:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:分類理論在權威控制的應用--以VIAF人名權威紀錄為例
書刊名:國家圖書館館刊
作者:鄭惠珍
作者(外文):Cheng, Hui-chen
出版日期:2016
卷期:105:2
頁次:頁147-170
主題關鍵詞:權威控制權威紀錄分類理論虛擬國際權威檔Authority controlAuthority recordsClassification theoryVIAF
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:12
  • 點閱點閱:14
本文以虛擬國際權威檔(VIAF)的人名權威紀錄為研究對象,探究權威控制可能應用到的分類理論,期能讓圖書資訊領域對權威控制與分類理論的關聯有更深一層的認識,甚或作為國內未來編目實施RDA改進權威紀錄參考之用。研究結果顯示權威控制工作應用了古典及現代的分類理論,前者包括互斥原理、保證原理;後者包括家族相似性理論、原型理論。文末提出五項建議:一、性別的著錄應以原型理論為基礎;二、個人名稱權威紀錄的來源應符合保證原理;三、區分人名應落實互斥原理;四、人名的區分兼顧自然屬性及社會屬性;五、建置名稱權威標目以家族相似性理論為基礎。
This study uses the personal name authority records in VIAF (Virtual International Authority File) to explore the classification theories which may be applied in authority control. This research provides those in library and information science (LIS) and related fields with a greater understanding of the affiliation between authority control and classification theory. This research can also be used as a reference for the application of RDA (Resources Description and Access) to improve the compilation of authority records. The results show that both the classical and modern classification theories should be used in the authority control process. The former includes the principle of mutual exclusivity and the principle of literary warrant; the latter includes the principle of family resemblance and prototype theory. Finally, it is suggested that: (1) the recording of gender in authority records should be based on prototype theory; (2) personal names in authority records should be consistent with the principle of warrant; (3) the distinction between personal names should be based on the principle of mutual exclusion; (4) consideration should be given to both natural attributes and social attributes while distinguishing personal names; and (5) family resemblance theory should be used as a basis for establishing name authority categories.
期刊論文
1.Sokal, Robert R.(1974)。Classification: purposes, principles, progress, prospects。Science,185(4157),1115-1123。  new window
2.Beghtol, C.(1986)。Semantic validity: Concepts of warrant in bibliographic classification systems。Library Resources & Technical Services,30(2),109-125。  new window
3.Fox, M. J.(2011)。Prototype Theory: An alternative concept theory for categorizing sex and gender。Knowledge Organization,38(4),328-334。  new window
4.陳光華(20000800)。數位圖書館中權威控制系統的設計。圖書與資訊學刊,34,51-71。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Hulme, E. W.(1911)。Principles of book classification。Library Association Record,13,354-358+389-394+444-449。  new window
6.陳和琴(19891200)。也談權威控制。教育資料與圖書館學,27(2),200-221。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.白延平、黃興國(2014)。原型理論下的大學英語詞匯教學。興義民族師範學院學報,6,80-83。  延伸查詢new window
8.林巧敏、林淑芬(20110300)。中文名稱權威資料庫合作發展之探討。檔案季刊,10(1),52-69。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.曹甯、仲岩(2006)。論中國個人名稱標目的區分問題。中國圖書館學報,6,89-92。  延伸查詢new window
10.許靜芬(20150600)。從資源建置及交流觀點探討中文人名權威紀錄消歧議題。國家圖書館館刊,104(1),67-88。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.許靜芬、鄭玉玲、林淑芬(20071200)。臺灣地區中文名稱權威的現況及展望。國家圖書館館刊,96(2),211-229。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.陳和琴(20080200)。權威資料功能需求(FRAD)概念模式初探。圖書與資訊學刊,64,31-46。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.陳昭珍(19890600)。權威控制淺論。書香季刊,1,46-51。  延伸查詢new window
14.彭慰(19950200)。權威控制--臺灣大學圖書館之經驗。圖書與資訊學刊,12,31-35。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.賈君枝、石燕青(2014)。中文名稱規範文檔與虛擬國際規範文檔的共享問題研究。中國圖書館學報,2014(6),83-92。  延伸查詢new window
16.賈君枝、薛秋紅(2015)。中文人名名稱規範檔與維基百科的鍊接。圖書情報工作,59(16),129-134。  延伸查詢new window
17.鄭惠珍、陳雪華(20151200)。從範疇理論的角度探索中西圖書分類思維。圖書資訊學研究,10(1),83-121。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.賴妍莉(2009)。Prototype理論在二語詞彙習得過程中的應用研究。科技風,5,112。  延伸查詢new window
19.釋見轂(20011200)。「佛教著者人名權威資料庫」之建置。佛教圖書館館訊,28,50-54。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.Goliff, N. A.(2009)。Authority control in a school library。Arkansas Libraries,66(3),13-16。  new window
21.Gorman, M.(2004)。Authority control in the context of bibliographic control in the electronic environment。Cataloging & Classification Quarterly,38(3),11-22。  new window
22.Martínez-Ávila, D.(2016)。Classification & authority control: Expanding resource discovery。Knowledge Organization,43(1),64-68。  new window
23.Park, J. R.、Tosaka, Y.(2015)。RDA implementation and training issues across United States academic libraries: An in-depth e-mail interview study。J. of Education for Library and Information Science,56(3),252-266。  new window
24.Thompson, K. J.(2016)。More than a name: A content analysis of name authority records for authors who self-identify as trans。Library Resources & Technical Services,60(3),140-155。  new window
25.Wolverton, R. E. Jr.(2006)。Current practices, resources, and trends in authority control。Tennessee Libraries,56(2),296-303。  new window
26.王應文、李隆盛、石延平(19950700)。建構技學知識分類體系的考慮要項。中學工藝教育月刊,28(7),2-8。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Jacob, E. K.(1992)。Classification and categorization: Drawing the line。The 2nd ASIS SIG/CR classification research workshop held at the 54th ASIS annual meeting,(會議日期: October 27-31, 1991)。Medford, NJ:Learned Information, Inc. for the American Society for Information Science。67-83。  new window
學位論文
1.黃媜嫆(2000)。圖書館自動化系統權威控制功能之探討(碩士論文)。輔仁大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Taylor, John R.(1989)。Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory。Oxford:Clarendon Press。  new window
2.Svenonius, Elaine(2000)。The intellectual foundation of information organization。MIT Press。  new window
3.Lancaster, F. W.(1986)。Vocabulary control for information retrieval。Arlington, Va:Information Resources Press。  new window
4.亞里士多德、秦典華、余紀元(2002)。工具論。台北:慧明文化。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳和琴、吳琉璃、江綉瑛(1996)。圖書分類編目。臺北:國立空中大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.Shera, J. H.(1965)。Libraries and the organization of knowledge。London:Crosby Lockwood & Son。  new window
7.Chan, L. M.、Richmond, P. A.、Svenonius, E.(1985)。Theory of subject analysis。Littleton, CO:Libraries Unlimited。  new window
8.Maltby, Arthur(1975)。Sayers' Manual of Classification for Librarians。London:Andre Deutsch。  new window
9.Taylor, A. G.、Joudrey, D. N.(2009)。The organization of information。Westport, CT:Libraries Unlimited。  new window
10.Chan, Lois Mai(1994)。Cataloging and classification: an introduction。New York:McGraw-Hill。  new window
11.Wittgenstein, Ludwig、Anscombe, G. E. M.(1953)。Philosophical Investigations。Basil Blackwell。  new window
12.Clack, Doris Hargrett(1990)。Authority control : principles, applications, and instructions。Chicago:American Library Association。  new window
13.RDA工作小組(2015)。RDA中文手冊初稿。臺北市:國家圖書館。  延伸查詢new window
14.王讚源(1996)。墨子。臺北市:三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
15.富平、劉小玲(2007)。中文書目規範控制的理論與實踐。北京市:北京圖書館。  延伸查詢new window
16.Rowley, J.、Farrow, J.(2002)。Organizing knowledge: An introduction to managing access to information。Burlington, VT:Ashgate。  new window
17.Taylor, A. G.(2004)。Wynar's introduction to cataloging and classification。Westport, Conn.:Libraries Unlimited。  new window
18.Lakoff, George(1987)。Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind。Chicago, IL:Chicago University Press。  new window
其他
1.Hjørland, B.(2007)。Core concepts in Library and Information Science (LIS),http://www.iva.dk/bh/Core%20Concepts%20in%20LIS/home.htm。  new window
2.王吳軍(20120319)。民國時期的文人筆名,http://big5.ycwb.com/culture/2013-09/09/content_5020042.htm。  延伸查詢new window
3.ANSI,NISO(2005)。Guidelines for the construction, format and management of monolingual controlled vocabularies(ANSI/NISO Z39.19-2005 (R2010))。,Baltimore, MD:NISO Press。,http://ppt.cc/kY9ih。  new window
4.Diessel, H.(2017)。Language and Cognition I: Categorization,http://www.personal.uni-jena.de/~x4diho/Script.Language%20and%20Cognition%201.pdf。  new window
5.IFLA Working Group on Functional Requirements and Numbering of Authority Records(2013)。Functional Requirements for Authority Data A Conceptual Model,https://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/frad/frad_2013.pdf。  new window
6.Library of Congress(2016)。Gender Code and Term Source Codes,http://www.loc.gov/standards/sourcelist/gender.html。  new window
7.Rosch, E.(1978)。Principles of Categorization,http://commonweb.unifr.ch/artsdean/pub/gestens/f/as/files/4610/9778_083247.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.Beghtol, C.(2001)。Relationships in classificatory structure and meaning。Relationships in the organization of knowledge。Dordrecht。  new window
2.Beghtol, C.(1992)。Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval。Classification research for knowledge representation and organization。Amsterdam:Elsevier。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE