能源憲章條約、德國廢核爭端與國際投資仲裁 : Vattenfall v. Germany一案之探討_

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料

題名：	能源憲章條約、德國廢核爭端與國際投資仲裁 : Vattenfall v. Germany一案之探討
書刊名：	歐美研究
作者：	李貴英
作者(外文)：	Li, Catherine
出版日期：	2014
卷期：	44:3
頁次：	頁305-358
主題關鍵詞：	能源憲章條約；國際投資爭端解決中心；逐步廢核；規制措施；徵收補償；Energy Charter Treaty；ECT；), International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes；ICSID；Nuclear phase-out；Regulatory measures；Compensation for expropriation
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:2 共同引用:3 點閱:136

2011年3月日本福島核災發生後，若干國家 (特別是德國) 改弦易轍，終結使用核能而大幅改變其能源政策。2012年5月，在德國境內擁有兩座核電廠之瑞典能源公司Vattenfall針對德國逐步廢核之決定，向國際投資爭端解決中心提出仲裁聲請。本文擬就德國採取逐步廢止核能使用之背景，以及Vattenfall公司與地主國間之衝突做一介紹。本文亦擬就本案涉及重大公共政策之層面與國際投資法核心議題所引發之爭議進行分析。

以文找文

After the Fukushima disaster in March 2011, a number of coun-tries, most notably Germany, dramatically changed their energy poli-cies in order to close nuclear power plants. In May 2012, the Swedish energy company Vattenfall, an investor controlling two nuclear power plants in Germany, filed a request for arbitration against Germany at the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) regarding the German nuclear phase-out. This article pro-vides background on the introduction and phasing out of nuclear en-ergy in Germany, as well as the conflict between Vattenfall and the host state. This article also analyzes important public policy aspects of this particular case with respect to core elements of international in-vestment law.

以文找文

期刊論文
1.	Abdala, M. A.(2009)。Key damage compensation issues in oil and gas international arbitration cases。American University International Law Review，24(3)，539-570。
2.	Abdala, M. A.、Spiller, P. T.(2003)。Damage valuation of indirect expropriation in international arbitration cases。American Review of International Arbitration，14，447-460。
3.	Aisbett, E.、Karp, L.、McAusland, C.(2010)。Compensation for indirect expropriation in international investment agreements: Implications of national treatment and rights to invest。Journal of Globalization and Development，1(2)，1-33。
4.	Appleton, Barry(2002)。Regulatory takings: The international law perspective。New York University of Environmental Law Journal，11(1)，35-48。
5.	Baughen, S.(2006)。Expropriation and environmental regulation: The lessons of NAFTA chapter eleven。Journal of Environmental Law，18(2)，207-228。
6.	Birmingham, Robert(1985)。Notes on the reliance interest。Washington Law Review，60(2)，217-266。
7.	Boute, A.(2009)。The potential contribution of international investment protection law to combat climate change。Journal of Energy and Natural Resources Law，27(3)，333-376。
8.	Choudhury, B.(2008)。Recapturing public power: Is investment arbitration engagement of the public interest contributing to the democratic deficit?。Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law，41(3)，775-832。
9.	Collins, D.(2009)。Reliance based remedies at ICSID。Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business，29(1)，195-216。
10.	Desierto, D. A.(2012)。ICESCR minimum core obligations and investment: Recasting the non-expropriation compensation model during financial crises。George Washington International Law Review，44(3)，473-520。
11.	Dolzer, R.、Bloch, F.(2003)。Indirect expropriation: Conceptual realignments?。International Law Forum du Droit International，5(3)，155-165。
12.	Fortier, L. Y.、Drymer, S. L.(2004)。Indirect expropriation in the law of international investment: I know it when I see it, or caveat investor。ICSID Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal，19(2)，293-327。
13.	Franck, T. M.(2008)。On proportionality of countermeasures in international law。American Journal of International Law，102(4)，715-767。
14.	Gunton, D. L.(2007)。Liability begins at home: An alternative compensation scheme for NAFTA expropriations。New York University Journal of International Law and Politics，40(1)，219-257。
15.	Han, X.(2007)。The application of the principle of proportionality in Teemed v. Mexico。Chinese Journal of International Law，6(3)，635-652。
16.	Isakoff, P. D.(2013)。Defining the scope of indirect expropriation for international investments。Global Business Law Review，3(2)，189-209。
17.	Kloepfer, Michael、劉家豪(20120600)。迷途的廢核之旅？--論德國廢核立法過程中的程序問題。中原財經法學，28，71-116。延伸查詢
18.	Kriebaum, U.(2007)。Partial expropriation。Journal of World Investment & Trade，8(1)，69-84。
19.	Lawrence, J. C.(2006)。Chicken little revisited: NAFTA regulatory expropriations after Methanex。Georgia Law Review，41(1)，261-309。
20.	Li, C.(2005)。Regulatory expropriations: Precedents, principles and prospects。Cheng-chi Law Review，86，321-375。
21.	Marlles, Justin R.(2007)。Public purpose, private losses: Regulatory expropriation and environmental regulation in international investment law。Journal of Transnational Law and Policy，16(2)，275-336。
22.	Moloo, Rahim、Jacinto, Justin(2011)。Environmental and health regulation: Assessing liability under investment treaties。Berkeley Journal of International Law，29(1)，1-65。
23.	Mostafa, Ben(2008)。The sole effects doctrine, police powers and indirect expropriation under international law。Australian International Law Journal，15(1)，267-296。
24.	Nathanson, R. A.(2013)。The revocation of clean-energy investment economic-support systems as indirect expropriation post- Ny- komb: A spanish case analysis。Iowa Law Review，98(1)，863-904。
25.	Newcombe, A.(2005)。The boundaries of regulatory expropriation in international law。ICSID Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal，20(1)，1-54。
26.	Opaluwa, G.(2011)。Effective compensation for expropriation of foreign investment。Coventry Law Journal，16(2)，1-16。
27.	Radi, Yannick(2012)。Realizing human rights in investment treaty arbitration: A perspective from within the international investment law toolbox。North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation，37(4)，1107-1185。
28.	Ratner, S. R.(2008)。Regulatory takings in institutional context: Beyond the fear of fragmented international law。American Journal of International Law，102(3)，475-528。
29.	Salazar, A. R.(2010)。NAFTA chapter 11, regulatory expropriation, and domestic counter-advertising law。Arizona Journal of International & Comparative Law，27(1)，31-82。
30.	Simmons, J. B.(2012)。Valuation in investor-state arbitration: Toward a more exact science。Berkeley Journal of International Law，30(1)，196-250。
31.	Spears, Suzanne A.(2010)。The quest for policy space in a new generation of international investment agreements。Journal of International Economic Law，13(4)，1037-1075。
32.	Stone, Sweet A.(2010)。Investor-state arbitration: Proportionality's new frontier。Law and Ethics of Human Rights，4(1)，47-76。
33.	Vandevelde, Kenneth J.(2010)。A unified theory of fair and equitable treatment。New York University Journal of International Law and Politics，43(1)，43-106。
34.	Wâlde, T. W.、Kolo, A.(2001)。Environmental regulation, investment protection and ‘regulatory taking’ in international law。International and Comparative Law Quarterly，50(4)，811-848。
35.	Walde, T. W.、Hobér, K.(2005)。The first Energy Charter Treaty arbitral award。Journal of International Arbitration，22(2)，104。
36.	李貴英(20050600)。從契約義務到條約義務--論Salini Costruttori S.p.A. and Italstrade S.p.A. v. the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan--案管轄權裁定。臺灣國際法季刊，2(2)，115-159。延伸查詢
37.	Gudofsky, J. L.(2000)。Shedding light on Article 1110 of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) concerning expropriations: An environmental case study。Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business，21(1)，243-315。
38.	Reisman, W. Michael、Sloane, Robert D.(2003)。Indirect Expropriation and its Valuation in the Bit Generation。British Yearbook of International Law，74(1)，115-150。

研究報告
1.	Yannaca-Small, C.(2004)。Indirect expropriation and the right to regulate in international investment law。

圖書
1.	Bishop, R. Doak、Crawford, James、Reisman, W. Michael(2005)。Foreign investment disputes: Cases, materials and commentary。The Hague：Kluwer Law International。
2.	Dugan, C.、Rubins, N. D.、Wallace, D.、Sabahi, B.(2008)。Investor-state arbitration。Oxford：Oxford University Press。
3.	Energy Charter Secretariat(2012)。Expropriation regime under the Energy Charter Treaty。Brussels, Belgium：Energy Charter Secretariat。
4.	Marboe, Irmgard(2009)。Calculation of compensation and damages in international investment law。Oxford：Oxford University Press。
5.	Newcombe, A.、Paradell, L.(2009)。Law and practice of investment treaties'Standards of treatment。Leiden, the Netherlands：Kluwer Law International。
6.	Vandevelde, Kenneth J.(2009)。U.S. international investment agreements。Oxford University Press。
7.	World Bank(1992)。Legal framework for the treatment of foreign investment: Guidelines。Washington, DC：World Bank。
8.	李貴英(2004)。國際投資法專論--國際投資爭端之解決。台北：元照出版有限公司。延伸查詢
9.	Ripinsky, Sergey、Williams, Kevin(2008)。Damages in international investment law。British Institute of International and Comparative Law。

其他
1.	Atomic nightmare: Kriimmel accident puts question mark over Germany nuclear future，http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/atomic-nightmare_kmemmel-accident_puts_question-mark-over-germany-s_nuclear-future-a-63 5788.html， 2009/07/13。
2.	Bernasconi, N.(2009)。Background paper on Vattenfall v. Germany arbitration，http://www.iisd.org/sites/default/files/pdf/2009/background_vatte nfall_vs_germany.pdf。
3.	Bernasconi-Osterwalder, N.，Hoffmann, R. T.(2012)。The German nuclear phase-out put to the test in international investment arbitration? :Background to the new dispute Vattenfall v.Germany，http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2012/german_nuclear_phase_out.pdf。
4.	Energy, Charter。Investor-state dispute settlement cases，http://www.encharter.org/index.php?id=213&L=1%2F%5C%5C%5C%5C%27。
5.	Energy Charter Secretariat(2004)。The Energy Charter Treaty and re¬lated documents，http://www.encharter.org/ file admin/user_upload/document/EN.pdf。
6.	Wiesmann, G.(20120613)。Eon seeks €8bn over nuclear phase-out，http://www_ft.com/cms/s/0/485529b0-b559-l Iel-ad93-00144feabdc0.html#axzz35 yzYHV7w。
7.	German nuclear shutdown unlawful(20140114)。World Nuclear News，http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/C-German-nuclear-shutdown-unlawful-1401131.html。
8.	ICSID。Vattenfall AB and others v. Federal Republic of Germany，https ://icsid.worldbank.org/ ICSID/FrontServlet?requestType CasesRH&reqFrom=ListCase s&caseld= C2220&actionVal=viewCase。
9.	Power-technology。Brunsbüttel Nuclear Power Plant, Germany，http://www_power-technology.com/projects/brun sbuttel-nuclear/。
10.	Vattenfall(2012)。Annual report 2011，http://www.vattenfall. com/en/file/2011_Annual_Report.pdf_20332206.pdf。
11.	(20120712)。Vattenfall says suing Germany over nuclear exit，http://www.nuclearpowerdaily.com/reports/Vattenfall_says_suing_Germany_over_nuclear_exit_999_ html。
12.	Wetterfors, J.(2005)。The first investor-state arbitration award under the 1994 Energy Charter Treaty Nykomb Synergetics Technology Holding Ab, Sweden (“Nykomb”）vs. the Republic of Latvia—A case comment. Transnational Dispute Management, 2,1，http://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/ article. asp?key=373。

圖書論文
1.	Bronfman, M. K.(2006)。Fair and equitable treatment: An evolving standard。Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law。The Hague, the Netherlands：Martinus Nijhoff。
2.	Coe, J. ,Jr.、Rubins, N.(2005)。Regulatory expropriation and the Teemed case: Context and contributions。International investment law and arbitration: Leading cases from the ICSID, NAFTAy bilateral treaties and customary international law。London：Cameron。
3.	Kingsbury, B.、Schill, S. W.(2010)。Public law concepts to balance investors' rights with state regulatory actions in the public interest—The concept of proportionality。International investment law and comparative public law。Oxford, UK：Oxford University Press。
4.	Laird, I. A.(2004)。Betrayal, shock and outrage—Recent developments in NAFTA article 1105。NAFTA investment law and arbitration: Past issues, current practice, future prospects。New York：Transnational。
5.	Paulsson, J.、Douglas, Z.(2004)。Indirect expropriations in investment treaty arbitrations。Arbitrating foreign investment disputes: Procedural and substantive legal aspects。The Hague, the Netherlands：Kluwer Law International。
6.	Schreuer, C. H.(2008)。Selected standards of treatment available under the Energy Charter Treaty。Investment protection and the Energy Charter Treaty。Huntington, NY：JurisNet。
7.	Walde, T. W.(1996)。International investment under the 1994 Energy Charter Treaty。The Energy Charter Treaty: An east-west gateway for investment and trade。The Hague, the Netherlands：Kluwer Law International。

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	投資人-地主國爭端解決機制的正當性危機與轉機--(CP)TPP和歐越IPA之制度改革分析
2.	論環保條款於投資協定之新定位
3.	條約衝突的類型、解釋、與制度性限制--國際投資仲裁之例
4.	迷途的廢核之旅？--論德國廢核立法過程中的程序問題
5.	「事前立法」對國家履行人權義務之必要性--以國家規制權與國家契約中之穩定條款為核心
6.	從契約義務到條約義務--論Salini Costruttori S.p.A. and Italstrade S.p.A. v. the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan一案管轄權裁定

1.	論外國投資人與地主國國際投資仲裁機制中之反訴及相關義務
2.	投資條約仲裁下的規範衝突與正當性危機—以公平與公正待遇為中心

無相關書籍

無相關著作

1.	球薑酮合倂抗癌藥對抑制肝癌細胞生長之評估
2.	寄/記憶：離散藝術家侯錦郎、夏卡爾的跨國自我再現
3.	多元對立？從服務使用者探原住民族家庭使用兒少服務方案之經驗--以某縣市兒少中心為例
4.	大臺北地區成人高熱量與空熱量食物攝取行爲及影響因素之分析
5.	夏目漱石〈掛軸〉與高濂《遵生八牋》
6.	The Impact of Social Milieu on EFL Learner's L2 Motivation
7.	Multi-Dimensional Course Design for Students at Tertiary Education: An Exploratory Study of Its Impacts on Learners' Motivation, Strategies and Self-Regulated Learning
8.	國內北部某大學教學評鑑問卷之研究
9.	從意識經驗的引導到活出天主的肖像
10.	癌末病情告知的倫理兩難
11.	《論語》中喪禮的教化功能
12.	神聖、他人與倫理
13.	微生物轉麩胺醯胺酶之基因選殖及在大腸桿菌中表現
14.	弘光科大103學年實習課程自我檢核--一個校務研究報告
15.	胡錦濤時期中共對臺政策研究

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫