本研究旨在探討假日籃球活動參與者在休閒效益情形，選取台北市、桃園市、新北市的假日租賃式球場之球友做為研究對象，採取便利取樣共發出361 份問卷，扣除57 份填答不完整之無效問卷；共計304 份有效樣本，達84.00%回收率。以假日籃球休閒效益量表為研究工具，藉由描述統計、t 考驗及單因子變異統計方法，探討不同背景變項之球友參與假日籃球之休閒效益差異情形 異。研究結果顯示 (一) 參與假日籃球有91.12%為男性，其中以31 歲以上的人為58.55%，有91.78%的參與者具大專校院學歷，其平均月收入以有50.99%的球友月收入為20,001 元~40,000 之間。(二) 不同性別與教育程度之假日籃球活動球友其休閒效益表現並無差異。(三) 31 歲以上族群之受訪對於社交效益的需求顯著高於11~20 歲與21~30 歲之族群。(四) 月收入在60,000 元以上的受訪者在生理效益上顯著優於無收入者，月收入在40,001 元~60,000 元的球友，在社交效益上顯著優於無收入者。假日籃球的參與者在休閒效益社交層面有積極的表現，藉此達到以球會友的社交利益。

This paper aims to explore the leisure benefits status quo for holiday basketball participants. It uses convenience sampling to collect data from 361 participants that play in Taipei City, Taoyuan City, and New Taipei City holiday-leasing basketball courts. After deleting 57 invalid questionnaires, 304 valid questionnaires are used for analysis with an 84% of recovery ratio. In order to understand differences among participants from various backgrounds, descriptive statistics, t test, and one-way ANOVA are used as the main research methods. The results show (1) 91.12% of holiday basketball participants are male. 58.55% of them are over 31 years of age. 91.78% are college-educated. 50.99% of them have monthly income between 20,001 to 40,000. (2) Genders and education levels show no significance on leisure benefits. (3) Over 31-year-old participants have significant demands on social benefits than age groups between 11 to 20 and 21 to 30. (4) Participants with over 60,000 monthly income are significantly better than those who have no income regarding psychological benefits, while participants with 40,001 to 60,000 monthly income are significantly better than those who have no income on social benefits. Holiday basketball participants perform actively on social aspect regarding leisure benefits so they can achieve their social benefits through playing basketball and sports.