:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:交互損益見真章--談英國國家課程評量的來時路
書刊名:課程與教學
作者:吳麗君 引用關係
作者(外文):Wu, Li-chun
出版日期:2000
卷期:3:1
頁次:頁79-93+143
主題關鍵詞:英國國家課程評量影響重大的評量教育典範的評量National curriculum assessmentHigh-stakes assessmentThe paradigm of contextualized assessment
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:77
     本文以1988年教育變革法案中的國定課程評量為焦點,採用五個「交互損益」(trade-offs)為架構,來回顧其十年來發展的來時路。 第一個交互損益是以評量提昇教育水準對應評量領導教學。評量領導教學這個回浪效應(back wash effect)並沒有嚇阻英國官方以國定課程評量來提昇教育水準的決心。 第二個交互損益是多元評量對應可行性(manageability)。頗具學界理想色彩的TGAT在報告中展現了新評量典範的理念,唯這種所謂的「評量文化」禁不起實踐面、可行性的挑戰。 第三個交互損益是形成性評量對應總結性評量。TGAT的報告書野心地想以國定課程評量的資料來同時達成形成性、診斷性、總結性以及評鑑性等多種功能,而最終的命運是不抵大環境中的政治意識型態,造成評鑑性目標宰制形成性評量的下場。 第四個交互損益是標準參照評量的陽光與陰影。英國國定課程評量的標準乃是由外而內被賦予的,並非透教師團體協商,修正評分(group moderation)而產生的共享意義。因此,有其陰影面。 第五個交互損益是專業理想對應政治關懷。前者通常披著理想的色彩,昂貴而費時、費力但穩健;後者則以效率、可行性為首要的考量。 從這些交互損益的分析所呈顯的圖像是:專業理想必須通過現實環境中可行性的考驗,並且贏得當權者意識型態關卡的放行才有倖存的機會
期刊論文
1.沈姍姍(19931100)。英國教育改革動態--從教師聯盟杯葛一九九三年十四歲學生成就測驗看國定課程之問題。中華民國比較教育學會比較教育通訊,32,6-8。  延伸查詢new window
2.沈姍姍(19940400)。英國進入二十一世紀的教育改革--一九八八年以來之變革與紛擾。中華民國比較教育學會比較教育通訊,34,32-40。  延伸查詢new window
3.莊明貞(19951200)。在國小課程的改進與發展--真實性評量。教師天地,79,21-25。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.吳麗君(1999)。英國小學教師的學習評量信念與實踐之研究(I)。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.周淑卿(1992)。英國國定課程之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Btterfield, S.(1995)。Educational objectives and national assessment。Educational objectives and national assessment。Buckingham:Open University Press。  new window
2.Daugherty, R.(1995)。National curriculum assessment - a review of policy 1987-1994。London, UK:The Falmer Press。  new window
3.Gipps, C. V.(1994)。Beyond testing: towards a theory of educational assessment。The Falmer Press。  new window
4.Black, P. J.(1998)。Testing: Friend or foe? The theory and practice of assessment and testing。Falmer Press。  new window
5.DES(1988)。Proposal for a national assessment system。Proposal for a national assessment system。London, UK。  new window
6.Broadfoot, P.(1996)。Educational assessment: the myth of measurement。Contemporary issues in teaching and learning。London, UK。  new window
7.Meighan, R.(1994)。The free thinkers' guide to the educational universe。The free thinkers' guide to the educational universe。Nottingham, UK。  new window
8.Berlak, H.(1992)。The need for a New Science of Assessment。Toward a New Science of Educational Testing & Assessment。New York, NY。  new window
9.Dwyeer, C. A.(1990)。Trends in the assessment of teaching and learning: educational and methodological perspectives。Changing educational assessment - International Perspectives and Trends。London, UK。  new window
10.Black, P.(1997)。Whatever happened to TGAT?。Assessment versus evaluation。London, UK。  new window
11.Broadfoot, P.(1996)。Performance assessment in perspective - international trends and current English experience。Primary education - assessment and planning learning。London, UK。  new window
12.Noah, H. J.、Eckstein, M. A.(1990)。Trades-offs in examination policies: an International comparative perspective。Changing educational assessment - international perspectives and trends。London, UK。  new window
13.Murphy, P.(1996)。Integrating learning and assessment - the role of learning theories?。Contemporary issues in teaching and learning。London, UK。  new window
14.Gipps, C.(1990)。National assessment: a comparison of English and American trends。Changing educational assessment - International Perspectives and Trends。London, UK。  new window
15.McNaugherty, T.(1990)。Exam questions: a consideration of consequences of reforms to examining and assessment in Great Britain and New Zealand。Changing educational assessment - International Perspectives and Trends。London, UK。  new window
16.Brown, M.、McCallum, B.、Gipps, C.(1995)。Intuition or evidence?。Intuition or evidence?。Buckingham。  new window
17.Murphy, P.(1990)。TGAT: a conflict of purpose。Assessment Debates。Milton Keynes, UK。  new window
18.Graves, W.、Wallace, B.(1995)。Poisoned apple - the bell-curve crisis。Poisoned apple - the bell-curve crisis。New York, NY。  new window
19.Woodings, V.(1996)。How primary schools deal with assessment in the National Curriculum。Assessment versus evaluation。London, UK。  new window
圖書論文
1.Gipps, C.(1995)。National Curriculum Assessment in England and Wales。International perspectives on educational reform and policy implementation。London:The Falmer Press。  new window
2.廖春文(1990)。英國一九八八年教育改革對我國中小學課程發展的啟示。各國中小學課程比較研究。臺北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
3.Torrance, H.(1997)。Assessment, accountability, and standards: Using assessment to control the reform of schooling。Education: Culture, economy, society。Oxford:New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
4.黃光雄(1990)。英國國定課程評析。各國中小學課程比較研究。臺北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top