臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：以資源為基礎之結構-行為-績效觀點下的策略群組分析：臺灣太陽能電池產業實證研究
書刊名：商略學報
作者：嚴奇峰 引用關係／李英睿
作者(外文)：Yen, Ghi-feng／Lee, Ying-jui
出版日期：2018
卷期：10:1
頁次：頁1-22
主題關鍵詞：太陽能電池；資源基礎觀點；策略群組；合圖法；Solar cell；Resource-based view；SCP model；Strategic group；Co-plot method
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:66
  • 點閱點閱:11
台灣太陽能電池產業受惠於歐美國家能源政策而快速成長，但在2009與2012年因外部環境鉅變而受到嚴峻考驗。本研究提出以資源為基礎的結構-行為-績效(R-SCP)模型，來探討台灣太陽能電池產業12年來的動態策略發展過程，依據資源投入的積累形成進入障礙，以及資源餘裕的配置決定策略行為的選擇等觀點，構成策略變數，透過迴歸分析結果探討策略變數之間的因果關係，並採取合圖法(Co-Plot)進行穩定策略期間及策略群組分析。研究結果實證：(1)新的R-SCP模型可整合策略前與策略後的觀點，並分析資源配置的優先順序及排擠效應，呈現結構特徵對績效表現的直接影響，以及績效表現、競爭優勢與行為之間的動態關係；(2)不同穩定策略期間的產業特徵與廠商策略態勢的改變高度關聯，皆明顯反映外部環境的變化；(3)績效目標與策略群組之間的交叉分析，可知前四大廠商多數採取側重資本支出及研發投入之純粹型策略，並兼顧獲利與成長；(4)混合型策略群組的種類在市場競爭激烈時最多，儘管跨群組之策略移動軌跡及混合型策略群組的多樣化，分別呈現出廠商間及群組間的模仿行為，在策略移轉過程中，少數廠商呈現不具顯著特徵的策略態勢。
The rapid growth of Taiwan solar cell industry has benefited from the energy policy of European countries and the United States. Yet, the industry also coped with the revenue downturn caused by the unexpected changes of the external environment in 2009 and 2012. Founded on the concepts that entry barrier is transformed from cumulated resources and that the allocation of slack resources determine firm's strategic conduct , this study proposes the resource based structure-conduct-performance (R-SCP) model to surface out how competitive strategies evolved within Taiwan solar cell industry during 2004-15, employs multiple linear regression to outline the causal relationship among strategic variables, and investigate whether stable strategic time periods (SSTPs) existed and the strategic groups in different SSTPs by co -plot analysis. The results validate that (1) the new R-SCP model successfully integrates the pre- and post-strategy perspectives, revealing the prioritization of and the crowding-out effect in firm's resource allocation as well as how firm's performance is influenced by its structural characteristics directly and the dynamic relation among firm’s performance, comp etitive advantage and conduct; (2) the industry's traits in different SSTPs correlate with the strategic postures of firms within the industry, and both reflect the changes of external environment; (3) the cross analysis of strategic group and performance objective shows that the top four firms in majority belonged to the pure strategic group featured by the much higher capital and R&D spending, and attended to profitability and revenue growth simultaneously; (4) the most types of hybrid strategic groups existed when the market competition turned to the fiercest, and the strategic posture of neutral characteristics is observed in a few firms' path of strategy switch, whereas firm's inter-group strategic move and the diversity of hybrid strategic groups reveal the imitation among firms and among groups respectively.
期刊論文
1.Olusoga, S. Ade、Mokwa, Michael P.、Noble, Charles H.(1995)。Strategic Groups, Mobility Barriers, and Competitive Advantage: An Empirical Investigation。Journal of Business Research，33(2)，153-164。  new window
2.Hatten, K. J.、Schendel, D. E.(1977)。Heterogeneity within an Industry: Firm Conduct in the U.S. Brewing Industry, 1952-71。Journal of Industrial Economics，26(2)，97-113。  new window
3.Weber, Y.、Shenkar, O.、Raveh, A.(1996)。National and corporate cultural fit in mergers/acquisitions: An exploratory study。Management Science，42(8)，1215-1227。  new window
4.Kraatz, M. S.、Zajac, E. J.(2001)。How organizational resources affect strategic change and performance in turbulent environments: Theory and evidence。Organization Science，12(5)，632-657。  new window
5.Tan, J.、Peng, M. W.(2003)。Organizational slack and firm performance during economic transitions: Two studies from an emerging economy。Strategic Management Journal，24(13)，1249-1263。  new window
6.Miller, D.(1986)。Configurations of Strategy and Structure: Towards a synthesis。Strategic Management Journal，7(3)，233-249。  new window
7.陳筱琪、陳文良、胡宜中(20140600)。探討臺灣薄膜太陽能電池產業之合作網絡評估模式：以多目標決策之觀點。科技管理學刊，19(2)，1-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.陳筱琪、陳文良(20110600)。探討臺灣矽晶圓太陽能電池產業之合作網絡評估模式。企業管理學報，89，81-105。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Bain, Joe S.(1951)。Relation of Profit Rate to Industry Concentration: American Manufacturing, 1936-1940。Quarterly Journal of Economics，65(3)，293-324。  new window
10.Tung, G. S.、Lin, C. Y.、Wang, C. Y.(2010)。The Market Structure, Conduct and Performance Paradigm Re-applied to the International Tourist Hotel Industry。African Journal of Business Management，4(6)，1116-1125。  new window
11.Hatten, K. J.、Hatten, M. L.(1987)。Strategic Groups, Asymmetrical Mobility Barriers and Contestability。Strategic Management Journal，8(4)，329-342。  new window
12.Hoskisson, Robert E.、Hitt, Michael A.(1990)。Antecedents and performance outcomes of diversification: A review and critique of theoretical perspectives。Journal of Management，16(2)，461-509。  new window
13.金成隆、林修葳、邱煒恒(20050900)。研究發展支出與資本支出的價值攸關性：以企業生命週期論析。中山管理評論，13(3)，617-643。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Galbraith, Craig S.、Schendel, Dan(1983)。An Empirical Analysis of Strategy Types。Strategic Management Journal，4(2)，153-173。  new window
15.Guttman, L.(1968)。A general nonmetric technique for finding the smallest coordinate space for a configuration of points。Psychometrica，33(4)，469-506。  new window
16.Voss, G. B.、Sirdeshmukh, D.、Voss, Z. G.(2008)。The Effects of Slack Resources and Environmental Threat on Product Exploration and Exploitation。Academy of Management Journal，51(1)，147-164。  new window
17.Delorme, Charles D. Jr.、Kamerschen, David R.、Klein, Peter G.、Voeks, Lisa Ford(2002)。Structure, Conduct and Performance: a Simultaneous Equations Approach。Applied Economics，34(17)，2135-2141。  new window
18.Cool, K.、Schendel, D.(1988)。Performance differences among strategic group members。Strategic Management Journal，9(3)，207-223。  new window
19.吳嘉興、邱曉瑩(20140900)。臺灣發展太陽光電產業之關鍵成功因素分析。管理資訊計算，3(2)，78-95。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.Desarbo, W. S.、Grewal, R.(2008)。Hybrid Strategic Groups。Strategic Management Journal，29(3)，293-317。  new window
21.Fiegenbaum, A.、Thomas, H.(1990)。Strategic Groups and Performance: The US Insurance Industry, 1970-84。Strategic Management Journal，11(3)，197-215。  new window
22.Giladi, R.、Spector, Y.、Raveh, A.(1996)。Multidimensional Scaling: An Analysis of 1980-1990 Computers。European Journal of Operational Research，95(2)，439-450。  new window
23.Lawless, M. W.、Tegarden, L. F.(1991)。A Test of Performance Similarity among Strategic Group Members in Conforming and Non-conforming Industry Structures。Journal of Management Studies，28(6)，645-664。  new window
24.Leask, G.、Pamell, J. A.(2005)。Integrating Strategic Groups and the Resource Based Perspective: Understanding the Competitive Process。European Management Journal，23(4)，458-470。  new window
25.Lipshitz, G.、Raveh, A.(1994)。Application of the Co-plot Method in the Study of Socio-economic Differences Between Cities: A Basis for a Differential Development Policy。Urban Studies，31(1)，123-135。  new window
26.Nath, P.、Mukherjee, A.、Pal, M. N.(2001)。Identification of Linkage between Strategic Group and Performance of Indian Commercial Banks: A Combined Approach Using DEA and Co-plot。International Journal of Digital Accounting Research，1(2)，125-152。  new window
27.Raveh, A.(2000)。Co-plot: A Graphic Display Method for Geometrical Representations of MCDM。European Journal of Operational Research，125(3)，670-678。  new window
28.Wiggins, R. R.、Ruefli, T. W.(1995)。Necessary Conditions for the Predictive Validity of Strategic Groups: Analysis without Reliance on Clustering Techniques。Academy of Management Journal，38(6)，1635-1656。  new window
29.Yang, Y. H.、Lee, Y. C.(2013)。Strategic Grouping of Financial Holding Companies: A Two-dimensional Graphical Analysis with Application of the Three-Stage Malmquist Index and Co-plot Methods。International Journal of Organizational Innovation，5(3)，158。  new window
30.McGee, John、Thomas, Howard(1986)。Strategic groups: Theory, Research, and Taxonomy。Strategic Management Journal，7(2)，141-160。  new window
31.Caves, R. E.、Porter, M. E.(1977)。From Entry Barriers to Mobility Barriers: Conjectural Decisions and Contrived Deterrence to New Competition。The Quarterly Journal of Economics，91(2)，241-262。  new window
32.Porter, Michael E.(1979)。The Structure Within Industries and Companies' Performance。The Review of Economics and Statistics，61(2)，214-227。  new window
33.曾真真、何雍慶(20050700)。以資源基礎觀點及動態能力觀點檢視併購決策及併購績效--以金融整合為例。管理評論，24(3)，95-116。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.Greve, Henrich R.(20031201)。A Behavioral Theory of R&D Expenditures and Innovations: Evidence from Shipbuilding。Academy of Management Journal，46(6)，685-702。  new window
35.Porter, M. E.(1981)。The Contributions of Industrial Organization to Strategic Management。The Academy of Management Review，6(4)，609-620。  new window
36.Wernerfelt, Birger(1984)。A Resource-based View of the Firm。Strategic Management Journal，5(2)，171-180。  new window
37.Barney, Jay B.(1991)。Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage。Journal of Management，17(1)，99-120。  new window
38.Bourgeois, L. J.(1981)。On the measurement of organizational slack。Academy of Management Review，6(1)，29-39。  new window
會議論文
1.Chatterjee, S.、Wemerfelt, B.(1988)。Related or Unrelated Diversification: A Resource Based Approach。  new window
學位論文
1.黃丙雄(2008)。太陽能光電產業關鍵成功因素之研究--AHP法之運用(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.Hunt, M.(1972)。Competition in the Major Home Appliance Industry(博士論文)。Harvard University。  new window
3.劉文光(2009)。台灣矽晶圓太陽能產業經營模式之分析(碩士論文)。中原大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.王瑞豐(2014)。企業競爭力及發展策略之研究--以台灣太陽能電池產業為例(碩士論文)。長榮大學。  延伸查詢new window
5.吳柄村(2009)。台灣薄膜太陽能電池產業競爭策略之研究(碩士論文)。元智大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.林偉倫(2012)。產品生命週期與中國政策對太陽能電池產業的影響(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.張騰文(2009)。以國家競爭力分析兩岸薄膜太陽能電池之競合策略(碩士論文)。中原大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.楊銀發(2009)。以國家競爭力分析矽晶圓太陽能光電產業之兩岸競合策略(碩士論文)。中原大學。  延伸查詢new window
9.蔡逸姝(2010)。兩岸太陽能光電產業商業模式比較分析(碩士論文)。國立交通大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Bain, J. S.(1956)。Barries to new competition。Cambridge, MA：Harvard University press。  new window
2.Day, G. S.(1984)。Strategic Market Planning: The Pursuit of Competitive Advantage。West Publishing。  new window
3.經濟部能源局(2016)。2016年能源產業技術白皮書。  延伸查詢new window
4.Caves, R. E.(1972)。American Industry: Structure, Conduct, Performance。Englewood Cliffs, N.J.：Prentice-Hall。  new window
5.Lahti, A.(1983)。Strategy and Performance of a Firm: An Empirical Investigation in the Knitwear Industry in Finland in 1969-1981。Helsinki：Helsinki School of Economics。  new window
6.Scherer F. M.、Ross, D.(1990)。Industrial Market Structure and Economics Performance。Boston：Houghton Mifflin Company。  new window
7.Shepherd, W. G.(1990)。The Economics of Industrial Organization。Englewood Cliffs, N.J.：Prentice Hall。  new window
8.Spender, J.-C.(1989)。Industry recipes: The Nature and Sources of Managerial Judgement。Oxford：Basil Blackwell。  new window
9.Uyterhoeven, H. E.、Ackerman, R. W.、Rosenblum, J. W.(1973)。Strategy and Organization: Text and Cases in General Management。Irwin：McGraw-Hill。  new window
10.Porter, Michael E.(1985)。Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance。New York, NY：Free Press。  new window
11.Penrose, E. T.(1995)。The theory of the growth of the firm。New York：John Wiley。  new window
其他
1.台灣經濟新報(2018)。TCRI採用之財務比率：獲利力，http://www.tej.com.tw/webtej/tcriweb/FinSt_1.htm。  延伸查詢new window
2.(2017)。太陽能產業產業鏈簡介，http://ic.tpex.org.tw/introduce.php?ic=A100。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：983（臺灣：982，外國：1） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1695817 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67498882
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上