:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:明太祖時期中央審判機構的淵源與變遷--以大理寺設置為例
書刊名:史匯
作者:楊鎮魁
作者(外文):Yang, Zun-kuei
出版日期:2017
卷期:20
頁次:頁1-26
主題關鍵詞:大理寺覆審制度仿元復宋The Grand Court of RevisionImitated Yuan restored SongJudicial review system
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:15
  • 點閱點閱:3
大理寺自北齊以來即為中央的司法機構。然而歷經各朝的演變,明代承襲宋代先後設置大理司與大理寺。其設置背景係是明太祖推動「仿元復宋」政策下的明證,為了瞭解明太祖時期大理寺的設置背景,須以明代以前的大理寺制度作為探討的對象。自唐以下,大理寺的規模日益宏大,所處理的事務也更加繁重。而宋代也設置大理寺處理司法業務,不過其之後發展卻與唐代迥異,而與明代大理寺制度的發展相似,故本文先述及宋代大理寺的建置過程與職務介紹,再探討明太祖如何從宋代大理寺的發展歷程中汲取經驗,並應用在大理寺的建置與職務分配等方面。探究明開國前後從大理司演變至大理寺的建置過程,分析明太祖在罷設中書省後恢復設置大理寺的過程與轉變,以及解說大理寺在恢復設置後的職掌分工與審案流程。而這個時期大理寺所奠定的基礎,對明清以後司法案件的覆審制度,有其一定的影響性。
The Grand Court of Revision was an agency in the capital since the North Chi dynasty around the 6th century A.D. Through all the periods, the Ming times imitated the regime from the Song dynasty that rebuilds the Grand Court of Revision once again. Ming Taizu established the Grand Court of Revision was the evidence of implementing the policy that the Ming government imitated the Yuan's polity originally and restored the Song's at last. In order to know that the background of restoring the Grand Court of Revision in Ming Taizu times, we should explore the Grand Court of Revision before the Ming times. Especially the Grand Court of Revision in the Song's central government was quite alike in the Ming's central government. In this article, we discovered the Ming Taizu, established the Grand Court of Revision in the Ming's central government before he united the states, until he disband the institute after he controlled all the provinces of China. He also interested in Song's polity when he canceled the institute of the decision making and restored the Grand Court of Revision in the Ming's central government. By the way, the Grand Court of Revision in the Ming Taizu times that established the foundation of the judicial review system in the Ming and Qing times.
期刊論文
1.王凌皓、劉淑蘭(1994)。明代國子監的坐監積分與實習歷事制度。教育科學,1994(3),59-61。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳登武(1991)。唐代司法制度研究--以大理寺為中心(碩士論文)。中國文化大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.田志光(2008)。宋代大理寺職能研究(碩士論文)。河北大學,保定。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.李心傳(1985)。建炎以來朝野雜記。臺北:新文豐出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.王雲海(1992)。宋代司法制度。河南大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.張延玉(1997)。明史。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.姚廣孝、夏原吉(1968)。明太祖實錄。臺北:中央研究院歷史語言研究所。  延伸查詢new window
5.李東陽、山根幸夫(1989)。正德大明會典。東京:汲古書院。  延伸查詢new window
6.李燾(2004)。續資治通鑑長編。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.翟善(1981)。諸司職掌。臺北:正中書局。  延伸查詢new window
8.徐松(1997)。宋會要。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.黃光昇(1996)。昭代典則。臺南:莊嚴文化事業。  延伸查詢new window
10.鄭曉(1995)。吾學編。上海:上海古籍。  延伸查詢new window
11.雷禮(1996)。皇明大政紀。臺南:莊嚴文化事業。  延伸查詢new window
12.楊樹藩、國立編譯館(1982)。中國文官制度史。臺北:黎明文化事業公司。  延伸查詢new window
13.黃彰健(19770000)。明清史研究叢稿。臺北:臺灣商務。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.脫脫(1985)。宋史。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
15.唐玄宗、李林甫、陳仲夫(1992)。唐六典。中華書局。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE