:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:桃園陂塘活化方案決策評估之研究
書刊名:都市與計劃
作者:江志成邱英浩 引用關係
作者(外文):Chiang, Chih-chengChiu, Yin-hao
出版日期:2018
卷期:45:3
頁次:頁237-256
主題關鍵詞:陂塘水圳活化永續發展模糊德爾菲分析網絡程序法折衷排序法重要程度-績效水準分析FDMANPVIKORFarm pondIrrigation waterwayRevitalizationSustainable developmentFuzzy Delphi methodAnalytic network processImportance-performance analysisIPA
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:28
  • 點閱點閱:10
陂塘為人工構築之地景,過去做為農業灌溉之用,由於都市發展與經濟環境演變,水利設施興闢造成陂塘經濟功能限縮,使陂塘地形也急遽變遷與轉型,生態環境亦受到衝擊與破壞,面臨快速消失的危機。如何活化陂塘及永續發展,和經濟及城市永續發展或灌溉技術日益密切及重要,成為必須面對的重要課題。本研究將以兩個以上不同研究方法針對陂塘活化過程分析探討,採用模糊德爾菲方法(Fuzzy Delphi Method, FDM)研擬評估因子,再以分析網路程序法(Analytic Network Process, ANP)決策模式工具,求取各待決方案的優先順序權值,依此選出最佳陂塘活化與永續發展發展方向與模式。最終以折衷排序法(塞爾維亞語VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje, VIKOR)與重要程度-績效水準分析(Importance-Performance Analysis, IPA)進行方案現況滿意度之評估,並提出未來可改善之處。研究結果發現陂塘活化模式中,透過限制開發維持陂塘自然環境之完整性為最優先之方案,且可知環境保護限制開發為最優先需改善之方案,其驗證將可作為桃園陂塘整體發展關鍵評估準則與方案。
As a specific manmade landscape, farm ponds were mainly used for agricultural irrigation. Due to the urban development and economic environment change, the function of farm ponds has decreased while the construction of the water conservancy facilities increased. It also resulted in the crisis of the farm ponds vanishing. In recent years, as the global warming and climate change become more intensive, farm ponds accidentally play the important role for palliation. Therefore, the issue to revitalize the farm ponds and make the environment more sustainable, while keeping promoting the economic growth and developing the technology of irrigation has got critical. In this research, Fussy Delphi method was applied to propose evaluation indicators of farm ponds conservation and regeneration projects. Afterwards, the study applied Analytic Network Process method through group discussion to obtain the priority value of each project. Accordingly, we found the optimal pattern of the farm ponds revitalization and the way for sustainable development. Finally, we assessed the satisfaction of the revitalization projects by VIKOR and Importance- Performance Analysis was applied to score the importance and satisfaction of the indicators. This study focuses on the farm ponds in Taoyuan and the key guidelines and the revitalization project mechanism of the farm ponds are discussed by considering the stakeholders, such as the public sector, developers, landlords, conservation group and the communities. We set up the assessment model through spatial analysis and expert questionnaire methods. The result shows that the best pattern of revitalization is limiting the exploitation to maintain the natural environment integrity of the farm ponds. This research is expected to be a reference for local government to evaluate the development projects of the farm ponds and set up the revitalization policies in the future.
期刊論文
1.陳桓敦、鍾政偉、蔡進祥、王維民(20081000)。桃園地區埤塘永續觀光之發展策略研究。休閒暨觀光產業研究,3(2),105-122。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Opricovic, S.、Tzeng, G. H.(2004)。Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS。European Journal of Operational Research,156(2),445-455。  new window
3.Hawes, J. M.、Rao, C. P.(1985)。Using importance-performance analysis to develop health care marketing strategies。Journal of Health Care Marketing,5(4),19-25。  new window
4.吳杰穎、黃昱翔(20110600)。颱洪災害脆弱度評估指標之建立:以南投縣水里鄉為例。都市與計劃,38(2),195-218。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Opricovic, S.(1998)。Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems。Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade,2(1),5-21。  new window
6.Liou, J. J. H.、Tsai, C. Y.、Lin, R. H.、Tzeng, G. H.(2011)。A modified VIKOR multiple-criteria decision method for improving domestic airlines service quality。Journal of Air Transport Management,17(2),57-61。  new window
7.王价巨、張馨心(20160600)。埤塘與滯洪空間關聯性探討--以桃園為例。都市與計劃,43(2),157-187。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.翁婉茹(20071000)。水圳從自然、文化、休閒角度再利用。農政與農情,184=421,78-80。  延伸查詢new window
9.Blayac, T.、Mathé, S.、Rey-Valette, H.、Fontaine, P.(2014)。Perceptions of the services provided by pond fish farming in Lorraine (France)。Ecological Economics,108,115-123。  new window
10.Chen, Q.、Guo, X.、Hua, G.、Li, G.、Feng, R.、Liu, X.(2017)。Migration and degradation of swine farm tetracycline's at the river catchment scale: Can the multi-pond system mitigate pollution risk to receiving rivers?。Environmental Pollution,220(B),1301-1310。  new window
11.Hüse, B.、Szabó, S.、Deák, B.、Tóthmérésza, B.(2016)。Mapping an ecological network of green habitat patches and their role in maintaining urban biodiversity in and around Debrecen city (Eastern Hungary)。Land Use Policy,57,574-581。  new window
12.Kristensen, S. B. P.、Busck, A. G.、Van der Sluis, T.、Gaube, V.(2016)。Patterns and drivers of farm-level land use change in selected European rural landscapes。Land Use Policy,57,786-799。  new window
13.Sanfo, S.、Barbier, B.、Dabiré, I. W. P.、Vlek, P. L. G.、Fonta, W. M.、Ibrahim, B.、Barry, B.(2017)。Rainfall variability adaptation strategies: An ex-ante assessment of supplemental irrigation from farm ponds in southern Burkina Faso。Agricultural Systems,152,80-89。  new window
14.Shih, W. Y.(2017)。Greenspace patterns and the mitigation of land surface temperature in Taipei metropolis。Habitat International,60,69-80。  new window
15.Ishikawa, Akira、Amagasa, Michio、Shiga, Tetsuo、Tomizawa, Giichi、Tatsuta, Rumi、Mieno, Hiroshi(1993)。The max-min Delphi method and fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy integration。Fuzzy Sets and Systems,55(3),241-253。  new window
16.Matzler, Kurt、Bailom, Franz、Hinterhuber, Hans H.、Renzl, Birgit、Pichler, Johann(2004)。The asymmetric relationship between attribute-level performance and overall customer satisfaction: A reconsideration of the importance-performance analysis。Industrial Marketing Management,33(4),271-277。  new window
17.Hollenhorst, Steve、Olson, David、Fortney, Ronal(1992)。Use of importance-performance analysis to evaluate state park cabins: The case of the West Virginia State Park System。Journal of Park and Recreation Administration,10(1),1-11。  new window
會議論文
1.方偉達、陸國先、張尊國(2004)。桃園臺地陂塘冬季鳥類微棲地空間形態分析。2004年農業工程研討會。臺北:中國農業工程學會。202-203。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳其澎(2012)。以桃園縣陂圳空間網絡為基礎的一個國土治理架構的擬議。第四屆發展研究年會--跨X:風險與正義。  延伸查詢new window
3.謝勝彥(2004)。提升桃園水利會灌區陂塘供水潛能之探討。桃園大圳水資源暨營運管理學術研討會。桃園。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.臺灣歷史資源經理學會(2009)。國家重要濕地生態環境調查及復育計畫--活化陂塘區域地景策略之行動計畫。桃園:桃園縣政府。  延伸查詢new window
2.桃園縣政府文化局(2004)。92年桃園歷史建築調查計畫之石門大圳灌溉系統陂塘調查研究第一期計畫。桃園:桃園縣政府。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳其澎、羅婷婷、鄭國賢、劉厚君(2003)。桃園大圳及光復圳系統陂塘調查研究。臺北:客家委員會。  延伸查詢new window
4.Turner, B. L. II、Skole, D.、Sanderson, S.、Fischer, G.、Fresco, L.、Leemans, R.(1995)。Land-use and land-cover change: Science/research plan。IGBP。  new window
學位論文
1.楊淑玲(1994)。桃園臺地之水利社會空間組織的演化(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃浩珽(2007)。以土地使用限制補償觀點探討桃園埤塘資源保存維護策略之研究(碩士論文)。國立台北科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.范佐東(1997)。桃園台地埤塘型態分佈與運作機制之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.鄭滄濱(2001)。軟體組織提昇人員能力之成熟度模糊評估模式(碩士論文)。國立臺灣科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Clawson, M.、Stewart, C. L.(1965)。Land use information, a critical survey of U.S. statistics including possibilities for greater uniformity。The Johns Hopskins Press。  new window
2.方偉達(2009)。城鄉--生態規劃、設計與批判。六合出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.張紹勳(2012)。模糊多準則評估法及估計。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.行政院農業委員會(2007)。農業水資源管理策略與灌溉管理相關業務檢討。臺北:行政院農業委員會。  延伸查詢new window
5.財團法人桃園農田水利研究發展基金會(2007)。桃園地區陂塘多功能營運分析研究及初步規劃。桃園:桃園縣政府。  延伸查詢new window
6.財團法人農業工程研究中心(2011)。桃園埤圳濕地調查作業。桃園:財團法人農業工程研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳正祥(1993)。臺灣地誌(原敷明產業地理研究所報告第94號)。臺北:南天書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.Saaty, Thomas L.(1996)。Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process。RWS Publications。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE