臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：臺灣大學生語言行為之研究：反對意見表達中的社會地位、語境與語氣設定的作用
書刊名：語文與國際研究
作者：栗原祐美／鍾曉芳 引用關係
作者(外文)：Kurihara, Yumi／Chung, Siaw-fong
出版日期：2016
卷期：16
頁次：頁57-80
主題關鍵詞：反對意見表達；社會地位；語境；語氣設定；Disagreement；Social status；Context；Mode of conversation
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:5
  • 點閱點閱:62
本研究探討華語母語人士表違反對意見(disagreement)時，社會地位(socials status)、語境(context)與語氣設定(mode of conversation)的三種因素對答案所造成的影響。研究方法為語篇補全測試(Discourse Completion Test)，調查了164位華語母語人士。研究結果顯示，在社會地位方面，母語人士對地位高者和低者所表達反對意見的方式並沒有明顯的差異；語境方面，正式的語境得到委婉的答案比較多，但非正式的語境得到情緒化的答案比較多；至於語氣設定方面，若在問卷中指定反對的語氣，受試者會依照指示作答，因此可以操控受試者的答案。
This paper examines the factors of social status, contexts, and mode of conversation in situations of disagreement in Taiwan. A questionnaire of discourse completion test was completed by 164 Mandarin native speakers in Taiwan. The result showed that, in terms of social status, there was no difference between interlocutors of higher and of lower status. As for the context factor, the findings were twofold: first, in more formal settings such as academic and office situations, participants tended to use roundabout expressions; in more casual home situations, relatively emotional expressions of disagreement were generated. As for the mode of conversation, it was found that participants were able to adjust their ways of disagreeing whenever they were prompted to use a particular tone. This showed how situational disagreements could be observed in Mandarin contexts.
期刊論文
1.Boxer, Diana、Pickering, Lucy(1995)。Problems in the presentation of speech acts in ELT materials: The case of complaints。ELT Journal，49(1)，44-58。  new window
2.Fraser, B.(1990)。Perspectives on politeness。Journal of Pragmatics，14，219-236。  new window
3.Rees-Miller, J.(2000)。Power, severity, and context in disagreement。Journal of Pragmatics，32，1087-1111。  new window
4.謝佳玲(20101200)。華語拒絕請求的策略分析：語體與語境的作用。臺灣華語教學研究，1，111-137。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Bardovi-Harlig, K.、Dörnyei, Z.(1998)。Do Language Learners Recognize Pragmatic Violations? Pragmatic Versus Grammatical Awareness in Instructed L2 Learning。TESOL Quarterly，32(2)，233-262。  new window
6.Ide, S.(1989)。Formal forms and discernment: neglected aspects of linguistic politeness。Multilingua，8(2)，223-248。  new window
7.Li, X.、Lin, L.(2015)。A Pragmatic Study on the Speech Act of Refusal by Chinese EFL Learners。Languages and International Studies，13(23)，23-45。  new window
8.Sorning, K.(1977)。Disagreement and contradiction as communicative acts。Journal of Pragmatics，1，347-374。  new window
9.Sifianou, M.(2012)。Disagreements, face and politeness。Journal of Pragmatics，44，1554-1564。  new window
10.Matsumura, Shoichi(2001)。Learning the Rules for Offering Advice: A Quantitative Approach to Second Language Socialization。Language Learning，51(4)，638-679。  new window
11.張絮茵(20120300)。商務漢語拒絕言語行為研究。華語文教學研究，9(1)，73-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.舒兆民(20070600)。計量分析英日語人士華語學習者之拒絕中介語。華語文教學研究，4(1)，99-124。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.楊佩佩(2014)。異議模式及其語用功能探究。雞西大學學報，14(1)，126。  延伸查詢new window
14.陳潔(2015)。漢語中表達異議的七種語用策略。文藝爭鳴，2015(3)，200。  延伸查詢new window
15.Matsumoto, Y.(1988)。Reexamination of the universality of face: Politeness phenomena in Japanese。Journal of Pragmatics，12，403-426。  new window
16.顧曰國(1990)。Politeness phenomena in Modern Chinese。Journal of Pragmatics，14(2)，237-257。  new window
會議論文
1.Lakoff, R.(1973)。The logic of politeness: Minding your P's and Q's。The Ninth Regional Meeting of Chicago Linguistic Society，292-305。  new window
2.薄井良子(2007)。新聞投稿文における反対意見表明--先行投稿文との関係から。日本社会言語科学会第19回大会。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Aeginitou, V.(1995)。Facework and politeness in the Greek EFL classroom(博士論文)。Lancaster University，Lancaster。  new window
2.Chen, S. C.(2010)。Politely Disagreeing in Online Asynchronous Debates in English as a Foreign Language(碩士論文)。National Kaohsiung First University of Science and Technology，Kaohsiung。  new window
3.Liu, J. Y.(2009)。Disagreement in Mandarin Chinese: A Sociopragmatic Analysis(碩士論文)。National Chengchi University，Taipei。  new window
4.陳靜雯(2010)。華語日籍學習者異議語策略及語言特徵研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.Tuan, H. T.(2006)。An Analysis of Disagreement Speech Act in Taiwanese EFL Speakers(博士論文)。National Kaohsiung Normal University，Kaohsiung。  new window
圖書
1.李櫻(2012)。語用學與華語文教學。台北：正中書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.Thomas, J.(1995)。Meaning in interaction: An introduction to pragmatics。London：Wesley Longman Limited。  new window
3.Brown, Penelope、Levinson, Stephen C.(1987)。Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage。Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Leech, Geoffrey Neill(1983)。Principles of Pragmatics。Longman。  new window
圖書論文
1.Searle, J. R.(1975)。Indirect speech acts。Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech act。New York：Academic Press。  new window
2.Beebe, L. M.、Takahashi, T.(1989)。Sociolinguistic Variation in Face-Threatening Speech Acts: Chastisement and Disagreement。The dynamic interlanguage: Empirical studies in second language variation。New York：Plenum。  new window
3.Judd, E. L.(1999)。Some issues in the teaching of pragmatic competence。Culture in second language teaching and learning。New York：Cambridge University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關博士論文
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：735（臺灣：722，外國：13） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1827278 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67634760
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上