:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:世界各主要國家高速鐵路公司營運績效評估之研究
書刊名:商管科技季刊
作者:黃俊穎吳泰熙 引用關係簡呈企
作者(外文):Huang, Chun-yingWu, Tai-hsiChien, Chen-chi
出版日期:2015
卷期:16:1
頁次:頁113-143
主題關鍵詞:高速鐵路績效評估資料包絡分析法環境變數High-speed railwaysPerformance evaluationDEAEnvironment variable
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:6
  • 點閱點閱:20
高速鐵路因為具有安全、快速且大量運輸旅客之特性,串起了城市與城市間更為緊密的溝通,目前已經成為各國政府在規劃其運輸網路的重要選項。由於興建高速鐵路的成本較一般鐵路高出許多,如何有效率地透過營運後的績效表現來盡速回收其在興建時期的投資成本,考驗著各國高速鐵路公司的營運管理能力。本文首先以國際鐵路聯盟(UIC)所公布之高速鐵路會員國進行資料蒐集,並參考相關文獻找出投入項變數、產出項變數、及環境變數以做為評估基礎。除了使用傳統資料包絡分析法來對世界各國高速鐵路公司之營運績效進行評比外,亦使用了三階段資料包絡分析法來排除環境因素對於受評單位可能帶來的干擾,以求算出更為公允之技術效率值。由分析結果來看,台灣高速鐵路公司三年平均之技術效率與純技術效率值雖然皆位於荷蘭與日本之後,但仍處於領先族群,優於南韓、德國、及法國等國。此外,我們比較排除環境因素前後之差異後發現,效率值確實有顯著之差異,例如排除環境變數導致之影響後,台灣高速鐵路公司三年之效率值皆為100%,顯示本文所選取之環境變數對於高速鐵路公司之營運效率有重大之影響,此項結果可做為其他即將投入高速鐵路產業之國家作為整體環境評估的參考。
Due to the characteristics of safety, high speed and capability of transporting high volume of passengers, high-speed railway has shortened the length of physical geography and played as a role of connectors between cities. It now has become the preference of governments around the world to design its transportation network. However, the cost of constructing a high-speed railway is very expense, how to turn into a benchmarking company is a very critical issue for every manager of high-speed-rail companies. This paper first applies the traditional data envelopment analysis (DEA) model, then emploies the three-stage DEA models to assess the performance of major high-speed-rail companies in the world. The effects of environmental factors to the performance of high-speed-rail companies are examined as well. Results from empirical analyses show that even the three-year average technical efficiency and pure technical efficiency of the Taiwan High Speed Rail Corporation (THSR) fall behind Netherlands and Japan, it is still better than South Korea, Germany, France and other countries. In addition, it is discovered that when environmental factors are excluded from the DEA model, the resulting performance scores are significantly better than the situation when they are included in the model. This indicates the environment variables we suggest in this paper have a significant impact on the operating efficiency of a high-speed-rail company.
期刊論文
1.Yu, M. M.、Lin, E. T. J.(2008)。Efficiency and Effectiveness in Railway Performance Using a Multi-Activity Network DEA Model。Omega: The International Journal of Management Science,36(6),1005-1017。  new window
2.Hoff, A.(2007)。Second Stage DEA: Comparison of Approaches for Model the DEA Score。European Journal of Operational Research,181,425-435。  new window
3.Banker, R. D.、Natarajan, R.(2008)。Evaluating Contextual Variables Affecting Productivity Using Data Envelopment Analysis。Operations Research,56(1),48-58。  new window
4.Pastor, J. M.(2002)。Credit risk and efficiency in the European banking system: A three-stage analysis。Applied Financial Economics,12(12),895-911。  new window
5.Carrington, R.、Puthucheary, N.、Rose, D.(1997)。Performance measurement in government service provision: The case of police services in New South Wales。Journal of Production Analysis,8(4),415-430。  new window
6.Coelli, T.、Perelman, S.(2000)。Efficiency measurement, multiple-output technologie and distance functions: With application to European railways。Applied Economics,32,1967-1976。  new window
7.Fried, H. O.、Schmidt, S.、Yaisawarng, S.(1999)。Incorporating the operating envirnment into a nonparametric measure of technical efficiency。Journal of Productivity Analysis,12(3),249-267。  new window
8.George, S. A.、Rangaraj, N.(2008)。A performance benchmarking study of Indian railway zones。Benchmarking: An International Journal,15(5),299-617。  new window
9.Gorman, M.、Ruggiero, J.(2008)。Evaluating U. S. state police performance using data envelopment analysis。International Journal of Production Economics,113(2),1031-1037。  new window
10.Growitsch, C.、Wetzel, H.(2009)。Testing for economies of scope in European railways: An efficiency analysis。Journal of Transport Economics and Policy,43(1),1-24。  new window
11.Hilmola, O. P.(2007)。European railway freight transportation and adaptation to demand decline, efficiency and partial productivity analysis from period of 1980-2003。Benchmarking: An International Journal,56(3),206-255。  new window
12.Lan, L. W.、Lin, E. T. J.(2003)。Technical efficiency and service effectiveness for the railway industry: DEA approaches。Journal of The East Asia Society for Transportation Studies,5,2932-2947。  new window
13.McDonald, J.(2009)。Using least squares and Tobit in second stage DEA efficiency analyses。European Journal of Operational Research,197(2),792-798。  new window
14.Merkert, R.、Hensher, D. A.(2011)。The impact of strategic management and fleet planning on airline efficiency: A random effects Tobit model based on DEA efficiency scores。Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice,45(7),686-695。  new window
15.Merkert, R.、Smith, A. S. J.、Nash, C. A.(2010)。Benchmarking of train operating firms: A transaction cost efficiency analysis。Transportation Planning and Technology,33(1),35-53。  new window
16.Movahedi, M. M.、Saati, S.、Vahidi, A. R.(2007)。Iranian railway efficiency (1971-2004): An application of DEA。International Journal of Contemporary Mathematical Sciences,2(32),1269-1579。  new window
17.Nolan, J. F.、Ritchie, P. C.、Rowcroft, J. E.(2002)。Identifying and measuring public policy goals: ISTEA and the US bus transit industry。Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,48(3),291-304。  new window
18.Novaes, A. G. N.(2001)。Rapid efficiency analysis with the assurance-region DEA method。Pesquisa Operational,21(2),179-197。  new window
19.Oum, T. H.、Yu, C.(1994)。Economic efficiency of railways and implications for public policy: A comparative study of the OECD countries railways。Journal of Transport Economics and Policy,28(2),121-138。  new window
20.Wu, T.-H.、Chen, M.-S.、Yeh, J.-Y.(2010)。Measuring the performance of police forces in Taiwan using data envelopment analysis。Evaluation and Program Planning,33(3),246-254。  new window
21.Banker, Rajiv D.、Charnes, Abraham、Cooper, William Wager(1984)。Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis。Management Science,30(9),1078-1092。  new window
22.藍武王、林村基(20030300)。鐵路運輸之生產效率分析:DEA與SFA方法之比較。運輸學刊,15(1),49-78。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.王國樑、張美玲、陳麗雪(20091000)。臺灣地方法院管理效率之探討:三階段資料包絡分析法之應用。管理學報,26(5),559-576。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.Charnes, Abraham、Cooper, William W.、Rhodes, Edwardo(1978)。Measuring the efficiency of decision making units。European Journal of Operational Research,2(6),429-444。  new window
學位論文
1.吳忠岳(2003)。台鐵車站生產效率分析(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.曾文君(2007-00-00)。三階段資料包絡分析法應用於亞太地區貨櫃港埠績效評估之研究(碩士論文)。國立交通大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉興華(2011)。美國職棒大聯盟經營績效評估-應用資料包絡分析法(碩士論文)。東吳大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.傅珮珮(2011)。台灣壽險公司經營效率之研究--資料包絡分析法之應用(碩士論文)。國立雲林科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.王東琪(1999)。航空站營運績效評估之研究--以亞太地區國際機場為例(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Saitech, Inc.(2003)。DEA-Solver: Professional Version 3.0。New Jersey。  new window
2.吳濟華、何柏正(2008)。組織效率與生産力評估:資料包絡分析法。新北市:前程文化。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.International Union of Railways(2013)。High Speed Lines in The World,http://www.uic.org/spip.php7article573, 2014/07/27。  new window
圖書論文
1.Lovell, C. A. K.、Walters, L. C.、Wood, L. L.(1995)。Stratified Models of Education Production Using Modified DEA and Regression Analysis。Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodologyand Applications。Boston:Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
2.Lovell, C. A. K.(1993)。Production Frontiers and Productive Efficiency。The Measurement of Productive Efficiency--techniques and applications。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE