:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:鄰避症候群之解析
書刊名:都市與計劃
作者:李永展
作者(外文):Lee, Yung-jaan
出版日期:1997
卷期:24:1
頁次:頁69-79
主題關鍵詞:鄰避設施鄰避症候群服務設施環境規劃及管理NIMBY facilitiesNIMBY syndromeService facilitiesEnvironmental planning and management
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(30) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(2)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:27
  • 共同引用共同引用:16
  • 點閱點閱:201
     本文主要目的在於從社會政治過程及居民接受意願來解析鄰避症候群的意涵。首 先,鄰避設施所代表的並不一定是社會的需求,而往往是資本家所製造的經濟問題之政治 答案;其次,鄰避主義並非為阻礙社會目標,而是針對資本家目標衍生的抗爭。另一方面 ,為了改變公共政策的決策過程,同時提高居民的接受意願,我們必須了解社區居民抗拒 鄰避設施的心態。根據鄰避症候群的解析,本文最後一部分提出環境規劃及管理上之應用 。
     The main purpose of this article is to re-examine the NIMBY syndrome from socio-political process and people's willingness to accept (WTA). First, NIMBY facilities are not necessarily needed to provide an important social benefit. Second, NIMBYism represents a barrier not to cosietal goals but to the goals of capital. On the other hand, to change decision making process of public policies to increase people's WTA, it is important to explore why residents demonstrate the NIMBY syndrome. Based on the re-examinatino of the NIMBYism, this article proposes several planning and management implications.
期刊論文
1.Lake, R. W.(1993)。Planners' Alchemy Transforming NIMBY to YIMBY。Journal of the American Planning Association,59(1),87-93。  new window
2.Wolsink, Maarten(1994)。Entanglement of Interests and Motives: Assumptions behind the NIMBY-Theory on Facility Siting。Urban Studies,31(6),851-866。  new window
3.曾明遜(19940600)。淺論鄰避設施的風險知覺。人與地,126,36-40。  延伸查詢new window
4.Kraft, Michael E.、Clary, Bruce B.(1991)。Citizen Participation and the Nimby Syndrome: Public Response to Radioactive Waste Disposal。The Western Political Quarterly,44(2),299-328。  new window
5.李永展、何紀芳(1995)。都市服務設施「鄰避」效果與選址規劃原則。環境教育,24,2-10。  延伸查詢new window
6.李永展(19941100)。鄰避設施與社區關係。人與地,131/132,46-53。  延伸查詢new window
7.李永展、何紀芳(19960900)。臺北地方生活圈都市服務設施之鄰避效果。都市與計劃,23(1),95-116。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Bosley, P.、Bosley, K.(1988)。Public Acceptability of California's Wind Energy Developments: Three Studies。Wind Engineering,12(5),311-318。  new window
9.Byers, E.(1990)。Now Entering the Age of NIMBY?。Waste Age,10(2),36-39。  new window
10.Diekmann, A.(1985)。Volunteer's Dilemma。Journal of Conflict Resolution,29,605-610。  new window
11.Easterling, D.(1992)。Fair Rules for Siting a High-level Nuclear Waste Repository。Journal of Policy Analysis and Management,11(3),442-475。  new window
12.Groothuis, P. A.、Miller, G.(1994)。Locating Hazardous Waste Facilities: The Influence of NIMBY Beliefs。American Journal of Economics and Sociology,53(3),335-346。  new window
13.Inhabler, H.(1992)。Of NIMBYs, LULUs, and NIMTOOs。The Public Interest,107,52-64。  new window
14.Kunreuther, H.、Kleindofer, R.、Knez, P. J.、Yaksick, R.(1987)。A Compensation Mechanism for Siting Noxious Facilities: Theory and Experimental Design。Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,14,371-383。  new window
15.Lake, R. W.、Disch, L.(1992)。Structural Constraints and Pluralist Contradictions in Hazardous Waste Regulation。Environment and Planning A,24(3),663-681。  new window
16.Matheny, A. R.、Williams, B. A.(1985)。Knowledge Vs. NIMBY: Assessing Florida's Strategy for Siting Hazardous Waste Disposal Facilities。Policy Studies Journal,14(1),70-80。  new window
17.O'Hare, Michael(1977)。Not on My Block, You Don't: Facility Siting and the Strategic Importance of Compensation。Public Policy,25(4),407-458。  new window
18.Petts, J.(1992)。Incineration Risk Perceptions and Public Concern: Experience in the UK Improving Risk Communication。Waste Management and Research,10(2),169-182。  new window
19.Portney, K. E.(1984)。Allaying the NIMBY Syndrome: Potential for Compensation in Hazardous Waste Treatment Facility Siting。Hazardous Waste,1(3),411-421。  new window
20.Solomon, B. D.、Cameron, D. M.(1985)。Nuclear Waste Repository Siting: An Alternative Approach。Energy Policy,13(6),564-580。  new window
21.Vlek, C.、Keren, G.(1992)。Behavioral Decision Theory and Environmental Risk Management: Assessment and Resolution of Four 'Survival' Dilemmas。Acta Psychologica,80(1-3),249-278。  new window
22.李永展(19960500)。鄰避設施對社區環境品質之影響--以臺北市三個垃圾焚化廠為例。國立政治大學學報,72(下),263-297。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.李永展(1993)。資源回收與資源再生區之規劃--以台北市文山區為例。台北:國立政治大學地政學系。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.何紀芳(1995)。都市服務設施鄰避效果之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Dear, M.(1990)。Gaining Community Acceptance。Princeton, NJ:The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation。  new window
2.O'Hare, M.、Bascow, L.、Sanderson, D.(1983)。Facility Siting and Public Opposition。N.Y.:Van Nostrand Reinhold。  new window
3.Brion, Denis J.(1991)。Essential Industry and the NIMBY Phenomenon。New York:Quorum Books。  new window
4.Blowers, A. T.、Lowry, D.、Solomon, B. D.(1991)。The International Politics of Nuclear Waste。London:MacMillan。  new window
5.Dear, M.、Taylor, S. M.(1982)。Not on Our Street: Community Attitudes Toward Mental Health Care。London:Pion。  new window
6.New York City Planning Commission(1990)。City Planning Commission, Criteria for the Location of City Facilities。N.Y.:New York City Planning Commission。  new window
7.Thurow, L. G.(1980)。The Zero-sum Society: Distribution and Possibilities for Economic Change。Harmondsworth:Penguin。  new window
8.Edelstein, M.(1988)。Contaminated communities: The social and psychological impacts of residential toxic exposure。Boulder:London:Westview Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.夏鑄九、張景森(1990)。台灣地區國土規劃歷史的回顧與檢討。國土規劃的挑戰民間國建會特輯。臺北:國家政策研究資料中心。  延伸查詢new window
2.Walker, R.(1981)。A Theory of Suburbanisation: Capitalism and the Construction of Urban Space in the United State。Urbanization and Urban Planning in Capitalist Socialites。New York:Methuen。  new window
3.Ducsik, D.(1987)。Citizen Participation in Power Plant Siting: Aladdin's Lamp or Pandora's Box?。Resolving Location Conflict。New Brunswick:Rutgers Center for Urban Policy Research。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE