:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:師範學院教育實習教學能力形成性評量之研究
書刊名:新竹師院學報
作者:謝文英 引用關係胡悅倫 引用關係
出版日期:1995
卷期:8
頁次:頁235-290
主題關鍵詞:教學能力評量標準形成性評量教育實習Teaching evaluation criteriaFormative evaluationEducational practicum
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(4) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:14
  • 點閱點閱:38
     本研究旨在瞭解(一)師院生教育實習形成性評量所需的教學能力;(二)師院生教育實習教學能力形成性評量標準之重要性與鑑別度;(三)師院生教育實習教學能力形成性評量之相對重要性。 本研究以自編之「師院生教育實習教學能力形成性評量調查問卷」,對師院教授、國小校長、主任、教師及師院學生進行施測,藉此調查問卷瞭解受試者對師院生教育實習教學能力形成性評量標準之重要性的看法。形成性評量調查問卷共發出1394份,回收問卷計1101份,回收率為79.0%。本研究採用的統計方法有:信度考驗、描述統計、鑑別度分析、肯氏和諧度係數。 研究結果發現: 1. 師院生教育實習形成性評量在教學態度、教學計畫、教學方法、教學技術及教學評量上,所需的教學能力,計有22項教學行為,73項行為指標。 2. 師院生教育實習能力形成性評量,各項目之重要性均很好,鑑別度大致良好,為一良好的評量工具。 3. 師院生教育實習教學能力形成性評量最重要的教學能力依序為:(1)教學態度,(2)教學技術,(3)教學方法,(4)教學計畫,(5)教學評量。
     The main purpose of this study was to examine formative teaching evaluation criteria for student teachers. This study employed the self-devised "Formative Teaching Evaluation Criteria for Student Teacher Evaluation Questionnaire" and was administered to educational professors of teachers' colleges, principals, grade principals, elementary teachers and teachers' college students. A total of 1,101 of 1,394 questionnaires were returned, for a rate of 79.0%. Descriptive statistics, reliability, item discrimination, and Kendall's W were employed to analyze the data collected. The findings showed that: 1. There were five areas of teaching performance of formative teaching evaluation criteria for student teachers. The five areas of teaching performance were teaching attitudes, teaching plans, teaching methods, teaching techniques and teaching evaluations. 2. The five areas of teaching performance included twenty-two teaching behaviors which included seventy-three teaching behavior indicators. 3. The most important area of teaching performance was teaching attitudes. The second was teaching techniques. The third was teaching methods. The fourth was teaching plans. The last was teaching evaluations. 4. The items of formative teaching evaluation criteria for students teachers were rated as important on a Likert scale. The index of discrimination of those items was generally good.
期刊論文
1.吳清山(19840300)。有效的教師評鑑方式。臺灣教育,399,38-40。  延伸查詢new window
2.呂木琳、趙明善(19840300)。DeTEK:一種教師評鑑及發展系統。師友月刊,201,34-37。  延伸查詢new window
3.Reynolds, A.(1992)。What is competent beginning teaching? A review of the literature。Review of Educational Research,62(1),1-35。  new window
4.Divid, H.(1987)。Appraising teacher performance in North Carolina。Educational Leadership,44(7),40-44。  new window
5.陳奎憙(19870400)。師範教育的「畫龍點睛」:談師大(院)教學實習。現代教育,2(2)=6,11-20。  延伸查詢new window
6.裘學賢(19900900)。教育實習的認識及其實施運作與輔導策略之研究。初等教育學報,3,579-611。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.洪美璇(19820600)。教育實習評量的探討。新竹師專學報,8,1-15。  延伸查詢new window
8.施冠慨(19860400)。從能力本位師範教育的觀點談現階段加強師專生實習問題之探討。國教園地,17,17-22。  延伸查詢new window
9.施冠慨(19860600)。從能力本位師範教育的觀點談現階段加強師專生實習問題之探討。國教園地,18,19-22。  延伸查詢new window
10.張清濱(19770200)。人事考核與教育革新。師友月刊,116,40-44。  延伸查詢new window
11.鄭明長(19930400)。質的評量--教學評量的新途徑--專訪臺灣省國民學校教師研習會歐主任用生。教育研究月刊,30,12-14。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.陳正昌(19930400)。正確的教學評量觀念--專訪臺中師院簡院長茂發。教育研究月刊,30,4-8。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Fant, H. E.、Hill, H. E.、Landes, R.(1985)。Evaluating student teachers: The national scene。Teacher Educator,21(2),2-8。  new window
14.Darling-Hammond, L.、Wise, A. E.、Pease, S. R.(1983)。Teacher evaluation in the organization context: A review of the literature。Review of Education Research,53(3),285-327。  new window
15.盧增緒(19900700)。教育評鑑的問題與趨向。現代教育,5(3)=19,15-38。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.譚寧君(1991)。加強師院教育實習課程之探討。臺灣省第二屆教育學術論文發表會。臺灣省立新竹師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.謝寶梅(1991)。師範學院教育實習評量改進之探討。臺灣省第二屆教育學術論文發表會。臺灣省立新竹師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
3.Salzman, S. A.(1991)。Selecting the qualified: Predictors of student teacher performance。The annual meeting of the Association of Teacher Educators。New Orleans, LA。  new window
學位論文
1.張芬芬(1984)。師大結業生分發實習前後教學態度與任教意願之比較研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Texas Education Agency(1986)。Teacher appraisal system: Teacher orientation manual。Austin, Texas:Texas Education Agency。  new window
2.高廣孚(1991)。教學原理。台北:五南圖書出版有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.林寶山(1992)。教學論--理論與方法。臺北:五南圖書出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.李咏吟(1992)。教學原理。臺北市:遠流出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.Harris, B. M.、Hill, J.(1982)。The DeTEK handbook。National Educational Laboratory Publishers, Inc.。  new window
6.Millersville University(1992)。A guide for student teaching。Millersville, PA:Millersville University。  new window
7.California State University(1988)。Supervision of student teachers。Los Angeles, CA:California State University。  new window
8.王秋絨(1987)。教師專業社會化理論在教育實習設計上的蘊義。臺北:師大書院。  延伸查詢new window
9.季明明、協齊煉(1993)。學校教師工作評估實用手冊。北京:中央民族學院出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.黃光雄(1993)。教學原理。台北:師大學苑。  延伸查詢new window
11.Rudner, T.(1988)。What's happening in teacher testing: An analysis of state teacher testing practices。Washington, DC:Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education。  new window
12.Murray, S.(1986)。Synthesizing teacher testing policy options。Portland, OR:Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory。  new window
13.方炳林(1979)。教學原理。教育文物出版社。  延伸查詢new window
單篇論文
1.張德銳(1992)。國民小學教師評鑑之研究,國立新竹師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.楊文雄(1980)。教育評鑑之理論與實際,臺灣省政府教育廳。  延伸查詢new window
3.教育廳(1983)。中華民國能力本位師範教育考察團報告書,臺灣省政府教育廳。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳梅生(1976)。國民小學教師基本能力研究報告,臺灣省國民學校教師研習會。  延伸查詢new window
5.饒見維(1993)。師範學院教育專科的課程內容與教學方法之研究,國立花蓮師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.謝美連(1986)。師範教育學術研討會議紀錄,國立台灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.王立行、饒見維(1992)。教育專業化與教育實習的實施。教育專業。台北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
2.歐用生(1991)。我國中小學師資培育課程的檢討與改進。世界各主要國家師資培育制度比較研究。台北:正中書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.吳聰賢(1986)。態度量表的建立。社會及行為科學研究法。臺北市:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.社源芳(1991)。我國師範教育的實習。世界各主要國家師資培育制度比較研究。台北:正中書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.李咏吟(1993)。如何增進教師的專業智能以減少學生學習問題。學習輔導。臺北:心理出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.陳舜芬(1993)。英美師範教育的新理念。高等教育研究論文集。臺北市:師大書苑。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.陳漢強(1991)。從社會變遷談小學師資培育制度的革新。社會孿遷與教育發展。台北:臺灣書店。  延伸查詢new window
8.簡茂發(1988)。教學評量原理與方法。教學原理。台北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE