:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:運用SOLO分類法探討科展活動之建模的類型--以八年級物理科展為例
書刊名:教育實踐與研究
作者:鐘建坪邱美虹 引用關係
作者(外文):Jong, Jing-pingChiu, Mei-hung
出版日期:2014
卷期:27:1
頁次:頁31-63
主題關鍵詞:事後回溯法建模科學展覽模型SOLO分類法Ex post facto methodModelingScience fairSOLO taxonomyTypology of model
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:22
  • 點閱點閱:36
模型與建模為科學實務的中心工作,而中小學科學展覽為最近似科學家的建模活動。本研究採用事後回溯法(Ex Post Facto Study)探討2位立意取樣之八年級學生歷經物理科展建模活動後所建構的模型表徵類型與其表徵模型階層。研究工具主要整合自模型表徵類型(Boulter & Buckley, 2000)與觀察學習表現架構(Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome, SOLO)(Biggs & Collis, 1982)分類階層形成模型種類與階層表。研究結果顯示學生在實驗室情境下建構模型的類型與其發展順序,包括:(1)在相同探究時期,學生可以建構出具體、動作、視覺、語彙與數學等多種具有目的性的模型;而在不同探究時期,學生主要從具體與動作表徵模型開始,接著建構視覺、語彙與數學模型的動態建模歷程,並依據先前建構的表徵模型從單一結構逐漸提升至延伸抽象結構;(2)學生經由不同的探究階段逐漸掌握科展主題探索的變因,包括纏繞物的種類、纏繞圈數、懸掛重量以及摩擦力等而形成自身對於科展主題的概念架構,並向外發展形成各種表徵模型。最後文末依據學生表徵模型建構次序,建議教師在設計實驗為主的探究相關活動時,應著重在具體與動作表徵模型的介紹,再逐步形成視覺與語彙模型表徵模型,最後形成數學模型。
Models play a core role in science. Engaging students in science exhibitions is a way to involve them in modeling activities similar to those practiced by scientists. This study adopted the ex post facto method to investigate the types and hierarchical levels of modeling processes which were present in the scientific inquiry activities of eighth grade students. The authors integrated a typology of models proposed by Boulter and Buckley (2000) and Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome (SOLO) taxonomy by Biggs and Collis (1982) to evaluate the typology of models used. The results revealed that (1) within the same inquiry phase, students constructed different types of representational models, including concrete, gestural, visual, verbal, and mathematical, each with a specific purpose. In other phases they constructed the same types from models that are uni-structural to ones that are extended and abstract. (2) Through various inquiry phases, the students gradually understood the variables of the project they worked on in order to develop a variety of corresponding representation models. Accordingly, school teachers are recommended to provide a progression of inquiry-based science activities that emphasize on introducing concrete and gestural representational models, forming visual and verbal models, and constructing mathematical models.
期刊論文
1.Giere, R. N.(2010)。An agent-based conception of models and scientific representation。Synthese,172(2),269-281。  new window
2.Minogue, J.、Jones, M. G.(2009)。Measuring the impact of haptic feedback using the SOLO taxonomy。International Journal of Science Education,31(10),1359-1378。  new window
3.Milner-Bolotin, M.(2012)。Increasing interactivity and authenticity of chemistry instruction through data acquisition systems and other technologies。Journal of Chemical Education,89(4),477-481。  new window
4.Prins, G. T.、Bulte, A. M. W.、van Driel, J. H.、Pilot, A.(2008)。Selection of authentic modelling practices as contexts for chemistry education。International Journal of Science Education,30(14),1867-1890。  new window
5.Roth, W.-M.、McGinn, M. K.(1998)。Inscriptions: Toward a Theory of Representing as Social Practice。Review of Educational Research,68(1),35-59。  new window
6.Blanchard, M. R.、Southerland, S. A.、Osborne, J. W.、Sampson, V. D.、Annetta, L. A.、Granger, E. M.(2010)。Is inquiry possible in light of accountability? A quantitative comparison of the relative effectiveness of guided inquiry and verification laboratory instruction。Science Education,94(4),577-616。  new window
7.Chinn, C. A.、Malhotra, B. A.(2002)。Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks。Science Education,86(2),175-218。  new window
8.Saari, H.、Viiri, F.(2003)。A research-based teaching sequence for teaching the concept of modelling to seventh-grade students。International Journal of Science Education,25(11),1333-1352。  new window
9.Harrison, A. G.、Treagust, D. F.(2000)。A typology of school science models。International Journal of Science Education,22(9),1011-1026。  new window
10.Schwarz, C. V.、White, B. Y.(2005)。Metamodeling knowledge: Developing students' understanding of scientific modeling。Cognition and Instruction,23(2),165-205。  new window
11.Schwarz, C. V.、Reiser, B. J.、Davis, E. A.、Kenyon, L.、Acher, A.、Fortus, D.、Krajcik, J.(2009)。Designing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners。Journal for Research in Science Teaching,46(6),632-654。  new window
12.毛松霖、張菊秀(19971200)。「探究式教學法」與「講述式教學法」對於國中學生地球科學「氣象」單元學習成效之比較。科學教育學刊,5(4),461-497。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.張志康、邱美虹(20090800)。建模能力分析指標的發展與應用--以電化學為例。科學教育學刊,17(4),319-342。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Van Driel, Jan H.、Verloop, Nico(1999)。Teachers' knowledge of models and modeling in science。International Journal of Science Education,21(11),1141-1153。  new window
學位論文
1.周金城(2002)。以孔恩的常態科學探究高中師生科學社群中科學探索活動的歷程--參與科學展覽活動之得獎個案分析(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Giere, Ronald N.(1988)。Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach。University of Chicago Press。  new window
2.Doherty, E. J. S.、Evans, L. C.(1983)。Primary independent study。Connecticut, CT:Synergetics。  new window
3.Bybee, Rodger W.(1997)。Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices。Portsmouth, NH:Heinemann。  new window
4.Bloom, B. S.、Engelhart, M. D.、Furst, E. J.、Hill, W. H.、Krathwohl, D. R.(1956)。Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals. Handbook 1, Cognitive domain。New York:Longman。  new window
5.教育部(2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要,自然與生活科技學習領域。台北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
6.Krajcik, J. S.、Czerniak, C. M.、Berger, C. F.(1999)。Teaching Children Science: A Project-Based Approach。Boston, Massachusetts:McGraw-Hill College。  new window
7.Latour, Bruno(1987)。Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society。Harvard University Press。  new window
8.Biggs, J. B.、Collis, K. F.(1982)。Evaluating the Quality of Learning: The SOLO Taxonomy (Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome)。New York:Academic Press。  new window
9.National Research Council(2000)。Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards。Washington, DC:National Academy Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Nersessian, N. J.、Patton, C.(2009)。Model-based reasoning in interdisciplinary engineering。Handbook of the philosophy of technology and engineering sciences。Amsterdam:Elsevier。  new window
2.Nersessian, N. J.(2002)。The cognitive basis of model-based reasoning in science。The Cognitive Basis of Science。Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.Boulter, C. J.、Buckley, B. C.(2000)。Constructing a typology of models for science education。Developing models in science education。Dordrecht:Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
4.Dunbar, K.(1995)。How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories。The nature of insight。Cambridge, MA:MIT Press。  new window
5.Latour, Bruno(1990)。Drawing things together。Representation in scientific practice。MIT Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE