:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:父母教養方式與少年道德行為
書刊名:中華心理學刊
作者:蘇建文
作者(外文):Su, Chien-wen
出版日期:1975
卷期:17
頁次:頁109-124
主題關鍵詞:父母教養方式少年道德行為
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(10) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(3)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:9
  • 共同引用共同引用:11
  • 點閱點閱:43
     本研究是以初中一年級學生為對象,應用故事完成測驗與社會計量法來測量兒童之罪疚感強度,抗拒誘感力量、道德判斷取向、以及誠實與替他人著想等道德指標,再應用問卷以了解少年心目中父母紀律與教養方式,進而考驗兩者間的關係。在中等社經階層中,父母之紀律方式與少年之道德發展間存有密切關係,誘導型之紀律方式,促進少年罪疚感發展,以及誠實、替人著想之美德,而權威型紀律方式之下,少年之罪疚感強度較為薄弱,此乃由於懼於父母之權威與懲罰之威脅,易造成陽奉陰違不誠實之行為及自我中心不替他人著想之習慣。在低等社經階層中,父母紀律方式與少年道德發展之間多無顯著關係,僅母親之權威型紀律方式與少年道德判斷外在取向有所關聯。至於父母教養方式與態度方面,中等與低等社經階層中,均顯示出寬鬆與愛護的教養方式與態度,促進少年多項道德指標之發展,而拒稱與忽視之教養方式,則產生相反之結果。
     7th-grade children were assessed on several dimensions of moral behavior, such as guilt intensity, resistance to temptation, moral judgement orientation, honesty and consideration for others by means of story completion tests and peer nomination. Parental discipline and child-rearing practices were also measured through adolescents by a parent-child relations questionnaire. Etreme groups were found along each moral dimension, and they were compared on measures of parental discipline and patterns of child-rearing practices. Data were analyzed separativelyfor middle- and lower-class boys and girls. The following results were found. Among the middle-class sample, advanced moral behavior in guilt intensity, honesty and consideration for others was associated with frequent use of induction and infrequent use of power assertion. Love with drawal, on the other hand, was related infrequently to moral behavior. However, the same results have not been found among the lower-class sample. As far as the patterns of child-rearing practices of parents were concerned, advanced moral behavior was as sociated with parental behaviors characterized as casual and loving, but negatively associated with neglecting and rejecting by parents. The same tendency was found both for middle-and lower-class samples.
期刊論文
1.初正平(19741200)。Parental Attitudes in Relation to Young Children's Creativity: Cross-Cultural Comparison。中華心理學刊,16,53-72。new window  new window
2.Johnson, R. C.(1962)。A study of children's moral judgments。Child Development,33,327-354。  new window
3.Roe, A.、Siegelman, M. A.(1963)。A parent-child relations questionnaire。Child Development,34(2),355-369。  new window
4.黃富順(19740600)。影響國中學業成就的家庭因素。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所集刊,16,383-486。  延伸查詢new window
5.Hoffman, M. L.、Saltzstein, H. D.(1967)。Parental discipline and the child's moral development。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,5,45-57。  new window
6.蘇清守(19720600)。我國學童道德判斷之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所集刊,14,271-366。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳淑美(19740600)。實驗情境中成人口語教導的不一致性與兒童抗拒誘惑之關係。教育心理學報,7,63-76。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Grinder, R. E.(1962)。Parental Childrearing Practices, Conscience, and Resistance to Temptation of Sixth-Grade Children。Child Development,33,803-820。  new window
9.Grinder, R. E.、McMichael, R.(1963)。Cultural Influences on conscience development: Resistance to temptation and guilt among Samoans and American Caucasians。Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,66,503-507。  new window
會議論文
1.Aronfreed, J.(1966)。The internalization of social control, through punishment: Experimental studies of the rate of conditioning and the second signal system in the development of conscience。The XVIII-th International Congress of Psychology。  new window
圖書
1.李亦園、楊國樞(1973)。中國人的性格。中央研究院民族學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
單篇論文
1.初正平(1975)。各種認知能力發展與兒童心目中父母教養方式之關係。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Mackinnon, Donald W.(1938)。Violation of Prohibitions。Explorations in Personality。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Hoffman, M. L.(1970)。Moral development。Carmichael's manual of child psychology。New York:John Wiley & Sons。  new window
3.朱岑樓(1973)。從社會個人與文化的關係論中國人性格的恥感取向。中國人的性格。臺北市:中央研究院民族學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
4.Allinonith, W.(1960)。The learning of moral standards。Inner conflict and defense。New York:Henry Holt。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE