:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:內線交易犯罪所得如何計算?--評最高法院105年度臺上字第549號刑事判決
書刊名:法令月刊
作者:賴英照 引用關係
出版日期:2017
卷期:68:1
頁次:頁1-31
主題關鍵詞:內線交易淨利法市場吸收法關聯所得法擬制所得法
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:26
  • 點閱點閱:4
期刊論文
1.王志誠(20120315)。證券交易法第171條「犯罪所得」之計算爭議。臺灣法學雜誌,196,21-30。  延伸查詢new window
2.Connolly, Erica(2012)。Playing Hot Potato in the Market: The Ninth Circuit s Better Approach to Calculating Loss for Securities Fraud Sentencing。Hastings Law Journal,63(2),567-594。  new window
3.Debold, David、Benjamin, M.(2011)。"Losing Ground"-- In Search of a Remedy for the Overemphasis on Loss and Other Culpability Factors in the Sentencing Guideline for Fraud and Theft。University Pennsylvania Law Review PENNumbra,160(1),141-157。  new window
4.Jones, James A. II(2011)。United States v. Berger: The rejection of civil loss causation principles in connection with criminal securities fraud。Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts,6(4),273-284。  new window
5.Nevins, Stephanie(2010)。Nacchio Profits: The Tenth Circuit in United States v. Nacchio properly departs from the Eighth Circuit in United States v. Mooney and adopts the civil remedy of disgorgement to measure an inside trad。Creighton Law Review,43,1107-1155。  new window
6.Padgett, Amy Dominick(2011)。United States v. Nacchio: The Tenth Circuits Civil Approach to Sentencing for Insider Trading。Oklahoma Law Review,63(3),579-606。  new window
7.Pellicani, Nicholas P.(2010)。No Pain, No Gain: The Criminal Absence of the Efficient Capital Markets Theory from Insider Trading Sentencing。St. John's Law Review,84(3),1057-1098。  new window
8.Manning, John F.(1997)。Textualism As A Nondelegation Doctrine。Columbia Law Review,97(3),673-739。  new window
9.賴英照(20131200)。內線交易的所得計算。中原財經法學,31,1-63。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.薛智仁(20121000)。內線交易之犯罪所得概念。政大法學評論,129,245-299。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.薛智仁(20121115)。[裁判簡評]加重內線交易罪/最高院101臺上1857判決。臺灣法學雜誌,212,195-204。  延伸查詢new window
12.Black, Nicole(2010)。United States v. Nacchio and the Implications of an Emerging Circuit Split: Practical and Policy Considerations of Amending Financial Gain as a Measure of Culpability。Denver University Law Review,87(3),633-668。  new window
13.Jung, Soo Ji(2014)。Comment, U. S. v. RAJARATNAM-No "Gain" Without Pain: Amending the Sentencing Guidelines for Insider Trading to Better Reflect the Rapidly Evolving Financial Industry。New England Journal on Criminal and Civil Confinement,40(2),295-312。  new window
14.江朝聖(20160400)。走出內線交易犯罪所得計算泥沼之嘗試--兼評最高法院104年度臺上字第2932號刑事判決。東海大學法學研究,48,117-168。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.廖大穎(20160214)。內線交易罪與計算犯罪所得的爭議/最高104臺上2932刑事判決。臺灣法學雜誌,289,169-174。  延伸查詢new window
16.Chattin, Danielle DeMasi(2011)。The more you gain, the more you lose: Sentencing insider trading under the U. S. Sentencing Guidelines。Fordham Law Review,79(1),165-215。  new window
17.Colesanti, J. Scott(2011)。Wall Street as Yossarian: The other effects of the Rajaratnam insider trading conviction。Hofstra Law Review,40(2),411-435。  new window
18.Driggers, Anna(2012)。Raj Rajaratnam's historic insider trading sentence。American Criminal Law Review,49(4),2021-2041。  new window
19.陳彥良(20110100)。內線交易犯罪所得計算爭議研析--最高法院九十八年度臺上字第四八〇〇號判決。月旦法學,188,201-220。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.Coffee, John C. Jr.(2005)。Loss Causation after Dura: Something for Everyone。New York Law Journal,231,883-924。  new window
研究報告
1.立法院(2003)。審查行政院函請審議「銀行法」、「金融控股公司法」、「票券金融管理法」、「信託業法」、「信用合作社法」「保險法」及「證券交易法」等法案部分條文修正草案。  延伸查詢new window
2.立法院(2003)。繼續審查行政院函請審議「銀行法」、「金融控股公司法」、「票券金融管理法」、「信託業法」、「信用合作社法」、「保險法」及「證券交易法」等法案部分條文修正草案案。  延伸查詢new window
3.立法院(2003)。繼續審查行政院函請審議「銀行法」、「金融控股公司法」、「票券金融管理法」、「信託業法」、「信用合作社法」、「保險法」及「證券交易法」等法案部分條文修正草案。  延伸查詢new window
4.立法院(2004)。「銀行法」、「金融控股公司法」、「票券金融管理法」、「信託業法」、「信用合作社法」、「保險法」及「證券交易法」等部分條文修正草案審查案--協商後處理。  延伸查詢new window
5.立法院(2004)。「銀行法」、「金融控股公司法」、「票券金融管理法」、「信託業法」、「信用合作社法」、「保險法」及「證券交易法」等部分條文修正草案審查案--協商後處理。  延伸查詢new window
6.立法院(2004)。「修正「證券交易法」第171條、第174條及第178條條文。  延伸查詢new window
7.立法院(2004)。立法院民進黨黨團,針對「證券交易法第171條條文」提出復議案--另定期處理。  延伸查詢new window
8.立法院(2004)。立法院民進黨黨團針對「證券交易法第171條條文」提出復議案--另定期處理。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Wang, William K. S.、Steinberg, Marc I.(2010)。Insider Trading。New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Cross, Frank B.(2009)。The Theory and Practice of Statutory Interpretation。Stanford University Press。  new window
3.余雪明(2016)。證券交易法--比較證券法。余雪明。  延伸查詢new window
4.賴英照(2014)。最新證券交易法解析。賴英照。  延伸查詢new window
5.劉連煜(2012)。內線交易構成要件。臺北:劉連煜。  延伸查詢new window
6.Greenawalt, Kent(2012)。Statutory and Common Law Interpretation。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
7.Katzmann, Robert A.(2014)。Judging Statutes。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
其他
1.Goldstein, Matthew(2014)。SAC Capital Ex-Trader, Gets 9 Years in Prison,http://nyti.ms/1lNFd0B。  new window
2.Goldstein, Matthew(2014)。Martoma Starts Serving 9-Year Sentence for Insider Trading,http://nyti.ms/1qIUNNQ。  new window
3.U. S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York(2014)。SAC Capital Portfolio Manager Mathew Martoma Found Guilty In Manhattan Federal Court Of Insider Trading Charges,https://www.justice.gov/archive/usao/nys/pressreleases/February14/MathewMartomaVerdictPR.php。  new window
圖書論文
1.江朝聖(2012)。論內線交易之犯罪所得--美國法的觀察。甘添貴教授七秩華誕祝壽論文集。臺北:甘添貴教授七秩華誕祝壽論文集編輯委員會。  延伸查詢new window
2.Scalia, Antonin(1997)。Common-Law Courts in a Civil-Law System: The Role of United States Federal Courts in Interpreting the Constitution and Laws。A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law。Princeton, N.J.:Princeton University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE