:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:以孔恩的常態科學探究高中師生科學社群中科學探索活動的歷程─參與科學展覽活動之得獎個案分析
作者:周金城 引用關係
作者(外文):Chin-Cheng Chou
校院名稱:國立臺灣師範大學
系所名稱:科學教育研究所
指導教授:邱美虹
學位類別:博士
出版日期:2002
主題關鍵詞:常態科學科學探索科學展覽活動概念改變normal sciencescientific inquiryscience fairsconceptual change
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:59
1本研究試圖由高中師生製作得獎科展的研究歷程與經驗,來探討科學研究能夠完成的重要方法與因素,並分析研究個案中概念改變的機制與特質。
科展的科學研究是一種孔恩所說的「常態科學」(normal science),而孔恩對其所謂常態科學也分成三類:1.決定重要事實;2.使典範與事實相符合;3.精鍊典範。而本研究以孔恩的常態科學的意涵為基礎,來加以分析科展中科學研究的動態歷程,並且在這三類的常態科學活動中,分析師生所面臨的困難與解決歷程。本研究並根據實踐認識論所強調的理論與實作之間來回辯證的過程,作為本研究探討學生在實作中發生概念改變的動態歷程。
本研究是以高中全國科展前三名得獎的師生為研究對象,在研究方法上採用質性化的半結構式訪談為主,每一組約有一至二名教師與一至四名學生,共晤談十一組,所有的受訪者皆是自願的。
經資料分析後,本研究得到以下的結論:
一、科展的研究問題除了孔恩的三類常態科學研究問題,還包含前典範時期與異例現象的研究。在本研究中,有七組的研究問題是屬於常態科學的研究問題。對於科展研究中最大的困難處是找出解釋現象的理論,也是學生花最多的時間。
二、一個好的研究問題最重要的是找出一個有典範指導解題的問題,由本研究中發現有六個研究問題是由教師所提出,而教師大多是根據科學理論來找出研究問題;反之,學生則大多是由現象來提出所欲研究的問題。本研究同時也發現他們的科學研究,其實就是提出問題、設法修改問題與提出不同解釋的理論,使能在有限的證據中尋找適當的理論來與研究結果相互的吻合。
三、由分析個案中發現,科學探索歷程的核心是一連串的概念改變,且改變是逐步發生而非孔恩所謂瞬間轉換的。當理論與證據間發生矛盾時,師生常將此矛盾認為是證據上有問題,而非是理論有問題,直到證據重複出現,才會試圖去修正理論。而理論與證據間產生矛盾,是提供研究持續進行的動力。
四、良好的外在環境,如家長的支持、團隊的小組合作等,能提供研究者情意方面的支持,有助於研究者去面對解題困境而不放棄。
五、師生認為目前實驗課能提供練習實驗操作技能的機會,但對科展研究能力的培養,則需要先引發學生的內在動機,需要有較長的實驗時間讓學生進行思考。
The purpose of this study is to investigate the important components that contribute toward the success of student’s science project in a science fair. We also try to analyze the mechanism of conceptual change and the characteristics in the case study.
The scientific inquiry of science fairs is a kind of Kuhn''s Normal Science. According to Kuhn''s Normal Science, there are three class of problem: 1. determination of significant fact; 2.matching of facts with theory; 3.articulation of theory. This study based on Kuhn''s normal science to analysis the dynamic process of the scientific inquiry in the science fairs. According the epistemology of practice, it addresses the process of dialectical between theory and practice; this study is to investigate the dynamic process of the conceptual change in student practice work.
For the purposes of our study, we designed an interviewing in-depth semi-structure questionnaire. The study involved eleven teams who got the 41st national science fairs grand awards in the senior high school of Taiwan. Each team’s members have 1~2 teachers and 1~4 students, and all volunteered to participate in this study.
Finding from this study are summarized as follow:
1. The research questions of students’ science fairs have categorized into three classes of problem of normal science, the pre-paradigm, and anomaly. In this study, seven research questions belong to the normal science problems.
2. For a good question, the most important is to find a paradigm that can guide the research. In the study, we find that teachers are posing six research questions. Teachers pose research questions based on scientific theory. On the contrary, students pose research questions based on phenomenon. We also find students’ scientific inquiry that is pose a question, modify the question, and give different kind of explanatory theory, let the incomplete evidences and theory can match well.
3. The core of scientific inquiry is a series of conceptual change, and the change is gradually and not as same as kuhn’s Gestalt switch. When the conflict is between theory and evidence, teachers and students usually consider the conflict coming from evidence, not the theory. Until the evidence repeatedly appears, the students started to modify the theory. Solving the conceptual conflict was the central elements of the power of research.
4. A Well-equipped external environment, such as supports from parents and corporative teamwork, can provide the students a good research situation for solving the research puzzles and for persistently doing the experiment.
5. Teachers and students think that lab work can provide an opportunity to practice experimental skill, but developing the scientific inquiry ability and to motivate students internal motivation should be promoted.
一、中文部分:
方泰山,劉哲淵(1999): 化學實驗在國際奧林匹亞三十年競賽的回顧與展望。科學教育月刊,第217期。
王文科(1990):教育研究法。台北市 : 五南圖書公司。new window
成映鴻(1984):科展與科學教育。國教輔導,23卷8期,pp. 12-13頁。
朱則剛(1996):建構主義知識論對教學與教學研究的意義。教育研究雙月刊,49期,39-45頁。new window
朱智賢(1990):心理學大辭典。北京師範大學出版社,台北結構群出版社總代理。
朱德生(1987):西方認識論史綱。新店市:谷風出版社。
吳天佑(2000):台灣教育探源。臺北市 : 教育資料館。
吳翠鳳(2000):個人諮商理論的建構。國立台灣師範大學心理與輔導研究所碩士論文,未出版。
呂溪木(1983):從國際科展看我國今科學教育發展的方向。科學教育,64期,pp. 13-19頁。
李偉俊(1996): 未來資優教育的新指標:獨立研究方案(ISP)。國教之聲,30卷1期,pp. 18-29。
林家慶、葉國慈 和徐志宏 (1993):從初二普化科展談師院非數理系的科學教育。國教之聲,22卷1期pp.13-17。
林素惠(1998):學生學習的新思路:教室經營與班級團隊。中等教育。第四十八卷第四期,頁70-76。new window
林陳涌(1995):從經驗證據到科學理論之間的關係來探討自然科實驗教學的意義。科教月刊,第184期。
邱玉玲(2000):科學展覽存廢問題之省思。師友,396期。
邱美虹(2000):概念改變的省思與啟示。科學教育學刊,8(1),1-34。new window
邱美虹, 劉嘉茹, 周金城 , 梁家祺(1999):認知師徒制對學生化學概念改變的影響。中華民國第十五屆科學教育學術研討會。
邱美虹,湯偉君(2000):美國新標準(New Standards):科學實作評量之內涵與範例介紹。科學教育月刊,第233期。
柯永河(2001):習慣心理學. 辨識篇 : 習慣的進化、發展與衰退。臺北市 : 張老師出版社。new window
洪志明(2001):我國國二學生課餘學習時間與學習成就之關係。科學教育月刊,第236期。
郁慕鏞(1994):科學定律的發現。台北市:淑馨出版社。
夏林清(1996):實踐取向的研究方法。胡幼慧 主編。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。台北市:巨流圖書公司。
徐美蓮、薛秋子(1999):以建構教學編織生命教育統整課程。國教天地,134期,pp.84-90。
袁江洋(1998):牛頓革命與近代科學興起的發生學詮釋。二十一世紀評論,第五十期。new window
高宣揚(1991): 德國哲學的發展。台北市 : 遠流出版。new window
高博銓(1999):透視獨立研究課程。資優教育,70期,pp.16-19。
教育部(1993):國民中學課程標準。台北:教育部。
教育部(1993):國民中學課程標準。台北:教育部。
教育部(1996):高級中學課程標準。台北:教育部。
教育部(1996):高級中學課程標準。台北:教育部。
許育彰(1999):探討高中生從力學情境中發現問題的能力之研究。國立台灣師範大學科學教育研究所博士論文,未出版。new window
郭文禎,張文華(2000):六年級學生投入實驗活動的方式。科學教育,226期,PP. 2-14。
郭正雄(1992):談資優兒童獨立研究能力之培養。資優教育,43期,pp. 22-25。
郭生玉(1994):心理與教育研究法。台北市 : 大世紀。
郭素琴(1998):第五項修練:學習型組織的內涵及評析。教育研究,第六期。
郭靜姿(1993):如何指導資優生進行獨立研究。資優教育,48期,pp. 5-15。
郭靜姿(1994):資優課程與教材教法,資優教育季刊,第五十二期,p29-30。
陳建宏、黃芳裕(2000):台北縣完全中學化學高成就學生實踐表現分析。第16屆科學教育學術研討會彙編。
陳美芳(1989):獨立研究過程的記錄。資優教育,30期,pp.1-5。
陳義勳(2000):中小學科學展覽之析論與評論。國教新知,46卷3期。
陳錫銘(1998):實踐認識論應用於諮商員專業自我建構之研究。國立台灣師範大學心理與輔導研究所博士論文,未出版。new window
彭森明(1997):實作評量理論與實際。教育資料與研究,第九期。new window
游經祥(1999):學生小論文及科展之輔導與研究。高中教育,4期,pp.51-56。
舒偉光(1994):科學哲學導論。台北市:五南出版社。
舒偉光、邱仁宗(1991): 當代西方科學哲學述評。台北市:水牛出版社。
馮桂莊(1999):中華民國參加國際科學展覽活動。科學教育月刊,第225期。
黃光國(1999):建立「學術實踐的主體性」:對心理學門的檢討。大葉學報,第八卷,第二期。new window
黃俊儒(2000):從社會互動與認知投入的觀點探討理化實驗課中學習機會之分佈。國立台灣師範大學科學教育研究所博士論文,未出版。new window
黃萬居(1999): 科學教學活潑化。科學教育研究與發展,17期。
楊文金(1996).比較、社會比較、與科學學習的動機。科學教育月刊,195期,2-15頁。
楊巧如、王沛清(2000):以「合作學習」導向的國中數學教學─行動研究。第16屆科學教育學術研討會。
楊深坑(1988):理論、詮釋與實踐。台北市:師大書苑。
楊慶誠(1993):科展經驗談。花師數理教育季刊,2期,24-29。
楊曉白(1988):如何指導資優生從事獨立研究。資優教育,28期,41-43。
詹志禹(1996):認識與知識:建構論與接受觀。教育研究雙月刊,49期,25-30。new window
詹焜能(2000):兒童科學創意競賽開放問題解決的個案研究。16屆科學教育學術研討會。
劉元亮、姚慧華、寇世琪、曾曉萱、曹南燕、高達聲(1990):科學認識論與方法論。台北市:曉園出版社。
劉知新 編,梁蕙珠、鄭長雲 著(1996):化學實驗論。中國:廣西出版社。
劉秋燕(1993):資優生獨立研究的理念與做法。資優教育季刊,47期,10-12。
劉魁(1998):後現代科學觀。台北市:揚智文化。
劉鎮寧(1999):論學習型學校的理想與實現。教育資料與研究,第二十七期。new window
潘裕豐(1999):遠距學習模式對資優生獨立研究之可行性探究。資優教育,70期,pp.7-15。new window
蔡典謨(1998):培養資優生成為知識的生產者。資優教育,69期,pp.1-5。
蔡崇建 (1982):在漫長的暑假裡如何讓資優學生從事獨立研究。資優教育,7期pp.26-28頁。
蔡崇建(1989):獨立研究之後──如何指導資優學生展現研究成果。資優教育,29期,pp.25-30。
鄭木城,顧錦濤,順榮和翁瑞美(1995):科學展覽的指導和製作。科學教育,1期。
鄭湧涇(1988):適合高中科學才賦優異學生的教學方案。資優教育,27期,pp.1-6。
鄭瑛珍(2000):物理學家問題發現與問題解決之個案研究。國立台灣師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版。
盧秀琴(1998):如何設計科學實驗。國民教育,38卷5期,頁48-54。
盧雪梅(1998):實作評量的應許、難題和挑戰。教育資料與研究,20期,頁1-5。.。new window
蕭英勵(1999): 科學實驗引導學生進行思考。師友,381期。
謝雪貞(2000):高級中學數理資優教育未來發展之導向研究:結論與建議。輔導通訊,60期,pp.57-61。
顏啟麟、馮桂莊(1995):國立臺灣科學教育館的國際教育活動:國際科展。臺灣教育,538期,pp.37-42。
魏明通(1988):中學生自由研究之道。科學教育,212期,pp.28-31。
羅蓓(1995):如何指導學生做科學展覽。國民教育,35卷9、10期,pp.57-59。
礬雪春、陳慧娟(1997):自然科的教與學。林清山 主編:有效的學習方法。台北市:教育部訓育委員會。
二、英文部分
Anderson, J. R.(1995). Cognitive psychology and its implications. NY: Carnegie Mellon University.
Basadur, M. (1994). Managing the creative process in organizations. In Runco, M. A. (Eds), Problem finding, Problem Solving, and Creativity. New Jersey:Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Bellipanni, L. J. & Lilly,J. E. (1999). What have researchers been saying about scienca fair. Science & Children,36(2),46-50.
Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Berry, A., Mulnall, P., Loughran, J. J. & Gunstone, R. F. (1999). Helping students learn from laboratory work. Australian Science Teachers’ Journal, 45(1), 27-31.
Bobner, G. M., Hunter, W., & Lamba, R. (1998). Chemical Educator, 3. 1.
Brookw, H., & Solomon, J. (1998): From playing to investigating: Research in an interactive science center for primary pupils. International Journal of Science Education. 20(8), 959-971.
Brown, J. R.(1991). The Laboratory of the Mind: thought experiments in the Natural Sciences. New York:Routledge.
Chinn, C. A. & Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63(1), 1-49.
Churchland, P. M (1994):Matter and Consciousness. 汪益 譯:物質與意識-當代心靈哲學導讀。台北市:遠流出版社。
Clough, M. P., & Clark, R. (1994): Cookbooks and Constructivism. The Science Teacher.61(2).PP.34-37.
Corey, G. (1995): Theory and Practice of Group Counseling. 張景然、吳芝儀 譯:團體諮商的理論與實務。台北市:揚智出版社。
Craig W. Bowen(1998). Item Design Considerations for Computer-Based Testing of Student Learning in Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education. 75, 9 ,1172-1175.
Czerniak, C. M. & Lumpe, A. T.(1996): Predictors of science fair participation using the theory of Planned Behavior. School Science & Mathematics. Vol.96, issue 7, 335-362.
Czerniak, C. M. (1996): predictors of success in a district science fair competition: an exploratory study. School Science & Mathematics. Vol.96, issue 1, P21-28.
Dillon, J. T. (1982). Problem Finding and Solving. The Journal of Creative Behavior, Vol.16, No.2, 147-165.
Domin, D. S. (1999) : A Rewiew of Laboratory instruction Styles. Journal of Chemical Education. 76, 4 ,543-547.
Dorothy G., (1999). Improving teaching and learning through chemistry education research: a look to the future. Journal of Chemical Education. Vol.76, No.4, 548-554.
Dunbar, K. & Schunn, C. D. (1990). The temporal nature of scientific discovery: The role of priming and analogy. In Proceedings of the twelfth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Dunbar, K. (1989). Scientific reasoning strategies in a simulated molecular genetics environment. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Dunbar, K. (1993). Concept discovery in a scientific domain. Cognitive Science,17, 397-434.
Dunbar, K. (1998). Problem solving. In W. Bechtel & G. Graham(Eds.), A companion to cognitive science(pp.289-298). Cambridge, MA:Blackwell.
Dunbar, K.(1995). How scientists really reason : scientific reasoning in real-word laboratories. In R. J. Sternberg and J. E. Davidson (Eds), The nature of insight (pp.65-395). Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
Dyson F. J. (1991) : “To Teach or not to Teach”, Amer. J. Phys.,June 1991, vol. 59,No.6, p.495.
Edomondson, K. M., & Novak, J. D. (1993): The interplay of science: A perspective from the philosophy of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(6),547-559.
Ferry & Ross-Gordon(1998): An Inquiry into Schon’s Epistemology of Practice : Exploring Links Between Experience and Reflective practice. Adult Education Quarterly, Vol. 48, Issue 2, P98-113.
Franklin, A. (1989). The epistemology of experiment. The Uses of experiment, Edited by David, Gooding, Trevor Pinch, & Simon Schaffer, Cambridge university press.
Freedman, M. P.(1997):Relationship among laboratory Instruction, Attitude toward Science, and Achievement in Science Knoeledge. Journal of Research In ScienceTeaching. Vol.34, No.4, pp.343-357.
Gagne, E. D., Yekovich, C. W., Yekovich, F. R.(1993): The cognitive psychology of school learning(2nd). Harper Collins College Publishers.
Gagne,E.D.(1993). The cognitive psychology of school learning (2nd ed.). Boston,MA:Little,Brown & Company.   
Geelan, D. R. (1997). Epistemological Anarchy and the many forms of constructivism. Science & Education, 6, 15-28.
Getzels, J. W. & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (l976). The creative vision: a longitudinal study of problem finding in art. New York: Wiley.
Gilbert, J. K., & Reiner, M. (2000): Thought experitments in science education: potential and current realization. International Journal of Science Education. Vol.22, No.3, pp.265-283.
Hacking, I. (1991). Representation and Intervening. 蕭明慧譯,1994,科學哲學與實驗。台北市:桂冠出版社。
Hapkiewicz, A.(1999). Authentic Research with the group of high School Students. Journal of chemical Education, V76, No9, 1212-1215.
Hart, C., Mulnall, P., Berry, A., Loughran, J.,&Gunstone, R.(2000): What is the purpose of this Experiment? Or Can Students Learn Something from Doing Experiment? Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Vol.37, No.7, PP.655-675.
Hempel, C. G. (1954). A logical appraisal of operationism. Scientific Monthly, 1, No.79, 215-220.
Henderleiter. J, & Pringle, L. D. (1999):Effect of context-based laboratory experiments on attitudes of analytical chemistry students. Journal of Chemical Education. Vol.76, No.1, PP.100-106.
Herman, J.L., Aschbacher, P.R., & Winters, L.(1990, November). Issues in developing alternative assessments. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the California Educational Research Association, Chicago.
  
Hilosky, A., Sutman, F., & Schmuckler, J (1998): Is Laboratory-based Instruction in Beginning College-Level Chemistry Worth the Effort and Expense? Journal of Chemical Education, Vol.75, No.1, pp.100-104.
Hofstein, A & Lunetta, V. N. (1982). The Role of the Laboratory in Science Teaching:Neglected Aspects of Research. Review of Educational Research, 52, 2, 201-217.
Hoover, S. M., & Feldhusen, J. F.(1994). Scientific problem solving and problem finging: A Theoretical model. In M. A. Runco(Ed.), Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity(pp.201-219). Norwood, NJ:Ablex.
Josefina A. & Betancourt, R (1997): Student-designed experiments in scientific lab instruction. Journal of College Science Teaching. Vol.27. PP.114-118.
Kanigel, R. (1993). Apprentice to genius. 潘震澤、朱業修譯,1998,天才的學徒。台北市:天下文化。
Keys, C. W. (2000): Investigating the Thinking Process of Eighth Grade Writers during the Composition of a Scientific Laboratory Report. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Vol.37, No.7, PP.676-690.
Keys, C. W., Hand, B., Prain, V., & Collins, S. (1999):Using the science writing heuristic as a tool for learning from laboratory investigations in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Vol.36, 1065-1084. PP.676-690.
Killion, J. P. & Todnem, G. R. (1991). A process for personal theory building. Educational Leadership, 48(60),14-16.
Klahr, D., Fay, A. L., & Dunbar, K. (1993). Heuristics for scientific experimentation: A development study. Cognition Psychology, 25, 111-146.
Kuhn, T(1965). The logic of discovery or the research of psychology? In Criticism and growth of Knowledge. Lakatos, I. & Musgrav, A. (Eds ). 周寄中 譯,1993,批判與知識的增長。台北市:桂冠出版社。
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions(2nd edition). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions(2nd edition). 程樹德、傅大為、王道還、錢永祥 譯,1994,科學革命的結構。台北市:遠流出版社。
Larochelle, M. & Desautels, J.(1991): “Of course, it’s just obvious”: adolescents’ ideal of scientific Knowledge. International Journal of Science Education. Vol.13, No.4, 373-389.
Lepper, M. R. (1988). Motivational considerations in the study of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 5, 289-309.
Liem, T. L. (1991): Invitations to Science Inquiry. California: Science Inquiry Enterprises.
Locke, E., Latham, G.(1984). Gola setting: A motivational technique that work. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
McCann, W. S. (1999): A science fair companion. Eric Digest. ED432455.
Merritt, M. V.,Schneider, M. J., & Darlington, J. A.(1993).Journal of chemical Education, 70. 660-662.
Merton, R. K. (1973). The Sociology of Science. Chicago and London: University of Chicago.
Millar, R. (1989).What is "scientific method" and can it be taught? In Wellington, J. (Ed). Skills and process in Science Education A Critical Analysis, London: Routledge.
Mitroff, I. I. (1974). The Subjective Side of Science. Amsterdam:lsevier.
Moore, M. T. (1983). The relationship between the originality of essays and variables in the problem-discovery process: A study of creative and noncreative middle school students. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED258786.
Mulkay, M. (1979). Science and Sociology of Knowledge. 蔡振中 譯,1991,科學與知識社會學。台北市:巨流圖書公司。
National Science Education Standards(1996). National Academy Press:Washington, DC, P.20。
Nolan, S. B. (1988). Reasons for studying: Motivational orientations and study strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 5, 269-287.
Northen, H. (1988). Social work with groups (3rd ed.). New York: Columbia University press.
Okada, T. & Simon, H. A. (1997). Collaborative Discovery in a Scientific Domain. Cognitive Science. Vol.21, 2, 109-146.
Piaget, J. (1967). The mental development of the child. In D. Elkind(Ed.), Six psychological studies. New York, NY: random House.
Piaget, J. (1980). Adapt ion and intelligence: Organic selection and photocopy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Pirece, W.(1998). Link Learning to Lads. Science Scope. PP.17-19
Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London : Hutchiuson.
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a Scintific Conception: Toward a Theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, PP.211-227.
Priestley, Priestley , and Schmuckler, and Hilosky, Sutman and Wang(1997). Science laboratory Instruction: Summary of Findings and Implications from Four Companion Studies .NARST ERIC:ED406164
Priestley, Priestley , and Schmuckler, and Hilosky, Sutman and Wang(2000). Science Laboratory Instruction : Summary of Findings and Implications from Four Companion Studies. Paper presented at National Assocation for Research in Science Teaching, ED406164.
Qin, Y., & Simon, H. A. (1990). Laboratory replication of scientific discovery process. Cognitive Science, 14, 281-312.
Rath, A. & Brown, D. E. (1996). Modes of engagement in science inquiry: A mcroanalysis of elementary students’ orientations toward phenomena at a summer science camp. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(10), 1083-1097.
Reid, K. E.(1997). Social Work Practice with Groups: A Clinlcal Perspective. 劉曉春、張意真 譯:社會團體工作。台北市:揚智出版社。
Reiner, M. & Gilbert, John (2000). Epistemological resources for thought experimentation in science learning. International Journal of Science Education. Vol.22, No.5, PP. 489-506.
Reiner, M.(1998). Thought Experiments and collaborative learning in physics. International Journal of Science Education. Vol.20, , pp.1049-1058
Rubin, S. F. (1996).Ph.D. Thesis;Temple University, Philadephia, PA.
Sanger, M. J. & Greenbowe, T. J. (1996).Journal of Chemical Education. 73, 532.
Saunders, W. L(1992):The Constructivist Perspective: Implications and Teaching Strategies for Science. School Science and Mathematic.Vol.92, 136-145.
Schmidt,A.(1989). Der Begriff der nature in der lehre von marx. 沈力 譯:馬克斯的自然概念。台北市:結構群文化事業有限公司。
Senge P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline-The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Bardon-Media Agency. 郭進隆 譯:第五項修練-學習型組織的藝術與實務。台北市:天下文化。
Shepardson, D. (1997). The Nature of Student Thinking in Life Science laboratories. School Science and Mathematics,Vol.97(1).
Simon, H. A., & Lea, G. (1974). Problem solving and rule induction: A unified view. In L.W. Gregg(Ed.), Knowledge and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
Sorensen, R. (1992). Thought Experiments. N. Y. :Oxford University Press.
Spencer, J. N. (1999) : New Directions in Teaching Chemistry : A Philosophical and Pedagogical Basis. Journal of Chemical Education. 76, 4 ,566-569.
Stiggins, R.(1987). Design and development of performance assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 6(3),33-42.
Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In D. A. Duschl & R.J. Hamiton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, Cognitive psychology and educational theory and practice(99147-176). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Syer, C. A. & Shore, B. M. (2001). Science fair :What are the source of help for students and how prevalent is cheating? School Science and Mathenatics,Vol.101(4), pp.206-220.
Todd, C. J.(1995):The Semester Project: The Power and Pleasures of Independent Study. English-Journal; v84 n3 p73-76. EJ502749.
Tyler, R. W.(1949). Principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: The University of Chicago.
Volkmann, M. J. & Eichinger, D. C. (1999). Habit of Mind: Integrating the Social and Personal characteristics of Doing Science Into the Science Classroom. School Science and mathematics. Vol.99(3).
White, R. T. (1996). The Link between the laboratory and learning. International Journal of Science Education. 18(7), PP.761-774.
Wilson, J. T.(1993). Using Three types of Outcomes to design Laboratory Activity. School Science and Mathematics. Vol.93(8).
Zimmerman, Bonner, & Kovach(1996). Development Self-Regulated Learners.林心茹 譯,自律學習。台北市:遠流出版社。
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE