The Use of a Diagnostic Profile in Assessing the Art Understandings of Taiwanese ESL Students_

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	The Use of a Diagnostic Profile in Assessing the Art Understandings of Taiwanese ESL Students
書刊名：	藝術教育研究
作者：	馬丁‧福客
作者(外文)：	Forker, Martin
出版日期：	2014
卷期：	27
頁次：	頁101-142
主題關鍵詞：	藝術評量；藝術教育；診斷剖析；跨領域課程；Art assessment；Art education；Diagnostic profile；Interdisciplinary course
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:1 點閱:13

本論文採用 Stavropoulos（1992）「以口頭回應藝術作品的藝術認識診斷剖析」（DP）做為評量英文系學生修一學期西方和亞洲藝術的跨領域課程後之藝術認識。運用DP 評量四向度（描述、形式、詮釋和歷史）分析學生對圖像的書面回應，結果顯示學生多種較低階的藝術認識。形式向度方面，許多學生成功運用藝術知識，以設計元素和原理來分析藝術品；詮釋向度，許多學生使用知識尋找策略尋找藝術認識；大部份學生在歷史向度並未取得高分；每個向度皆發現回應錯誤、不合邏輯或藝術判斷能力幼稚、模糊地描述畫作；亦明顯缺乏支持性判斷、美學推論、描述性訊問、延伸或挑戰藝術歷史家、有力的論調評論藝術等。有幾位學生的圖畫則印證了Howard Gardner 的空間智能觀念。總之，研究結果建議跨領域課程可提供給學生有用的知識庫來發展藝術教育。

以文找文

This study uses Stavropoulos’ (1992) “A Diagnostic Profile of Art Understandings Based on Verbal Responses to Works of Art (DP)” to evaluate ESL students’ understandings of Western and Asian art during a one-semester interdisciplinary course. Stavropoulos’ DP uses four dimensions to assess student’s verbal and written responses to imagery: descriptive, formal, interpretative, and historical. The findings reveal that the students gave multiple lower-order descriptive art understandings. Within the formal dimension, many students successfully developed their formal art knowledge-base as many analyzed artworks in terms of elements and principles of design. Within the interpretative dimension, many students employed knowledgeseeking strategies in their search for understanding. Most students’ responses did not score highly within the historical dimension. There is evidence of students giving incorrect appraisals, illogical findings, immature judgment, and nebulous or unclear statements within each dimension. It is also palpable that there is a scarcity of responses which provide supported judgment or aesthetic reasoning, descriptive questioning, extending or challenging the art historian’s or the art critic’s description of the work through convincing argument. Several of the students’ drawings demonstrate Howard Gardner’s (1983) notion of spatial intelligence. Overall, the findings suggest that the interdisciplinary course provided students with a useful knowledge-base for developing their art education.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Short, G.(1996)。Incorporating a depth of understanding model into a high school studio curriculum。Arts and Learning Research，12(1)，18-32。
2.	Stavropoulos, Carol Susann(1995)。Assessing Student Learning in the Arts: Building a Bridge between Theory and Practice。Arts and Learning Research Journal，12(1)，18-32。
3.	馬丁‧福客(20121200)。Achieving Visual Literacy: Prior Knowledge of Spiritual Symbolism in Modern Art。藝術教育研究，24，111-147+149-150。
4.	Alexander, P.、Schallert, D.、O'Hare, V.(1991)。Coming to terms: How researchers in learning and literacy talk about knowledge。Review of Educational Research，61(3)，315-345。
5.	Alvermann, D. E.、Smith, L. C.、Readence, J. E.(1985)。Prior knowledge activism and the comprehension of compatible and incompatible text。Reading Research Quarterly，20(4)，421-436。
6.	Blair, L.、Morbey, M. L.(1993)。Arts and learning research, 1992-1993。The Journal of the Arts and Learning，10(1)，1-15。
7.	Davis, D. J.(1993)。Art education in the 1990s: Meeting the challenges of accountability。Studies in Art Education，34(2)，82-90。
8.	Forker, M.(2008)。Assessing the written responses to conflict imagery by Northern Ireland art and non-art students。Journal of Taipei Municipal University of Education，39(1)，137-178。
9.	Holyoak, K.、Spellman, B. A.(1993)。Thinking。Annual Review of Psychology，44，265-315。
10.	Ives, W.、Pond, J.(1980)。The arts and cognitive development。The High School Journal，63(8)，335-340。
11.	Koroscik, J. S.(1982)。The effects of prior knowledge, presentation time and task demands on visual art processing。Studies in Art Education，23(3)，13-22。
12.	Koroscik, J. S.(1990)。Novice-expert differences in understanding art and their implications for student assessment in art education。Arts and Learning Research，8(1)，2-29。
13.	Koroscik, J. S.、Short, G.、Stavropoulos, C.、Fortin, S.(1992)。Frameworks for understanding art: The function of comparative art contexts and verbal cues。Studies in Art Education，33(3)，154-164。
14.	Parsons, M. J.(1990)。A comparison of novice-expert and developmental paradigms in terms of their use in work on the assessment of student learning in art education。Arts and Learning Research，8(1)，30-49。
15.	Perkins, D. N.、Salomon, G.(1989)。Are Cognitive Skills Context-Bound?。Educational Researcher，18(1)，16-25。
16.	Short, G.(1995)。Understanding domain knowledge for teaching: Higher-order thinking in pre-service art teacher specialists。Studies in Art Education，36(3)，154-169。
17.	Stavropoulos, C. S.(1992)。A diagnostic profile of art understandings based on verbal responses to works of art。Marilyn Zurmuehlen Working Papers in Art Education，11(1)，48-53。
18.	Stavropoulos, C. S.(1994)。Distinguishing the effectiveness of a writing-intensive DBAE curriculum: A quasi-experimental study comparing three elementary classrooms' written responses to a work of art。Arts and Learning Research，11(1)，25-44。
19.	Wilson, B.(1986)。Testing and the process of change. Design for Arts in。Education，8(12)，6-11。
20.	Cason, N.(1998)。Interactive Multimedia: An Alternative Context for Studying Works of Art。Studies in Art Education，39(4)，336-349。
21.	Koroscik, J. S.(1992)。Assessing student learning in the visual arts: Application of a theoretical model。Arts and Learning Research，10(1)，5-15。
22.	Vosniadou, S.、Brewer, William F.(1987)。Theories of knowledge restructuring in development。Review of Educational Research，57(1)，51-67。
23.	Holyoak, Keith J.、Gick, Mary L.(1983)。Schema Induction and Analogical Transfer。Cognitive Psychology，15(1)，1-38。
24.	Bransford, J. D.、Johnson, M. K.(1972)。Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension。Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior，11(6)，717-726。
25.	Prawat, R. S.(1989)。Promoting access to knowledge, strategy, and disposition in students: A research synthesis。Review of Educational Research，59(1)，1-41。
26.	Bransford, J. D.、Sherwood, R. D.、Vye, N.、Rieser, J.(1986)。Teaching thinking and problem solving: Suggestions from research。American Psychologist，41(10)，1078-1089。
27.	Perkins, D. N.、Simmons, R.(1988)。Patterns of Misunderstanding: An Integrative Model for Science, Math, and Programming。Review of Educational Research，58(3)，303-326。

會議論文
1.	Confrey, J.(1987)。Misconceptions across subject matters: Science, mathematics, and programming。New York, NY：Cornell University。81-106。

學位論文
1.	Forker, M.(2002)。A Diagnostic Profile of Art Understandings and Social Attributions Based on Written Responses to Conflict Imagery(博士論文)。Queens University of Belfast，Northern Ireland。

圖書
1.	Chapman, L. H.(1985)。Discover art。Worcester, MA：Davis。
2.	Efland, A. D.、Koroscik, J.、Parsons, M.(1991)。Assessing art learning based on the novice-expert paradigms: A progress report。Atlanta, GA：National Art Education Association。
3.	Feldman, E. B.(1967)。Varieties of visual experience。New York, NY：Harry N. Abrams。
4.	Herberholz, B.、Hanson, L.(1990)。Early childhood art。Dubuque, IA：W. C. Brown。
5.	Hubbard, G.、Rouse, M. J.(1981)。Art: Meaning, method, and media。Chicago, CH：Benefic Press。
6.	Koster, J.(1981)。Bringing art into the elementary classroom。Belmont, CA：Wadworth。
7.	McKenzie, W.(2005)。Multiple intelligences and instructional technology。Oregon, OR：International Society for Technology Education (ISTE)。
8.	Piaget, J.、Inhelder, B.(1967)。A child's conception of space。New York, NY：Norton。
9.	Sless, D.(1981)。Learning and visual communication。London, UK：Croom Helm。
10.	Winslow, L.(1939)。The integrated school art program。New York, NY：McGraw-Hill。
11.	Catto, M.(1977)。Art in Ulster。Belfast, NI：Black Staff Press。
12.	Compton, S. P.(1985)。Chagall。New York, NY：Harry N. Abrams。
13.	Hobbs, J.、Salome, R.(1991)。The visual experience。Worcester, MA：Davis。
14.	Hurwitz, A.、Day, M.(1991)。Children and their art。New York, NY：Harcourt Brace Jovanovich。
15.	Makarius, M.(1988)。Chagall。New York, NY：Portland House。
16.	Sweeney, J. J.(1946)。Marc Chagall。New York, NY：Museum of Modern Art。
17.	Guba, E. G.(1978)。Toward a methodology of naturalistic inquiry in educational evaluation。Los Angeles, CA：Center for the Study of Evaluation, UCLA Graduate School of Education, University of California。
18.	Paivio, A.、Sadoski, M.(2001)。Imagery and text: A dual coding theory of reading and writing。Mahwah, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。
19.	Chi, M. T. H.、Glaser, R.、Farr, M. J.(1988)。The nature of expertise。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。
20.	Efland, A. D.(1990)。A history of art education: Intellectual and social currents in teaching the visual arts。New York：Teachers College Press, Columbia University。
21.	Resnick, Lauren B.(1987)。Education and learning to think。National Academies Press。
22.	Arnheim, Rudolf(1969)。Visual Thinking。Berkeley：Los Angeles：California, CA：University of California Press。
23.	Bruner, J.(1973)。Going Beyond the Information Given。New York, NY：Norton & Company。
24.	Frankel, J. R.、Wallen, N. E.(1990)。How to design and evaluate research in education。New York, NY：McGraw-Hill。
25.	Gardner, H.(1983)。Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences。NY：Random House。

其他
1.	Graves, D.(2013)。Copying the masters，http://www.florenceacademyofart.com/news.php?id=10&r=f。
2.	New York State Education Department Office of Bilingual Education and Foreign Languages Studies(2010)。Art as a tool for teachers of English language learners，http://www.p12.nysed.gov/biling/docs/Art_as_a_Tool-for_Teachers.pdf。

圖書論文
1.	Feltovich, P. J.、Spiro, R. J.、Coulson, R. L.(1989)。The nature of conceptual understanding in biomedicine: The deep structure of complex ideas and the development of misconceptions。The Cognitive sciences in medicine。Cambridge, MA：MIT Press。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	STEAM跨領域美感教育課程設計：以「悠遊樂視界」為例
2.	The Logic of the Imaginary: Metaphors of the Spirit
3.	Achieving Visual Literacy: Prior Knowledge of Spiritual Symbolism in Modern Art
4.	Learning Visual Culture: The Important Relationship of Curriculum and Assessment
5.	"It's Kind of a Give and Take Thing": Conducting Assessments by Sitting Down and Talking to Students
6.	The Teacher as Stakeholder in Student Art Assessment and Art Program Evaluation

無相關博士論文

無相關書籍

無相關著作

1.	臺藝大校園雕塑藝術作品介紹之一：臺灣近代雕塑教育的孕育者--丘雲(1912~2009)
2.	「日本雕刻的近代」系列翻譯(1)--明治的雕刻
3.	邁向近代雕塑的路程--黃土水於日本早期學習歷程與創作發展
4.	心印--1980年代朱銘在美國紐約的奮鬥歷程
5.	陳澄波藝術中的摩登迷戀
6.	試析後90年代透過戲劇展演臺灣歷史的一種美學趨勢轉向--以三位女性劇場創作者的劇作及演出為例
7.	以A/r/tography藝術方法學省思劇場活動在社區文化發展的作用
8.	運用教育戲劇策略在原住民族孩童的傳統婚禮文化學習之探究
9.	社會戲劇遊戲之後設溝通研究
10.	國中表演藝術專家教師班級經營之研究
11.	戲劇教育促進親子溝通之多個案研究
12.	實驗室劇場的《衛城》和生活劇場的《天堂此時》中的亞陶概念和觀眾/演員關係
13.	波瓦的戲劇政治化--從「被壓迫者劇場」到「立法劇場」
14.	批判性展演式教育學：從身體出發，剖析解放教育中的政治
15.	臺灣東北角水湳洞邊陲礦業漁港地景之歷史地理初探

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫