:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:毒品犯罪受刑人假釋審查決意分析
書刊名:警察行政管理學報
作者:蘇恆舜
作者(外文):Su, Heng-shun
出版日期:2014
卷期:10
頁次:頁195-219
主題關鍵詞:毒品假釋決意DrugParoleDecision-making
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:26
  • 點閱點閱:12
毒品犯罪起訴件數及人數是呈現逐年增加的趨勢,且在新入監再累犯人數、毒品犯罪前科者再累犯的比率、在監受刑人、在看守所人數皆居各類犯罪之首。又因毒品問題往往伴隨著衍生性犯罪,而造成對治安的衝擊、矯正機關嚴重超收、以及國民健康的傷害等問題。因此,對於長時間接受機構處遇的毒品犯罪者,是否能透過監獄矯正處遇及假釋審查,來協助毒品犯罪受刑人脫離毒品的荼毒,是值得探討的議題。在紮根理論研究法的思惟下,進行理論抽樣選取不同專業背景的監獄假釋委員25名,以及法務部審查人員10名,共計35名,透過深度訪談並運用三角檢定法蒐集資料,以瞭解假釋審查人員決定毒品犯罪受刑人核准或駁回假釋的決意歷程和考量因素。研究發現,假釋審查人員對毒品犯罪受刑人的審查,是就其「危害性」、「應報性」、「悛悔性」、「再犯危險性」和「復歸性」等作綜合考量之「行政審判」。最後,為使對於毒品犯罪受刑人之假釋能更加完善,發揮其假釋之功能,提出具體假釋政策及執行之建議,以使社會大眾擁有一個免於恐懼的環境。
The numbers of drug-related crimes and drug offenders prosecuted have increased annually. In addition, the rate of recidivists with drug-related criminal records and the number of new drug-related prisoners becoming recidivists, drug-related prisoners, and offenders in detention centers have been the highest among all types of criminals. Drug problems always occur with derivative crimes, thereby causing problems, such as public security impacts, excess prisoners in correction institutions, and damage to citizens' health. Therefore, whether correction measures and parole review can be used to help drug offenders in prisons that receive long-term institution treatment abstain from drugs is a critical issue. Based on the thinking of Grounded Theory Methodology, the theoretical sampling was undertaken, to select 25 Parole Board Members and 10 parole review personnel from Ministry of Justice. The sample size was 35 in total. Data collection was made through In-depth Interview, in order to understand the influence factors in parole decision-making. Also, the Triangulation method was utilized, so as to enhance the trustworthiness of this study. Research has indicated that parole reviewers assess drug offenders' harmfulness, retribution, repentance, recidivism risk, and regression comprehensively in administrative trials. Finally, to complement the parole system of drug offenders and exert complete functions of parole, we propose suggestions regarding concrete parole policies and implementations. Consequently, the public may live in a fear-free society.
期刊論文
1.Goldstein, P. J.(1985)。The drugs-violence nexus: A tri-partite conceptual framework。Journal of Drug Issues,15,493-506。  new window
2.陳玉書、林學銘、蘇昱嘉(20071200)。受刑人假釋准駁影響因素之研究。執法新知論衡,3(2)=6,1-25。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.李思賢、吳憲璋、黃昭正、王志傑、石倩瑜(20100600)。毒品罪再犯率與保護因子研究:以基隆地區為例。犯罪學期刊,13(1),81-105。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.楊士隆(1999)。受刑人累(再)犯問題紓緩對策。當前犯罪問題與對策研討會,國立中正大學犯罪防治研究所主辦 。嘉義。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.蘇恆舜(2010)。假釋審查決意影響因素之研究(博士論文)。國立中正大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.法務部統計處(2014)。中華民國法務統計月報103年1月。台北:法務部。  延伸查詢new window
2.許春金(2009)。犯罪學。臺北:三民。  延伸查詢new window
3.Walker, S.(2001)。Sense and nonsense about crime and drugs。Belmont, CA:Wadsworth/Thomson Learning。  new window
4.Wilson, D. J.(2000)。Drug use, testing, and treatment in jails。Washington, DC:Bureau of Justice Statistics。  new window
5.Alarid, L. F.、Cromwell, P. F.、Del Carmen, Rolando V.(2008)。Community-Based Corrections。CA:Thomson Wadsworth。  new window
6.法務部保護司(2011)。犯罪狀況及其分析(中華民國99年)。台北:法務部。  延伸查詢new window
7.監察院(2004)。假釋辦理情形及其績效檢討專案調查研究報告。台北:監察院。  延伸查詢new window
8.Gottfredson, D. M.、Wilkins, L. T.、Hoffman, P. B.(1978)。Guidelines for Parole and Sentencing。Lexington, Mass.:Heath。  new window
9.高淑清(2008)。質性研究的18堂課:揚帆再航之旅。高雄:麗文文化。  延伸查詢new window
10.Gottfredson, Michael R.、Gottfredson, Don M.(1988)。Decision Making in Criminal Justice: Toward the Rational Exercise of Discretion。New York:Plenum Press。  new window
11.Marshall, Catherine、Rossman, Gretchen B.、李政賢(2006)。質性研究:設計與計畫撰寫。五南。  延伸查詢new window
12.Champion, Dean J.(2001)。Corrections in the United States: A contemporary perspective。Prentice Hall, Inc.。  new window
13.Strauss, Anselm Leonard、Corbin, Juliet M.、吳芝儀、廖梅花(2001)。質性研究入門:紮根理論研究方法。濤石文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE