:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:以Q方法探討求職者認知面試官表現類型及理論方向之研究
書刊名:東吳經濟商學學報
作者:劉仲矩 引用關係
作者(外文):Liu, Chung-chu
出版日期:2014
卷期:86
頁次:頁29-60
主題關鍵詞:求職者Q方法認知類型面試官創造力理論Job seekersQ methodCognitive styleInterviewerInnovative theory
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:272
  • 點閱點閱:454
面試官的表現對求職過程是否成功扮演著重要關鍵。面試官有哪些態度類型,從求職者觀點來看可能是多元的表現。不同類型的面試官表現可能會對求職者帶來不同的面談效果。這些不同的表現可否因此對理論有所修正或提出創新方向,值得研究。故本研究目的主要探討求職者認知面試官表現類型及可能的理論發展面向。題項方面,採用參酌文獻及開放式問卷詢問有求職經驗者,進而發展36個題項,經過Q分類的方法加以處理後,共有28位有效求職者。研究結果發現求職者認知面試官表現類型包括:創意刁鑽型、正面靈活型、正向激勵型、與懷疑挑戰型四類。上述類型可協助人資部人員瞭解求職者認知面試官的表現,並提供改善面試官態度的建議及可能發展的理論。
Interviewers' performance plays an essential role when companies select employees. It's worth studying that how many attitude types of interviewers' performance through applicants' perspectives. In fact, the performance of employees' performance should be different and suit for theories development. As a result, the purpose of this study is to focus on the applicants' cognitive styles of interviewers and theories development. Literature review and open-ended questionnaire were used and 36 items developed. The Q method was adopted to collect and analyze data. A total of 28 participants were selected. According to the result, cognitive types of interviewers through applicants' perspectives were categorized into four types including flexible tricky, positive tricky, positive motivation, and suspect rejected. Measuring and comparing the perception types of interviewers through applicants' perspectives can be helpful to understand interviewers' performance and improve managerial effectiveness and theories development.
期刊論文
1.蔡維奇、楊文芬、林正偉(20090600)。面試官行為、企業雇用形象對應徵者工作選擇意圖的影響:以國防役男甄試為例。臺大管理論叢,19(2),295-320。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.曹筱玥、林小慧(20121200)。想像力量表之編製。教育科學研究期刊,57(4),1-37。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.林素真、林麗娟、方世杰、陳建智(20090100)。以期望理論觀點探討部落格互動行為與滿足。資訊社會研究,16,33-55。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.劉仲矩、楊運秀(20110900)。外籍勞工人力仲介網站使用者知覺類型之研究。電子商務研究,9(3),251-267。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Chapman, D. S.、Webster, J.(2006)。Toward an integrated model of applicant reactions and job choice。International Journal of Human Resource Management,17(6),1032-1057。  new window
6.Liu, C. C.(2011)。Identifying the Value Types of Virtual Communities Based on the Q Method。International Journal of Web Based Community,7(1),52-65。  new window
7.Cross, R. M.(2005)。Exploring attitude: the case for Q methodology。Health Education Research,20(2),206-213。  new window
8.吳文雄(20020400)。電腦技能學習者過去的績效、目標認同、電腦自我效能及電腦績效因果關係之驗證--社會認知理論與目標設定理論的整合。師大學報. 科學教育類,47(1),39-54。  延伸查詢new window
9.楊牧貞、陳沐新(20110600)。利他意願在調節負向情緒上的效果。教育心理學報,42(4),701-718。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.余泰魁(20070900)。科技媒介學習環境之學習成效比較研究。教育心理學報,39(1),69-90。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.王元聖、王俊傑(20121200)。國中體育教師心理資本對學校認同之預測研究。運動教練科學,28,1-9。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.朱彩馨、彭虹綾(20090100)。提昇科技中介學習成效--從個人內在認知因素探討合作學習的學習成效。資訊管理學報,16(1),135-162。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Liu, C. C.(2008)。Mobile phone user types by Q methodology: an exploratory research。International Journal of Mobile Communications,6(1),16-31。  new window
14.郭峰淵、曾繁絹、劉家儀(20060600)。從社會認知觀點探討醫師專業知識分享。圖書資訊學刊,4(1/2),97-114。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.池文海、邱天佑、李立偉(20121200)。網際網路資訊系統實際使用前置因素之研究。品質學報,19(6),523-540。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.王依仁、葉忠達、江怡瑩(20120500)。國小六年級學童的繪畫創作想像力研究。藝術教育研究,23,105-137。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.余嬪、吳靜吉、陳以亨、區衿綾(20110300)。不同年齡男女專業工作者之玩興與工作創新。教育心理學報,42(3),423-444。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.吳朝森、陳盈吉、陳建廷(20120700)。大學生主動性人格、冒險遊憩與創造力關係之研究。中原體育學報,1,138-146。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.張文馨、季力康(20130900)。心理彈性對運動心理學研究的啟示。中華體育季刊,27(3)=106,237-244。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.陳建丞(20051200)。應徵者外表吸引力對面試官評量之影響--以面試官訓練為干擾變數。人力資源管理學報,5(4),55-66。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.黃士滔、林秀琴(2013)。應用灰色EAM於ANP探討半導體業界對工管人才於IE職務評選。商業現代化,7(1),129-154。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.劉仲矩(20121200)。職場工讀負面人際互動知覺類型之研究。新竹教育大學教育學報,29(2),65-91。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.劉仲矩、黃湘凌(20140300)。以Q方法探討智慧型手機使用者反應類型之研究。電子商務研究,12(1),27-49。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.龍紫君(20120600)。招募時,應徵者數量與廣度對甄選者行為的影響。育達科大學報,31,69-86。  延伸查詢new window
25.謝佩芯(20120400)。個人設計思考力與團隊創造力之關係--以綠色產學活動為例。藝術學報,8(1)=90,69-88。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.Connerley, M. L.、Rynes, S. L.(1997)。The influence of recruiter characteristics and organizational recruitment support on perceived recruiter effectiveness: views from applicants and recruiters。Human Relations,50,1563-1586。  new window
27.Huffcutt, A. I.、Iddekinge, C. H. V.、Roth, P. L.(2011)。Understanding Applicant Behavior in Employment Interview: A Theoretical Model of Interviewee Performance。Human Resource Management Review,21(4),353-367。  new window
28.Huffcutt, A. I.(2011)。An Employment Review of the Employment Interview Construct Literature。International Journal of Selection and Assessment,19(1),62-81。  new window
29.Kluger, A. N.、Nir, D.(2010)。The Feedforward Interview。Human Resource Management Review,20(3),235-246。  new window
30.Hamdani, M. R.、Valcea, S.、Buckley, M. R.(2014)。The Relentless Pursuit of Construct Validity in the Design of Employment Interviews。Human Resource Management Review,24(2),160-176。  new window
31.Huffcutt, A. I.、Culbertson, S. S.、Weyhrauch, W. S.(2013)。Employment Interview Reliability: New Meta-analytic Estimates by Structure and Format。International Journal of Selection and Assessment,21(3),264-276。  new window
32.Hunter, S. T.、Cushenbery, L.、Friedrich, T.(2012)。Hiring an Innovative Workforce: A Necessary Yet Uniquely challenging Endeavor。Human Resource Management Review,22(4),303-322。  new window
33.Jack, E. P.、Raturi, A. S.(2006)。Lessons Learned from Methodological Triangulation in Management Research。Management Research News,29(6),345-357。  new window
34.Liden, R. C.、Martin, C. L.、Parsons, C. K.(1993)。Interviewer and Applicant Behaviors in Employment Interviews。Academy of Management Journal,36(2),372-386。  new window
35.Liu, C. C.(2013)。Using Q Methodology to Classify Users' Value Types on Hospital Websites。International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management,13(2),190-205。  new window
36.Roulin, N.、Bangerter, A.(2012)。Understanding the Academic-Practitioner Gap for Structure Interviews: ‘Behavioral’ Interviews Diffuse, ‘Structured’ Interviews Do Not。International Journal of Selection and Assessment,20(2),149-158。  new window
37.Roch, S. G.、Mishra, V.、Trombini, E.。Does Selection Measure Scoring Influence Motivation: One Size Fits All?。International Journal of Selection and Assessment,22(1),23-38。  new window
38.Nickson, D.、Chris, W.、Eli, D.、Scott, H.(2008)。A Job to Believe In: Recruitment in the Scottish Voluntary Sector。Human Resource Management Journal,18(1),20-35。  new window
39.王精文、陳心懿、林怡君、林栢章、李珍玫(20110600)。Exploring the Creativity Performance of Virtual Teams from the Perspectives of Leadership and Creative Personality。交大管理學報,31(1),135-168。new window  延伸查詢new window
40.周斯畏、陳碧玉(20090100)。個人持續使用企業資源規劃系統(ERP)意願之探討--以社會認知理論、期望確認理論為基礎。資訊管理學報,16(1),79-108。new window  延伸查詢new window
41.唐震(20080600)。網路通訊工具作為協調媒介之研究。資訊管理展望,10(1),23-43。  延伸查詢new window
42.黃宇晨、林谷鴻(20110900)。使用分析網路程序法(ANP)評估招募目標的關鍵準則--以Y公司為例。工程科技與教育學刊,8(3),502-517。  延伸查詢new window
43.劉仲矩(20100900)。網路衝突成因認知類型之研究。電子商務研究,8(3),299-322。new window  延伸查詢new window
44.蔡俊傑(20111100)。以自我效能理論探討青少年健身運動社會支持與滿意度之關係。臺灣運動心理學報,19,23-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
45.羅新興、李幸穗(20040900)。應徵者面談過程所呈現的訊息對面談評價的影響--以企業員工的招募甄選為實驗情境。人力資源管理學報,4(3),55-72。new window  延伸查詢new window
46.Macan, T.(2009)。The Employment Interview: A Review of Current Studies and Directions for Future Research。Human Resource Management Review,19(3),203-218。  new window
47.Posthuma, R. A.、Morgeson, F. P.、Campion, M. A.(2002)。Beyond Employment Interview Validity: A Comprehensive Narrative Review of Recent Research and Trends over Time。Personnel Psychology,55(1),1-81。  new window
48.唐震(20060600)。現金卡在學生族群消費認知類型之探索性研究。管理與資訊學報,11,77-103。new window  延伸查詢new window
49.蔡維奇、吳祉芸(20120800)。辯解有效嗎?談應徵者防禦型印象管理策略對面試官心理評價之影響。組織與管理,5(2),57-99。new window  延伸查詢new window
50.蔡維奇、陳建丞、陳皓怡、宋立國(20091000)。應徵者印象管理戰術與面試官評價:面試官作筆記行為的干擾效果。管理學報,26(5),577-597。new window  延伸查詢new window
51.郭建志、張適年(201103)。組織任用面談的結構特徵: 程序正義知覺與應徵者反應之研究。中華心理學刊,53(1),97-114。new window  延伸查詢new window
52.Chapman, D. S.、Uggerslev, K. L.、Carroll, S. A.、Piasentin, K. A.、Jones, D. A.(2005)。Applicant attraction to organizations and job choice: a meta-analytic review of the correlates of recruiting outcomes。Journal of Applied Psychology,90(5),928-944。  new window
53.吳相儀、陳學志、邱發忠、徐芝君、許禕芳(20080800)。樂觀訓練課程對國小高年級學童樂觀信念之影響研究。師大學報‧教育類,53(2),193-221。new window  延伸查詢new window
54.羅文輝(1986)。Q方法的理論與應用。民意學術專刊,春季號,41-71。new window  延伸查詢new window
55.鄭光廷、徐士傑、林東清(20120400)。影響使用者持續使用Web 2.0傳遞與分享知識之研究。資訊管理學報,19(2),249-274。new window  延伸查詢new window
56.陳學志、吳相儀、徐芝君、陳馨怡(20081200)。揮灑正向的生活素養彩虹:涵養學生的感恩與樂觀情緒。教師天地,157,19-27。  延伸查詢new window
57.莫廣遠、徐木蘭、張文華、李俊賢(20001200)。網路倫理認知類型研究。科技管理學刊,5(3),1-27。new window  延伸查詢new window
58.Kaiser, H. F.(1958)。The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis。Psychometrika,23(3),187-200。  new window
59.張文馨、陳思羽、季力康(20121200)。運動熱情與主觀幸福感的關係:正向情緒的中介效果。體育學報,45(4),301-309。new window  延伸查詢new window
60.常雅珍、毛國楠(20061000)。以正向心理學建構情意教育之行動研究。師大學報. 教育類,51(2),121-146。new window  延伸查詢new window
61.蕭佳純(20121200)。國小學童科學學習動機、父母創意教養與科技創造力關聯之研究。教育科學研究期刊,57(4),103-133。new window  延伸查詢new window
62.Farh, Jiing-Lih、Zhong, Chen-Bo、Organ, Dennis W.(2004)。Organizational Citizenship Behavior in The People's Republic of China。Organization Science,15(2),241-253。  new window
63.Ehrhart, K. H.、Ziegert, J. C.(2005)。Why are individuals attracted to organizations?。Journal of Management,31(6),901-919。  new window
64.賴英娟、陸偉明、董旭英(20110600)。以結構方程模式探討臺灣大學生自尊、生活目標、希望感及校園人際關係對憂鬱情緒之影響。教育心理學報,42(4),677-699。new window  延伸查詢new window
65.Seligman, Martin E. P.、Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly(2000)。Positive psychology: An introduction。American Psychologist,55(1),5-14。  new window
66.陳建丞(20070600)。甄選面談中外表與性別偏誤之探討:結構式面談能消除它們嗎?。臺大管理論叢,17(2),183-208。new window  延伸查詢new window
67.胡宜中、王仁宏、易慧珍(20121200)。運用網路程序分析法探討甄選管理師與工程師之關鍵人格特質--以C國營事業為例。人力資源管理學報,12(4),53-79。new window  延伸查詢new window
68.Cattell, Raymond B.(1966)。The scree test for the number of factors。Multivariate Behavioral Research,1(2),245-276。  new window
69.Schlinger, M. J.(1969)。Cues on Q-Technique。Journal of Advertising Research,9(3),53-60。  new window
70.Hung, Wei-hsi、Chang, Li-min、Yen, David C.、Ho, Chin-tsang、Chiang, Mei-chen(20111200)。ERP Success in the SMEs: The Perspectives of Service Quality and Social Cognitive Theory。Asia Pacific Management Review,16(4),503-519。new window  new window
71.劉仲矩、羅新興、徐木蘭(20000600)。國軍幹部倫理認知類型之探索性研究。人文及社會科學集刊,12(2),319-345。new window  延伸查詢new window
72.Larsen, D. A.、Phillips, J. I.(2002)。Effect of Recruiter on Attraction to the Firm: Implications of the Elaboration Likelihood Model。Journal of Business and Psychology,16(3),347-364。  new window
73.DeBell, C. S.、Montgomery, M. J.、McCarthy, P. R.、Lanthier, R. P.(1998)。The critical contact: A study of recruiter verbal behavior during campus interviews。Journal of Business Communication,35(2),202-223。  new window
74.Ralston, S. M.、Brady, R.(1994)。The relative influence of interview communication satisfaction on applicants' recruitment interview decisions。The Journal of Business Communication,31(1),61-77。  new window
會議論文
1.劉仲矩(2013)。應徵者知覺面試官類型之研究。2013年勞動與就業關係學術研討會。新北市:中華勞動與就業關係協會。211-224。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.林玫玫(2011)。面試官正向情緒表達與組織人才吸引力之關係:中介機制與限制情境之探討(博士論文)。國立臺北科技大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.何名申(2003)。創新思維訓練--連愛因斯坦都想不到。新北:達觀出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.蘇振芳(2013)。創新思維方法。北京:社會科學文獻出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.Stephenson, William(1974)。The Play Theory of Mass Communication。University of Chicago Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Rynes, S. L.(1991)。Recruitment, job choice, and post-hire consequences: A call for new research directions。Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology。Palo Alto, California:Consulting Psychologists Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE