:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:以Q方法探討臺灣民眾對一夜情態度之調查研究
書刊名:性學研究
作者:林宜臻郭洪國雄 引用關係施俊名 引用關係
作者(外文):Lin, Yi-chenKuo Hung, Kuo-hsiungShih, Chun-ming
出版日期:2019
卷期:10:1
頁次:頁53-73
主題關鍵詞:一夜情不同世代臺灣民眾態度Q方法One-night standDifferent generationsTaiwanese peopleAttitudeQ method
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:29
  • 點閱點閱:1
本研究旨在瞭解台灣民眾對一夜情態度為何,利用質量並重、專為探討主觀態度及價值觀的Q方法作為研究工具,企圖摒除傳統大樣本量化研究,難以探索受訪者各個層面間觀點差異之憾,並將其主觀意識更完整表達。綜合分析Q分類結果根據受訪者的訪談整理可分為三大類型:「情感貞潔型」、「性愛愉悅型」、「矛盾情緒型」。關聯性比對發現,有無一夜情經驗對其態度影響較其他背景變項高。研究建議為以下幾點:1.研究結果發現有無一夜情經驗對其態度影響較其他背景變項高,其中矛盾情緒型有經驗的比例最高,建議未來可針對是否有一夜情經驗與其態度的關係進一步探討。2.訪談過程發現許多受訪者的性知識仍有誤解,建議針對以下幾點加強說明,如:「性解放」一詞解釋、婚外性問題、安全性行為知識、尋找性的方式具高風險。此外,亦建議增加情感教育以增進民眾對情感價值觀之認識。3.研究方法的建議:(1)後續研究如欲得更精細之分類,陳述句可針對單一層面進行設計;(2)普遍認知較敏感或隱私議題之研究,可考慮網路施測或現場施測、網路(電話)訪談,以避免得到無效訪談結果;(3)不同類型數之因素負荷顯著量相同者,其解釋變異量若接近,可選擇較少之類型數;若差距大,則相反之。
With changes of social ethos in Taiwan and the increasing convenience of communication tools and network, more and more people become receptive to one-night stand and sexual hookup. Statistics show that the popularity of one-night stand in Taiwan has been increasing in recent years, but the average age of such people has been decreasing. This research aims at understanding the attitudes of Taiwanese people towards one-night stand, and uses the research tool of Q method that pays equal attention to the quality and explores subjective attitudes and values in order to make up for the disadvantage that the traditional quantitative research of large sample has difficulty in exploring the differences of opinions of interviewees at all levels and to more completely express their subjective idea. According to the comprehensive analysis of Q classification result respecting the interview, the interviewees can be divided into three types: "Emotional Chastity Type," "Erotic Pleasure Type," and "Emotional Ambivalence Type." The correlation comparison unveils that whether the experience of one-night stand exists has higher influence than other background variables on their attitudes. Research suggestions are as follows: 1. The research result reveals that whether the experience of one-night stand exists has larger influence on their attitudes than other background variables. The interviewees of Emotional Ambivalence Type who has this experience have the largest proportion. It is supposed to explore the relationship between whether the experience of one-night stand exists and their attitudes. 2. During the interview, it is found that misunderstanding exists in sexual knowledge of many interviewees. The following aspects should be focused to explain, e.g, explanation on "Sexual Liberation," issue of extramarital sex, knowledge of safe sex, ways of seeking sex are highly risky. Furthermore, we can increase emotional education so that the public's opinions on correct emotional values will be improved. 3. Recommendations for research method: (1) In order to obtain more detailed classification, subsequent researches can focus on single aspect; (2) Researches on widely believed sensitive or private issues can consider network testing and interview or site testing, network (telephone) interview to avoid invalid interview result; (3) For the same significance of factor loading on number of types (the number of people classified is the same), if the explained variance is close, the smaller number of types is adopted; if the variance is large, the larger number of types is adopted.
期刊論文
1.王坤龍(19931200)。Q方法之簡介。中國工商學報,15,287-298。  延伸查詢new window
2.羅文輝(19861100)。Q方法的理論與應用。新聞學研究,37,45-71。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Dennis, K. E.(1986)。Q methodology: relevance and application to nursing research。Advances in Nursing Science,8(3),6-17。  new window
4.Tetting, D. W.(1988)。Q-sort update。Western Journal of Nursing Research,10(6),757-765。  new window
5.許齡臻、陳泓劭、李裕民、林松甫(20031200)。師院生性態度與性行為之相關性調查研究--以臺中師院為取樣分析。社會科教育研究,8,91-134。  延伸查詢new window
6.王心怡(2005)。四成大專生渴望網路一夜情。台北期刊,25,18-25。  延伸查詢new window
7.安云鳳(2003)。對「一夜情」的倫理透析。道德與文明,2003(6),52-55。  延伸查詢new window
8.李小芳、羅維、謝嘉梁(2005)。網友一夜情現象透視。中國青年研究,2005(4),9-11。  延伸查詢new window
9.馬藜(2006)。是一杯毒酒還是一碗心靈雞湯--對「一夜情」現象的解讀。湖南人文科技學院學報,2006(5),65-68。  延伸查詢new window
10.張殘(2014)。「約砲」的實踐與解放--臉書匿名粉絲頁風潮。共誌,8,52-55。  延伸查詢new window
11.程毅、嚴大龍(2007)。上海市大學生性行為現狀凋〔調〕查。中國公共衛生,23(6)。  延伸查詢new window
12.劉中一(2011)。來自網路的性呼喚:網路「一夜情」的社會人類學考察。中國性科學,20(11),46-54。  延伸查詢new window
13.劉中一(2011)。過程與特徵:網路一夜情的質性研究。中國青年研究,2011(8),54-58。  延伸查詢new window
14.Carolyn, B.、Arnold, S. K.、Bryan, K. S.(2010)。To hook up or date: Which gender benefits?。Sex Roles,62(9/10),661-669。  new window
15.Easton, J. A.、Confer, J. C.、Goetz, C. D.、Buss, D. M.(2010)。Reproduction expediting: Sexual motivations, fantasies, and the ticking biological clock。Personality and Individual Differences,49(5),516-520。  new window
16.Garcia, J. R.、Reiber, C.(2008)。Hook-up behavior: A biopsychosocial perspective。Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology,2(4),192-208。  new window
17.Garcia, J. R.、Reiber, C.、Massey, S. G.、Merriwether, A. M.(2012)。Sexual hookup culture: A review。Review of General Psychology,16(2),161-176。  new window
18.Rebecca, D. S.(2010)。Hooking up in young adulthood: A review of factors influencing the sexual behavior of college students。Journal of College Student Psychotherapy,24(2),98-115。  new window
19.Schlinger, M. J.(1969)。Cues on Q-Technique。Journal of Advertising Research,9(3),53-60。  new window
20.楊嘉玲、陳美伶(20010600)。Q研究法之簡介。長庚護理,12(2)=34,144-153。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.郭思禹(2005)。政治行政關係之研究:以Q方法論對台北市府會聯絡人的應用(碩士論文)。世新大學,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.戴一凡(2004)。我國國立大學行政法人化之論述分析(碩士論文)。國立暨南國際大學,南投縣。  延伸查詢new window
3.簡維政(1993)。青少年性態度及性行為影響因素之研究(碩士論文)。中國文化大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
4.熊威(2008)。網路人際關係的行為意圖:網路交友與網路一夜情(碩士論文)。國立臺北大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.盧嬿任(2017)。新媒體時代中部彰化地區大學生一夜情性態度及性行為現況調查(碩士論文)。樹德科技大學,高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Stephenson, William(1974)。The Play Theory of Mass Communication。University of Chicago Press。  new window
2.Stephenson, William(1953)。The Study of Behavior: Q-Technique and Its Methodology。Chicago:The University of Chicago Press。  new window
其他
1.李定宇(20131130)。手機約砲別太爽 愛滋感染增1倍,https://tw.appledaily.com/headline/daily/20131130/35474859。  延伸查詢new window
2.李珮雲(20170123)。交友軟體統計iPhone用戶一夜情比例高達……驚人,https://www.chinatimes.com/hottopic/20170123004827-260804?chdtv。  延伸查詢new window
3.沈能元,寗瑋瑜(20110211)。危險一夜情 不到1成戴保險套,https://tw.appledaily.com/headline/daily/20110211/33174963。  延伸查詢new window
4.邱俊吉(20160124)。撿屍、一夜情夯 淋病衝破3000人,https://tw.appledaily.com/new/realtime/20160124/782126。  延伸查詢new window
5.楊雅靜,羅凡勇(20100814)。2成上班族 渴望一夜情,https://tw.news.appledaily.com/headline/daily/20100814/32737244。  延伸查詢new window
6.羅真(20171130)。愛滋病年輕化調查:年輕人更愛玩卻不戴套,https://health.udn.com/health/story/6047/2847762。  延伸查詢new window
7.Bryner, J.(20090811)。Men not choosy in one-night stands,https://www.livescience.com/5625-men-choosy-night-stands.html。  new window
8.Matthews, S.(20170119)。Surprise, surprise! Women feel guilty about having one night stands but men regret not having more - And it's because of evolution, scientists reveal,https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-4136312/A-fifth-men-don-t-feelguilty-one-night-stands.html。  new window
9.McDonald, T.(20161103)。Have you regretted a one night stand? Men and women both feel bad after casual sex,https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3901800/Have-regrettedsex-moming-Women-men-feel-negative-emotions-one-night-stand.html。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top