate Standard? 36 Bus. Law. 1439 (1981).
46.Chew, Pat K., Competing Interests in the Corporate Opportunity Doctrine, 67 N. C. L. Rev. 435 (1989).
47.Chiappinelli, Eric A., Trans Union Unconsidered, 15 J. Corp. L. 27 (1989).
48.Childres, Condition in the Law of Contract, 45 N. Y. U. L. Rev. 33 (1970).
49.Cieri, Richard M.; Ganske, Lyle G. & Lennox, Heather, Breaking Up is Hard to Do: Avoiding the Sovency--Relate Pitfalls in Spin off Transactions, 54 Bus. Law. 534 (1999).
50.Clark, Robert C., Voting Buying and Corporate Law, 29 case W. Res. L. Rev. 776 (1979).
51.Coffee, John C. Jr., Liguidity Versus Control: The Institutional Investor as Corporate Munilor, 91 Colum. L. Rev. 1277 (1991).
52.Coffee, John C., Jr., Transfers of Control and the Quest for Efficiency: Can Delaware Law Encourage Efficiency Transactions While Chilling Inefficient? 21 Del. J. Corp. L. 359 (1996).
53.Cohen, David, Valuation in the context of share appraisal, 34 Emory L. J. 117 (1985).
54.Cohen, Michael H., Rewnetructing Breach of the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing as a Tort, 73 Calif. L. Rev. 1293 (1985).
55.Cohn, Stuart R., Demise of the Director’s Duty of Care: Judicial Avoidance of Standards and Sanctions Through the Business Judgment Rule, 62 Tex. L. Rev. 591 (1983).
56.Comment, Corporate Opportunity, 74 Harv. L. Rev. 765 (1961).
57.Committee on Corporate Laws, ABA, Changes in the Model Business
58.orporation Act─Amendments Pertaining to Electronic Filings/Standards of Conduct and Standards of Liability for Directors, 53 Bus. Lawyer 157 (1997).
59.Committee on Corporate Law , Corporate Director’s Guide Book -1994 Edition , 49 Bus. Law 1243 (1994).
60.Committee on Corporate Laws, Changes in the Revised Model Business Corporation Act-Amendment pertaining to liability of Directors, 45 Bus. Law 695 (1990).
61.Conard, Alfred F., Amendment of Model Business Corporation Act Affecting Dissenter’s Rights (Section 73, 74, 80 and 81) 33 Bus. Law. 2587 (1978).
62.Cox, The Duty to Bargain in Good Faith, 71 Harv. L. Rev. 1401 (1958).
63.Cooter, Robert and Freeman, Bradley J., The Fiduciary Relationship: Its Economic Character and Legal Consequences, 66 N. Y. U. L. Rev. 1045 (1991).
64.Daines, Robert M. and Hanson, Jon D., The Corporate Law Paradox: The Case For Restructuring Corporate Law, 102 Yale L. J. 577 (1992).
65.Daodd, E. Mericck, For Whom Are Coprorate Managers are Trustees: A Note, 45 Harv. L. Rev. 1365 (1932).
66.Davis, Kenneth, Jr., Approval by Disinterested Directors, 20 J. Corp. L. 215 (1995).
67.Davis, Kenneth B., Corporate Opportunity and Comparative Advantages, 84 Iowa L. Rev. 211 (1999).
68.Demott, Deborah A., Director’s Duties in Management Buyouts and Leveraged Recaptilization, 49 Ohio St. L. J. 517 (1988).
69.Deutsch, The Form and Substance of a Merger: A Reading of Farris v. Glen Alen Corp., 20 Vill. L. Rev. 80 (1974).
70.Deutsch, J. G., The Teaching of Corporate Law: A Socratic Investigation of Law and Bureaucracy, 97 Yale L. J. 96 (1987).
71.Directors on Business Judgment Grounds: From Zapata to Aronson, 39 Bus. Lawyer 1503 (1984).
72.Dooley, Two Model of Corporate Governance, 47 Bus. Law 461 (1992).
73.Dooley, Not in the Corporation’s Best Interests, A.B.A.J., May (1992).
74.Dooley & Veasey, The Role of the Board in Derivative Litigation: Delaware law and the Current ALI Proposals Compared, 44 Bus. Law 503 (1989).
75.Dooley, Michael P. and Goldman, Michael D., Some Comparisons Between the Model Business Corporation Act and the Delaware General Corporate Law, 56 Bus. Law 737 (2001).
76.Easterbrook, Frank H. and Fischel, Daniel R., Contract and Fiduciary Duty, 36 J. L. & Econ. 425 (1993).
77.Easterbrook, Frank H. & Fischel, Daniel R., Corporate Control Transactions, 91 Yale L. J. 717 (1982).
78.Easterbrook, Frank H.&Daniel R. Fischel, The Economic Structure of Corporate Law 18 (1991).
79.Easterbrook, Frank H. & Daniel R. Fischel, The Proper Role of a Target’s, 76 J. Law & Econ. 395 (1983).
80.Eisenberg, Melvin Aron, The Directors Duty of Care in Negocioted Dispositions, 51 U. Miami. L. Rev. 579 (1997).
81.Eisenberg, Melvin A., The Duty of Care of Corporate Directors and Officer, 51 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 945 (1990).
82.Eisenberg, Melvin A., New Modes of Discourse in the Corporate Law Literature, 52 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 582 (1984).
83.Elharge, Einer, The Triggering Function of Sale of Control Doctrine, 59 U. Chi. L. Rev. 1465 (1992).
84.Elson, Alex and Shakman, Michael L., The ALI Principles of Corporate Governance: A Tanited Process and a Flawed Product, 49 Business Lawyer 1761 (1994).
85.Engel, David, An Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility, 32 Standford L. Rev., 1 (1980).
86.Fams, Eugene F., Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm, 88 J. Pol. Ecom. 288 (1980).
87.Fama, Eugene F. and Jensen, Michael C., Separation of Ownship and Control, 26 L. & Econ. 301 (1983).
88.Farnsworth, You Loss or My Gain?---- The Dilemma of the Disgorgement Principle in Breach of Contract, 94 Yale L. J. 1339 (1985).
89.Farnsworth, E. Allan, Good Faith Performance and Commercial Resonableness under the Uniform Commercial Code, 30 Univ. Chi. L. Rev. 666 (1963).
90.Farnsworth, Disputes Over Omission in Contract, 68 Colum. L. Rev. 860 (1968).
91.Fitzgibbon, Scott, Fiduciary Relationships Are Not Contract, B 82 Marg, L. Rev. 303 (1999).
92.Fischel, The Business Judgment Rule and the Trans Union Case, 40 Bus. Law 1437 (1985).
93.Fischel, Daniel R., The Appraisal Remedy in Corporate Law, 1983 Am B. Found. Res. J. 87 (1983).
94.Fishel, Daniel R., The Economics of Lender Liability, 99 Yale L. J. 131 (1989).
95.Folk, Ernest, De Facto Merger in Delaware: Hariton v. Arco Electronics, Inc., 49 Va. L. Rev. 1261 (1963).
96.Frankel, Tamar, Fiduciary Law, 71 Cal. L. Rev. 795 (1983).
97.Frankel, Tamar, Fiduciary Duties as Default Rules, 74 Or. L. Rev. 1209 (1995).
98.Gavin, John J., Proxy Contests Emerge: Supply Tender Offers in Seeking Corporate Change, N. Y. L. J., Oct. 9 (1990).
99.Gellhorn, Limitation on Contract Termination Rights -- Franchise Cancellation, 1967 Duke L. J. 495.
100.Gilson, Ronald J. and Kraakman, Reinier, Reinventing the Outside Director: An Agenda for Institutional Inventors, 43 Stan. L. Rev. 863 (1991).
101.Gilson, Ronald J. and Roe, Mark J., Understanding the Japanese Keiretsu: Overlaps Between Corporate and Industrial Organization, 102 Yale L. J. 871 (1993).
102.Gilson, Ronald, A Structural Approach to Corporations: The Cases Against Defense Tactics in Tender Offer, 33 Stanford L. Rev. 819 (1981).
103.Gilson, Ronold J. & Kraakman, Reinior H., The Mechanisms of Market Efficiency 70 Va. L. Rev. 549 (1984).
104.Gilson, Ronald J., Unocal Fifteen Later (And What We Can Do About It), 26 Del. J. Corp. L.491 (2001).
105.Gordley, James, Equality and Distributive Justice, 69 Cal. L. Rev. 1587 (1981).
106.Green, Successor Liability: The superiority of Statutory Reform to Protect Product Liability Claimants, 72 Cor. L. Rev. 365 (1986).
107.Grundfest, Joseph, Corporate Responsibility: A Panel Response, 8 Cardozo L. Rev. 817 (1987).
108.Gurdon, Jeffrey N., Institutions as Relational Investors: A New Look at Cumulative Voting, 94 Colum. L. Rev. 124 (1994).
109.Hamilton, Robert W., Corporate Governance in America 1950-2000: Major Changes But Unertain Benefits, 25Iowa J. Corp. L. 340 (2000).
110.Hamilton, Robert, Private Sale of Control Transactions: Where We Stand Today, 36 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 248 (1985).
111.Hanks, James J., Jr., Evaluating Recent State Legislation on Directors and Officer Liability Limitation and Indemnification, 43 Bus. Law 1207 (1988).
112.Hawes & Sherrard, Reliance on Advice of Counsel as a Defense in Corporate and Securities Cases, 62 Va. L. Rev. 1 (1976).
113.Herzel and Colling, Establishing Procesural Fairness in Squeeze-Out Mergers after Weinberger, 39 Business Law 1525 (1984).
114.Herzel & Katz, Smith v. Van Gorkom: The Business of Judging Business Judgment, 41 Bus. Law 1187 (1986).
115.Hillman, R. A., The Crisis in Modern Contract Theory, 67 Tex. L. Rev. 103 (1988).
116.Hillman, Contract Modification the Restatement (Second) of Contract, 67 Cornell L. Rev. 680 (1982).
117.Hillman, Policing Contract Modifications under UCC: Good Faith and the Doctrine of Economic Duress, 64 Iowa L. Rev. 849 (1979).
118.How to Merger: After the Deal, The Economist, Jan. 9, 1999.
119.Johnson, Joseph F., Corporate Indemnification and Liability Insurance for Director and Officers, 33 Bus. Law 1993 (1978).
120.Kanda, Hideki & Levmore, Saul, The Appraisal Remedy and the Goals of Corporate Law, 32 U.C.L.A. 429 (1985).
121.Kennedy, The Standard of Responsibility for Directors, 52 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 624, (1984).
122.Kessler /Fine, Culpa in Contrahendo: Bargaining in Good Faith and Freedom of Contract: A Comparative Study, 77 Harv. L. R. 401 (1964).
123.Kessler & Stern, Competition Contract and Vertical Integration, 69 Yale L. J. 1160 (1969).
124.Kumment, Richard O., State Statutory Restriction on Financial Distributions by Corporate to Shareholders, 59 Wash. L. Rev. 185 (1984).
125.Landes, De Larme R., Economic Efficiency and the Corporate Opportunity Doctrine: In Defense of Contextual Disclosure Rule, 74 Temp. L. Rev. 837 (2001).
126.Langevoot, Donald C., Theories, Assumptions and Securities Regulation: Market Efficiency Revisited, 140 U. P. A. L. Rev. 851 (1992).
127.Leech, Noyes E. & Robert H. Hundhein, The Outside Director of the Publicly Held Corporation, 31 Bus. L. 1814-26 (1976).
128.Lessig, Lawrence, The Limits of Lieber, 16 Cardozo L. Rev. 2249 (1995).
129.Leubsdoff, John, The Standard for Preliminary Injunction, 91 Harv. L. Rev. 549 (1991).
130.Lin, Laura, Shift of Fiduciary Duty upon Corporate Insolevercy: Proper Scope of Directors’ Duty to Creditor, 46 Vand. L. Rev. 1148 (1193).
131.Ma∕ltee, The Role of the Dealer Manager in the Disclosure Process, 32 Bus. Law, 1331 (1977).
132.Macey & Miller, Trans Union Reconsidered, 98 Yale L. J. 127 (1988).
133.Management in Responding to a Tender offer, 94 Harv. L. Rev. 1161 (1981).
134.Manning, The Business Judgment Rule and the Director’s Duty of Attention, 39 Bus. Law 1477 (1984).
135.Manning, Reflections and Practical Tips on Life m the Boardroom After Van Gorkom, 41 Bus. Law 1073 (1985).
136.Manning, Bayless, The Shareholder’s Appraisal Remedy: An Essay For Frank Coker, 72 Yale. L. J. 223 (1962).
137.Marsh, Harold, Are Directors Trustees ? Conflict of Interest and Corporate Monality 22 Bus. Law 35 (1966).
138.Michell, Lawrence E., The Fairness Rights of Corporate Bondholders, 65 N.Y.U.L. Rev. 1165 (1990).
139.Millstein, The Professional Board, 50 Bus. Law 1427 (1995).
140.Moscow, Lesser and Schulman, 46 Bus. Law 57 (1990).
141.Note: Three-Party Mergers: The Fourth Form of Corporate Acquisition, 57 Va. L. Rev. 1242 (1971).
142.Note: Using Capital Cash Flows to Value Dissent Shares in appraisal Proceedings 111 Harv. L. Rev. 2099 (1998).
143.Parfitt &Munro, Case Comment: Whose Interests are We Talking About : A. (C.) v. Critchley and Developments in the Law of Fiduciary Duty, 33 U. B. C. L. Rev. 199 (1999).
144.Perkins, The ALI Corporate Governance Project in Midstream, 41 Bus. Law 1195 (1986).
145.Pound, Roscoe, Induvidualigation of Trustice, 7 Fordham L. Rev. 166 (1938).
146.Rapson, U.C.C. Article 6: Should It Be Revised or“Deep-Sixed”?, 38 Bus. Law 1753 (1983).
147.Rehniquist, The Prominence of the Delaware Court of Chancery in the State-Federal Joint Jenture of Providing Justice, 48 Bus. Law 351 (1992).
148.Rock, Edward B. Saints and Sinners: How Does Delaw are Corporate Law Work, 44 UCLA. L. Rev. 1009 (1997).
149.Roe, Mark J., Some Differences in Corporate Structure in Germany, Japan, and United States, 102 Yale L. J. 1927 (1993).
150.Scott, The Fiduciary Principle, 37 Calif. L. Rev. 539 (1947).
151.Scott, Kenneth E., Corporation Law and the American Law Institute Corporate Governance Project, 35 Stan. L. Rev. 927 (1983).
152.Shaw, Bill & C., Edward J. Ga., Fairness Opinions in Leveraged Buy Outs: Should Investments Be Directly Liable to Shareholders? 23 See Reg. L. J. 293 (1995).
153.Sherwin, Emily L., Creditors’ Rights Against Participants in Leveraged Buyout, 72 Minn. L. Rev. 449 (1988).
154.Shupack, Paul M., Sloving the Puzzle of Secured Transactions, 41 Rutgers L. Rev. 1067 (1989).
155.Siegel, Mary, Back to the Future: Appraisal Rights in the Twenty-First Century, 32 Harv. J. Legis. 79 (1995).
156.Siegel, Mary The Erosion of the law of Controlling Shareholders, 24 Del. J. Corp. L. 27 (1999).
157.Siegel, Stanley, When Corporation Divide: A Statutory and Financial Analysis, 79 Harv. L. Rev. 550 (1966).
158.Sommer, “Going Private” Seventeen Years Later, 70 Wash. L. Q. 571 (1992).
159.Sommer, A. A., Jr., Whom Should the Corporation Serve? The Berle-Dodd Debate Revisited Sixty Years Later, 16 Del. J. Corp. L. 33 (1991).
160.Stack, David, The Two Standard of Good Faith in Canada Contract Law, 62 Sask. L. Rev. 202 file: // A: \ fide 8 htm (1999).
161.Steven L. Schwartz, Rethinking A Creditor’s Obligations to Creditors, 17 Cardozo L. Rev. 647 (1996).
162.Steven L. Schwartz, A Fundamental Inquiry into the Statutory Rulemaking Process of Private Legislatures, 29 Ga. L. Rev. 909 (1995).
163.Stout, Lynn A., Are Takeover Presiums Really Presiums? Market Price, Fair Value, and Corporate Law, 99 Yale L. J. 1235 (1990).
164.Subak, A., Snapshot of the Law Being Carved in Stone, 42 Bus. Law 761 (1987).
165.Summers, Good Faith in General Contract Law and the Sale Provisions of Uniform Commercial Code, 54 Va. L. Rev.195 (1968).
166.Summers, Robert S., The General Duty of Good Faith —Its Recognition and Conceptuation, 67 Cornell L. Rev. 810 (1982).
167.Summers, Robert S., General Equitable Principles under §1-103 of the Uniform Commercial Code, 72 Nw. L. Rev. 906 (1978).
168.Symposuim, The American Law Institute’s Corporate Governance Project, 48 Business Law 1267 (1993).
169.Symposium, The Genesis and Goal of the ALI Corporate Governance Project, 8 Cadoro L. Rev. 661 (1987).
170.Symposium on Corporate Governance, 48 Bus. Law 1267 (1993). Talley, Eric
171.Turning Service Opportunities to Gold: A Strategic Analysis of the Corporate Opportunity Doctrine, 108 Yale L. T. 277 (1998).
172.Thompson, Robert B. Exit, Liquidity, and Majority Rule: Appraisal’s Role in Corporate Law, 84 Geo. L. J. I, 29 (1995).
173.Thompson, Samuel C., Jr., A Lawyer’s Guide to Modern Valuation Techniques in Merger and Acquisition, 21 J. Corp. L. 457 (1996).
174.Three-Party Merger: The Fourth Form of Corporate Acquisition 57 Va. L. Rev. 1242 (1971).
175.Tuttle, Robert W., The Fiduciary’s Fiduciary: Legal Ethics in Fiduciary Representation, 1994 U. Ill. L. Rev.
176.Use of Modern Finance Theory in Securities Fraud Cases Involving Actively Tread Securities, 38 Bus. Law 1 (1982).
177.Vagts, Detler F., Corporation Law: Material — Cases — Text, 1989.
178.Veasey, The defining Tension in Corporate Governance in American 75 Tex. L. Rev. 393 (1997).
179.Vestal, Allan W., Choice of law and the Fiduciary Duties of Partners Under the Revised Uniform partnership Act, 79 Iowa L. Rev. 219 (1994).
180.Veasey ﹠Finkelstein, New Delaware Statute :Allows Limits on Director Liability and Modernizes Indemnification protection, 6 Bus. Law update 1 (July / August 1986).
181.Veasey & Manning, Codified standard — Safe Harbor or Uncharted Reef ? An Analysis of the Model Act Standard of Care Compared with Delaware Law, 35 Bus. Law 919 (1980).
182.Veasey & Reef, Codified Standard — Safe Harbor or Unchanted Reef ? An Analysis of the Model Act Standard of Care Compared with Delware Law, 35 Bus. Lawyer 919 (1980).
183.Veasey & Seitz, The Business Judgment Rule in the Revised Model Act , the Trans Union Case , and the ALI project — A Strange Porridge, 63 Tex. L. Rev. 1483 (1985).
184.Veasey, E. Norman, et al., Delaware Supports Directors With a Three-Legged Stool of Limited Liability, Indemnification and Insurance, 42 Bus. Law 401 (1987).
185.The Venture Capitalist’s Corporate Opportunity Problem, 2001 Colum. Bus. L. Rev. 473 (2001).
186.Weiss, The Law of Take Out Merger: Weinberger v. UPO, Inc. Ushers in Phase Six, 4 Cardozo L. Rev. 245 (1983).
187.Weiss, Elliott J., The Law of Take Out Merger: A historical Perspective, 56 N. Y. U. L. Rev. 614 (1981).
188.Wertheimer, Barry M., The Shareholders’ Appraisal Remedy and How Court Determine Fair Value, 47 Duke L. J. 613 (1998).
189.Williamson, Oliver E., Transaction Cost Economics, in Foundation of Corporate Law (R. Romanoed), 1993.
190.Yablon, Chanles, On the Allocation of Burdens of Proof in Corporation Law: An Essay on Fairness and Fuzzy Seb, 13 Cardozo Rev. 497 (1991).
三、網址:
1.經濟合作暨開發組織http://www.oecd.org/daflgovevnance/principles.htm
2.世界銀行http://www.worldbank.org/html/tpg/privatesector/cglcg-pubs.htm
3.司法院法學資料全文檢索系統http://wjirs.judicial.gov.tw
4.Westlaw: http://lawschool.westschool.westlaw.com
5.Lexis-Nexis: http://au.lexisnexis.com.tw/ccu
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE