臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：平等權利與社會制度間的婚姻家庭--美國聯邦最高法院與歐洲人權法院的共識？
作者：翁燕菁
書刊名：美國最高法院重要判決之研究. 2010~2013;黃昭元 (主編)
頁次：125-196
出版日期：2015
出版項：臺北:新學林
主題關鍵詞：平等權；社會制度；婚姻家庭
學門：法律學
資料類型：專書論文
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:5
期刊論文
1.翁燕菁(20110900)。私人與家庭生活的歐洲共識與善良風俗--《歐洲人權公約》體系求同存異之道。中研院法學期刊，9，179-269。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Woehrling, Jean-Marie(2008)。Le droit français de la lutte contre les discriminations à la lumière du droit comparé。Informations Sociales，148，58-71。  new window
3.劉宏恩(2010)。法學英文之「風中奇緣」--以美國「深愛夫婦訴維吉尼亞州」(Loving v. Virginia)案為例。月旦法學，187，161-169。  延伸查詢new window
4.Bribosia, Emmanuelle、Rorive, Isabelle、Van den Eynde, Laura(2014)。Same-Sex Marriage--Building an Argument Before the European Court of Human Rights in Light of the U.S. Experience。Berkeley Journal of International Law，32(1)，1-43。  new window
5.McClain, Linda C.(2013)。From Romer v. Evans to United States v. Windsor: Law as a Vehicle for Moral Disapproval in Amendment 2 and the Defense of Marriage Act。Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy，20，351-478。  new window
6.黃昭元(20030900)。純男性軍校與性別歧視--評United States v. Virginia一案判決。歐美研究，33(3)，461-539。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.張宏誠(20111200)。雖不獲亦不惑矣--美國同性婚姻平等保障司法判決之回顧與展望。成大法學，22，143-228。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.劉靜怡(19971100)。同性戀者之憲法平等權保障--以美國聯邦最高法院Romer V. Evans判決為核心。月旦法學，30，35-48+49。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.翁燕菁(20130900)。不歧視原則之經濟社會權利保障效力：歐洲人權公約當代課題。歐美研究，43(3)，637-707。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Strasser, Mark(1997)。Loving the Romer out for Baehr: On Acts in Defense of Marriage and the Constitution。University of Pittsburgh Law Review，58，279-323。  new window
11.Tribe, Laurence H.(2004)。Lawrence v. Texas: The "fundamental right" that dare not speak its name。Harvard Law Review，117(6)，1893-1955。  new window
12.Szymczak, David(2012)。Question prioritaire de constitutionnalité et Convention européenne des droits de l'Homme: L'européanisation 'heurtée' du Conseil constitutionnel français。Jus Politicum，7，1-23。  new window
13.Barrie, Jeneba(2013)。European Union Law and Gay Rights: Assessing the Equal Treatment in Employment and Occupation Directive and Case Law on Employment Benefits for Registered Same-Sex Partnerships。Journal of Civil Law Studies，6(2)，617-652。  new window
14.Johnson, Paul(2011)。Challenging the Heteronormativity of Marriage: The Role of Judicial Interpretation and Authority。Social & Legal Studies，20(3)，349-367。  new window
15.Scherpe, Jens M.(2013)。The Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Couples in Europe and the Role of the European Court of Human Rights。The Equal Rights Review，10，83-96。  new window
16.廖福特(20110715)。【歐洲人權研討會】國家積極義務與私人生活保障--歐洲人權法院2010年相關判決之檢視。臺灣法學雜誌，180，45-67。  延伸查詢new window
17.Ammaturo, Francesca Romana(2014)。The Right to a Privilege? Homonormativity and the Recognition of Same-Sex Couples in Europe。Social & Legal Studies，23，175-194。  new window
18.(2003)。Development in the Law II--Inching Down the Aisle: Differing Paths Toward the Legalization of Same-Sex Marriage in the United States and Europe。Harvard Law Review，116，2004-2027。  new window
19.(2004)。Litigating the Defense of Marriage Act: The Next Battleground for Same-Sex Marriage。Harvard Law Review，117，2684-2707。  new window
20.Araiza, William D.(2014)。After the Tiers: Windsor, Congressional Power to Enforce Equal Protection, and the Challenge of Pointillist Constitutionalism。Boston University Law Review，94，367-413。  new window
21.Bartlett, Philip L. II(1999)。Recent Legislation: Same-Sex Marriage。Harvard Journal on Legislation，36，581-590。  new window
22.Bower, Chris(2014)。Juggling Rights and Utility: A Legal and Philosophical Framework for Analyzing Same-Sex Marriage in the Wake of United States v. Windsor。California Law Review，102，971-1013。  new window
23.Burgorgue-Larsen, Laurence(2001)。L'autonomie constitutionnelle aux prises avec la Convention européenne des droits de l'homme。Revue belge de droit constitutionnel，1，31-64。  new window
24.Chemerinsky, Erwin(2014)。Law Review Symposium 2014--Keynote by Erwin Chemerinsky。University of California at Davis Law Review，48，447-472。  new window
25.Crușmac, Oana(2014)。Democracy, Deliberation and Exclusion. A Brief Case Study on Romanian Deliberation Regarding the Civil Partnership。Analize--Journal of Gender and Feminist Studies，3，137-158。  new window
26.Culverhouse, Renee、Lewis, Christine(1993)。Homosexuality as a Suspect Class。South Texas Law Review，34，205-249。  new window
27.Decaux, Emmanuel(2001)。L'Europe à ses miroirs。Droits fondamentaux，1，31-66。  new window
28.Dorocak, John R.(2014)。Is the Constitution Only Libertarian and Not Socially Conservative? U.S. v. Windsor and the Unconstitutionality of DOMA's Definition of Marriage to Exclude Same-Sex Couples--Requiem for a Heavyweight?。George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal，24，263-296。  new window
29.Eskridge, William N. Jr.(2004)。United States: Lawrence v. Texas and the Imperative of Comparative Constitutionalism。International Journal of Constitutional Law，2(3)，555-560。  new window
30.Eskridge, William N. Jr.(2004)。Yale Law School and the Overruling of Bowers v. Hardwick。Yale Law Review，51。  new window
31.Eude, Marina(2003)。Vingt ans après la Cour européenne des droits de l'homme, la Cour suprême américaine condamne la répression pénale des relations homosexuelles。Droits fondamentaux，3，155-161。  new window
32.Farrell, Robert C.(1997)。Successful Rational Basis Claims in the Supreme Court from the 1971 Term Through Romer v. Evans。Indiana Law Review，32，357-419。  new window
33.Fassin, Éric(1998)。Homosexualité et mariage aux États-Unis (Histoire d'une polémique)。Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales，125，63-73。  new window
34.Flauss, Jean-François(2005)。La présence de la jurisprudence de la Cour suprême des Etats-Unis d'Amérique dans le contentieux européen des droits de l'homme。Revue trimestrielle des droits de l'homme，62，313-331。  new window
35.Franke, Katherine M.(2004)。The Domesticated Liberty of Lawrence v. Texas。Columbia Law Review，104，1399-1426。  new window
36.Gonzalez, Gérard(2002)。Le Protocole n° 12 à la Convention européenne des droits de l'homme portant interdiction générale de discriminer。RFDA，2，113-123。  new window
37.Hamilton, Frances(2013)。Why the Margin of Appreciation Is not the Answer to the Gay Marriage Debate。European Human Rights Law Review，2013(1)，47-55。  new window
38.Hervieu, Nicholas(2012)。Actualités Droits-Libertés du 16 mars 2012。Actualité Droits-Libertés。  new window
39.Hervieu, Nicolas(20140512)。Une Cour européenne des droits de l'homme maîtresse de son destin。Actualité Droits-Libertés。  new window
40.Issaeva, Maria、Kiskachi, Maria(2014)。Immoral Truth vs. Untruthful Morals? Attempts to Render Rights and Freedoms Conditional upon Sexual Orientation in Light of Russia's International Obligations。Russian Law Journal，1，82-105。  new window
41.Johnson, Paul(2012)。Adoption, Homosexuality and the European Convention on Human Rights: Gas and Dubois v France。The Modern Law Review，75(6)，1136-1149。  new window
42.Joslin, Courtney G.(2013)。Windsor, Federalism, and Family Equality。Columbia Law Review，113，156-179。  new window
43.Kramer, Larry(1997)。Same-Sex Marriage, Conflict of Laws, and the Unconstitutional Public Policy Exception。The Yale Law Journal，106，1965-2008。  new window
44.Loveland, Ian(2014)。A Right to Engage in Same Sex Marriage in the United States?。European Human Rights Law Review，2014(1)，10-20。  new window
45.Persad, Xavier B. Lutchmie(2014)。An Expanding Human Rights Corpus: Sexual Minority Rights as International Human Rights。Cardozo Journal of Law & Gender，20，337-369。  new window
46.Marguénaud, Jean-Pierre(2010)。Enterrement du mariage homosexuel et naissance de la vie familiale homosexuelle。RTD Civ.，2010。  new window
47.Martinico, Giuseppe(2012)。Is the European Convention Going to Be 'Supreme'? A Comparative-Constitutional Overview of ECHR and EU Law before National Courts。European Journal of International Law，23(2)，401-424。  new window
48.Myers, Richard S.(2014)。The Implications of Justice Kennedy's Opinion in United States v. Windsor。Elon Law Review，6，323-335。  new window
49.Parrish, Austen L.(2007)。Storm in a Teacup: The U.S. Supreme Court's Use of Foreign Law。University of Illinois Law Review，2，637-680。  new window
50.Patten, James M.(1998)。The Defense of Marriage Act: How Congress Said "No" to full Faith and Credit and the Constitution。Santa Clara Law Review，38，939-959。  new window
51.Poirier, Marc R.(2014)。"Whiffs of Federalism" in Windsor v. United States: Power, Localism, and Kulturkampf。University of Colorado Law Review，85，935-1001。  new window
52.Pollvogt, Susannah W.(2014)。Marriage Equality, United States v. Windsor, and the Crisis in Equal Protection Jurisprudence。Hofstra Law Review，42，1045-1062。  new window
53.Popescu, Corneliu-Liviu(2008)。Les rapports entre le droit international des droits de l'homme et le droit roumain。Derecho y Politica，8，121-134。  new window
54.Rensberger, Jeffrey L.(1998)。Same-Sex Marriages and the Defense of Marriage Act: A Deviant View of an Experiment in Full Faith and Credit。Creighton Law Review，32，409-456。  new window
55.Rozakis, Christos L.(2006)。The European Judge as Comparatist。Tulane Law Review，80，257-280。  new window
56.Sanders, Steve(2014)。Is the Full Faith and Credit Clause Still "Irrelevant" to Same-Sex Marriage?: Toward a Reconsideration of the Conventional Wisdom。Indiana Law Journal，89，95-113。  new window
57.Siegel, Reva B.(2013)。The Supreme Court 2012 Term. Foreword: Equality Divided。Harvard Law Review，127，1-94。  new window
58.Smith, Daniel(2004)。Continental Drift: The European Court of Human Rights and the Abolition of Anti-Sodomy Laws in Lawrence v. Texas。University of Cincinnati Law Review，72，1799-1819。  new window
59.Spindelman, Marc(2004)。Surviving Lawrence v. Texas。Michigan Law Review，102，1615-1667。  new window
60.Strasser, Mark(2000)。Loving, Baehr, and the Right to Marry: On Legal Argumentation and Sophistical Rhetoric。Nova Law Review，24，769-791。  new window
61.Sunstein, Cass R.(1996)。The Supreme Court 1995 Term: Foreword: Leaving Things Undecided。Harvard Law Review，110，4-101。  new window
62.Vaigè, Laima(2012)。The Problematics of Recognition of Same-Sex Marriages Originating from Member States According to the EU Legal Regulation。Societal Studies，4(2)，755-775。  new window
63.Vick, Gabe(1996)。The Defense of Marriage Act: The Crossroad of Love and Legislation。Journal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers，22，105-115。  new window
64.Wadlington, Walter(1966)。The Loving Case: Virginia's Anti-Miscegenation Statute in Historical Perspective。Virginia Law Review，52，1189-1223。  new window
65.Young, Earnest A.、Blondel, Erin C.(2013)。Federalism, Liberty, and Equality in United States v. Windsor。Cato Supreme Court Review，2012/2013，117-147。  new window
66.Zamansky, Stephen(1993)。Colorado's Amendment 2 and Homosexuals' Right to Equal Protection of the Law。Boston College Law Review，35(1)，221-258。  new window
67.黃昭元(20040500)。憲法權利限制的司法審查標準：美國類型化多元標準模式的比較分析。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，33(3)，45-148。new window  延伸查詢new window
68.陳荔彤(20040100)。美國最高法院同性性行為除罪化與同性婚姻合法化的憲法發展。月旦法學，104，204-224。new window  延伸查詢new window
69.廖元豪(20140100)。革命即將成功，同志仍須努力--簡評美國聯邦最高法院同性婚姻之判決。月旦法學，224，20-37。new window  延伸查詢new window
70.Blumberg, Grace Ganz(2004)。Legal Recognition of Same-sex Conjugal Relationships: The 2003 California Domestic Partner Rights and Responsibilities Act in Comparative Civil Rights and Family Law Perspective。UCLA Law Review，51，1555-1618。  new window
71.Posner, Richard A.(1992)。Legal Reasoning from the Top Down and from the Bottom Up: The Question of Unenumerated Constitutional Rights。The University of Chicago Law Review，59(1)，433-450。  new window
會議論文
1.王韻茹(2014)。「同者」等之：德國同性伴侶平等權之憲法實踐。第二屆翁岳生教授公法研討會：德國聯邦憲法法院2010-2013年重要判決之研究，國立臺灣大學法律學院主辦 (會議日期: 2014年6月14日)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃舒芃(2014)。隔離但平等？從「收養同性伴侶養子女」一案檢討德國聯邦憲法法院對同性伴侶法制之立論。第二屆翁岳生教授公法研討會：德國聯邦憲法法院2010-2013年重要判決之研究，國立臺灣大學法律學院主辦 (會議日期: 2014年6月14日)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.Smith, Alison M.(20140417)。Same-Sex Marriage: A Legal Background after United States v. Windsor。  new window
圖書
1.Allard, Julie、Garapon, Antoine(2005)。Les juges dans la mondialisation. Une nouvelle révolution du droit。Paris：Seuil。  new window
2.Vasseur-Lambry, Fanny(2000)。La famille et la Convention européenne des droits de l'homme。Paris：L'Harmattan。  new window
3.Kilkely, Ursula(2001)。The Right to Respect for Private and Family Life. A Guide for the Implementation of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights。Strasbourg：Council of Europe。  new window
4.Commissaire aux droits de l'homme du Conseil de l'Europe(2011)。La discrimination fondée sur l'orientation sexuelle et l'identité de genre en Europe。Strasbourg：Conseil de l'Europe。  new window
5.Johnson, Paul(2012)。Homosexuality and the European Court of Human Rights。NY：Routledge。  new window
6.Pettiti, L. E.、Decaux, E.、Imbert, P. H.(1995)。La Convention européenne des droits de l 'homme. Commentaire article par article。Paris：Economica。  new window
7.Decaux, E.(2010)。Le Pacte international relatif aux droits civils et politiques. Commentaire article par article。Paris：Economica。  new window
8.Pettiti, L.-É.、Decaux, E.、Imbert, P.-H.(1999)。La Convention européenne des droits de l'homme. Commentaire article par article。Paris：Economica。  new window
單篇論文
1.Commission européenne des droits de l'homme(1956)。Travaux préparatoires de l'article 8 de la Convention européenne des droits de l'Homme，Conseil de l'Europe。(DH(56)12)。  new window
圖書論文
1.陳昭如(2008)。抗拒失憶--女性主義法律史的理論與方法初探。2008法律思想與社會變遷。臺北市：中央研究院法律學研究所籌備處。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳宜倩(2007)。性／性慾特質、隱私權與同志人權--評析Lawrence v. Texas一案判決。美國最高法院重要判決之研究：2000-2003。臺北：中央研究院歐美研究所。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃昭元(2002)。司法消極美德的積極實踐--評Sunstein教授的「司法最小主義」理論。當代公法新論--翁岳生教授七秩誕辰祝壽論文集。臺北：元照。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Baias, Favius(2013)。Commentaire introductif au Livre II. De la famille。Nouveau Code civil roumain. Traduction commentée。Paris：Dalloz。  new window
5.Burgorguc-Larsen, Laurence(2009)。De l'internationalisation du dialogue des juges。Le dialogue des juges: Mélanges Bruno Genevois。Paris：Dalloz。  new window
6.Calabresi, Steven G.、Bickford, Lucy D.(2014)。Federalism and Subsidiarity: Perspectives from U.S. Constitutional Law。Federalism and Subsidiarity。New York：New York University Press。  new window
7.Dutheillet de Lamothe, Olivier(2008)。Conseil constitutionnel et Cour européenne des droits de l'Homme: un dialogue sans parole。Le dialogue des juges: Mélanges en l'honneur du président Bruno Genevois。Paris：Dalloz。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：765（臺灣：751，外國：14） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1520404 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67325830
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上