臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：流域之颱洪災害衝擊、脆弱度與調適之特性及關聯性分析： 以莫拉克颱風高屏溪流域村（里）為例
作者：劉怡君
作者(外文)：LIU,YI-CHUNG
校院名稱：國立臺北大學
系所名稱：不動產與城鄉環境學系
指導教授：洪鴻智
學位類別：博士
出版日期：2016
主題關鍵詞：脆弱度；衝擊；調適；莫拉克颱風；高屏溪流域；Vulnerability；Impacts；Adaptation；Typhoon Morakot；Kaoping River Basin
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:20
近幾年如莫拉克颱風之慘痛教訓，不但揭露傳統河川治理與個別災害管理途徑之困境，更顯明面對極端氣候事件趨勢，當代風險治理者必須從多元角度理解災害風險跨災害、跨領域、跨行政區之複合屬性，方能提出有效之跨域治理策略。基此，本研究結合傳統災害風險形成機制與氣候變遷災害衝擊理論，從整體流域之空間脈絡，建立颱洪災害風險評估模型。本研究以莫拉克颱風為例，並選取高屏溪流域為研究對象，運用多變量統計模型、空間統計模型、地理資訊系統、問卷調查等方法及工具，系統性地評估各村(里)之颱洪災害脆弱度與莫拉克颱風衝擊程度，同時探討影響民眾調適行為決策的重要因素，並分析「脆弱度－衝擊－調適」之關聯性。
研究結果顯示莫拉克颱風前高屏溪流域內各村（里）之颱洪災害脆弱度，在上中下游有明顯的空間分布與地域性群聚特徵，且導致這些地區高脆弱度的主要因素不盡相同。莫拉克颱風對高屏溪流域所帶來之衝擊亦具有空間群聚特性，高海拔地區為坡地崩塌、橋樑損壞以及農業損失之熱區，中游支流匯流處為淹水熱區，而下游河川東側近出海口地區則為房屋損毀熱區。此外，高達九成民眾於災前會採取短期自主性調適措施，但僅有四成會採取災後調適措施；其中，防災教育、災害經驗與風險認知為影響個人調適行為的重要因素，而社經條件與災害資訊則多不具影響力，甚至社會支持與社會信任可能會降低民眾自主調適意願。
研究同時發現高災害潛勢、高海拔、高度土地開發以及低調適能力等高脆弱度地區，為莫拉克颱風人員或財產損失較嚴重區域。不過傳統認為會導致災害損失的人口與社經脆弱度因子，解釋力則不佳。在影響個人調適行為的村（里）脆弱度面向上，實質環境與土地使用之敏感性具有正相關，但人口社會經濟與調適能力則具有負相關。至於莫拉克颱風之人員與財產損失，則均會提升民眾採取災後調適行為之意願。最後，根據實證分析結果提出流域上中下游之災害風險治理策略建議，以作為相關決策參據。
Typhoon Morakot's devastating impacts reveal great challenges to the traditional approaches to both river basin management and disaster risk management. To cope with the increasing risks posed by extreme weather and climate events, the risk managers have to recognize the complex nature of disaster risk, which is usually multi-hazard, multi-disciplinary, and cross jurisdictional boundaries. Accordingly, effective strategies for disaster risk governance must be developed. Based on an integration of the risk-hazard model and the climate change impact model, this research proposes a novel methodology to assess the disaster risks posed by typhoons. Specifically, we use a multi-criteria assessment which includes multivariate analysis, spatial statistical analysis, geographic information systems and questionnaires. Using the Kaoping River Basin as a case study, we analyze different phases of Typhoon Morakot-induced risks. Firstly, we assess the pre-event vulnerability and the impacts of Typhoon Morakot at the local level. Next, we examine the key factors that influence residents’ decision-making for adaptation to typhoon related risks. Finally, we analyze the relationship among vulnerability, impacts and adaptation.
The research results show that there is an apparent spatial pattern in the local vulnerability among the upstream, midstream and downstream areas. Also, the significant indicators vary among different areas. There is a pronounced spatial clustering of Typhoon Morakot’s impacts. For example, the hotspots of landslide, bridge damage and agriculture loss are located in upstream regions, the flooding hotspots are concentrated in the midstream zones where the tributary joins, and the housing damage is mainly in the lower east downstream near the mouth of Kaoping River. Furthermore, up to 90% of residents adopted a short-term autonomous adaptation before a typhoon arrives. Conversely, less than 40% of residents adopted adaptive measures in the aftermath of typhoon-caused disasters. Those indicates, such as risk perception, disaster experience and public education for disaster risk reduction, are critical in determining personal adaptation. However, socioeconomic status and typhoon warning message do not certainly affect adaptation; rather social support and social trust have negative effects on autonomous adaptation.
The analysis results provide partial support for the correspondence among vulnerability, impacts and adaption. The findings demonstrate that the casualties and property losses caused by Typhoon Morakot are significantly affected by the context of local vulnerability, such as larger hazard-prone areas, higher elevation, more intense land uses and less adaptive capacity. It is noteworthy that neither demographic nor socioeconomic indicators, which are usually seen as key vulnerable factors, are strongly correlated with disaster losses. The findings also indicate that the local sensitivities related to biophysical and land use are positively correlated with personal adaptation, yet there is a significant negative association between personal adaptation and local demographic characteristics or local socioeconomic status. In addition, Typhoon Morakot’s losses are significantly positively related to personal adaptation. In conclusion, we suggest that guidance of risk governance should account for different areas of a river basin in order to enhance effectiveness of disaster risk reduction for future typhoons.
中央災害應變中心（2009）。莫拉克颱風災害應變處置報告第74報。內政部消防署網站，取自http://www.nfa.gov.tw/ContentDetail.aspx? MID=164&UID=164&CID=2747&
　　PID=164，下載日期：2010年6月15日。
王俊明、李心平、李鎮鍵、臧運忠、謝正倫（2010）。莫拉克颱風災害綜覽。中華防災學刊，2(1)，27-34。new window
白仁德、吳杰穎、賴炳樹、黃冠華（2010）。土石流災害下行動弱勢族群疏散避難決策影響因素之研究。建築與規劃學報，11(1)，35-52。new window
江申，謝龍生（ 2010）。綜合流域治理推動芻議。國研科技，25，47-52。
行政院災害防救辦公室（2015）。104年災害防救白皮書。臺北市：行政院。
行政院農業委員會水土保持局（2010）。98年全台重大土石災情總報告。行政院農業委員會水土保持局土石流防災資訊網，取自http://246.swcb.gov.tw/AllFiles/DOC/98%
　　E5%B9%B4%E5%85%A8%E5%8F%B0%E9%87%8D%E5%A4%A7%E5%9C%9F%
　　E7%9F%B3%E7%81%BD%E6%83%85%E7%B8%BD%E5%A0%B1%E5%91%8A1.
　　pdf，下載日期：2010年6月15日。
余桂霖（2012）。多元迴歸分析。臺北市：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
吳宜昭、陳永明、朱容練（2010）。台灣氣候變遷趨勢。國研科技，25，40-46。
吳杰穎（2009）。不同土石流潛勢區居民疏散避難決策與行為之比較。坡地防災學報，8(1)，1-14。
吳杰穎、江宜錦（2008）。臺灣天然災害統計指標體系建構與分析。地理學報，51，65-84。new window
吳杰穎、黃昱翔（2011）。颱洪災害脆弱度評估指標之建立：以南投縣水里鄉為例。都市與計劃，38(2)，195-218。new window
李欣輯、楊惠萱（2011）。坡地災害家戶損失模型之建立與應用。中國土木水利工程學刊，23(4)，437-444。
李欣輯、楊惠萱（2012）。坡地災害社會脆弱度指標評估與應用。都市與計劃，39(4)，375-406。new window
李欣輯、楊惠萱、廖楷民、蕭代基（2010）。水災社會脆弱性指標之建立。建築與規劃學報，10(3)，163-182。new window
李堅明、陳建智（2010）。台灣脆弱性指標建構與評估之研究。都市與計劃，37(1)，71-96。new window
周仲島、于宜強、陳永明、李宗融、張智昇、朱容練、吳宜昭、陳淡容、王安翔、朱吟晨、翁進登、黃柏誠、鄭兆尊（2010）。莫拉克颱風氣象分析。新北市：國家災害防救科技中心。
林文苑（2011）。天然災害老人弱勢族群社經脆弱度評估指標之建立與空間聚集性分析應用。都市與計劃，38(3)，219-243。new window
林冠慧（2004）。全球變遷下脆弱性與適應性研究方法與方法論的探討。全球變遷通訊雜誌，43，33-8。
林冠慧（2011）。流域集水區人類與環境系統脆弱性分析架構之建立：臺灣新竹縣尖石鄉大漢溪上游石門水庫集水區泰雅族部落為例（博士論文）。國立臺灣大學，臺北市。
林冠慧、張長義（2015）。脆弱性研究的演變與當前發展。地理學報，77，49-82。new window
林美聆，王國隆，陳天健，林聖琪（2009）。莫拉克颱風重大土石流災害案例析，地工技術，122，123-132。
林韋秀、廖學誠（2005）。汐止地區店家的洪患災害識覺及調適行為之研究。中華水土保持學報，36(4)，413-427。
林雪美、羅煒婷（2012）。宜蘭冬山河流域洪患時空變遷研究。工程環境會刊，28，63-87。
林震岩（2007）。多變量分析—SPSS 的操作與應用。臺北市：智勝。
邱永芳、謝明志、林雅雯、黃進國、羅冠顯、蔡明邑、陳家隆、袁瑜鎂、汪書瑜、郭庭鳴（2012）。莫拉克颱風造成橋梁損壞之探討。臺北市：交通部運輸研究所。
邱皓政（2005）。量化研究法（二）：統計原理與分析技術：SPSS中文視窗版操作實務詳析。臺北市：雙葉。
洪如江（2009）。坡地災害防治。水利土木科技資訊季刊，46，7-16。
洪如江、林美聆、陳天健、王國隆（2000）。921集集大地震相關的坡地災害、坡地破壞特性與案例分析。地工技術，81，17-32。
洪政耀、林雪美（2010）。新竹縣五峰、尖石鄉坡地災害對居民的災害識覺與調適行為之研究。工程環境會刊，25，23-32。
洪政耀、林雪美（2014）。區域災害系統評估坡地災害風險程度：以臺東縣海端鄉為例。地理學報，75，29-56。new window
洪鴻智（2002）。颱風損害之綜合評估：模糊多準則評估法之應用。臺灣土地研究，4，1-27。new window
洪鴻智（2010）。災害防救與災害風險管理：舊思維的挑戰。建築與規劃學報，10(3)，I-IV。new window
洪鴻智、陳令韡（2012）。颱洪災害之整合性脆弱度評估－大甲溪流域之應用。地理學報，65，79-96。new window
洪鴻智、劉怡君、簡頌愔（2014）。河川流域颱風災害損失與地區脆弱度－莫拉克颱風為例。地理學報，74，87-106。new window
洪鴻智、盧禹廷（2015）。沿海居民的氣候變遷與颱洪災害調適。都市與計劃，42(1)，87-108。new window
科技部（2014）。災害領域行動方案102-106年。臺北市：科技部。
財團法人成大研究發展基金會（2009）。莫拉克颱風重點勘查計畫子計畫一淹水、河海堤重點勘查。新北市：國家災害防救科技中心。
高屏溪流域管理委員會（2009）。高屏溪流域整治綱要檢討計畫(98-103年)規劃報告。屏東縣：經濟部水利署第七河川局。
國立臺灣大學（2011）。強化高屏溪流域因應氣候變遷防洪調適能力研究計畫。臺中市：經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所。
國立臺灣大學、國立中興大學（2009）。莫拉克颱風重點勘查計畫子計畫二-坡地重點勘查（濁水溪、旗山溪流域）。新北市：國家災害防救科技中心。
國家災害防救科技中心（2010）。莫拉克颱風之災情勘查與分析（摘要本）。新北市：國家災害防救科技中心。
國家災害防救科技中心（2015）。災害潛勢圖資說明手冊。新北市：國家災害防救科技中心。
張志新、林又青、王俞婷（2013）。颱風事件之坡地災害衝擊的分級探討。工程環境會刊，31，91-107。
張恒裕（2012）。愛與希望耀動生命力：莫拉克颱風災後重建3周年成果彙編（上）。高雄市：行政院莫拉克颱風災後重建推動委員會。
張荻薇、周功台、楊智堯、王仲宇、陳銘鴻（2009）。高屏溪流域之公路橋梁與邊坡災害。地工技術，122，105-114。
張嘉祥、王貞富（2001）。九二一集集地震磚造歷史街屋震害調查研究。建築學會建築學報，37，93-113。new window
張學聖、廖晉賢（2014）。複合性災害評估架構研究：莫拉克風災為例。都市與計劃，41(3)，305-327。new window
張齡方、蘇明道（2001）。空間資料於洪災損失推估之應用。農業工程學報，47(1)，20-28。
曹建宇、張長義（2008）。地震災害經驗與調適行為之比較研究－以台南縣白河、台中縣東勢居民為例。華岡地理學報，21，52-75。
許明禎、林晏洲（2001）。民眾對公園綠地防災機能認知與避難行為傾向之探討。都市與計劃，28(2)，237-251。new window
許晃雄、陳正達、盧孟明、陳永明、周佳、吳宜昭等（2011）。臺灣氣候變遷科學報告2011。臺北市：行政院國家科學委員會。
郭翡玉（2010）。因應氣候變遷之國土調適策略－以台灣沿海地區為例。都市與計劃，37(1)，47-69。new window
陳亮全、吳杰穎、劉怡君、李宜樺（2007）。土石流潛勢區內居民疏散避難行為與決策之研究：以泰利颱風為例。中華水土保持學報，38(4)，325-340。
陳亮全、洪鴻智、詹士樑、簡長毅（2003）。地震災害風險－效益分析於土地使用規劃之應用：應用HAZ-Taiwan系統。都市與計劃，30(4)，281-299。new window
陳亮全、陳海立（2007）。易致災都市空間發展之探討：以臺北盆地都市水災形成為例。都市與計劃，34(3)，293-315。new window
陳聯光、林聖琪、林又青、王俞婷、林祺岳、陳如琳（2010）。莫拉克颱風降雨與崩塌分佈特性探討。中央氣象局天氣分析與預報研討會暨美華海洋大氣學會第五屆國際海洋大氣研討會，臺北市。
陳韻如、林宣汝、張駿暉、陳永明（2016a）。應用RCP8.5氣候情境評估氣候變遷下之災害風險圖。新北市：國家災害防救科技中心。
陳韻如、林建宏、陳偉柏、施虹如、林宣汝、陳永明（2016b）。極端氣候衝擊下曾文溪流域調適策略之研究評估。新北市：國家災害防救科技中心。
黃書禮、林峰田、詹士樑、陳維斌、李俊霖、葉佳宗（2012）。地方氣候變遷調適計畫規劃作業指引。臺北市：行政院經濟建設委員會。
黃書禮、詹士樑、洪鴻智（2007）。國土保育地區防災空間規劃策略之整合型規劃（第二期）。臺北市：內政部營建署市鄉規劃局。
楊惠萱、陳怡臻、李欣輯（2014）。天然災害社會脆弱度指標之建立及評估: 以鄉鎮層級為例。災害防救科技與管理，3(2)，71 – 93。new window
經建會（2012）。國家氣候變遷調適政策綱領。臺北市：行政院經濟建設委員會。
經濟部水利處（2000）。讓我們看河去。臺北市：經濟部水利處。
經濟部水利署（2006）。易淹水地區水患治理計畫（核定本）。臺北市：經濟部水利署。
經濟部水利署（2009）。莫拉克颱風暴雨量及洪流量分析。臺北市：經濟部水利署。
詹士樑、黃書禮、王思樺（2003）。台北地區洪水災害風險分區劃設之研究。都市與計劃，3(4)，263-280。new window
劉怡君（2016）。極端氣候下的災害調適策略：山區聚落的因應對策。鉅變新視界電子報，16。
劉怡君、陳亮全（2015）。防災社區之回顧與課題。災害防救科技與管理學刊，4(2)，59-81。new window
劉怡君、簡頌愔、洪鴻智、陳亮全（2010）。由空間觀點探討莫拉克颱風災情特性。由空間觀點探討莫拉克颱風災情特性。2010年臺灣災害管理研討會，臺北市。
劉格非、李欣輯（2006）。土石流直接災損評估之研究。中華水土保持學報，37(2)，143-155。
蔡光榮、王弘祐、林金炳、侯峻棕、林昆賢（2000）。921集集大地震誘發大山崩與形成堰塞湖災害初步調查。地工技術，77，93-100。
蕭代基、陳淑惠、丘昌泰、林舒予、李欣輯、郭彥廉、麥王若凡、陳嫈瑜、黃德秀、楊惠萱、范裕康（2007）。九十五年天然災害社會、心理、經濟影響調查：水災與龍王風災。新北市：國家災害防救科技中心。
蕭煥章（2008）。鄉鎮市區水災脆弱性評估模式之研究。華岡地理學報，21，1-18。
謝龍生、劉怡君、曾敏惠（2014）。社區水災環境檢查手冊。新北市：國家災害防救科技中心。
蘇怡如、鄭美孌、王俊豪（2013）。農作物天然災害損失之空間分析。農業經濟叢刊，18(2)，73-119。new window
蘇鼎鈞、王劍虹（2000）。員林地區集集大地震土壤液化評估案例探討。地工技術，81，57-68。
Aall, C., & Norland, I. T. (2004). Indicators for assessing local climate vulnerability. Published in Norwegian only. Report nr. 2/04. Oslo, ProSus/University of Oslo. As sited in Næss, L. O., Norland, I. T., Lafferty, W. M., & Aall, C. (2006). Data and processes linking vulnerability assessment to adaptation decision-making on climate change in Norway. Global Environmental Change, 16(2), 221-233.
Adger, W. N. (1999). Social vulnerability to climate change and extremes in coastal Vietnam. World Development, 27(2), 249-269.
Adger, W. N. (2000). Institutional adaptation to environmental risk under the transition in Vietnam. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90(4), 738-758.
Adger, W. N. (2003). Social capital, collective action and adaptation to climate change. Economic Geography, 79, 38-404.
Adger, W. N. (2006). Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 268-281.
Adger, W. N., Agrawala, S., Mirza, M. M. Q., Conde, C., O’Brien, K., Pulhin, J.,…Takahashi, K. (2007). Assessment of adaptation practices, options, constraints and capacity. In: M. L. Parry, O.F. Canziani, J. P. Palutikof, P. J. van der Linden, & C. E. Hanson (Eds.), Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp.717-743). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Adger, W. N., Brooks, N., Kelly, M., Bentham, G., Agnew, M., & Eriksen, S. (2004). New indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity. Norwich: Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research.
Adger, W. N., Dessai, S., Goulden, M., Hulme, M., Lorenzoni, I., Nelson, D. R.,…Wreford, A. (2009). Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Climate Change, 93(3), 335-354.
Anselin, L. (1995). Local indicators of spatial association—LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27(2), 93-115.
Aragón-Durand, F. (2007). Urbanization and flood vulnerability in the peri-urban interface of Mexico City. Disasters, 31(4), 477-494.
Birkmann, J., & Fernando, N. (2007). Measuring revealed and emergent vulnerabilities of coastal communities to tsunami in Sri Lanka. Disaster, 32(1), 82-105.
Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I., & Wisner, B. (1994). At risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability, and Disasters. Routledge: London.
Boruff, B. J., Emrich, C., & Cutter, S. L. (2005). Erosion hazard vulnerability of US coastal counties. Journal of Coastal Research, 21(5), 932-942.
Brooks, N. (2003). Vulnerability, Risk and Adaptation: A Conceptual Framework. Working Paper 38. Norwich, UK: Norwich Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, University of East Anglia.
Brooks, N., Adger, W. N., & Kelly, P. M. (2005). The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the national level and the implications for adaptation. Global Environmental Change, 15(2), 151-163.
Brouwer, R., Akter, S., Brander, L., & Haque, E. (2007). Socioeconomic vulnerability and adaptation to environmental risk: A case study of climate change and flooding in Bangladesh. Risk Analysis, 27(2), 313-326.
Burton, I., Kates, R. W., & White, G. F. (1978). The Environment as Hazard. New York: Oxford University Press.
Burton, I., Kates, R. W., & White, G. F. (1993). The Environment as Hazard (2nd). New York: Guilford Press.
Chambers, R. (2006). Vulnerability, coping and policy (editorial introduction). IDS Bulletin, 37(4): 33-40.
Clark, G. E., Moser, S. C., Ratick, S. J., Dow, K., Meyer, W. B., Emani, S.,…Schwarz, H. E. (1998). Assessing the vulnerability of coastal communities to extreme storms: The case of Revere, MA, USA. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 3, 59-82.
Cliff, A .D., & Ord, J. K. (1973). Spatial Autocorrelation. London: Pion.
Cliff, A. D., & Ord, J. K. (1981). Spatial Processes: Models and Applications. London: Pion.
Colten, C. E., & Sumpter, A. R. (2009). Social memory and resilience in New Orleans. Natural Hazards, 48(3), 355-364.
Cutter, S. L. (1996). Vulnerability to environmental hazards. Progress in Human Geography, 20(4), 529-539.
Cutter, S. L., Barnes, L., Berry, M., Burton, C., Evans, E., Tate, E., & Webb, J. (2008). A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global Environmental Change, 18(4), 598-606.
Cutter, S. L., Boruff, B. J., & Shirley, W. L. (2003). Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Social Science Quarterly, 84(2), 242-261.
Cutter, S. L., Mitchell, J. T., & Scott, M. S. (2000). Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: A case study of Georgetown County, South Carolina. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90(4), 713-737.
Dow, K., & Downing, T. (1995). Vulnerability research: Where things stand. Human Dimensions Quarterly, 1, 3-5.
Downton, M., & Pielke, R. A. (2005). How accurate are disaster loss data? The case of U.S. flood damage. Natural Hazards, 35(2), 211-228.
Eakin, H. (2005). Institutional change, climate risk, and rural vulnerability: Cases from Central Mexico. World Development, 33(11), 1923-1938.
Eakin, H., & Bojórquez-Tapia, L. A. (2008). Insights into the composition of household vulnerability from multicriteria decision analysis. Global Environmental Change, 18(1), 112-27.
Eakin, H., & Luers, A. (2006). Assessing the vulnerability of social-environmental systems. Annual Review of Environmental Resources, 31, 365-394.
Engle, N. L. (2011). Adaptive capacity and its assessment. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 647-656.
Fontaine, M. M., & Steinemann, A. C. (2009). Assessing vulnerability to natural hazards: Impact-based method and application to drought in Washington State. Natural Hazards Review, 10(1), 11-18.
Füssel H. M. (2007). Vulnerability: A generally applicable conceptual framework for climate change research. Global Environmental Change, 17(2), 155-167.
Gallopín, G. C. (2006). Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 293-303.
Godber, O. F., & Wall, R. (2014). Livestock and food security: Vulnerability to population growth and climate change. Global Change Biology, 20(10), 3092-3102.
Grothmann, T., & Patt, A. (2005). Adaptive capacity and human cognition: The process of individual adaptation to climate change. Global Environmental Change, 15(3), 199-213.
Hewitt, K. (1997). Regions at Risk: A Geographical Introduction to Disasters. Harlow: Longman.
Hutton, D., & Haque, C. E. (2004). Human vulnerability, dislocation and resettlement: Adaptation processes of river-bank erosion-induced displaces in Bangladesh. Disasters, 28(1), 41-62.
IPCC. (2014). Summary for policymakers. In: C. B. Field, V. R. Barros, D. J. Dokken, K. J. Mach, M. D. Mastrandrea, T. E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, K. L. Ebi, Y. O. Estrada, R. C. Genova, B. Girma, E. S. Kissel, A. N. Levy, S. MacCracken, P. R. Mastrandrea, & L. L. White (Eds.), Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp.1-32). Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.
Kasperson, J. X., Kasperson, R. E., Turner II, B. L., AMD Schiller, A., & Hsieh, W. (2005). Vulnerability to global environmental change. In: J. X. Kasperson, & R. E. Kasperson (Eds.), Social Contours of Risk. Vol. II: Risk Analysis Corporations and the Globalization of Risk (pp.245-285). London: Earthscan.
Kuruppu, N. & Liverman, D. (2011). Mental preparation for climate adaptation: The role of cognition and culture in enhancing adaptive capacity of water management in Kiribati. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 657-669.
Lambert, D. (1992). Zero-inflated Poisson regression, with an application to defects in manufacturing. Technometrics, 34(1), 1-14.
Laugé, A., Hernantes, J., & Sarriegi, J. M. (2015). Analysis of disasters impacts and the relevant role of critical infrastructures for crisis management improvement. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 6(4), 424-437.
Lindell, M. K., & Perry, R. W. (2000). Household adoption of earthquake hazard adjustments: A review of research. Environment and Behavior, 32(4), 461-501.
Lindell, M. K., & Perry, R. W. (2012). The protective action decision model: Theoretical modifications and additional evidence. Risk Analysis, 32(4), 616-631.
Lindell, M. K., & Prater, C. S. (2000). Household adoption of seismic hazard adjustments: A comparison of residents in two states. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 18(2), 317-338.
Lindell, M. K., & Prater, C. S. (2002). Risk area residents’ perceptions and adoption of seismic hazard adjustments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(11). 2377-2392.
Lindell, M. K., Lu, J. C., & Prater, C. S. (2005). Household decision making and evacuation in response to Hurricane Lili. Natural Hazards Review, 6(4), 171-179.
Liu, Y. C., Chien, S. Y., Hung, H. C., & Chen, L. C. (2014). Exploring the spatial patterns of disaster impacts caused by Typhoon Morakot. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 37(5), 582-594.
Luers, A. L., Lobell, D. B., Sklar, L. S., Addams, C. L., & Matson, P. A. (2003). A method for quantifying vulnerability, applied to the agricultural system of the Yaqui Valley, Mexico. Global Environmental Change, 13(4), 255-267.
McCarthy J., Canziani O. F., Leary N. A., Dokken D. J., & White K. S. (eds.) (2001). Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.•
Mileti, D. (1993). Communicating public earthquake risk information. In J. Nemec, J. Nigg, & F. Siccardi (Eds.), Prediction and Perception of Natural Hazards. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Miller, M., Paton, D., & Johnston, D. M. (1999). Community vulnerability to volcanic hazard consequences. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 8(4), 255-260.
Moss, R. H., Brenkert, A. L., & Malone, E. L. (2001). Vulnerability to climate change: A quantitative approach. Technical Report PNNL-SA-33642, Pacific Northwest National Laboratories, Richland, WA.
Næss, L. O., Norland, I. T., Lafferty, W. M., & Aall, C. (2006). Data and processes linking vulnerability assessment to adaptation decision-making on climate change in Norway. Global Environmental Change, 16(2), 221-233.
O’Brien, K., Leichenko, R., Kelkar, U., Venema, H., Aandahl, G., Tompkins, A.,…West, J. (2004). Mapping vulnerability to multiple stressors: Climate change and globalization in India. Global Environmental Change, 14(4), 303-313.
Olwig, M. F. (2012). Multi-sited resilience: The mutual construction of “local” and “global” understandings and practices of adaptation and innovation. Applied Geography, 33, 112-118.
Paton, D., & Johnston, D. M. (2001). Disasters and communities: Vulnerability, resilience and preparedness. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 10(4), 270-277.
Posey, J. (2009). The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the municipal level: Evidence from floodplain management programs in the United States. Global Environmental Change, 19(4), 482-493.
Russell, L., Goltz, J. D., & Bourque, L. B. (1995). Preparedness and hazard mitigation actions before and after two earthquakes. Environment and Behavior, 27, 744-770.
Sharma, U., Patwardhan, A., & Parthasarathy, D. (2009). Assessing adaptive capacity to tropical cyclones in the East coast of India: A pilot study of public response to cyclone warning information. Climate Change, 94(1), 189-209.
Sidle, R. C., Taylor, D., Lu, X. X., Adger, W. N., Lowe, D. J., de Lange, W. P.,…Dodson, J. R. (2004). Interactions of natural hazards and society in Austral-Asia: Evidence in past and recent records. Quaternary International, 118-119, 181-203.
Smit, B., Burton, I., Klein, R. J. T. & Street, R. (1999). The science of adaptation: A framework for assessment. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 4, 199-213.
Smit, B., & Wandel, J. (2006). Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 282-292.
Smit, B., Burton, I., Klein, R. J. T., & Wandel, J. (2000). An anatomy of adaptation to climate change and variability. Climate change, 45(1), 223-251.
Smit, B., Pilifosova, O., Burton, I., Challenger, B., Huq, S., Klein, R. J. T., & Yohe, G. (2001). Adaptation to climate change in the context of sustainable development and equity. In J. J. McCarthy, O. F. Canziani, N. A. Leary, D. J. Dokken, & K. S. White (Eds.), Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (pp.877-912). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, J. B., Ragland, S. E., & Pitts, G. J. (1996). A process for evaluating anticipatory adaptation measures for climate change. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 92(1), 229-238.
Smithers, J., & Smit, B. (1997). Human adaptation to climatic variability and change. Global Environmental Change, 7(2), 129-146.
Turner II, B. L., Kasperson, R. E., Matson, P. A., McCarthy, J. J., Corell, R. W., Christensen, L.,… Schiller, A. (2003). A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(14), 8074-8079.
Turner, N. J., Gregory, R., Brooks, C., Failing, L., & Satterfield, T. (2008). From invisibility to transparency: Identifying the implications. Ecology and Society, 13(2), 7.
UNISDR. (2004). Living with Risk: A Global Review of Disaster Reduction Initiatives. Geneva, Switzerland: UNISDR.
UNISDR. (2005). Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015: Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters. Geneva, Switzerland: UNISDR.
van Aalst, M. K., Cannon, T., & Burton, I. (2008). Community level adaptation to climate change: The potential role of participatory community risk assessment. Global Environmental Change, 18(1), 165-179.
White, G. F., & Haas, J. F. (1975). Assessment of Research on Natural Hazards. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
Whitney, D. J., Lindell, M. K., & Nguyen, H. H. D. (2004). Earthquake beliefs and adoption of seismic hazard adjustments. Risk Analysis, 24(1), 87-102.
Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., & Davis, I. (2004). At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disasters (2nd edition). New York: Routledge.
Wood, N. J., Burton, C. G., & Cutter, S. L. (2010). Community variations in social vulnerability to Cascadia-related tsunamis in the U.S. Pacific Northwest. Natural Hazards, 52(2), 369-389.
Yi, C. S., Lee, J. H., & Shim, M. P. (2010). GIS-based distributed technique for assessing economic loss from flood damage: Pre-feasibility study for the Anyang Stream Basin in Korea. Natural Hazards, 55(2), 251-272.
Yohe, G., & Tol, R. S. J. (2002). Indicators for social and economic coping capacity: Moving toward a working definition of adaptive capacity. Global Environmental Change, 12(1), 25-40.
Zahran, S., Brody, S. D., Peacock, W. G., Vedlitz, A., & Grover, H. (2008). Social vulnerability and the natural and built environment: A model of flood casualties in Texas. Disasters, 32(4), 537-560.

 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：904（臺灣：882，外國：22） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1473665 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67289065
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上