:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:巨量資料應用在臺灣個資法架構下的法律風險
書刊名:臺大管理論叢
作者:彭金隆 引用關係陳俞沛孫群
作者(外文):Peng, Jin-lungChen, Yu-peiSun, Aureola
出版日期:2017
卷期:27:2S
頁次:頁93-118
主題關鍵詞:巨量資料個人資料保護法隱私權Big dataPersonal Information Protection ActThe right to privacy
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:75
  • 點閱點閱:16
巨量資料使用如涉及個人資料的蒐集、處理與利用,將面臨諸多潛在法律風險。本研究以我國2010年大幅修正之個人資料保護法出發1,研究發現,因為巨量資料的大量性、強調速度與資料多樣性等特質,適用我國個資法架構時可能發生以下問題:(1) 無法完全履行個資法第8 條與第9 條對於個人資料於蒐集、處理或利用時之告知義務、(2) 不易符合個資法第11 條在特定目的消失或契約到期後,不得持有、處理或利用資料的規定、(3) 部分蒐集方可能不符個資法第19 條須具有特定目的之要求、(4) 無法充分執行個資法第20 條對特定目的外之利用及停止行銷相關要求、(5) 無法配合個資法第54 條於首次利用時告知之要求等,顯見我國現行個資法可能對巨量資料應用產生重大法律風險。
In spite of their underlying values, big data now present enormous challenges as their collection, processing and application are potentially susceptible to the legal risks under Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA 2010) in Taiwan. By putting big data under the analysis framework of PIPA, this paper notes that by taking into consideration the staggering volume, velocity and variety claimed by big data and the enactment of PIPA, problems might arise in a number of ways: (1) In terms of information disclosure, data collection and processing would not meet the requirement of Article 8 and Article 9 of PIPA;(2) Data controllers are very likely to breach the duty stipulated by Article 11 of PIPA, which is, deleting and discontinuing to process or use when the specific purpose no longer exists or contract period expires; (3) Some data collectors might fail to satisfy the specific purpose requirement set by Article 19 of PIPA; (4) Data controllers might violate Article 20 of PIPA at the first marketing action; (5) They also might not meet Article 54 of PIPA that requires a notification may be given at the time where such personal information is first used.
期刊論文
1.林秀蓮(20110400)。「個人資料保護法」初探。萬國法律,176,2-13。  延伸查詢new window
2.呂丁旺(20100800)。淺析修正「個人資料保護法」。月旦法學,183,131-146。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.陳起行(20001200)。資訊隱私權法理探討--以美國法為中心。政大法學評論,64,297-341。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.彭金隆(20120600)。銀行保險業務個人資料保護之法律遵循風險分析。風險管理學報,14(1),75-92。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.王志誠、陳春山、李智仁、李金樺、鄭少珏(20051200)。由個人資料保護法修正草案論對金融聯合徵信中心及金融機構之影響及因應途徑。金融風險管理季刊,1(4),107-142。  延伸查詢new window
6.邵國松(2013)。「被遺忘的權利」:個人信息保護的新問題及對策。南京社會科學,2013(2),104-125。  延伸查詢new window
7.洪海林(2007)。個人信息保護立法理念探究--在信息保護與信息流通之間。河北法學,25(1),108-113。  延伸查詢new window
8.祝蓓蓓(2007)。論個人信息的保護。貴陽學院學報:社會科學版,2007(2),47-49。  延伸查詢new window
9.梅紹祖(2005)。個人信息保護的基礎性問題研究。蘇州大學學報(哲學社會科學版),2005(2),25-30。  延伸查詢new window
10.陳紅(2008)。個人信息保護的法律問題研究。浙江學刊,2008(3),147-150。  延伸查詢new window
11.彭禮堂、饒傳平(2006)。網絡隱私權的屬性:從傳統人格權到資訊自決權。法學評論,2006(1),57-62。  延伸查詢new window
12.謝青(2006)。日本的個人信息保護法制及啟示。政治與法律,2006(6),152-157。  延伸查詢new window
13.Westin, Alan F.(1968)。Privacy and freedom。Washington and Lee Law Review,25(1),166-170。  new window
14.翁清坤(20100700)。論個人資料保護標準之全球化。東吳法律學報,22(1),1-60。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.范姜真媺(20120100)。個人資料自主權之保護與個人資料之合理利用。法學叢刊,57(1)=225,69-103。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Warren, Samuel D.、Brandeis, Louis D.(1890)。The Right to Privacy。Harvard Law Review,4(5),193-220。  new window
17.劉佐國(20050400)。我國個人資料隱私權益之保護--論「電腦處理個人資料保護法」之立法與修法過程。律師雜誌,307,42-51。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Langheinrich, M.(2001)。Privacy by design--Principles of privacy-aware ubiquitous systems。Ubicomp 2001。Berlin:Springer。273-291。  new window
圖書
1.Mayer-Schönberger, Viktor、Cukier, Kenneth(2013)。Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think。Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company。  new window
2.許文義(2001)。個人資料保護法論。三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.孔令傑(2009)。個人資料隱私的法律保護。武漢:武漢大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.張軍(2007)。憲法隱私權研究。北京:中國社會科學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Shirota, M.(2012)。Big Data No Shougeki。Tokyo:Toyo Keizai。  new window
其他
1.姚嶽絨(2012)。日本:混合型個人資訊立法保護,http://www.legaldaily.com.cn/bm/content/2012-06/19/content_3648746.htm?node=20738。  延伸查詢new window
2.湯德宗(2008)。電腦處理個人資料保護法2008修正草案評釋,台北。  延伸查詢new window
3.European Commission(2012)。Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the council on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (general data protection regulation),http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/document/review2012/com_2012_11_en.pdf。  new window
4.European Union(1995)。Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data,http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31995L0046:en:HTML。  new window
5.Executive Office of the President(2014)。Big data: Seize opportunities, preserving values,https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/big_data_privacy_report_may_1_2014.pdf。  new window
6.German Government(1977)。Gesetz zum schutz vor mißbrauch personenbezogener daten bei der datenverarbeitung,http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bdsg_1990/。  new window
7.Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development(1980)。OECD guidelines on the protection of privacy and transborder flows of personal data,https://www.oecd.org/sti/ieconomy/oecdguidelinesontheprotectionofprivacyandtransborderflowsofpersonaldata.htm。  new window
8.Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development(1999)。OECD guidelines for consumer protection in the context of electronic commerce,http://www.oecd.org/sti/consumer/oecdguidelinesforconsumerprotectio ninthecontextofelectroniccommerce1999.htm。  new window
9.President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology(2014)。Report to the president. Big data and privacy: A technological perspective,https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/PCAST/pcast_big_data_and_privacy_-_may_2014.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.Cate, F. H.(2006)。The failure of fair information practice principles。Consumer Protection in the Age of the ‘Information Economy'。Oxford:Routledge。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE