臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：嫌惡性設施的風險知覺
書刊名：中國行政評論
作者：張寧 引用關係／黃崑峰
作者(外文)：Chang, Ning／Huang, Kun-feng
出版日期：2015
卷期：21:3
頁次：頁21-47
主題關鍵詞：鄰避；社會判斷理論；風險溝通；風險知覺；NIMBY；Social judgment theory；Risk communication；Risk perception
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:189
  • 點閱點閱:71
補償回饋是用以弭帄居民反對嫌惡性設施的主要方法，但仍難以確保衝突的減少。本研究之目的即在藉由對利害關係人的認知分析，了解嫌惡性設施風險的認知衝突來源。透過社會判斷理論（Social Judgment Theory, SJT）之架構，以火力發電廠、核能發電廠，焚化爐和核廢料儲存場等四種設施為例，檢視政府官員、環保團體、設施員工與當地民眾等利害關係人對於上開設施的風險知覺，以期發現鄰避情結、補償回饋、溝通與設施種類對利害關係人風險認知的影響。研究成果顯示，在火力發電場和焚化爐的案例，補償金越高、距離越遠、溝通的層次越高，受測者對於設施的接受程度越高。而在核能發電廠和核廢料掩埋場的案例中，距離與溝通層次對接受程度的影響，與對非核能設施相同，但補償金額提高，受測者的接受程度卻反而降低。因此鄰避情結以及溝通的程度對所有種類的設施皆有影響，而補償僅對非核能設施有效。
Government usually used compensation to dispel objection of residents for siting of NIMBY, but the conflict was not reduced. This study wants to understand the source of cognitive conflict about risk perception of NIMBY by the stakeholders’ cognitive analysis. It adopted Social Judgment Theory (SJT) to develop a SJT-Based questionnaire and use thermal power plant, nuclear power plant, incinerator, and radioactive waste repository as examples to investigate government officers, environmental groups, local residents, and staff of these facilities. The objective is to realize the impacts of NIMBY complex, compensation, communication, and distance on risk perception of NIMBY. The results show that the more willingly the respondents accept the setting of thermal power plant and incinerator as the more the compensation is, the farther the distance is, and the higher level the communication is. Yet for nuclear power plant and radioactive waste repository, increasing the amount of compensation decreases the willing of acceptance, even though the impacts of distance and communication are the same as the non-nuclear facilities. Therefore the NIMBY complex and communication influence the risk perception for both nuclear and non-nuclear facilities, but compensation works only in non-nuclear facilities.
期刊論文
1.Fiorino, Daniel J.(1990)。Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms。Science, Technology & Human Values，15(2)，226-243。  new window
2.李永展(19940600)。如何克服「鄰避」（NIMBY）併發症。人與地，126，24-31。  延伸查詢new window
3.Heiman, Michael(1990)。From "Not in My Backyard!" to "Not in Anybody's Backyard!": Grassroots Challenge to Hazardous Waste Facility Siting。Journal of the American Planning Association，56(3)，359-362。  new window
4.楊國柱、顏愛靜(20041200)。An Analysis on the NIMBY Conflict of Locating Funerary Facilities : From the Viewpoint of Transaction Costs Theory。中國行政評論，14(1)，27-58。new window  new window
5.丘昌泰(20050600)。NIMBY Syndrome and Facility Siting。中國行政評論，14(3)，33-64。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.陳錫鎮(19980900)。解決「鄰避設施」設置管理問題之新議--「創意思考」之實例與應用。人與地，177，39-49。  延伸查詢new window
7.Hunter, Susan、Leyden, Kevin M.(1995)。Beyond NIMBY: Explaining Opposition to Hazardous Waste Facilities。Policy Studies Journal，23(4)，601-619。  new window
8.林茂成(20010500)。鄰避型設施區位選擇與處理模式之探討--以都會區捷運系統為例。現代營建，22(5)=257，67-76。  延伸查詢new window
9.陳錫鎮(19960800)。解決「鄰避設施」設置管理問題新議初論--「創意思考」的實例與應用。人與地，152，31-39。  延伸查詢new window
10.Lake, Robert W.(1993)。Planners' Alchemy Transforming NIMBY to YIMBY。Journal of the American Planning Association，59，87-93。  new window
11.Kunreuther, Howard、Fitzgerald, Kevin、Aarts, Thomas D.(1993)。Siting Noxious Facilities: A Test of the Facility Siting Credo。Risk Analysis，13，301-318。  new window
12.Takahashi, Lois M.、Gaber, Sharon Lord(1998)。Controversial facility siting in the urban environment: Resident and planet perceptions in the United States。Environment and Behavior，30(2)，184-215。  new window
13.Kunreuther, Howard、Easterling, Doug(1996)。The Role of Compensation in Siting Hazardous Facilities。Journal of Policy Analysis and Management，15(4)，601-622。  new window
14.蕭代基(19960700)。汙染性設施之設置與民眾信心之建立。臺灣經濟預測與政策，27(1)，39-52。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.張寧(20071200)。策略性假設分析法之問題建構--以核四案爭議為例。環境與管理研究，8(2)，52-75。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.黃淑君(20071200)。臺北市立動物園遊客對於環境風險知覺之探討。環境與管理研究，8(2)，18-34。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.McAvoy, Gregory E.(1998)。Partisan Probing and Democratic Decisionmaking: Rethinking the Nimby Syndrome。Policy Studies Journal，26(2)，274-292。  new window
18.Rohrbaugh, John(1981)。Operationalizing the Competing Value Approach: Measuring Performance in Employment Service。Public Productivity Review，5(2)，141-159。  new window
19.Rundmo, TorbjØrn(2002)。Associations between Affect and Risk Perception。Journal of Risk Research，5(2)，119-135。  new window
20.Shants, Frank B.(1978)。Countering the Anti-nuclear Activists。Public Relations Journal，34，10-11。  new window
21.Slovic, Paul、Fischhoff, Baruch、Lichtenstein, Sarah(1981)。Informing the Public about the Risks from Ionizing Radiation。Health Physic，41(4)，589-598。  new window
22.汪明生、黃國良、郭文俊(20050800)。酒後駕車風險知覺之實驗研究--資訊整合理論之應用。管理學報，22(4)，429-447。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.張寧、汪明生、郭瑞坤(20070400)。社會判斷理論對互動管理成果之評估。管理學報，24(2)，135-154。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.湯京平、陳金哲(20050300)。新公共管理與鄰避政治：以嘉義縣市跨域合作為例。政治科學論叢，23，101-132。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.黃懿慧(19920800)。從風險溝通理論談美國核電問題。美國月刊，7(8)=76，123-134。  延伸查詢new window
26.黃懿慧(19940400)。科技風險的認知與溝通問題。民意研究季刊，188，95-129。  延伸查詢new window
27.劉阿榮、石慧瑩(20040300)。社群意識與永續發展：鄰避現象及補償金之分析。中國行政評論，13(2)，1-32。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.劉錦添(19940900)。環境風險的知覺--臺灣的實證研究。臺灣銀行季刊，45(3)，216-231。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.Field, Patrick(1996)。Risk and Justice: Rethinking the Concept of Compensation。The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science，545，156-164。  new window
30.Fischhoff, Baruch(1985)。Managing Risk Perceptions。Issues in Science and Technology，2(1)，83-96。  new window
31.Ibitayo, Olurominiyi O.、Pijawka, K. David(1999)。Reversing NIMBY: An Assessment of State Strategies for Siting Hazardous-waste Facilities。Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy，17(4)，379-389。  new window
32.Wolsink, Maarten(1994)。Entanglement of Interests and Motives: Assumptions behind the NIMBY-Theory on Facility Siting。Urban Studies，31(6)，851-866。  new window
33.汪銘生、陳碧珍(20030400)。風險資訊整合模式與風險知覺之研究--以石化業為例。管理學報，20(2)，251-287。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.李永展、翁久惠(19950700)。鄰避設施對主觀環境生活品質影響之探討--以居民對垃圾焚化廠之認知與態度為例。經社法制論叢，16，89-117。  延伸查詢new window
35.曾明遜(19940600)。淺論鄰避設施的風險知覺。人與地，126，36-40。  延伸查詢new window
36.丘昌泰(20021200)。從「鄰避情結」到「迎臂效應」--臺灣環保抗爭的問題與出路。政治科學論叢，17，33-56。new window  延伸查詢new window
37.葉俊榮(19920100)。「出賣環境權」: 從五輕設廠的十五億「回饋基金」談起。Proceedings of the National Science Council. Part C, Humanities and Social Sciences，2(1)，17-34。  延伸查詢new window
38.Brunswik, E.(1943)。Organismic Achievement and Environmental Probability。Psychological Review，50(3)，255-272。  new window
39.Castellan, N. John Jr.(1973)。Comments on the "Lens Model" Equation and the Analysis of Multiple-cue Judgment Tasks。Psychometrika，38(1)，87-100。  new window
40.Fischhoff, Baruch、Slovic, Paul、Lichtenstein, Sarah、Read, Stephen、Combs, Barbara(1978)。How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits。Policy Sciences，9(2)，127-152。  new window
41.Tolman, E. C.、Brunswik, E.(1935)。The Organism and the Causal Texture of the Environment。Psychological Review，42(1)，43-77。  new window
42.Kasperson, Roger E.、Renn, Ortwin、Slovic, Paul、Brown, Halina S.、Goble, Robert、Emel, Jacque、Ratick, Samuel、Kasperson, J. X.(1988)。The Social Amplification of Risk: a Conceptual Framework。Risk Analysis，8(2)，177-187。  new window
43.李永展(19970300)。鄰避症候群之解析。都市與計劃，24(1)，69-79。new window  延伸查詢new window
44.陳俊宏(19990900)。「鄰避」(NIMBY)症候群，專家政治與民主審議。東吳政治學報，10，97-132。new window  延伸查詢new window
45.Kasperson, Roger E.、Golding, Dominic、Tuler, Seth(1992)。Social Distrust as a Factor in Siting Hazardous Facilities and Communicating Risk。The Journal of Social Issues，48(4)，161-187。  new window
46.Slovic, Paul(1987)。Perception of Risk。Science，236(4799)，280-285。  new window
47.Frey, Bruno S.、Oberholzer-Gee, Felix(1997)。The Cost of Price Incentives: An Empirical Analysis of Motivation Crowding-out。The American Economic Review，87(4)，746-755。  new window
48.周桂田(20041200)。獨大的科學理性與隱沒(默)的社會理性之「對話」--在地公眾、科學專家與國家的風險文化探討。臺灣社會研究季刊，56，1-63。new window  延伸查詢new window
49.Cooksey, Ray. W.、Freebody, Peter(1985)。Generalized multivariate Lens model analysis for complex human inference tasks。Organizational Behavior and Human Decision processes，35(1)，46-72。  new window
50.Brunswik, Egon(1955)。Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology。Psychological Review，62(3)，193-217。  new window
51.Hursch, Carolyn J.、Hammond, Kenneth R.、Hursch, Jack L.(1964)。Some Methodological Considerations in Multiple-cue Probability Studies。Psychological Review，71(1)，42-60。  new window
52.李永展(19960500)。鄰避設施對社區環境品質之影響--以臺北市三個垃圾焚化廠為例。國立政治大學學報，72(下)，263-297。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Rosenbaum, Walter A.、許舒翔、李建宏、徐正能、吳豐帥(2005)。環境政治學。臺北：五南。  延伸查詢new window
2.Hance, Billie Jo、Chess, Caron、Sandman, Peter M.(1988)。Improving Dialogue with Communities: A Risk Communication Manual for Government。Trenton：New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection。  new window
3.Saint, P. Michael、Flavell, Robert J.、Fox, Patrick F.(2009)。Nimby Wars: The Politics of Land Use。MA：Saint University Press。  new window
4.劉錦添(1989)。污染性設施設置程序之研究。臺北：行政院經濟建設委員會健全經社法規工作小組。  延伸查詢new window
5.Krimsky, Sheldon、Plough, Alonzo(1988)。Environmental Hazards: Communicating Risks as a Social Process。Dover, MA：Auburn House Publishing Company。  new window
6.Lesbirel, S. Hayden(1998)。NIMBY Politics in Japan: Energy Siting and the Management of Environmental Conflict。Ithaca：Cornell University Press。  new window
7.POLICY PC(1991)。Judgment Analysis Software--Reference Manual。Executive Decision Services。  new window
8.National Research Council(1989)。Improving Risk Communication。National Academies Press。  new window
9.Douglas, Mary、Wildavsky, Aaron(1982)。Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technical and Environmental Dangers。University of California Press。  new window
10.Anderson, Barry F.、Deane, Donald H.、Hammond, Kenneth R.、McClelland, Gary H.、Shanteau, James C.(1981)。Concepts in Judgment and Decision Research。New York, NY：Praeger Publishers。  new window
11.Cooksey, R. W.(1996)。Judgment Analysis: Theory, Methods and Applications。University of New England。  new window
12.Hammond, Kenneth R.、McClelland, Gary H.、Mumpower, Jeryl(1980)。Human Judgment and Decision Making: Theories, Methods, and Procedures。Praeger Publishers。  new window
圖書論文
1.Slovic, Paul、Fischhoff, Baeuch、Lichtenstein, Sarach(1980)。Facts and Fears: Understanding Perceived Risk。Societal Risk Assessment: How Safe Is Safe Enough?。New York, NY：Plenum Press。  new window
2.Brehmer, Berndt、Joyce, C. R. B.(1988)。Introduction。Human judgment: The SJT View。New York：North-Holland。  new window
3.Kasper, Raphael G.(1980)。Perceptions of Risk and Their Effects on Decision Making。Societal Risk Assessment: How Safe Is Safe Enough?。New York：Plenum Press。  new window
4.Zinn, Jens O.(2008)。Introduction: the Contribution of Sociology to the Discourse on Risk and Uncertainty。Social Theories of Risk and Uncertainty: An Introduction。Malden：Blackwell。  new window
5.Covello, Vincent T.(1985)。Social and Behavioral Research on Risk: Uses in Risk Management Decision-making。Environmental Impact Assessment, Technology Assessment, and Risk Analysis。Berlin：Springer-Verlag。  new window
6.Popper, Frank J.(1987)。The Environmentalist and the LULU。Resolving Location Conflicts。New Brunswick, NJ：Center for Urban Policy Research。  new window
7.Vlek, Charles、Kuyper, Hans、Boer, Henk(1985)。Large-scale Risk as a Problem of Technological, Psychological, and Political Judgement。Environmental Impact Assessment, Technology Assessment, and Risk Analysis。Belin：Springer-Verlag。  new window
8.Slovic, Paul(2000)。Perceived risk, trust, and democracy。The Perception of Risk。Earthscan Publications Ltd.。  new window
9.Hammond, Kenneth R.、Stewart, Thomas R.、Brehmer, Berndt、Steinmann, Derick O.(1975)。Social Judgment Theory。Human Judgment and Decision Processes。Academic Press。  new window
10.Stewart, T. R.(1988)。Judgment Analysis: Procedures。Human Judgment: The SJT View。North-Holland。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：877（臺灣：850，外國：27） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1498098 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67306443
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上