資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.138.134.229)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
影響數位閱讀表現的學生與環境因素:PIRLS 2016資料探討
書刊名:
教育心理學報
作者:
張郁雯
/
柯華葳
作者(外文):
Chang, Yuwen
/
Ko, Hwawei
出版日期:
2019
卷期:
51:1
頁次:
頁161-181
主題關鍵詞:
紙本閱讀
;
家庭學習資源
;
數位使用
;
數位閱讀
;
閱讀自信
;
Digital reading
;
Digital use
;
Home resources for learning
;
Print reading
;
Reading confidence
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
1
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
1
共同引用:
7
點閱:4
本研究的目的為探討學生個別因素(紙本閱讀能力、性別、閱讀自信、電腦使用自我效能)以及環境因素(家庭學習資源、家中數位設備與數位使用經驗)對國小學童數位閱讀表現之影響。資料來源為13個國家共69507位國小四年級學童在PIRLS 2016紙本以及數位閱讀表現與相關問卷資料。運用IDB Analyzer第四版進行相關與迴歸分析。結果發現紙本閱讀能力、閱讀自信、電腦使用自我效能、電腦使用經驗、家庭學習資源以及家中數位設備能共同解釋數位閱讀表現49%-73%的變異。其中,紙本閱讀表現大約可以解釋六成數位閱讀表現的變異,顯示兩者涉及共同的歷程,但數位閱讀也需要異於紙本閱讀的技能。雖然大多數國家紙本與數位閱讀表現是女生表現優於男生,當控制了紙本閱讀成績,僅剩四個國家數位閱讀表現的性別差異達顯著水準,顯示多數國家兩性的閱讀落差不因閱讀形式而有所不同。家庭學習資源可以分別解釋數位閱讀表現與紙本閱讀表現變異的14%和16%,家庭學習資源透過對紙本閱讀之影響間接影響數位閱讀表現,但仍有0.6%-2.3%的變異是家庭學習資源直接影響數位閱讀表現。閱讀自信每增加1分,數位閱讀表現平均可以增加16分;而電腦使用自我效能每增1分,數位閱讀表現平均增加4分。閱讀自信的重要性高於電腦使用自我效能。電腦使用經驗與數位閱讀表現的關係,因國家不同而不同。使用電腦和數位閱讀能力的關係也因所從事的活動性質不同而不同,意味著學童如何使用數位工具比數位近用對數位閱讀能力更為重要。
以文找文
The purpose of the study is to examine the effects of personal factors (print reading performance, gender, and reading confidence, and self-efficacy for computer use) and environmental factors (home resources for learning, digital devices in the home, and digital use) on digital reading performance in primary students. The data of 69507 fourth graders from 13 countries participating in the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) 2016 were examined. Correlation and multiple regression analyses were conducted by the IEA IDB Analyzer software version 4. The results showed that print reading performance, reading confidence, self-efficacy for computer use, home resources for learning, digital devices in the home, and digital use as predictors, the regression line can explain 49%-73% the variation of digital reading performance. Print reading ability can explain 60% variance in digital reading performance, which suggested that processes readers use to comprehend digital text are similar to what is required to comprehend print text. It also suggested that digital reading requires a different set of skills from those required to read the print text. Most countries in the study, girls have outperformed boys in print reading and digital reading. When holding print reading performance constant across genders, gender gaps are no longer statistically significant. This means that digitalization does not exacerbate gender inequality. Home resources for learning can explain 14% and 16% variation respectively in digital and print reading performance. The indirect association (through the effect of home resources for learning on print reading skills) accounts for most of the variation, the direct association accounts for 0.6-2.3% of the variation. Increasing in reading confidence of 1 point could increase in the digital reading of 16 points while increasing in self-efficacy for computer use of 1 point, the increase in digital reading is only 4 points. This suggests the importance to boost students' reading confidence. The relationship between digital use and digital reading skills varies across countries and the activities for which student use computers. What students do with ICT are more important than digital access to them.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Kennedy, T.、Wellman, B.、Klement, K.(2003)。Gendering the digital divide。IT & Society,1(5),72-96。
2.
張貴琳(20141200)。青少年線上閱讀素養表現之關聯變項探討。市北教育學刊,45,29-68。
延伸查詢
3.
van Deursen, A. J. A. M.、van Dijk, J. A. G. M.(2014)。The Digital Divide Shifts to Differences in Usage。New Media & Society,16(3),507-526。
4.
劉宜芳、柯華葳(20170600)。線上閱讀研究之回顧與展望。教育科學研究期刊,62(2),61-87。
延伸查詢
5.
Attewell, P.(2001)。Comment: The first and second digital divides。Sociology of Education,74(3),252-259。
6.
Borgonovi, F.(2016)。Video gaming and gender differences in digital and printed reading performance among 15-year-olds students in 26 countries。Journal of adolescence,48,45-61。
7.
Lenhard, W.、Schroeders, U.、Lenhard, A.(2017)。Equivalence of Screen Versus Print Reading Comprehension Depends on Task Complexity and Proficiency。Discourse Processes: A multidisciplinary journal,54(5/6),427-445。
8.
Singer, L. M.、Alexander, P. A.(2017)。Reading on paper and digitally: What the past decades of empirical research reveal。Review of educational research,87(6),1007-1041。
研究報告
1.
柯華葳、詹益綾、張建妤、游婷雅(2008)。PIRLS 2006報告:臺灣四年級學生閱讀素養 (計畫編號:NSC 96-MOE-S-008-002)。桃園縣:國立中央大學學習與教學研究所。
延伸查詢
2.
柯華葳、詹益綾、丘嘉慧(2013)。PIRLS 2011報告:臺灣四年級學生閱讀素養。國立中央大學學習與教學研究所。
延伸查詢
3.
柯華葳、張郁雯、詹益綾、丘嘉慧(2018)。PIRLS 2016臺灣四年級學生閱讀素養國家報告。桃園市:國立中央大學。
延伸查詢
4.
Azzolini, D.、Schizzerotto, A.(2017)。The second digital divide in Europe. A cross-national study on students' digital reading and navigation skills。Research Institute for the Evaluation of Public Policies, Bruno Kessler Foundation。
圖書
1.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development(2014)。PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do--Student performance in mathematics, reading and science。Paris:PISA, OECD Publishing。
2.
Mullis, Ina V. S.、Martin, Michael O.、Foy, P.、Drucker, K. T.(2012)。PIRLS 2011 international results in reading。Chestnut Hill, MA:TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College。
3.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development(2011)。PISA 2009 Results: Students on Line: Digital Technologies and Performance。
4.
Fraillon, J.、Ainley J.、Schulz, W.、Friedman, T.、Gebhardt, E.(2014)。Preparing for Life in a Digital Age: The IEA International Computer and Information Literacy Study International Report。New York, NY:Springer。
5.
International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement(2018)。Help Manual for the IEA IDB Analyzer。Hamburg:International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement。
6.
Martin, M. O.、Mullis, I. V. S.、Hooper, M.(2017)。Methods and Procedures in PIRLS 2016。
7.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2015)。Students, Computers and Learning: Making the Connection。PISA, OECD Publishing。
8.
Rideout, V.(2017)。The Common Sense census: Media use by kids age zero to eight。San Francisco, CA:Common Sense Media。
9.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2016)。PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and Equity in Education。OECD。
其他
1.
Hattie, John(2018)。Hattie ranking: 252 influences and effect sizes related to student achievement,https://visible-learning.org/hattie-ranking-influences-effect-sizes-learning-achievement/。
圖書論文
1.
Hartman, D. K.、Morsink, P. M.、Zheng, J.(2010)。From print to pixels: The evolution of cognitive conceptions of reading comprehension。The new Literacies: Multiple perspectives on research and practice。New York:Guilford。
2.
Leu, D. J.、Kinzer, C. K.、Coiro, J.、Castek, J.、Henry, L. A.(2013)。New Literacies: A Dual-Level Theory of the Changing Nature of Literacy, Instruction, and Assessment。Theoretical models and processes of reading。Newark, DE:International Reading Association。
3.
Martin, M. O.、Mullis, I. V. S.、Hooper, M.、Yin, L.、Foy, P.、Fishbein, B.、Liu, J.(2017)。Creating and Interpreting the PIRLS 2016 Context Questionnaire Scales。Methods and Procedures in PIRLS 2016。
4.
TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center(2017)。PIRLS 2016 achievement scaling methodology。Methods and Procedures in PIRLS 2016。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
臺灣PIRLS 2016測試模式、題型和文本特徵的性別差異
2.
108課綱第四學習階段國語文閱讀素養線上評量之建構
3.
國小學生知覺教師正向領導對學習表現影響之研究:以教師資通訊科技運用為中介變項
4.
國中生線上閱讀環境態度之測量及其與線上閱讀能力的潛在關聯探討
5.
線上閱讀研究之回顧與展望
6.
網路閱讀策略量表之測量恆等性檢驗
7.
青少年線上閱讀素養表現之關聯變項探討
1.
大學國語文教師「課程意識與教學實踐」之敘事探究──一位博士生兼任講師的自我敘說
2.
影響中學學生閱讀素養個人及學校因素之研究~以PISA 2015台灣資料庫為例
無相關書籍
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code