:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:轉譯和建構中文版病人隱私量表
書刊名:護理雜誌
作者:陳麗馮先瓊楊小莉李羅紅
作者(外文):Chen, LiFeng, Xian-qiongYang, Xiao-liLi, Luo-hong
出版日期:2017
卷期:64:3
頁次:頁56-64
主題關鍵詞:護理人員病人隱私量表信度效度NursesPatientPrivacy scaleReliabilityValidity
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:13
  • 點閱點閱:189
背景:病人隱私洩露問題在世界各國均很嚴重,護理人員是與病人接觸最多且擁有較多病人資訊之專業人員,其對病人隱私保護扮演著重要的角色。然而,目前中國大陸卻缺少適用於測量臨床護理人員對病人隱私保護之工具。目的:譯製中文版「病人隱私量表」(patient privacy scale),並進行信效度檢定。方法:本量表原為Özturk、Bahcecik與Özçelik(2014)所發展,用於測量護理人員在職場是保護還是侵犯病人之隱私。本研究採「翻譯—回譯」方法,進行中英文的雙次翻譯,並以中國大陸西部地區兩所三級甲等綜合醫院,共616位護理人員為研究對象進行施測,藉以檢定中文版量表之內在一致性與再測信度,以及結構效度。結果:量表總的Cronbach’s α為 .94,五個因素的Cronbach’s α介於 .84~ .90;折半信度為 .91;再測信度為.82;內容效度為 .95。經探索性因素分析後,可解釋之總變異量為64.98%。結論 「病人隱私量表」中文版具有良好的信、效度。本量表可實際應用於測量臨床護理人員對病人之隱私保護情況;亦可作為評量病人隱私保護訓練成效的前後測工具。
Background: The unauthorized releasing of confidential patient information is a serious problem worldwide. Nurses, the healthcare professionals who are in most frequent contact with patients, have access to a significant amount of confidential patient information and play a key role in protecting patient privacy. However, currently, there is no proper tool to measure the level to which clinical nurses protect the privacy of their patients in China. Purpose: To translate the patient privacy scale (PPS) into Chinese and to test the reliability and validity of this Chinese version. Methods: The original scale was developed by Özturk, Bahcecik, and Özçelik (2014) to identify whether nurses protect or violate patient privacy in the workplace. This study used the "back translation" method to translate the scale. A total of 616 nurses in two tertiary hospitals in the Western region of China were enrolled to test the internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity of the translated scale. Results: The Cronbach's coefficients of the total scale and its 5 factors ranged from .84 to .94; the split half reliability was .91; the test-retest reliability was .82; and the content validity index was .95. Explanatory factor analysis revealed that the 5 factors explained 64.98% of the total variance. Conclusions: The Chinese version of the PPS is reliable and valid, and may be used to reliably assess the behaviors of nurses with regard to protecting the privacy of their patients. The scale may also be used to evaluate the effects of training on patient privacy protection.
期刊論文
1.盧淵源、鄭玉惠(20070600)。內部服務品質因子、服務能力、工作滿意及外部服務品質關係之研究--以護理人員為例。品質學報,14(2),161-179。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.陳寶如、蔡秀芬、龔美珍、趙明玲(20120300)。住院病人對護理服務重視程度與滿意度之相關性探討--以桃園二所地區教學醫院為例。長庚護理,23(1)=77,14-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Nayeri, N. D.、Aghajani, M.(2010)。Patients' privacy and satisfaction in the emergency department: A descriptive analytical study。Nursing Ethics,17(2),167-177。  new window
4.史靜琤、莫顯昆、孫振球(2012)。量表編制中內容效度指數的應用。中南大學學報(醫學版),37(2),152-155。  延伸查詢new window
5.朱禮坤、陳同良(2012)。泌尿外科患者隱私權現狀調查分析。齊魯護理雜誌,18(8),53-54。  延伸查詢new window
6.王燕、高穎、張齊放(2006)。涉及患者隱私部位臨床實習操作情況的調查與分析。解放軍護理雜誌,23(4),31-33。  延伸查詢new window
7.王春玲、戴新娟(2010)。護理工作中患者隱私保護的現狀與展望。護理學報,17(4B),15-17。  延伸查詢new window
8.張傳友(2005)。試論患者的隱私權。中國醫院管理,25(5),26-28。  延伸查詢new window
9.張鐵麗、王玉梅、霍葳、初喆、李血金、馬鴻雁(2011)。急診留觀患者就醫隱私問題的調查。吉林醫學,32(8),1596。  延伸查詢new window
10.黃蘭蘭(2015)。婦科護理過程中患者隱私保護的研究。中外醫學研究,13(27),90-91。  延伸查詢new window
11.Karro, J.、Dent, A. W.、Farish, S.(2005)。Patient perceptions of privacy infringements in an emergency department。Emergency Medicine Australasia,17(2),117-123。  new window
12.Ozair, F. F.、Jamshed, N.、Sharma, A.、Aggarwal, P.(2015)。Ethical issues in electronic health records: A general overview。Perspectives in Clinical Research,6(2),73-76。  new window
13.Özturk, H.、Bahcecik, N.、Özçelik, K. S.(2014)。The development of the patient privacy scale in nursing。Nursing Ethics,21(7),812-828。  new window
14.Taitsman, J. K.、Grimm, C. M.、Agrawal, S.(2013)。Protecting patient privacy and data security。The New England Journal of Medicine,368(11),977-979。  new window
15.楊建昌、彭依雯、賴靜莉、陳世欣、楊紅玉、趙婉青(20040600)。工作滿足對組織承諾與病人滿意度之相關性探討--以臺北某區域教學醫院護理人員為例。醫務管理期刊,5(2),152-170。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Kelley, Truman L.(1939)。The Selection of Upper and Lower Groups for the Validation of Test Items。The Journal of Educational Psychology,30(1),17-24。  new window
圖書
1.沈中、許文潔(2010)。隱私權論兼析人格權。上海市:上海人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳明隆(2011)。量表統計分析實務。重慶市:重慶大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.胡雁(2012)。護理研究。北京市:人民衛生出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Leech, N. L.、Barrett, K. C.、Morgan, G. A.(2008)。SPSS for intermediate statistics: Use and interpretation。New York, NY:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
其他
1.張貴餘(20100330)。英醫療記錄存信息漏洞--醫院清潔工可查患者病歷,http://news.163.com/10/0330/17/631RE7B5000146BB.html。  延伸查詢new window
2.劉延春(20080610)。深圳10萬孕產婦個人信息遭洩露,http://news.sina.com.cn/s/2008-06-10/020715710408.shtml。  延伸查詢new window
3.Hennessy-Fiske, M.(20100808)。When Facebook goes to the hospital, patients may suffer,http://articles.latimes.com/2010/aug/08/local/la-me-facebook-20100809。  new window
4.Office for Civil Rights(2015)。Numbers at a glance,http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacy/hipaa/enforcement/highlights/indexnumbers.html。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
QR Code
QRCODE