:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:長高--教學評量實踐知識的意象內涵與運作
書刊名:課程與教學
作者:胡惠絮吳毓瑩 引用關係徐式寬 引用關係
作者(外文):Hu, Hui-hsuWu, Yuh-yinHsu, Shih-kuan
出版日期:2010
卷期:13:4
頁次:頁111-131
主題關鍵詞:教學評量實踐知識評量意象Assessment in instructionPractical knowledgeImage of assessement
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:158
  • 點閱點閱:82
本研究意在探討一位國中國文教師在教學評量上的實踐知識,包括評量實踐的運思歷程,以及如何促進學生學習的評量策略之運用。我們採個案研究取向,進入教室觀察,輔以訪談、文件蒐集等策略。歷經一個學年的現場參與,分析歸納出教師的評量意象為「長高」-提升學生的學習能力,其下攝三個教學評量目的:1.增高:評量作為主食,與教學內容結合以促進學習,且依其與教材相關程度,實施習作、應用練習等,如同吃飯對於身高增進的作用一般,另外也有其他輔助活動如翻翻書、聯絡簿生活札記等,如同吃菜增加營養般來增進身高。2. 助高:評量作為調味,增加學習趣味,強調參與過程並藉活動維持學習動力,如背書競賽、圖畫課文等。3. 量高:評量作為刻度以瞭解學習成果,穩定教學進程,如小考、段考等。個案老師適當調配「促進學生學習」(增高)、「增加學習趣味」、(助高)以及「瞭解學習成果」(量高)三個評量的目的達成學生能力長高的任務。文末研究者進一步提出關於意象隱喻、個人風格、與考試評量的啟示。
This study was to investigate a junior high school teacher's practical knowledge on classroom assessment, particularly aiming on rationality and strategies. Case study was adopted. Data were collected from classroom observations, interviews, and documents during one-year fieldwork. The image of growing tall was concluded as a theme that serves three objectives in classroom assessment: 1. As main meals to increase height: to improve learning as a source of energy. Assessment is part of instruction. Main dishes and side dishes serve as textbooks materials and related activities 2. As seasonings to stimulate growing: to raise students' interest of learning. Learning process and participation were emphasized than assessment results. 3, As a scale to measure the height: Assessment was utilized to diagnose and monitor learning results. The case teacher balanced out the three roles of classroom assessment: to improve learning, to increase learning interests, and to monitor learning results, with a purpose to guide students growing tall on ability, which was the core content of the case teacher's practical knowledge on classroom assessment.
期刊論文
1.吳毓瑩(200303)。教學評量之信念探究--松竹梅三個個案詮釋暨啟示。國立臺北師範學院學報,16(1),137-161。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Munby, H.(1986)。Metaphor in the thinking of teacher: An exploratory study。Journal of Curriculum Studies,18(2),197-209。  new window
3.Beijaard, D.、Verloop, N.、Vermunt, J. D.(2000)。Teachers' perceptions of professional identity: An exploratory study from a personal knowledge perspective。Teaching and Teacher Education,16(7),749-764。  new window
4.Linn, R. L.、Gronlund, N. E.(1995)。Measurement and Assessment in Teaching。Journal of Educational Measurement,32(4),416-419。  new window
5.黃秀文(19960600)。從傳統到變通:教學評量的省思。國民教育研究學報,2,1-26。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Duffee, L.、Aikenhead, G. G.(1992)。Curriculum change, student evaluation, and teacher practical knowledge。Science Education,76(5),493-506。  new window
7.Clandinin, D. Jean(1985)。Personal practical knowledge: A study of teachers' classroom images。Curriculum Inquiry,15(4),361-385。  new window
8.簡紅珠(20020700)。教師知識的不同詮釋與研究方法。課程與教學,5(3),1-15+125。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Stiggins, R. J.(1999)。Are you assessment literacy?。The High School Journal,1(5),20-23。  new window
10.林佩璇(20020900)。行動研究的知識宣稱--教師實踐知識。國立臺北師範學院學報. 教育類,15,189-207+209。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.陳美玉(19990400)。教師專業發展途徑之探討--以教師專業經驗合作反省為例。教育研究資訊,7(2),80-99。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.陳國泰(20060900)。國小自然與生活科技資深專家教師實務知識的發展之個案研究。國立臺北教育大學學報. 數理科技教育類,19(2),31-64。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.吳麗君(2000)。交互損益見真章-談英國國家課程評量的來時路。課程與教學季刊,3 (1 ),79-94。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.吳鐵雄、洪碧霞(2000)。教學評量質變的反思與建議。測驗與輔導,159,3323-3324。  延伸查詢new window
15.林怡呈、吳毓瑩(2008)。多元評量的活化、迷思、與神話─教學歷程的個案研究。課程與教學季刊,11(1 ),147-172。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Black A. L. & Halliwell G.(2000)。Assessing practical knowledge:How?why?。Teacher and Teacher education,16,103-115。  new window
17.McMillan J. H. Myran S. & Workman D.(2002)。Elementary teachers’ classroom assessment and grading practices。The Journal of Educational Research,95(4),203-213。  new window
學位論文
1.陳國泰(2000)。國小初任教師實際知識的發展之研究(博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Elbaz, Freema(1983)。Teacher thinking: A study of practical knowledge。London:Croom Helm。  new window
2.甄曉蘭(2004)。課程理論與實務--解構理論與重建。臺北市:高等教育。  延伸查詢new window
3.Earl, Lorna M.、Marzano, Robert J.、Guskey, Thomas R.(2003)。Assessment as learning: using classroom assessment to maximize student learning。Thousand Oaks, Calif.:Corwin Press。  new window
4.王秋絨(1991)。批判教育論在我國教育實習制度規畫上的意義。台北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
5.Stake, Robert E.(1995)。The Art of Case Study Research。Sage Publications。  new window
6.Connelly, F. M.、Clandinin, D. J.(1988)。Teachers as curriculum planners: Narratives of experiences。New York, NY:Teachers College Columbia University。  new window
7.Clandinin, D. J.(1986)。Classroom practice: Teacher images in action。Falmer Press。  new window
8.郭玉霞(19970000)。教師的實務知識:一位國民小學初任教師的個案研究。高雄:復文。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE