:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:歐洲人權法院保障同性關係策略評析--彈性、侷限及展望
書刊名:中研院法學期刊
作者:翁燕菁 引用關係
作者(外文):Weng, Vivianne Yen-ching
出版日期:2018
卷期:22
頁次:頁77-141
主題關鍵詞:婚姻平權同性伴侶家庭生活受尊重權歐洲人權公約禁止性傾向歧視Marriage equalitySame-sex relationshipsRight to repect of family lifeEuropean Convention on Human RightsProhibition of discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:23
  • 點閱點閱:24
期刊論文
1.Takács, Judit、Szalma, Ivett(2011)。Homophobia and Same-sex Partnership Legislation in Europe。Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal,30(5),356-378。  new window
2.翁燕菁(20130900)。不歧視原則之經濟社會權利保障效力:歐洲人權公約當代課題。歐美研究,43(3),637-707。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Dunne, Peter(2014)。Marriage Dissolution as a Pre-requisite for Legal Gender Recognition。Cambridge Law Journal,73(3),506-510。  new window
4.許耀明(20081200)。歐盟關於結婚權與組成家庭權之保護:從歐洲人權法院與歐洲法院相關案例談起。歐美研究,38(4),637-669。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Borrillo, Daniel(2015)。Manage pour tous et filiation pour certains: les résistances à l’égalité des droits pour les couples de même sexe。Droit et Cultures,69,179-220。  new window
6.Bailly, Estelle、Rault, Wilfried(2013)。Les pacsés en couple hétérosexuel sont-ils différents des mariés?。Population & Sociétés,497,1-4。  new window
7.Barrie, Jeneba(2013)。European Union Law and Gay Rights: Assessing the Equal Treatment in Employment and Occupation Directive and Case Law on Employment Benefits for Registered Same-Sex Partnerships。Journal of Civil Law Studies,6(2),617-652。  new window
8.Berlant, Lauren、Warner, Michael(1998)。Sex in Public。Critical Inquiry,24,547-566。  new window
9.Buckel, David S.(2005)。Government Affixes a Label of Inferiority on Same-Sex Couples When It Imposes Civil Unions and Denies Access to Marriage。Stanford Law & Policy Review,16,73-82。  new window
10.Coleman, David(2013)。Partnership in Europe; its Variety, Trends and Dissolution。Finnish Yearbook of Population Research,48,5-49。  new window
11.Cox, Barbara(2000)。But Why Not Marriage: Some Thoughts on Vermont's Civil Unions Law, Same-Sex Marriage, and Separate But (Un)Equal。Vermont Law Review,25,113-147。  new window
12.D'Amico, Marilisa、Nardocci, Costanza(2016)。LGBT Rights and the Way Forward: The Evolution of the Case Law of the ECtHR in Relation to Transgender Individuals' Identity。ERA Forum,17,191-202。  new window
13.Dothan, Shai(2011)。Judicial Tactics in the European Court of Human Rights。Chicago Journal of International Law,12,115-142。  new window
14.Dohotariu, Anca(2014)。La vie à deux hors mariage: du juridique au politique dans le postcommunisme roumain。Politiques sociales et familiales,115,37-45。  new window
15.Dean, James Joseph(2011)。The Cultural Construction of Heterosexual Identities。Sociology Compass,5,679-687。  new window
16.Danner, Elke(2013)。Non-Discrimination Between Weddings and the Conclusion of Registered Partnerships: The Ferris Wheel Goes round?。Vienna Journal of International Constitutional,7,381-384。  new window
17.Fichera, Massimo、Hartnell, Helen(2014)。All You Need Is Law: Italian Courts Break New Ground in the Treatment of Same-Sex Marriage。International Journal of Human Rights and Constitutional Studies,2,171-177。  new window
18.Fenech, Dominic(2012)。Divorced from Political Reality: The New Limits of Ecclesiastical Power in Malta。The Round Table,101,221-234。  new window
19.Harwood, Mark(2014)。Adopting Same-Sex Unions in Catholic Malta: Pointing the Finger at 'Europe'。South European Society and Politics,20,113-131。  new window
20.González-Salzberg, Damián A.(2015)。Confirming (the Illusion of) Heterosexual Marriage: Hämäläinen v Finland。Journal of International and Comparative,2,173-186。  new window
21.Gouttenoire, Adeline(2013)。Cohérence des contrôles de conventionnalité et de constitutionnalité en matière de droit des personnes et de la famille。Les Nouveau Cahiers du Conseil constitutionnel,39,63-77。  new window
22.Knezevic, Gaso、Pavic, Vladimir(2006)。Same-Sex Unions Within the Current Regulatory Framework of Serbian Private International Law。Yugoslav Law Year,33。  new window
23.Hooghe, Marc、Meeusen, Cecil(2013)。Is Same-Sex Marriage Legislation Related to Attitudes Toward Homosexuality? Trends in Tolerance of Homosexuality in European Countries Between 2002 and 2010。Sexuality Research Social Policy,10(4),258-268。  new window
24.Johnson, Paul(2011)。Challenging the Heteronormativity of Marriage: The Role of Judicial Interpretation and Authority。Social & Legal Studies,20(3),349-367。  new window
25.Johnson, Paul(2015)。Marriage, Heteronormativity, and the European Court of Human Rights: A Reappraisal。International Journal of Law, Policy and Family,29,56-77。  new window
26.Lopatka, Andreas(2013)。Same-Sex Partnership and Right to a Name。Vienna Journal on International Constitutional,7,372-377。  new window
27.Murer, Iris(2015)。Exclusion of Registered Partners from Adoption Rights Found to Be Discriminatory。Vienna Journal on International Constitutional,9,281-288。  new window
28.Mécary, Caroline(2008)。Homosexualité, mariage et filiation: où en sommes-nous?。Informations sociales,149,136-149。  new window
29.Mazeaud, Vincent(2015)。La constitutionnalisation du droit au respect de la vie privée。Les nouveaux cahiers du Conseil constitutionnel,48,5-20。  new window
30.Murray, John L.(2011)。The Influence of the European Convention on Fundamental Rights on Community Law。Fordham International Law Journal,33,1388-1422。  new window
31.Oppenheimer, David B.、Oliveira, Alvaro、Blumenthal, Aaron(2014)。Religiosity and Same-Sex Marriage in the United States and Europe。Berkeley Journal of International Law,32,195-238。  new window
32.Podolnjak, Robert(2015)。Constitutional Reforms of Citizen-Initiated Referendum: Causes of Different Outcomes in Slovenia and Croatia。Revus,26,129-149。  new window
33.Pluyette, Gérard(2007)。La définition du mariage civil en question (on en droit positif)。Recueil Dalloz,1389-1395。  new window
34.Ragone, Sabrina、Volpe, Valentina(2016)。An Emerging Right to A "Gay" Family Life? The Case Oliari v. Italy in a Comparative Perspective。German Law Journal,17,451-486。  new window
35.Sanders, Anne(2012)。Marriage, Same-Sex Partnership, and the German Constitution。German Law Journal,13,911-940。  new window
36.Scherpe, Jens M.(2013)。The Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Couples in Europe and the Role of the European Court of Human Rights。The Equal Rights Review,10,83-96。  new window
37.Schiek, Dagmar(2002)。A New Framework on Equal Treatment of Persons in EC Law?。European Law Journal,8(2),290-314。  new window
38.Simon, Denys(2008)。Cour de justice et Tribunal de première instance des Communautés européennes。AFDI,54,589-611。  new window
39.Schnapper, Dominique(2004)。L'irrésistible manage homosexuel?。Commentaire,107,765-771。  new window
40.Schmitt, Sophie、Euchner, Eva-Maria、Preidel, Caroline(2013)。Regulating Prostitution and Same-Sex Marriage in Italy and Spain: The Interplay of Political and Societal Veto Players in Two Catholic Societies。Journal of European Public,20,425-441。  new window
41.Sundhofer, Beate(2013)。The Competence of the District Administrative Authority Instead of the Office for Matters of Personal Status to Conclude a Registered Partnership。Vienna Journal of International Constitutional Law,7,378-380。  new window
42.Sutherland, Elaine E.(2011)。A Step Closer to Same-Sex Marriage Throughout Europe。Edinburgh Law Review,15,97-102。  new window
43.Szeibert-Erdős, Orsolya(2008)。Same-sex partners in Hungary Cohabitation and registered partnership。Utrecht Law Review,4,212-221。  new window
44.Thornton, Arland、Philipov, Dimiter(2009)。Sweeping Changes in Marriage, Cohabitation, and Childbearing in Central and Eastern Europe: New Insights from the Developmental Idealism Framework。European Journal of Population,25,123-156。  new window
45.Van der Sloot, Bart(2014)。Between Fact and Fiction: An Analysis of the Case-Law on Article 12 of the European Convention on Human Rights。Child and Family Law Quarterly,26,397-420。  new window
46.陳靜慧(20100100)。同性生活伴侶之平等權問題--以歐洲法院、德國聯邦憲法法院及德國聯邦行政法院之判決為中心。東吳法律學報,21(3),161-195。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Omejec, Jasna(2015)。Principle of the Separation of Powers and the Constitutional Justice System。Conference of constitutional control bodies of Central Asia "The Role of the Constitutional Court in Safeguarding the Supremacy of the Constitution",(會議日期: Oct. 28-29, 2015)。Strasbourg。  new window
圖書
1.Sudre, Frédéric(2012)。Droit européen et international des droits de l'homme。PUF。  new window
2.Equal Rights Trust(2016)。Justice or Complicity?: LGBT Rights and the Russia Courts。London:Equal Rights Trust。  new window
3.Vasseur-Lambry, Fanny(2000)。La famille et la Convention européenne des droits de l'homme。Paris:L'Harmattan。  new window
其他
1.Burgorgue-Larsen, Laurence(2005)。L'appréhension constitutionnelle de la vie privée en Europe,https://www.univparisl.fr/fileadmin/IREDIES/Contributions_en_ligne/L._BURGORGUE-LARSEN/L_apprehensionconstitutionnellevieprivee_1_.pdf。  new window
2.Silvola, Salla(2015)。National Report: Finland,http://ceflonline.net/wp-content/uploads/Finland-IR.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.Warner, Michael(1993)。[Fear of a Queer Planet: Queer Politics and Social Theory] Introduction。Fear of a Queer Planet: Queer Politics and Social Theory。Minneapolis:University of Minneapolis。  new window
2.黃舒芃(2016)。隔離但平等?--從「收養同性伴侶養子女」一案檢討德國聯邦憲法法院對同性伴侶法制之立論。框架秩序下的國家權力(二)--公法學術論文集。臺北:新學林。  延伸查詢new window
3.翁燕菁(2015)。平等權利與社會制度間的婚姻家庭--美國聯邦最高法院與歐洲人權法院的共識?。美國最高法院重要判決之研究--2010-2013。臺北:新學林。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Bodnar, Adam、Śledzińska-Simon, Anna(2014)。Between Recognition and Homophobia: Same-Sex Couples in Eastern Europe。Same-Sex Couples Before National Supranational and International Jurisdictions。Springer。  new window
5.de Freitas, Tiago Fidalgo、Tega, Diletta(2014)。Judicial Restraint and Political Responsibility: A Review of the Jurisprudence of the Italian, Spanish and Portuguese High Courts on Same-Sex Couples。Same-Sex Couples Before National, Supranational and International Jurisdictions。Springer。  new window
6.Enrich Mas, Montserrat(1999)。Article 12, in Pettiti, Louis-Edmond, Decaux, Emmanuel, et Imbert, Pierre-Henri, La Convention européenne des droits de l'homme。Commentaire article par article。Paris:Economica。  new window
7.Graupner, Helmut(2012)。Comparing People or Institutions? Sexual Orientation Discrimination and the Court of Justice of the European Union。Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Relationships in Europe。Cambridge:Intersentia。  new window
8.Friðriksdóttir, Hrefna(2014)。The Nordic Model: Same-Sex Families in Love and Law。Same-Sex Couples Before National, Supranational and International Jurisdictions。Springer。  new window
9.Koulu, Sanna(2015)。Towards a Negotiatory Ideal? Contractualization of Family Law in Finland。Contractualisation of Family Law--Global Perspectives。Springer。  new window
10.Laurent-Boutot, Carine(2010)。Une vision nouvelle de la vie familiale en Europe。La Charte des droits fondamentaux de l'Union europeenne après le traité de Lisbonne。Bruxelles:Burylant。  new window
11.Kuhar, Roman、Čeplak, Metka Mencin(2016)。Same-Sex Partnership Debate in Slovenia: Between Declarative Support and Lack of Political Will。The EU Enlargement and Gay Politics: The Impact of Eastern Enlargement on Rights, Activism and Prejudice。Basingstoke:Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
12.Villaverde, Lorenzo、María, José(2015)。And the Story Comes to an End: The Constitutionality of Same-Sex Marriages in Spain。Same Sex Couples--Comparative Insights on Marriage and Cohabitation。Springer。  new window
13.Marguénaud, Jean-Pierre(2010)。Enterrement du manage homosexuel et naissance de la vie familiale homosexuelle。RTD Civ。  new window
14.Mole, Richard C. M.(2016)。Nationalism and Homophobia in Central and Eastern Europe。The EU Enlargement and Gay Politics: The Impact of Eastern Enlargement on Rights, Activism and Prejudice。Basingstoke:Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
15.Moss, Kevin(2014)。Split Europe: Homonationalism and Homophobia in Croatia。LGBT Activism and the Making of Europe: A Rainbow Europe?。Basingstoke:Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
16.Pustorino, Pietro(2014)。Same-Sex Couples Before the ECtHR: The Right to Marriage。Same-Sex Couples Before National, Supranational and International Jurisdictions。Springer。  new window
17.Talalaev, Helen(2015)。The Situation of LGBT Persons in Estonia。Human Rights in Estonia 2014-2015: Annual Report of the Estonian Human Rights Centre。Tallinn:Estonian Human Rights Centre。  new window
18.Waaldijk, Kees(1998)。La libre circulation des partenaires de même sexe。Homosexualité et droit. De la tolérance sociale à la reconnaissance juridique。Paris:PUF。  new window
19.Weng, Vivianne(2014)。Une vue de l'extérieur sur l'interdiction du mariage entre personnes de même sexe dans le nouveau code civil。Le nouveau Code civil roumain: Vu de l'intérieur-Vu de l'extérieur。Bucharest:Editura universitatii din Bucaresti。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
1. 歐洲人權法下國家應對氣候變遷的積極義務:以荷蘭Urgenda一案為例
2. 社群媒體不實訊息之治理--以個資保護模式為選項
3. 「謝尖順事件」之媒體語藝框架分析:「跨性別國家主義」的觀點
4. 外國人可否享有社會給付受給之權利--評釋日本永住外國人準用或適用生活保護法訴訟事件
5. 憲法解釋中的家庭圖像與其規範地位
6. 憲政叢林下的婚姻平權
7. 奧、德同性婚姻法制發展與現況--兼論司法院釋字第748號解釋後之同性婚姻立法途徑
8. 論婚姻平權釋憲案之法理意義與我國稅捐法制的影響:以德國法及德國聯邦憲法法院有關判決作為比較
9. 對話與爭議:從歐洲人權法圖像論臺灣施行人權公約之實質意涵
10. 我國移民融合機制之實際成效與可行對策之研究:從「移民融合政策指標」(MIPEX)之角度開展
11. 憲法上婚姻家庭之制度性保障不應排除同性伴侶及其家庭,拒絕同性伴侶締結婚姻有害同性家庭子女之權益--法律學者法庭之友意見書
12. 從「移民融合政策指標」(MIPEX)探討韓國移民融合機制之現況、成效與對策:兼論對我國之啟示
13. 法律與語言之雙重挑戰--醫療糾紛通譯角色與功能之研究
14. 從「移民融合政策指標」(MIPEX)探討我國移民融合機制之現況、成效與未來可行之發展對策
15. 我國婚姻制度裡的性別歧視與多元成家方案之變革
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE