臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：華語文寫作測驗信度與評分規準適切性研究--以流利精通級摘要寫作題型為例
書刊名：華語文教學研究
作者：陳柏熹／彭淑惠／藍珮君
作者(外文)：Chen, Po-hsi／Peng, Shu-hui／Lan, Pei-jiun
出版日期：2019
卷期：16:2
頁次：頁75-102
主題關鍵詞：信度；流利精通級；華語文寫作測驗；評分規準；摘要寫作；Band C test；Reliability；Rubrics；Summary writing；TOCFL writing test
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:18
  • 點閱點閱:9
寫作測驗因題數少且須仰賴人工評分，使其信度研究更形重要，然而過往華語寫作測驗信度相關文獻甚為少見。緣此，本研究針對流利精通級華語文寫作測驗摘要寫作題型的信度與評分規準的適切性進行探討，運用的分析模式包括斯皮爾曼等級相關分析、類推性理論與多元迴歸分析。研究結果顯示：（1）在採取分析式評分方式的情況下，多數評分者所評定出的整體級分與最後成績呈中度或高度正相關，評分者間信度大致良好。（2）受試者的變異成分最高，可佐證其得分能反映寫作能力。（3）文本由3人評閱，有利兼顧評分品質與經濟效益。（4）在11個變項中，複雜句型、組織、詞彙語法、詞語運用、規範性為預測力較為顯著的變項
A writing test is a form of language test that has fewer items in each test and relies heavily on subjective rating. These features of the writing test make the issue of reliability rather significant. This research focuses on the task type of Summary Writing used in the TOCFL Writing Test, Band C. By utilizing the analysis methods associated with Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, multiple regression analysis and generalizability theory, this study aims to discuss the reliability of, and the rubrics associated with, this specific task type. The results of this study can be summarized as follows: (1) By adopting an analytic rating method, the individual scores given by the majority of the raters have high-positive or medium-positive correlations with the final score. Inter-rater reliability is moderately high. (2) The variance components of the test-takers are the highest, which indicates that the scores for this task type can clearly reflect individual test-taker's writing ability. (3) Assigning three raters to rate each test essay can assure the quality and efficiency of the rating process. (4) Among the 11 variables which we have analyzed, 5 of them - complex sentence patterns, organization, vocabulary and syntax, vocabulary switching, and response requirements - can predict test-takers' writing ability more significantly
期刊論文
1.Kretchmar, Jennifer(2006)。Assessing the reliability of ratings used in undergraduate admission decisions。Journal of College Admission，192，10-15。  new window
2.王德蕙、李奕璇、曾芬蘭、宋曜廷(20130300)。「國民中學學生基本學力測驗寫作測驗」信度與效度分析研究。測驗學刊，60(1)，151-184。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Webb, Noreen M.、Rowley, Glenn L.、Shavelson, Richard J.(1988)。Using generalizability theory in counseling and development。Measurement and evaluation in counseling and development，21，81-90。  new window
4.Shavelson, Richard J.、Webb, Noreen M.、Rowley, Glenn L.(1989)。Generalizability theory。American Psychologist，44(6)，922-932。  new window
5.熊玉雯、李慧萱、宋曜廷(20141200)。基於ACTFL之華語文寫作評分規準。華語文教學研究，11(4)，111-139。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.聶丹(2009)。漢語水平考試（HSK）寫作評分標準發展概述。雲南師範大學學報.對外漢語教學與研究版，7(6)，15-20。  延伸查詢new window
7.Alkharusi, Hussain(2012)。Generalizability theory: An analysis of variance approach to measurement problems in educational assessment。Journal of Studies in Education，2(1)，184-196。  new window
8.Mushquash, Christopher、O'Connor, Brian P.(2006)。SPSS and SAS programs for generalizability theory analyses。Behavior Research Methods，38，542-547。  new window
9.Brennan, Robert L.(2000)。Performance assessments from the perspective of generalizability theory。Applied Psychological Measurement，24(4)，339-353。  new window
研究報告
1.Chen, Eva、Niemi, David、Wang, Jia、Wang, Haiwen、Mirocha, Jim(2007)。Examining the generalizability of direct writing assessment tasks。National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, University of California。  new window
學位論文
1.張玉茹(2004)。國民中學學生英語寫作能力測驗的編製與其相關因素之研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.陳柏熹(2011)。心理與教育測驗：測驗編製理論與實務。精策教育有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.王文中、呂金燮、吳毓瑩、張郁雯、張淑慧(2008)。教育測驗與評量--教室學習觀點。臺北市：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Brookes, Arthur、Grundy, Peter(1998)。Beginning to write。Cambridge, Massachusetts：Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.張郁雯(20090000)。華語評量。新北市：正中書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Grabe, William、Kaplan, Robert B.(1996)。Theory and practice of writing: An applied linguistic perspective。Longman。  new window
6.Shavelson, Richard J.、Webb, Noreen M.(1991)。Generalizability Theory: A Primer。Newbury Park, California：Sage。  new window
7.Alderson, J. Charles、Clapham, Caroline、Wall, Dianne(1995)。Language test construction and evaluation。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.Council of Europe(2001)。Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment。Cambridge University Press。  new window
9.Bachman, Lyle F.(1990)。Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing。Oxford University Press。  new window
10.Sullivan, Kathleen E.(1980)。Paragraph Practice: Writing the Paragraph and the Short Composition。New York：MacMillan Publishing Co.。  new window
11.國家華語測驗推動工作委員會(2018)。華語文能力測驗技術報告2016（2）寫作測驗信效度。新北市：國家華語測驗推動工作委員會。  延伸查詢new window
12.Weigle, Sara C.(2002)。Assessing Writing。Cambridge University Press。  new window
13.吳明隆(2000)。SPSS統計運用實務。臺北：松崗電腦圖書資料股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
14.國家華語測驗推動工作委員會(2015)。華語文能力測驗技術報告2013（4）寫作測驗信效度。新北市：國家華語測驗推動工作委員會。  延伸查詢new window
15.國家華語測驗推動工作委員會(2016)。華語文能力測驗技術報告2014（4）寫作測驗信效度。新北市：國家華語測驗推動工作委員會。  延伸查詢new window
16.Luoma, Sari(2004)。Assessing speaking。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Chang, Li-ping(2017)。The development of the test of Chinese as a foreign language (TOCFL)。Chinese as a Second Language Assessment。Berlin：Springer。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：592（臺灣：587，外國：5） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2516201 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：68326516
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上