資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(18.117.103.28)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
構建都會區運輸路網脆弱度評量模式
書刊名:
運輸學刊
作者:
謝承憲
/
馮正民
/
柯旻嬋
作者(外文):
Hsieh, Cheng-hsien
/
Feng, Cheng-min
/
Ke, Min-chan
出版日期:
2014
卷期:
26:3
頁次:
頁349-372
主題關鍵詞:
路網脆弱度
;
地理資訊系統
;
關鍵設施防護
;
Transportation network vulnerability
;
Geographic information system
;
GIS
;
Critical infrastructure protection
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
1
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:0
共同引用:
25
點閱:15
臺灣地區天然災害之頻率與強度因全球氣候變遷與日俱增,造成生命財產與生活安全可觀損失。運輸系統除於防災整備階段扮演資源調度及預先疏散功能外,救災物流與孤島救援更顯其關鍵。若運輸系統失效,將直接影響當地居民移動需求,並負面衝擊疏散、醫療及救災功能。接此,本研究研擬路網脆弱度衡量模式與指標,以道路交通及社會兩構面共七項因子進行分析,藉由分析網絡程序法計算指標權重,以臺北都會區為實例驗證模式可行性,利用地理資訊系統顯示圖像化結果。其中,替代路徑數量及連結性為影響脆弱度最劇之指標;而納莉風災導致路網失效則以服務水準影響最大。本研究有助於規劃者了解路網脆弱度分析架構與工具,並供決策者分析道路單元脆弱度內涵以研擬改善及資源配置策略,進行關鍵設施防護並降低災害風險。
以文找文
The frequency and magnitude of natural disaster in Taiwan has increased in past years because of global climate changes, causing remarkable losses in mortality, injury as well as property. Besides resource allocation and pre-evacuation in disaster mitigation and preparedness, transportation systems also play a crucial role in emergent disaster logistics and islanding rescue. In fact, the failure of transportation system not only directly affects the transportation needs of stakeholders, but also negatively impacts the evacuation, health care and disaster relieve. Accordingly, this study explored the factors influencing transportation network vulnerability and constructed a model for assessing vulnerability according to seven vulnerability factors in two dimensions, in which the weights of indicators were determined through the Analytic Network Process (ANP). The Taipei metropolitan was utilized as an empirical case to validate the feasibility of the proposed model. The Geographic Information System (GIS) was employed to illustrate and overlap layers for analyzing the vulnerability of each link. The analytical results revealed that the number of redundant paths and the connectivity affect the vulnerability more significantly. In the case of Typhoon Nari, the level of service was the most crucial factor leading to the failure of network. The developed method could assist planners in understanding the framework and assessment tools of transportation network vulnerability and help decision makers identify the vulnerable links and prioritize the resource allocation for protecting the critical links in a transportation network for reducing disaster risks.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Chambers, R.(2006)。Vulnerability, Coping and Policy。Institute of Development Studies Bulletin,37(4),33-40。
2.
Dai, F. C.、Lee, C. F.、Zhang, X. H.(2001)。A GIS-based Geo-environmental Evaluation for Urban Land-use planning: A Case Study。Engineering Geology,61(4),257-271。
3.
Cutter, S. L.、Mitchell, J. T.、Scott, M. S.(2000)。Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: a case study of Georgetown county, South Carolina。Annals of the Association of American Geographers,90(4),713-737。
4.
Bana e Costa, C. A.、Oliveira, C. S.、Vieira, V.(2008)。Prioritization of Bridges and Tunnels in Earthquake Risk Mitigation Using Multicriteria Decision Analysis: Application to Lisbon。Omega--International Journal of Management Science,36(3),442-450。
5.
Feng, C. M.、Hsieh, C. H.(2009)。Implications of Transport Diversity for Quality of Life。Journal of Urban Planning and Development,135(1),13-18。
6.
Hsieh, C. H.、Su, J. L.、Feng, C. M.(2011)。Disaster Risk Assessment of Highway Bridge from Vulnerability Perspective。Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies,9,1-15。
7.
Jenelius, E.、Petersen, T.、Mattsson, L. G.(2006)。Importance and Exposure in Road Network Vulnerability Analysis。Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice,40(7),537-560。
8.
Levine, J.、Garb, Y.(2002)。Pricing Conditional Promise: Promotion of Accessibility or Mobility。Transport Policy,9(3),179-188。
9.
Remondo, J.、Bonachea, J.、Cendrero, A.(2008)。Quantitative Landslide Risk Assessment and Mapping on the Basis of Recent Occurrences。Geomorphology,94,3-4。
10.
Rygel, L.、O'Sullivan, D.、Yamal, B.(2006)。A Method for Constructing a Social Vulnerability Index。Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change,11,3-741。
11.
Sanchez-Silva, M.、Daniels, M.、Lleras, G.、Patino, D.(2005)。A Transport Network Reliability Model for the Efficient Assignment of Resources。Transportation Research Part B: Methodological,39(1),47-63。
12.
Wang, X. D.、Zhong, X. H.、Liu, S. Z.、Liu, J. G.、Wang, Z. Y.、Li, M. H.(2008)。Regional Assessment of Environmental Vulnerability in the Tibetan Plateau: Development and Application of a New Method。Journal of Arid Environments,72(10),1929-1939。
13.
Yang, L.、Qian, D.(2012)。Vulnerability Analysis of Road Networks。Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology,12(1),105-110。
14.
Gallopin, G. C.(2006)。Linkage between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity。Global Environmental Change,16(3),293-303。
15.
Saaty, Thomas L.(1977)。A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structure。Journal of Mathematical Psychology,15(3),234-281。
16.
吳杰穎、黃昱翔(20110600)。颱洪災害脆弱度評估指標之建立:以南投縣水里鄉為例。都市與計劃,38(2),195-218。
延伸查詢
17.
Turner, B. L. II、Kasperson, Roger E.、Matson, Pamela A.、McCarthy, James J.、Corell, Robert W.、Christensen, Lindsey、Eckley, Noelle、Kasperson, Jeanne X.、Luers, Amy、Martello, Marybeth L.、Polsky, Colin、Pulsipher, Alexander、Schiller, Andrew(2003)。A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science。Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,100(14),8074-8079。
18.
Levinson, D.(2003)。Perspectives on Efficiency in Transportation。International Journal of Transport Management,1(3),145-155。
19.
Cutter, S. L.(1996)。Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards。Progress in Human Geography,20(4),529-539。
會議論文
1.
Nathan, F.(2004)。Water-related Natural Risks as Insecurity。The 5th Pan-European Conference on International Relations。
圖書
1.
UNDP(2004)。Reducing Disaster Risk - A Challenge for Development。New York:United Nations Development Programme。
2.
交通部運輸研究所(2011)。2011年臺灣地區公路容量手冊。
延伸查詢
3.
GTZ(2004)。Guidelines: Risk Analysis--A Basis for Disaster Risk Management。Eschbom:Deutsche Gesellschaft fiir Technische Zusammenarbeit。
4.
Harmeling, A.(2010)。Global Climate Risk Index 2010: Who is Most Vulnerable? Weather-related Loss Events since 1990 and How Copenhagen Needs to Respond。Bonn:Germanwatch e.V.。
5.
IPCC(2001)。Technical Summary-climate Change 2001: Impacts,Adaptation, and Vulnerability。Geneva:Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change。
6.
NOAA(1999)。Community Vulnerability Assessment Tool。Maryland:National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration。
7.
Parry, M. L.、Canziani, O. F.、Palutikof, J. P.、van der Linden, P. J.、Hanson, C. E.(2007)。Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。
8.
UNISDR(2004)。Living with Risk: A Global Review of Disaster Reduction Initiatives。Geneva:United Nations, International Strategy for Disaster Reduction。
9.
UNISDR(2009)。UNISDR Terminology on Disaster Risk Reduction。Geneva:United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction。
10.
Dwyer, A.、Zoppou C.、Nielsen, O.、Day, S.、Roberts, S.(2004)。Quantifying Social Vulnerability: A Methodology for Identifying those at Risk to Natural Hazards。Australia:commonwealth of Australia。
11.
Pelling, M.(2003)。The Vulnerability of Cities-Natural Disasters and Social Resilience。London:Earthscan Publications Ltd.。
12.
Saaty, Thomas L.(1996)。Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process。RWS Publications。
其他
1.
臺北市交通管制工程處(2011)。交通流量調查資料,http://www.bote.taipei.gov.tw/ct.asp?xltem=660485& CtNode=20205&mp=l17031, 2011/04/26。
延伸查詢
2.
Messner, F.,Meyer, V.(2005)。Damage,Vulnerability and Risk Perception-challenges for Flood Damage Research,https://www.ufz.de/export/data/1/26222_Disk_Papiere_2005_13.pdf, 2011/05/14。
圖書論文
1.
Wisner, B.(2002)。Who? What? Where? When? In an Emergency: Notes on Possible Indicators of Vulnerability and Resilience by Phase of the Disaster Management Cycle and Social Actor。Environment and Human Security, Contributions to a workshop in Bonn。Bonn:United Nations University。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
從災害韌性觀點探討流域之脆弱度、衝擊與調適
2.
都會颱洪災害韌性變遷及其與脆弱度、調適力之連結
3.
社區災害韌性的探討:以莫拉克颱風災區重建為例
4.
新北市里層級之水災暨坡地災害脆弱性分析:全盤型脆弱性管理架構的初步應用
5.
鄉鎮市區層級災害耐韌力指標關聯性與權重之DANP分析以及空間聚集性分析之應用
6.
國家氣候變遷與災害脆弱度評估:資本分析法之應用
7.
桃園陂塘活化方案決策評估之研究
8.
臺灣本島網格化災害脆弱度空間分佈評估與OWA分析應用
9.
颱洪災害脆弱度與地方調適策略分析之研究
10.
考量空間關聯之地區洪災脆弱性研究--以雲林縣易淹水地區為例
11.
臺灣西部城際旅客運輸路網脆弱度之評估模式
12.
屏東縣颱洪災害脆弱度評估
13.
脆弱性研究的演變與當前發展
14.
天然災害社會脆弱度指標之建立及評估:以鄉鎮層級為例
15.
城市氣候風險治理評估指標建構之初探
1.
陂塘用地再利用之研究-以桃園市為例
2.
氣候變遷下都市規劃策略指標之研究
3.
地方產業發展評估與策略研擬之研究
4.
流域之颱洪災害衝擊、脆弱度與調適之特性及關聯性分析: 以莫拉克颱風高屏溪流域村(里)為例
5.
因應氣候變遷之洪災脆弱度評估與調適策略規劃
6.
建物地震損害程度評估模式之研究
無相關書籍
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code