:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:多元化師資養成型態畢業生其任教職志與教學狀況的比較研究--以屏東師院為例
書刊名:屏東師院學報
作者:郭明堂
作者(外文):Guo, Ming-tarng
出版日期:2001
卷期:15
頁次:頁1-39
主題關鍵詞:師資養成型態任教職志教學效能Training models of teachersTeaching willingnessTeaching effectiveness
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(8) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:8
  • 共同引用共同引用:184
  • 點閱點閱:18
     本研究旨在了解師院大學部及學士後國小師資班畢業生,在養成教育階段、實習教師階段、初任教師階段,其任教職志之差異與改變之情形,同時進一步比較兩者之初任教師,其教學狀況之差異,以供教育當局對於師資多元化培育政策及課程安排之參考,其研究結果如下: 一、養成教育階段 (一)學士後國小師資班在校學生在奉獻、任教意願、角色知覺的認知,均顯著高於師院大學部之學生。 (二)在性別上,男、女在校學生在任教職志方面,並沒有明顯不同。 二、實習教師階段 (一)學士後國小師資班實習老師在角色知覺層面上,明顯著高於師院大學部之實習老師。 (二)在奉獻層面上,師院畢業女實習老師高於男實習老師,但學士後國小師資班女實習老師,卻低於男實習老師。 三、初任教師階段 (一)師院大學部與學士後國小師資班之初任教師在任教職志各方面,均沒有顯著差異存在,男、女初任教師在任教職志方面,也沒有明顯不同。 (二)在任教職志上,隨著不同養成階段有逐漸下降之傾向。 四、在教學狀況方面: (一)教師自評部分:師院大學部畢業之初任教師其教學狀況與學士後國小師資班畢業之初任教師沒有顯著差異。 (二)校長他評部分:師院大學部畢業之初任教師其專業精神層面優於學士後國小師資班畢業之初任教師依據本研究之結果,提出下列建議,以供教育當局對於師範教育決策之參考。 (一)提高在校師院生的任教職志。 (二)加強實習老師與初任老師對教育現實的認識,並加強實習輔導工作。 (三)加強學士後國小師資班初任教師之專業精神。
     The purpose of this study is to investigate the differences of teaching willingness and teaching effectiveness between the educational program's students and teachers college's students. Three purpose of this study are 1.to compare the differences between graduated from an alternative teacher education program and teacher education program on its teaching willingness at fresh period、student's teacher period and initiate teacher period. 2.to compare the differences between graduated from an alternative teacher education program and teacher education program on its teaching effecitveness through self-evaluated and other-evaluated at initiate teacher. period. 3.to make suggestions in order to improve teacher education. Graduated from the academic year of 86 to 88, student's teachers working in lementary schools among those located in county and city of kaohsiung and Pingtung and freshman at N.P.T.T.C were drawn as the sample for the study. The questionnaire is included four parts 「Questionnaire of teaching willingness」、「Questionnaire of teaching attitude」、「Questionnaire of teaching effectiveness」 and 「Instruments of teaching interview」. In the analysis of this data, methods such as ANOVA, T test, Scheffe test are used To analyze or generalize the related information and data. The result of this study were stated as follows: 1.There was significant differences between graduated from an alternative teacher education program and teacher education program on its teaching willingness at fresh period and tudent's teacher period; but there was no significant differnces at initiate teacher period. 2.There was no significant differences between female teacher and male teacher on its teaching willingness at fresh period and initiate teacher period; but there was significant differences a student's teacher period. 3.On its teaching effectiveness, initiate teacher graduated from teacher education program better than graduated fro malternative teacher education through their principle evaluation; there was no significant differences through self-evaluated.
期刊論文
1.余幸怡(19960100)。臺南師院特教系學生教學態度與任教特殊班之意願調查研究。臺南師院學生學刊,17,175-199。  延伸查詢new window
2.Nias, J.(1981)。'Commitment' and motivation in primary school teachers。Educational Review,33(3),181-190。  new window
3.Emmer, E. T.、Evertson, C. M.、Anderson, L. M.(1980)。Effective management at the beginning of the school year。Elementary School Journal,80,219-231。  new window
4.陳英豪、吳裕益、李坤崇(19900100)。教師態度量表之修訂報告。測驗年刊,37,25-33。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.郭靜芬(19770600)。師範生教育態度之調查研究。教育文粹,6,84-91。  延伸查詢new window
6.王佩蓮(19920600)。師範學院國小師資班之現況。國教月刊,38(5/6),26-39。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.黃政傑(19831225)。師大師院學生任教意願研究的啟示。中國論壇,17(6)=198,51-55。  延伸查詢new window
8.葉宗文(19870600)。高雄市國小實習師範生教師態度之研究。教育研究(高師),1,115-133。  延伸查詢new window
9.Brown, D.、Edington, E.、Spencer, D. A.、Tinafero, J.(1989)。A Comparison of alternative certification, traditionally trained, and emergency permit teacher。Teacher Education and practice,5(2),21-23。  new window
10.Devalt, M.、Ball, D. W.(1987)。Some effects of training on the competence of beginning teachers。Journal of Educational Research,80(6),343-347。  new window
11.Marcynski, T. J.、Siler, E. R.、McLaughlin, M. L.、Smith, J. R.(1988)。A Comparative analysis of achievement in arts and science courses by teacher education and non-teach education graduate。Journal of Teacher Education,39,32-36。  new window
12.Phillipson, S. G.(1985)。Course design in teacher education: an English institutional view。European Journal of teacher Education,8(1),89-95。  new window
13.陳青青(19720500)。師資態度量表之編製。女師專學報,1,153-188。  延伸查詢new window
14.楊文貴(19920600)。臺北師院駐校集中實習制度對實習生的教師態度、教師角色知覺及任教職志的影響效果之研究。臺北師院學報,5,101-130。  延伸查詢new window
15.楊景堯(19810500)。新竹師專學生志趣、生活及學習態度之研究。新竹師專學報,7,95-145。  延伸查詢new window
16.藍瑞霓(19990600)。師院教育學分班學生、大學部學生和國小在職教師任教意願之研究。屏東師院學報,12,85-101。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Wood, K. E.(1978)。What motivates students to teach?。Journal of Teacher Education,29(6),48-50。  new window
18.毛連塭、湯梅英(19930300)。師範學院學生學習滿意及結業生任教意願之調查研究。教育研究資訊,1(2),34-42。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.王家通、郭明堂(19930900)。我國實習教育制度有關研究之探討與評析。教育研究資訊,1(5),84-99。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.Smylie, M. A.(1989)。Teachers' Views of the Effectiveness of sources of Learning to Teach。The Elementary school Journal,89(5),542-557。  new window
21.張玉成(1974)。影響國民小學教師服務精神之因素。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所集刊,16,493-495。  延伸查詢new window
22.張芬芬(1985)。師大結業生分發實習前後教學態度與任教意願之比較研究。國立台灣師範大學教育研究所集刊,28,311-331。  延伸查詢new window
23.李新鄉(20000600)。師範校院公自費生與一般大學教育學程學生就讀滿意度、工作價值觀、教師角色知覺與任教承諾之比較研究。國民教育研究學報,6,25-59。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.郭為藩、郭生玉(19710600)。本省師專學生的專業教育態度研究。師大學報,16,143-159。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.張春興(19831200)。從師大學生的求學心態檢討師教法「加強師範生專業精神」構想的成效。教育心理學報,16,1-28。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.陳英豪(19770100)。教師人格特質及教學態度對教學成績預測效果之研究。高雄師院學報,5,295-322。  延伸查詢new window
27.陳鏡潭、陳炯彰、黃偉蓉(19940500)。師院國小師資班結業生角色知覺、任教職志、教學態度、工作滿意與教學狀況之研究。教育研究資訊,2(3),71-88。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.楊妙芬(19970600)。國小教師工作價值觀、工作滿意度、任教職志與其相關因素之研究。屏東師院學報,10,97-132。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.Shulman, Lee S.(1987)。Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform。Harvard Educational Review,57(1),1-23。  new window
30.湯梅英(19941200)。師院生任教意願及其相關因素之研究--以臺北市立師範學院學生為例。初等教育學刊,3,59-99。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.Becker, Howard S.(1960)。Notes on the Concept of Commitment。American Journal of Sociology,66(1),32-40。  new window
會議論文
1.邱兆偉、楊文雄、薛梨真、郭明堂(1992)。師範學院結業生之追蹤研究:結果與總評。高雄市教育學會八十一年年會,1-36。  延伸查詢new window
2.郭明堂(1997)。包班制?科任制?--國民小學教學型態的學理與實證之評析。一九九七海峽兩岸小學教育學術研討會,國立嘉義師範學院(編) 。嘉義:嘉義師範學院。123-144。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.吳裕益、劉佑星、郭丁熒、賴書通(1992)。師院結業生就讀動機、在校成績與知覺教學效能關係之研究。  延伸查詢new window
2.毛連塭、吳清山、湯梅英、張芬芬、柯元麗(1992)。師範學院學生學習滿意及結業生任教意願之調查研究。  延伸查詢new window
3.何美鈴、湯梅英(1991)。師院生與師專生教學態度、意願與能力之比較。台北市立師範學院初等教育系。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃國彥、王以仁、盧富美、林淑玲、楊惠芳(1991)。師院國小師資班結業生教學態度與教學效果之相關研究。  延伸查詢new window
5.李保玉(1992)。新制師院生角色認同與自我期許之研究。  延伸查詢new window
6.劉春榮、吳清山(1997)。一般大學選修教育學程與師範校院學生對教育專業認知及其任教意願研究。台北市立師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Allard, M. A.(1992)。A Comparison of specialists and non-specialists Teaching Elementary Beginning string Music: Time use, student Attentiveness, and performance(博士論文)。University of Texas。  new window
2.王有倫(1983)。我國師專學生價值觀念及教師態度之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.顏銘志(1996)。國民小學教師教學信念、教師效能與教學行為之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
4.賴清標(1979)。師專生任教意願及教學態度之調查分析(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.郭明堂(1995)。國小教師任教專長、教學經驗、養成型態與其教學效能之研究(博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.黃昆輝(1983)。能力本位師範教育。省立新竹師專。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳英豪、汪榮才、劉佑星、李坤崇(1991)。新制師院生教學態度及其相關因素之研究。省立台南師範學院初等教育系。  延伸查詢new window
3.楊景堯、黃三吉、邱祖賢(1998)。教育法規。高雄:麗文文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.Brophy, J. E.、Evertson, C. M.(1976)。Learning from teaching: A developmental perspective。Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon。  new window
5.Medley, D. M.(1982)。Teacher competency testing and the teacher Educator。Charlottesville, VA:University of virginia。  new window
6.Lacey, C.(1977)。The socialization of teachers。London:Methuen and Co. Ltd.。  new window
7.Medley, D. M.(1979)。Teacher Competence and Teacher Effectiveness. A Review of Process-Product Research。Washington, DC:American Educational Research Association。  new window
8.Dreeben, R.(1970)。The nature of teaching: Schools and the work of teacher。Glenview, Ill:Scott, Foersman。  new window
9.Dunkin, Michae J.、Biddle, Bruce J.(1974)。The study of teaching。New York:Holt, Rinehart and Winston。  new window
10.林瑞欽(1990)。師範生任教職志之理論與實徵研究。高雄:復文出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.Grossman, Pamela L.(1990)。The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education。Teachers College Press。  new window
單篇論文
1.Carole, D. V.(1991)。The Texas teacher appraisal system and mastery teaching: A Comparative analysis(ED 332 332)。  new window
2.Ellett, C. D.,Loup, K. S.,Chauvin, S.(1989)。System for Teaching and Learning Assessment and Review (STAR),Baton Rouge, Louisiana:College of Education, Louisiana state University。(ED 338 565)。  new window
3.Ropo, Eero(1987)。Teachers' Conceptions of Teaching and Teaching Behavior: Some Differences between Expert and Novice Teachers(ED287824)。  new window
4.Hill, F. H.(1991)。Assessing the relationship between reflective practice, content knowledge and teaching effectiveness of student teachers(ED338565)。  new window
其他
1.楊妙芬(199306)。師院生職業興趣類型、性別、家庭社經地位、學業成績、年級與任教職志之相關研究(八十一學年度師範學院教育學術論文發表會),教育部:國立嘉義師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
2.Duru, I.(1988)。Teaching effectiveness of teaching training college teachers and university graduate teachers in selected secondary schools in IMO STATE, NIGERIA(AAC 8812417)。  new window
圖書論文
1.呂錘卿、郭碧惍(1992)。臺中師院學生實習前後教育信念之比較。教育專業。臺北:師大書宛。  延伸查詢new window
2.林清江(1982)。教師職業聲望與專業形象之調查研究。文化發展與革新。台北:五南書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.郭明堂(1995)。不同師資養成型態對教學效能影響之比較研究。高雄市政府研究發展成果彙編。  延伸查詢new window
4.郭明堂(1994)。國民小學教師教學表現之評估研究--以數學科為例。高雄市政府研究發展成果彙編。  延伸查詢new window
5.Eraut, M.(1988)。Management knowledge: Its nature and its development。Teachers' Professional Learning。London:Falmer press。  new window
6.歐用生(1991)。我國中小學師資培育課程的檢討與改進。世界各主要國家師資培育制度比較研究。臺北市:正中書局。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Carter, K.(1990)。Teachers' knowledge and learning to teach。Handbook of research on teacher education。New York:Macmillan。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE