:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:學校運動場館非使用價值經濟效益評估之研究--以大專校院運動場館為例
書刊名:臺灣體育運動管理學報
作者:陳逸政 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, I-cheng
出版日期:2014
卷期:14:1
頁次:頁145-167
主題關鍵詞:願付價格願受補償迴歸模型支付卡法Tobit模型Willingness to payWTPWillingness to acceptWTARegression modelPayment cardTobit model
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:104
  • 點閱點閱:49
本研究主要目的在探討學校運動場館假設市場價值效益評估,以檢視學校運動場館非經濟效益之影響,並改善成本效益分析無法納入非經濟性影響效果之因素。本研究方法以自行發展之「學校運動場館條件評估問卷」進行問卷調查,針對北部某大學400名游泳館受訪者為樣本,透過條件評估法(contingentvaluation method, CVM)之支付卡法為誘導支付工具,讓學校游泳館受訪者填寫願付價格(WTP)與願受補償(WTA)。結果顯示,游泳館受訪者在Probit、Logit與Tobit迴歸模型下,「平均每次使用時間」、「健康休閒認知」構面顯著影響學校運動場館非使用效益之WTP模型,學校每學期之運動場館之非使用效益價值約為9,274,953元至18,797,660元,每人平均願付價格落在311.47至631.26元之間。結論:學校運動場館管理者應制定合理之價格,並重視學校運動場館之使用品質與管理,以增加使用率,進而提升運動場館使用效率。
Purpose: This study is aiming to investigate the use benefits of school sports facilities by using the contingent valuation method (CVM), examining the effects of non-use value benefits and improving the factors of cost-benefit analysis that could overlook non-economic effects. Methods: A questionnaire, "The Assessment of Conditions for Sports Facilities," was designed and administered to 400 natatorium users from a university in Northern Taiwan. A Payment Card Method in CVM was selected as the elicitation format, ensuring that the 400 respondents could liberally fill in an amount based on their willingness to pay (WTP) and their willingness to accept (WTA) by using the natatorium. Results: The natatorium users under the Probit, Logit, and Tobit regression models, showed that "average time per use" and "recognition of health and leisure" significantly affected the non-use benefits in the WTP model, and that the value of non-use of the sport facilities ranged from approximately NT$ 9,274,953 to NT$ 18,797,660 per semester. The amount that average people are willing to pay ranges from NT$ 311.47 to NT$ 631.26. Conclusion: The administrators of the sports facilities should establish a reasonable price range and value the importance of quality and management of sports facilities to increase the utilization rate, and thereby raise the use-effectiveness.
期刊論文
1.董志明、郭孟軒、陳佳欣、黃戊田(20121200)。應用條件評估法評估臺南市一級古蹟之遊憩效益。嘉南學報. 人文類,38,457-468。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.吳珮瑛、吳巽庚、楊壽麟、吳麗敏(20070600)。條件評估選擇式資料的理論詮釋與實證檢視--對臺灣戶外遊憩效益評估研究的一些啟示。戶外遊憩研究,20(2),1-37。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Ronald, G. C.、Laura, T.(1999)。Unbiased value estimates for environmental goods:A cheap talk design for the contingent valuation method。The American Economic Review,89(3),649-665。  new window
4.Siegfried, J.、Zimbalist, A.(2000)。The economics of sports facilities and their construction。Journal of Economic Perspectives,14,95-114。  new window
5.Thompson, M. S.、Read, J. L.、Lian, M.(1984)。Feasibility of willingness-to-pay measurement in chronic arthritis。Medical Decision Making,4,195-215。  new window
6.廖尹華、鄭志富(20120600)。大學運動設施提供社區休閒服務績效評估之研究。教育科學研究期刊,57(2),95-124。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Hanemann, M. W.(1994)。Valuing the environment through contingent valuation。Journal of Economic Perspectives,8,19-43。  new window
8.Johannesson, M.、Jonsson, B.(1991)。Willingness to pay for antihypertensive therapy-results of a Swedish pilotstudy。Journal of Health Economics,10,461-474。  new window
9.Johannesson, M.、Johansson, P. O.、O'Conor, R.(1996)。The value of private safety versus the value of public safety。Journal of Risk and Uncertainty,13,263-275。  new window
10.Portney, P. R.(1994)。The contingent valuation debate: Why economists should care。Journal of Economic Perspectives,8,3-17。  new window
11.康正男、葉允棋、林謙如(20100600)。消費體驗、參與動機、顧客滿意及顧客忠誠之研究--以臺灣大學溫水游泳池為例。臺灣體育運動管理學報,10(2),65-85。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.許富淑(20100500)。大專學生選修游泳課之學習動機、學習滿意度與學習成效之研究。輔仁大學體育學刊,9,66-83。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Ciriacy-Wantrup, S. V.(1947)。Capital returns from soil conservation practices。Journal of Farm Economics,29(4),1181-1196。  new window
14.朱文增(200605)。臺灣職業棒球在天母與新莊球場比賽之經濟效益評估--以2004年球季為例。休閒運動期刊,5,185-196。  延伸查詢new window
15.Barget, E.、Gouguet, J. J.(2007)。The total economic value of sporting events: Theory and practice。Journal of Sport Economics,8(2),165-182。  new window
16.Johnson, B. K.、Whitehead, J. C.(2000)。Value of public goods from sport stadiums: The CVM approach。Contemporary Economic Policy,18(1),48-58。  new window
17.Johnson, B. K.、Groothuis, P. A.、Whitehead, J. C.(2001)。The value of public goods generated by a major league sport team: the CVM approach。Journal of Sport Economics,2(1),6-21。  new window
18.葉公鼎(20050600)。提升臺灣公共運動設施營運人員專業知能的策略。國民體育季刊,34(2)=145,24-30+115。  延伸查詢new window
19.方進隆、黃泰諭(20110900)。我國學生體適能政策分析。中華體育季刊,25(3)=98,451-461。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.王慶堂(20080300)。臺灣運動休閒產業發展策略之研究。管理實務與理論研究,2(1),131-148。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.劉以德(20080500)。運動賽會經濟分析:條件評估法之運用。福爾摩沙體育學刊,2,45-53。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.吳珮瑛、謝雯華(19950500)。環境財需求函數之估計:封閉式條件評估模型之比較分析。農業經濟叢刊,1(1),1-46。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.董至聖(20030200)。SWOT分析在學校體育館行銷策略之運用--以宜蘭技術學院體育館為例。大專體育,64,55-64。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.郭仁宗、李豪(2010)。臺灣運動健身俱樂部之整合性研究。2010年第三屆運動科學暨休閒遊憩管理學術研討會。國立屏東教育大學。165-185。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Johnson, B. K.、Whitehead, J. C.、Mason, D. S.、Walker, G. J.(2006)。Willingness to pay for amateur sport and recreation programs。Boone, NC:Appalachian State University。  new window
學位論文
1.林倚霈(2006)。社區體育之效益評估研究--以南投縣上安社區為例(碩士論文)。雲林科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.Davis, R.(1963)。The Value of Outdoor Recreation: An Economic Study of the Maine Woods(博士論文)。Harvard University。  new window
圖書
1.鄭良一(2002)。全球運動場館建築--涵蓋100個國家的田野調查。台北市:加斌有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.行政院體育委員會(2011)。中華民國體育白皮書。臺北市:行政院體育委員會。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳明隆(2007)。SPSS統計應用學習實務--問卷分析與應用統計。臺北市:五南。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳順宇(2009)。迴歸分析。臺北:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.Mitchell, Robert Cameron、Carson, Richard T.(1989)。Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method。Washington, DC:Resources for the Future Press。  new window
6.Kotler, Philip、Ang, S. H.、Leong, S. M.、Tan, C. T.(2003)。Marketing management: An Asian perspective。Prentice Hall。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE