併購後企業品牌名稱重配置對顧客知覺反應影響之研究－探討同異業併購類型及顧客嵌陷的調節效果_

:::

詳目顯示

第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆

/1頁

論文基本資料
摘要
外文摘要
參考文獻

題名：	併購後企業品牌名稱重配置對顧客知覺反應影響之研究－探討同異業併購類型及顧客嵌陷的調節效果
作者：	徐孝芳
作者(外文)：	Hsiao-Fang Hsu
校院名稱：	中原大學
系所名稱：	企業管理研究所
指導教授：	呂鴻德
學位類別：	博士
出版日期：	2013
主題關鍵詞：	保險業；顧客嵌陷；異業；抗拒理論；併購；品牌名稱重配置；M&A；Customer Entrapment；Brand Name Redeployment；Insurance Industry；Reactance Theory；Cross-market
原始連結：	連回原系統網址
相關次數：	被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0) 排除自我引用:0 共同引用:0 點閱:6

企業在併購後如何整合兩家公司的資產成為組織重整之重要工作，其中無形資產之一的品牌重配置至關重要，因其影響消費者態度。雖然近年來關於企業品牌的研究甚多，然而較少關注於併購型態及決策嵌陷情況對被併公司顧客的影響，本研究旨在探究不同品牌名稱對被併公司顧客知覺顧客權益剝奪感、抗拒心理及品牌轉換意圖之影響，以北部某科技大學418位大學生及研究生為實驗對象，採用5(品牌：A為被併公司品牌、B為主併公司品牌、BA為主併及被併公司聯名品牌、AB為被併及主併公司聯名品牌、C為創新品牌)×2(併購類型:同業、異業)×2(顧客嵌陷：低、高)混合實驗設計，以便利抽樣方式進行問卷調查。分析結果顯示：
1. 品牌名稱改變對顧客權益剝奪感及品牌轉換意圖有顯著影響。
2. 在高嵌陷時顧客知覺之權益剝奪感、抗拒心理均大於低嵌陷情況，但高嵌陷時品牌轉換意圖則是小於低嵌陷情況。
3. 同業併購相對異業併購的情況下，併購後的公司若採用主併公司品牌B，則被併A公司顧客之權益剝奪感和品牌轉換意圖高於採用被併公司品牌A。
4. 同業併購相對異業併購的情況下，併購後的公司若採用主併公司品牌B，則被併A公司顧客之權益剝奪感和品牌轉換意圖高於採用創新品牌C。
5. 同業併購相對異業併購的情況下，併購後公司若採用創新品牌C，則被併A公司顧客之權益剝奪感高於採用主併優勢綜效品牌BA。
6. 顧客高嵌陷程度相對於低嵌陷的情況下，併購後的公司若採用主併公司品牌B，則被併A公司顧客之抗拒心理和品牌轉換意圖高於採用被併公司品牌A。
7. 顧客高嵌陷程度相對於低嵌陷的情況下，併購後的公司若採用主併公司品牌B，則被併A公司顧客之抗拒心理和品牌轉換意圖高於採用創新品牌C。
8. 顧客高嵌陷程度相對於低嵌陷的情況下，併購後的公司若採用創新品牌C，則被併A公司顧客之品牌轉換意圖高於採用被併公司品牌A。
9. 顧客高嵌陷程度相對於低嵌陷的情況下，併購後的公司若採用創新品牌C，則被併A公司顧客之品牌轉換意圖高於採用主併優勢綜效品牌BA。
綜合上述交互作用效果，在同業併購相對於異業情況下，品牌管理上採用主併優勢綜效品牌BA為最佳策略、創新品牌C為次佳策略，兩者皆優於採用主併公司品牌B能有效減輕被併A公司顧客權益剝奪感。在顧客高嵌陷程度相對於低嵌陷的情況下，品牌管理上採用主併優勢綜效品牌BA或被併公司品牌A為最佳策略、創新品牌C為次佳策略，兩者皆優於採用主併公司品牌B能有效降低被併A公司顧客品牌轉換意圖。

以文找文

In the context of M&A, how to redeploy two corporate assets is one of important organizational tasks. Among tasks, the management of intangible assets – in particular of corporate brand name is a critical element reflects consumers’ response. There has been increasing interest in the role of corporate names in academic fields. However, little attention has been paid to the different name and symbol options on M&A types. No empirical research has yet addressed branding strategies between in-market and cross-market M&A from the individual customers’ perspectives of acquired company. Neither decision entrapment of the moderating variable has yet discussed relevant to branding strategy. This paper seeks to address the research gap, by exploring acquired company customer on brand identity options in the context of post merger. Specifically, it considers the degree to which name and symbol influence acquired consumer responses. Thus, 5(brand strategy: A, B, BA, AB or C)×2(M & A types: in market or cross-market)×2(decision entrapment：high or low) mixed experiment design was conducted. 418 undergraduate or graduate students are the subjects from a college of northern Taiwan. Questionnaires were collected by convenience sampling. The results show that: (1). Brand name redeployment strategy has signficant effect on customers’ sovereignty deprivation and brand switching intention. (2). Decision entrapment has signficant effect on acquired company customers’ sovereignty deprivation, psychological reactance and brand switching intention. With high level of decision entrapment, the degree of customers’ perceived sovereignty deprivation and psychological reactance are higher than those in low level of entrapment. With high level of decision entrapment, the degree of customers’ brand switching intention is lower than those in low level of entrapment. (3). In in-market M&A type situation, target-dominant brand tend to outperform acquirer-dominant brand strategy in decreasing the degree of acquired company customers’ perceived sovereignty deprivation and brand switching intention when compared with cross-market M&A type. (4). In in-market M&A type situation, new brand tend to outperform acquirer-dominant brand strategy in decreasing the degree of acquired company customers’ perceived sovereignty deprivation and brand switching intention when compared with cross-market M&A type. (5). In-market M&A type situation, acquirer-dominant synergistic redeployment tends to outperform new brand name strategy in decreasing the degree of acquired company customers’ sovereignty deprivation when compared with cross-market M&A type. (6). With high level of decision entrapment, the degree of customers’ psychological reactance and brand switching intension tend to be higher after mergers using the acquirer-dominant strategy than those using target-dominant strategy in low level of entrapment situation. (7). With high level of decision entrapment situation, the degree of customers’ psychological reactance and brand switching intension tend to be higher after mergers using the acquirer-dominant strategy than those using new brand name stratey in low level of decision entrapment. (8). With high level of decision entrapment, the degree of customers’ brand switching intension tend to be higher after mergers using new brand name than those using target-dominant redeployment strategy in low level of entrapment. (9).With high level of decision entrapment, the degree of customers’ brand switching intension tend to be higher after mergers using new brand name than those using acquirer-dominant synergistic redeployment strategy in low level of entrapment. In summary, in in-market M&A type situation, acquirer-dominant synergistic brand is the best strategy and new brand name is the second best option in decreasing the degree of acquired company customers’ perceived sovereignty deprivation when compared with cross-market type situation. With high level of decision entrapment, acquirer-dominant synergistic brand or target-dominant brand is the best strategy and new brand name is the second best option in decreasing the degree of acquired company customers’ brand switching intention in low level of decision entrapment. The results should guide managers regarding post-M&A branding strategies.

以文找文

參考文獻
一、中文參考文獻
1.伍忠賢 (2002)。策略管理 (初版)。台北: 三民書局。
2.吳青松 (2002)。國際企業管理─理論與實務。台北: 智勝文化。
3.李文煒 (2011)。比較分析消費者在品牌聯盟與品牌購併之品牌權益差異－以消費性電子產品為例。中原大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
4.邱志聖、謝佳宏、葉相億 (2003)。國際購併組合品牌名稱對消費者態度之影響－以銀行業為例。管理學報，29(3)，207-228。 new window

5.邱志聖 (2010)。策略行銷分析：架構與實務應用 (三版)。台北: 智勝文化。
6.林炳倉 (2002)。成功的企業購併 (再版)。台北: 眾信聯合會計事務所。
7.林素綉 (2012)。從顧客知覺關係利益觀點探討壽險業顧客關係加強努力對關係結果之影響。管理學報，20(6)，1123-1158。
8.林家五、鄭伯壎、蔡明宏 (2000)。決策嵌陷的成因分析。管理學報，17(3)，456-515。 new window

9.林家五、鄭伯壎、陳淑琪 (2000)。組織決策嵌陷的陷溺與挽救歷程－個案研究取向。人力資源管理學報，3(2)，27-56。 new window

10.林惠文 (2000)。從美國併購風潮看台灣銀行產業之發展。商管科技季刊，1(4)，447-457。
11.林書妤 (2003)。團體凝聚力對決策嵌陷的影響。中原大學企業心理學系碩士論文。
12.張幸惠 (2011)。股市投資人的續擴承諾之探討。東吳經濟商學學報(35)，133-166。
13.黃營杉、楊景傅、汪志堅、梁富梅譯 (2003)。高等策略管理 (二版)。台北: 華泰文化。
14.陳亭羽、吳靜昕、王曉斌 (2010)。品牌名稱組合形式對於品牌聯盟效果的影響。行銷評論，7(3)，323 -356。 new window

15.曾真真、何雍慶 (2005)。以資源基礎觀點及動態能力觀點檢視併購決策及併購績效－以金融整合為例。管理評論，24(3)，95-116。 new window

二、英文參考文獻
1.Anderson, N. H. (1981). Foundations of information integration theory. New York: Academic Press.
2.Arkes, H. R., & Blumer, C. (1985). The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35(1), 124-140.
3.Barwise, P. (1993). Brand equity: Snark or boojum? International Journal of Research in Marketing, 10(1), 93-104.
4.Basu, K. (2006). Merging brands after mergers. California Management Review, 48(4), 28-40.
5.Bazerman, M. H., Giulaiano, T., & Appelman, A. (1984). Escalation of commitment in individual and group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33(2), 141-152.
6.Berry, C. H. (1971). Corporate growth and diversification. Journal of Law and Economics, 14(2), 371-383.
7.Bekier, M. B.,Bogardus, A. J., & Oldham, T. (2001). Why mergers fail. The McKinsey Quarterly,6-9.
8.Bekier, M. B., & Shelton, M. J. (2002). Keeping your sales force after the merger. The McKinsey Quarterly, 106-115.
9.Brealey, R. A., Myers, S. C., & Allen, F. (2006). Corporate finance (International 8th ed.). Irwin: McGraw Hill.
10.Brehm, J. W. (1966). Theory of psychological reactance. San Diego: CA Academic Press.
11.Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. N.Y: Academic Press.
12.Brooking, A. (1996). Intellectual capital. Boston, M.A: International Thompson Business Press.
13.Capron, L. (1999). The long-term performance of horizontal acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 20(11), 987-1018.
14.Capron, L., & Hulland, J. (1999). Redeployment of brands, sales forces, and general marketing management expertise following horizontal acquisitions: A resource-based view. Journal of Marketing, 63(2), 41-54.
15.Cartwright, S., & Cooper, C. L. (1992). Mergers and acquisitions: The human factor. Oxford: Butterworth-Hcinemann Ltd.
16.Chatterjee, S. (1986). Types of synergy and economic value: The impact of acquisitions on merging and rival firms. Strategic Management Journal, 7(2), 119-139.
17.Chung, S., Singh, H., & Lee, K. (2000). Complementarity, status similarity and social capital as drivers of alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 21(11), 1-22.
18.Clee, M. A., & Wicklund, R. A. (1980). Consumer behavior and psychological reactance. Journal of Consumer Research, 6(4), 389-405.
19.Down, J. W. (1995). The M&A game is often won or lost after the deal. Paper presented at the Management Review Executive Forum.
20.Elgers, P. T., & Clark, J. J. (1980). Merger types and shareholder returns: Additional evidence. Financial Management (Summer), 66-72.
21.Erdem, T., & Swait, J. (1998). Brand equity as a signaling phenomenon. Journal of consumer Psychology, 7(2), 131-157.
22.Ettenson, R., & Knowles, J. (2006). Merging the brands and branding the merger. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(4), 39-49.
23.Fazio, R. H. (1986). How do attitude guide behavior? N.Y: Guilford Press.
24.Fazio, R. H. (1989). On the power and functionality of attitudes: the role of attitude accessibility. N.Y: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25.Fournier, S., & Yao, J. L. (1997). Reviving brand loyality: A reconceptualization within the framework of consumer-brand relationship. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 14(5), 451-472.
26.Garland, H. (1990). Throwing good money after bad: The effect of sunk costs on the decision to escalate commitment to an ongoing project. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(6), 728-731. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.6.728
27.Gaughan, P. A. (2007). Mergers, acquisitions, and corporate restructurings (2nd ed.). N.J: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
28.Gussoni, M., & Mangani, A. (2012). Corporate branding strategies in mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Brand Management, 19, 772–787.
29.Garland, H., & Newport, S. (1991). Effects of absolute and relative sunk costs on the decision to persist with a course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 48(1), 55-69.
30.Gwinner, K. P., Gremler, D. D., & Bitner, M. J. (1998). Relational benefits in services idustries: The customer’s Perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26(2), 101-114.
31.Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. 1992. Multivariate data analysis with reading, (3rd Ed.). New York: Macmillan.
32.Harrison, J. S., Hitt, M. A., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2001). Resources complementarity in business combinations: Extending the logic to organizational alliances. Journal of Management, 27(6), 679-690.
33.Homburg, C., & Bucerius, M. (2005). A marketing perspective on mergers and acquisitions: How marketing integration affects post merger performance. Journal of Marketing, 69(1), 95-113.
34.Horsky, D., & Swyngedouw, P. (1987). Does it pay to change your company's name? A stock market perspective. Marketing Science, 6(4), 320-335.
35.Jaju, A. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of corporate brand name redeployment. (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from http:// athenaeum.libs.uga.edu/bitstream/handle/10724/6162/jaju_anupam_200208_phd.pdf?sequence=1
36.Jaju, A., Joner, C., & Reddy, S. K. (2006). Consumer evaluations of corporate brand redeployments. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 206-215.
37.Jeffrey, C. (1992). The relation of judgment, personal involvement, and experience in the audit of bank loans. Accounting Review, 67(4), 802-819.
38.Jones, M. A., Mothersbaugh, D. L., & Beatty, S. E. (2000). Swithcing barrier and repurchase interntions in services. Journal of Retailing, 76(2), 259-274.
39.Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2 March), 263-291.
40.Kayaman, R., & Arasli, H. (2007). Customer based brand equity: Evidence from the hotel industry. Management Service Quality, 17(1), 92-109.
41.Keller, K. L. (1993). Conceptualizing, measuring, managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1-22.
42.Keller, K. L. (1998). Strategic brand management: Building, measuring, and managing brand equity. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall.
43.Kitching, J. (1967). Why do mergers miscarry? Harvard Business Review, 45, 84-101.
44.Kling, G., Ghobadian, A., & O'Regan, N. (2009). Organic growth and shareholder value: A case study of the insurance industry. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26(4), 276-283. doi: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2009.08.002.
45.Krishnan, H. A. & Park, D.(2002). The impact of work force reduction on subsequent performaqnce in major mergers and acquisition-An explora study. Journal of Business Research,55(4),285-292.
46.Kumar, S., & Blomqvist, K. H. (2004). An approach to access the importance of brand equity in acquisition decisions. Strategy & Leadership, 32(2), 22-27.
47.Lambkin, M., & Muzellec, L. (2008). Rebranding in the banking industry following mergers and acquisitions. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 26(5), 328-352.
48.Laughhunn, D., & Payne, J. W. (1984). The impact of sunk cost on risky choice behaviour. Paper presented at Canadian Journal of Operations Research and Information Processing, 22, 151-181.
49.Lee, H. M., & Lee, C. C. (2011). Country-of-origin and brand redeployment impact after brand acquisition. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 28(6), 412-420. doi: 10.1108/07363761111165921.
50.Lee, H. M., Lee, C. C., & Wu, C. C. (2011). Brand image strategy affects brand equity after M&A. European Journal of Marketing, 45(7/8), 1091-1111. doi: 10.1108/03090561111137624
51.Lev, B. (2001). Intangibles-management, measurement, and reporting. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
52.Levin, I. P., & Levin, A. M. (2000). Modeling the role of brand alliances in the assimilation of product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 9(1), 43-52.
53.Luo, Y. (2002). Product diversification in international joint ventures: Performance implications in an emerging market. Strategic Management Journal, 23(1), 1-20.
54.Machado, J. C., Paulo-de, L., Vacas-de-Carvalho, L., & Costa, P. (2012). Rebranding mergers: How attitudes influence consumer choices? Journal of Brand Management, 19(6), 513-524.
55.Machado, J. C., Vacas-de-Carvalho, L., Costa, P., & Lencastre, P. (2012). Brand mergers: Examining consumers' responses to the name and logo design. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 21(6), 418-427.
56.Marks, M. L., & Marvis, P. H. (2001). Making mergers and acquisitions work: Strategic and psychological preparation. Academy of Management Executive, 15(2), 80-92.
57.Mazursky, D., & Jacoby, J. (1986). Exploring the development of store images. Journal of Retailing, 62(Summer), 145-165.
58.Mizik, N., Knowles, J., & Dinner, I. (2011). Value implications of corporate branding in mergers. (working paper). Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1756368
59.Monroe, K. B. (1976). The influence of price differences and brand familiarity on brand preference. Journal of Consumer Research, 3(June), 42-49.
60.Morrall, K. (1996). Managing a merger without losing customers. Bank Marketing, 28(3), 18-23.
61.Motameni, R., & Shahrokhi, M. (1998). Brand equity valuation: A global perspective. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 7(4), 275-290.
62.Muthukrishnan, A. V. (1995). Decision ambiguity and incumbent brand adventage. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(1), 98-109.
63.Nunnally, J.C., (1978), Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill.Osuna, E. E., (1985), “The Psychological Cost of Waiting,” Journal ofMathematical Psychology, 29, 82-105.
64.Nunnally. J. C. & Bernstein. I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory, NY: McGraw-Hill.
65.Pappu, R., & Quester, P. G. (2008). Does brand equity vary between department stores and clothing stores: Results of an empirical investigation. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 17(7), 425-435.
66.Park, C. W., & Lessig, V. P. (1981). Familiarity and its impact on consumer decision biases and heuristics. Journal of Consumer Research, 8(2), 223-230.
67.Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitude and persuasion: Classical and contemporary approaches, Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown Compnay.
68.Rao, A. R., Lu, Q., & Ruekert, R. W. (1999). Signaling unobservable product quality through a brand ally. Journal of marketing research, 36(2), 258-268.
69.Rao, A. R., & Monroe, K. B. (1989). The effect of price, brand name, and store name on buyers' perceptions of product quality: An integrative review. Journal of marketing research, 26(3), 351-357.
70.Ringold, D. J. (1988). Consumer response to product withdrawal: The reformulation of Coca-Cola. Psychology and Marketing, 5(3), 189–210.
71.Rubin, J. Z. & Brockner, J. (1975). Factors affecting entrapment in waiting situations: The Rosencrantz and Guildstern effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(6), 1054-1063.
72.Rechheld F. F. & W. E. Jr. Sasser (1990). Zero Defections: Quality comes to services. Harvard Business Review, 68(5), 105-111.
73.Rock, L., & Rock, R. H. (1990). Corporate restructuring. N.Y: McGraw-Hill.
74.Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertaity, 1(1), 7-59.
75.Schweizer, L. (2005). Organization integration of acquired biotechnology companies into pharmaceutical companies: The need for hybrid approach. Academy of Management Executive, 48(6), 1051-1074.
76.Seth, A. (1990a). Sources of value creation in acquisitions: An empirical investigation. Strategic Management Journal, 11(6), 431-446.
77.Seth, A. (1990b). Value creation in acquisitions: A reexamination of performance issues. Strategic Management Journal, 11(2), 99-115.
78.Shelton, L. M. (1988). Strategic business fits and corporate acquisition empirical evidence. Strategic Management Journal, 9(3), 279-287.
79.Shimp, T. A., & William, O. B. (1982). The use of extrinsic cue to facilitate product adoption. Journal of marketing research, 19(2), 229-239.
80.Sikora, M. (2005). Consumers are a hot issue for merging businesses. Mergers & Acquisitions: The Dealmeaker's Journal, 40, 16-18.
81.Simonin, B. L. & Julie, A. R. (1998). Is a company known by the company it keeps? Assessing the spillover effects of brand alliances on consumer brand attitudes. Journal of Marketing Reseaerch, 35(February), 30-42.
82.Singh, H., & Montgomery, C. A. (1987). Corporate acquisition strategies and economic performance. Strategic Management Journal, 8(4), 377-386.
83.Sleesman, D. J., Conlon, D. E., McNamara, G., & Miles, J. E. (2012). Academy of Management Journal, 55(3), 541-562.
84.Smith, D. C., & Park, C. W. (1992). Choice in context: Tradeoff contrast and extremeness aversion. Journal of marketing research, 29(3), 296-313.
85.Staw, B. M. (1976). Knee-deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(1), 27-44.
86.Staw, B. M. (1981). The escalation of commitment to a course of action. Academy of Management Review, 6(4), 577-587.
87.Staw, B. M. (1997). Organizational decision making. NY: Cambridge University Press.
88.Staw, B. M., & Hoang, H. (1995). Sunk costs in the NBA: A behavioral determinant of playing time and survival in professional basketball. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 474-494.
89.Steiner, P. O. (1975). Mergers: Motives, effects, policies. Ann Arbor, M.I: University of Michigan Press.
90.Tetenbaum, T. J. (1999). Beating the odds of merger & acquisition failure: Seven key practices that improve the chance for expected integration and synergies. Organizational Dynamics, 28(2), 22-35.
91.Thakor, M. V., & Katsanis, L. P. (1997). Managing product quality levels and country image: Implications for developing countries. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 9(3), 79-100.
92.Thaler, R. H. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4(3), 199-214.
93.Thaler, R. H. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4(3), 199-214.
94.Thorbjørnsen, H., & Dahlén, M. (2011). Customer reactions to acquirer-dominant mergers and acquisitions. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 28(4), 332-341. doi: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2011.05.005
95.Thornton, E., Arndt, M., & Weber, J. (2004). Why consumers hate mergers. Business Week, 58-63.
96.Trond, R. K., Finskud, L., Tornblom, R., & Hogna, E. (1997). Brand consolidation makes a lot of economics sense: But only one in five attempts succeeds. The McKinsey Quarterly, 189-195.
97.Urban, D. J., & Pratt, M. D. (2000). Perceptions of banking services in the wake of bank mergers: An empirical study. Journal of Service Marketing, 14(2), 118-131.
98.Washburn, J. H., Till, B. D., & Priluck, R. (2004). Brand alliance and customer-based brand equity effects. Psychology & Marketing, 21(7), 487-508.
99.White, T. B., & Zahay, D. L. (2008). Getting too personal: Reactance to highly personalized email solicitations. Marketing Letters, 19(1), 39-50.
100.Whyte, G. (1991). Diffusion of responsibility: Effect on escalation tendency. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(3), 408-415.
101.Whyte, G. (1993). Escalation commitment in individual or group decision making: A prospect theory approach. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 54(3), 430-455.
102.Wilson, R. M. S., & Zhang, Q. (1997). Entrapment and escalating commitment in investment decision making: A review. British Accounting Review, 29(3), 277-305.
103.Wong, K. F. E., Yik, M., & Kwong, J. Y. Y. (2006). Understanding the emotional aspects of escalation of commitment: The role of negative affect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 282-297. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.282
104.Wortzel, R. (1979). New life style determinants of women’s food shopping behavior. Journal of Marketing, 43(3), 28-29.
105.Wyatt, A. (2005). Accounting recognition of intangible assets: Theory and evidence on economic determinants. The Accounting Review, 80(3), 967-1003.
106.Wyatt, A. (2008). What financial and non‐financial information on intangibles is value‐relevant? A review of the evidence. Accounting and Business Research, 38(3), 217-256.
107.Yang, D., Davis, D. A., & Robertson, K. R. (2011). Integrated branding with mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Brand Management, 19(5), 438-456. doi: 10.1057/bm.2011.52
108.Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22.
二、網址參考資料
1.邱金蘭 (2011年10月17日)。保險滲透度台灣蟬聯全球NO.1【經濟日報】。取自http://money.udn.com/wealth/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=248745
2.解析台商之併購策略與實務(2011年11月22日)。取自http://www.investintaiwan.org.tw/invest/gpa01/c_4_1.htm

推文
推薦
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
轉寄

top

:::

相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱

1.	經營策略對上市、櫃銀行經營績效的影響
2.	企業購併宣告效果、溢價與績效之研究--以臺灣金融業為例
3.	顧客價值觀與顧客滿意度中介效果之影響--以銀行業為例
4.	以資源為基礎之結構-行為-績效觀點下的策略群組分析：臺灣太陽能電池產業實證研究
5.	門市業務員影響策略、顧客溝通風格與銷售績效之研究
6.	併購與策略聯盟在公司理財文獻之回顧與展望：亞洲市場之研究
7.	討好顧客還是友善社會？企業社會責任、關係投資、關係品質對顧客公民行為的影響
8.	認知偏誤影響廠商資訊專案續擴行為之研究
9.	以資源基礎觀點及動態能耐觀點檢視不同情境下廠商獲取競爭優勢的策略
10.	品牌形象、品牌知名度、品牌識別對消費者知覺風險與購買意願之影響--以澎湖A旅行社為例
11.	融洽關係、關係前因與關係品質之研究--以民宿業為例
12.	外部創新多元性、吸收能力，與創新產出：以臺灣2000年到2004年上市公司為例
13.	品牌名稱組合形式對於品牌聯盟效果的影響
14.	從內家修練看「資源基礎觀」的資源建構機制
15.	產業層級及企業層級因素對併購活動之影響--以金融整合為例

1.	病患忠誠影響來源與醫院、醫師中介關係之研究-以台中地區醫院為例
2.	從資源基礎觀點探討台灣紡織產業製造業服務化之關鍵資源要素
3.	市場知識與顧客知識鑲嵌競爭力－網路資源觀點
4.	管理階層異動資訊對股價報酬之影響

1.	認同與決策行為
2.	台灣的組織行為研究 : 過去、現在及未來

無相關著作

無相關點閱

QR Code

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

詳目顯示

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫