王明源（1998）：台灣中部地區國民小學實施學評量之調查研究。台中：國立台中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
王恭志（2000）：教師教學信念與教學實務之探析。教育研究資訊，8（2），84-98。
王國華、段曉林和張惠博（1998）：國中學生對科學教師學科教學知識之知覺。科學教育學刊，6（4），363-381。吳崑檳（1999）：評量課中的評量--一位師資培育者評量信念的詮釋研究。台北：國立台北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
吳毓瑩（1996）：評量的蛻變與突破－－從哲學思潮與效度理論思考起，教育研究資料與研究，13，12-15。吳毓瑩（2001）：教學評量信念與實踐之松竹梅。收錄於課程與教學學會主編，第三屆課程與教學論壇：課程改革的反省與前瞻學術研討會論文集（pp.127-153）。台北：課程與教學學會。
吳毓瑩（2002）：後現代社會中多元評量之解毒與解讀。載於歐用生、張梅枝主編，邁向課程新紀元（十）反省與前瞻─課程改革向前跑（pp.203-219）。台北：中華民國課程發展學會。吳麗君（1999）：夢裡故事說不完--英倫評量的邂逅。國立台北師範學院學報，12，119-146。吳麗君（2000）：交互損益見真章--談英國國課程評量的來時路。課程與教學季刊，3（1），78-94。呂金燮（1999）：評量與教學目標的連結。載於王文中、呂金燮、吳毓瑩、張郁雯及張淑慧合著，教育測驗與評量：教室學習觀點（pp.21-46）。台北：五南書局。
宋文菊（1998）：國小學童在閱讀理解實作評量上的表現分析。台南：國立臺南師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
李秀娟（2000）：概念改變教學情境下社會互動的情形。新竹：國立新竹師範學院系國民教育研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
李金泉（1992）：SPSS/PC＋實務與應用統計分析。台北：松崗圖書公司。
佘曉清（1999）：生物教師的教學信念、教學、與師生互動-個案研究。科學教育學刊，7（1），35-47。林清山（1993）：心理與教育統計學。台北：東華書局。
段曉林、靳知勤和謝祥宏（2001）：科學學習動機問卷的效化研究。中華民國第十七屆科學教育學術研討會。高雄市：國立高雄師範大學。
洪碧霞（1998）：國小教學評量深度與廣度的反省與前瞻。收錄於「國小教學評量的反省與前瞻」專輯。臺南：國立臺南師範學院測驗發展中心。
孫逸秀（2000）：國中生物教師課室教學表現評量基準表效化之研究。彰化：國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
海克和威廉（1999）：教師角色（桂冠前瞻教育叢書編譯組）。台北：桂冠圖書股份有限公司。（原著出版年1984）
國民中學學生基本學力測驗推動工作委員會自然學科研究小組（2000）：國民中學學生基本學力測驗自然學科命題研習手冊。
張文華和郭重吉（1995）：科教革新中評量理念的重建。教育研究雙月刊，45，23-30。
張紹勳、張紹評和林秀娟（2000）：SPSS For Windows（上、下冊）。台北市：松崗電腦圖書資料公司。
教育部（2003）：國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要-自然與生活科技學習領域。台北市：教育部印製。連瑞琦（1998）：實作評量對國小學生數學成就與態度的影響。嘉義：南華管理學院教育社會學研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
郭生玉（1994）：心理與教育測驗。臺北：精華書局。
郭重吉（1992）：從建構主義的觀點探討中小學數理教學的改進。科學發展月刊，20，548-570。陳文典（2002）：自然與生活科技領域學習成就評量。文載於中國測驗學會，2002年會多元評量工作坊。
陳文典、陳義勳、李虎雄和簡茂發（1995）：由馬里蘭州的學習成就評量與其在台灣試測的結果看--實作評量的功能與運用。科學教育月刊，185，2-11。
陳惠邦（2000）：在保守的傳統中謹慎前進：德國小學教師評量信念與實踐研究。新竹師院學報，13，245-264。曾嘉琪（1996）：臺北市國民小學試辦教學及評量改進班之評鑑研究。台北市：國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
黃智信（1998）：情境真實程度對評量功能的影響。國立台灣師範學大學物理研究所碩士論文(未出版）。
楊榮祥（2000）：科學教室中教師角色的隱喻。彰師大科學教育研究所專題演講（2000年12月6日）。
楊銀興（1999）：傳統評量與新式評量之比較及國小教師對實施新式評量相關問題覺知情形之研究。台北市：國立臺灣北師範大學教育研究所博士論文（未出版）。廖佳仁（1999）：國民小學自然科不同評量程序對五年級學生學習動機與策略之影響。台北市：國立臺北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
甄曉蘭和周立勳（2000）：國小教師數學教學信念及其相關因素之探討。課程與教學季刊，2（1），49-68。
鄭湧涇（1990）：科學教學評量的理論與實際應用。科學教育雙月刊，36，2-10。
龍麟如（1997）：國小學生對科學的態度與相關變項之研究。台北市：國立台灣師範大學生物研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
薛梨真（1987）：國民小學自編測驗問題之研究。高雄市：國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文（未出版）。
謝祥宏、龍麟如和段曉林（2004）：國小學生對自然科評量知覺初探之研究。科學教育學刊，（出版中）。謝祥宏和段曉林（1999）：國小自然科教師教學與評量相關變項之研究。第三屆數理教學及師資培育研討會。彰化：國立彰化師範大學主辦。
謝祥宏和段曉林（2000）：國中學生對於理化科評量看法之研究，中華民國第十六屆科學教育學術討會論文彙編。台北：國立台灣師範大學主辦。
鍾聖校（1998）：澳洲小學教師評量信念研究（1/3）。國科會專題研究計畫（NSC-87-2413-H-001-F14）成果報告。
Airasian, P. W. (2nd Ed.) (1994). Classroom assessment. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Alberta Assessment Consortium. (2003). The power of assessment for learning. 2003.08.15. Retrieved from http://www.aac.ab.ca/ public/ PowerofAssessment.doc
Albertson, R. P. (1979). Differences between beliefs and knowledge system. Cognitive Science, 3, 355-366.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1998). Blueprints for reform-Science, Mathematics, and Technology education. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bell, B. & Cowie, B. (2001). Formative assessment and science education. Science & Technology Education Library: Kluwer academic Publishers.
Berenson, S. B. (1995). Changing assessment practice in science and mathematics. School Science & Mathematics, 95(4), 182-186.
Berglund, A. & Daniel, M. (1998). Assessment to in crease students'' creativity: two case studies. European Journal of Engineering Education, 23(1), 45-54.
Birenbaum, M. & Dochy, F. J. R. C. (1996). Alternatives in assessment of achievements, learning process, and prior knowledge. Boston: Kluwer academic publishers.
Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Educational Assessment: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5 (1), 7-74.
Bol, L. & Strage, A. (1996). The contradiction between teachers’ instructional goals and their assessment practices in high school biology course. Science Education, 80(2), 145-163.
Bourke, R. (2001). How do you know when you have learned? Students'' conceptions of self-assessment. Paper presented at Australian Association for Research in Education, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Brookhart, S. M. (1993). Teachers'' grading practice: meaning and values. Journal of Education Measurement, 30(2), 123-142.
Brookhart, S. M. (1994). Teachers'' grading: practice and theory. Applied Measurement in of Education, 7(4), 279-301.
Brookhart, S. M., DeVoge, J. G. (2000). Classroom assessment, student motivation, and achievement in elementary and middle school. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 440 999)
Brookhart, S. M. (2001). The “standards” and classroom assessment research. Paper present at the Annual Meeting of American Association of Colleges for teacher education, Dallas, TX. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 451 189)
Butler, R. & Nisan, M. (1986). Effects of no feedback, task-related comments, and grades on intrinsic motivation and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 1-14.
Carter, G. & Berenson, S. B. (1996). Authentic assessment: vehicle for reform. In Rohton, J. & Bowwers, P. (Eds.), Issue in Science Education (pp.96-106), Virginia: NSTA.
Connell, J. P. (1985). A new multidimensional measure of children’s perceptions of control. Child Development, 56, 1018-1041.
Cronin, L. L. (1991). Science teacher beliefs and their influence on curriculum implementation: two case studies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(3), 235-250.
Darling-Hammond, L., Ancess, J. & Falk, B. (1995). Authentic assessment in action-studies of schools and students at work. New York and London: Teachers college press.
Davis, N. (2000). Using assessment as a tool for educational reform. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southeastern Association of Educators of Teachers of Science, Auburn, Alabama. October, 2000.
Delandshere, G. & Jones, J. H. (1999). Elementary teachers'' beliefs about assessment in mathematics: a case study of assessment paralysis. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 14(3),216-240.
Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, London: SAGE.
Doran, R. L., Lawrenz, F. & Helgeson, S. (1994).Research on assessment in science. In Gabel, D. L. (Eds.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning a project of the national science teachers association (pp.388-442), NY: Macmilan publishing company.
Doran, R., Chan, F. & Tamir, P. (Eds.) (1998). Science Educator''s guide to assessment. Virginia: NSTA.
Duschl, R. A. & Gitomer, D. H.(1991). Epistemological perspectives on conceptual change: implications for educational practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 839-858.
Evans, E. D. & Engelberg, R.A. (1988). Student perceptions of school grading. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 21(2), 45-54.
Flint, N. (1998). Educational assessment: students’ perceptions of fairness. Paper presented at Australian Association for Research in Education. Retrieved August 5, 2002, from Http://www.aare.edu.au/98pap/fli98304.htm
Foster, W. G. & Heiting, A.W. (1994). Embedded assessment. Science and Children, October, 30-33.
Frykholm, J. (1999). Assessment in mathematics teacher education: introducing preservice teachers to assessment reform. Teacher Educator, 34(4), 244-258.
Gaffney K. E. (1992). Multiple assessment for multiple learning style. Science Scope, March, 54-59.
Gallagher, J. (2000). Implementing needed reforms in science education: research and development to enhance understanding and application of knowledge. Paper present in Second International Conference on Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, Taipei NTNU, January, 2000.
Gallagher, J., Parker, J., & Ngwenya, L. (1999). Embedded assessment and reform in science teaching and learning. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
Gess-Newsome, J. (2003). Implications of the definition of knowledge and beliefs on research and practice in science teacher education. Paper presented at Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. (Philadelphia, PA, March 2003)
Gipps, C. & Murphy, P. (1994). A fair test? Assessment, achievement and equity. Open University Press.
Glatthorn, A. A., Bragaw, D., Dawkins, K. & Parker. (1998). Performance assessment and standards-based curricula: The achievement cycle. NY: Eye on education.
Greeno, J. G., Collins, A. M., & Resnick, L. B. (1996). Cognition and Learning. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp.15-26), New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
Grundy, S. (1987). Curriculum: product or praxis. London: Falmer Press.
Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989).Fourth generation evaluation. Sage publication: The international professional publisher Newbury Park London New Delhi.
Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp.105-117). Thousand Oaks, London: Sage publication.
Hart, D. (1994). Authentic Assessment: A Handbook for Education. California: Addison-Wesley.
Harlen, W. (1996). Editorial. The curriculum Journal, 7(2), 129-135.
Harlen, W., Gipps, C., Broadfoot, P. & Nuttall, D. (1992). Assessment and the improvement of education. The curriculum Journal, 3(3), 215-230.
Howley, A., Kusimo, P. S. & Parrott, L. (1999). Grading and the ethos of effort. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 435 728)
Jorgensen, M. A. & Shymansky, J. A. (1996). Assessment in science: A tool to transform teaching and learning. In J. Rohton, & P. Bowers, (Eds). Issue in Science Education, (pp.107-113), Arlington: NSTA.
Jovanivic, J., Solano-Flores, G. & Shavelson, R. J. (1994). Performance-based assessments: will gender difference in science achievement be eliminated. Education and Urban Society, 26, 352-366.
Koballa Jr., T.R. (1995). Children''s attitudes toward learning science. In S. M. Glynn, & R. Duit (Eds.), Learning Science in the schools: Research Reforming Practice.(pp.59-84). New Jeresey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Koballa, Jr. (1988). Attitude and related concepts in science education. Science Education, 72 (2), 115-126.
Lawrenz, F. (1991). Research matters--to the science teacher, authentic assessment, NARST News, 33, 15-17.
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and value. New York: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Linda, B. & Nunnery, J. (2000). Changes in teachers'' assessment practices in the New American Schools Restructuring Models. Teacher & Change, 7(2),127-147.
Lorsbach, Q. W. (1991). An examination of prospective science teachers'' beliefs'' about teaching, learning, and the nature of science. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University.
McMillan, J. H. & Workman, D. T. (1998). Classroom assessment and grading practice: a review of the literature. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 453 263)
McMillan, J. H. (2000). Fundamental assessment principles for teachers and school administrators. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(8). Retrieved from Http://ericae. net/pare/getvn.asp?v=7&n=8
Marshall, H. H. (1988). Work or learning: implication of classroom metaphors. Educational Researcher, 17(9), 9-16.
Matese, G., Griesdorn, J. & Edelson, D. C. (2002). Teacher beliefs about assessment in inquiry-based science: Research to inform professional development. Paper presented at American Educational Research Association Conference.
National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, D. C.: National Academic Press.
Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(4), 317-328.
Nespor, J. K. (1985). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching: final report of the teacher beliefs study. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 270 446)
Oliver, S. & Koballa, T. (1992). Science educator use of the concept of beliefs. Paper presented at 65th annual meeting of the National Association Research in Science Teaching, Boston.
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers'' beliefs and educational research: cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Education Research, 62(3), 307-332.
Parke, J. (1997). Performance assessment and student motivation: questioning construct relevant variance. Paper present at the Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 411 312)
Parker, L.H. & Rennie, L. (1998). Equitable assessment strategies. In B. J. Fraser & K.G. Tobin (Eds.), International Handbook of Science Education, Part Two (pp. 897-910). Virginia: Kluwer academic Publishers.
Paul, B. (1998). Testing: friend or foe? Theory and practice of assessment and testing, London: Famer Press.
Placier, M. (1995). But I have to have an A”: probing the cultural meanings and ethical dilemmas of grades in teacher education. Teacher Education Quarterly, Sum, 45-62.
Popham, W. J. (1995). Classroom assessment-What teachers need to know. Boston: Allyn and Nacon.
Potter, T. (1994). What’s you’re A.Q.?-Let’s assess your assessment quotient. Science and Children, 32(2), 13.
Prawat, R. S. (1992). Teachers'' beliefs about teaching and learning: A constructivist perspective. American Journal of Education, May, 354-395.
Rokeach, P. R. (1980). Beliefs, attitudes and values. New York: The Free Press.
Scott, R. H. & Fisher, D. L. (2002). Differences between boys'' and girls'' perceptions of their science teachers'' interpersonal behaviour. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching New Orleans, LA, April 6-10, 2002.
She, H. C. (2000). The interplay of a biology teacher’s beliefs, teaching practices and gender-based student-teacher classroom interaction. Educational Research, 42(1), 28-39.
Shepard, L. A. (2000). The Role of Assessment in a learning Culture. Educational Researcher, 27, 4-14.
Shepard, L. A. (2001). The Role of Classroom Assessment in Teaching and learning. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (pp.1066-1101), American Educational Research Association.
Shepardson, D. P. & Adams, P. E. (1996). Perspectives on assessment in science: Voice from the field. Paper present at the annual meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, St. Louis, MO, March , 1996. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 399266)
Shepardson, D. P. (2001). Assessment in science. Netherlands: Kluwer academic Publishers.
Shieh, S. H. & Tuan, H. L. (2000). Elementary students'' perceptions of assessment of the science class. In D. Fisher & J. H. Yang (Eds.), Improvement classroom research through international cooperation, proceeding of the Second International Conference on Science, Mathematics and Technology Education (pp. 43-54), Taipei: NTNU.
Shieh, S. H. & Tuan, H. L. (2002). Explore the relations between elementary teachers’ role and their perceptions towards assessment in science class. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA, April 7-10, 2002.
Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(1), 4-14.
Stiggins, R. J. (1991). Assessment literacy, Phi Delta Kappan, March, 534-539.
Stiggins, R. J. (2001). The Unfulfilled Promise of Classroom Assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 20(3), 5-15.
Stipek, D. J. (1996). Motivation and instruction. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp.85-113), New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
Stipek, D. J. (1998). Motivation to learn: from theory to practice. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Stuessy, C. L. & Foster, A. S. (2002). Looking inside: A cross case analysis of the complexity, balance, and flow of Urban secondary science settings. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching New Orleans, LA, April 6-10, 2002.
Tippins, D. J. & Dana, N. F.(1992). Culturally relevant alternative assessment. Science Scope, March, 50-53.
Tobin, K. (1992). Teacher learning and curriculum reform. Paper presented at a symposium at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Associated in San Francisco.
Tobin, K., Tippins, D.J. & Gallard, A. J. (1994). Research on instructional strategies for teaching science. In D. L. Gabel (Eds.) Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp.45-93), NY: Macmillan publishing.
Torrance, H. & Pryor, J. (1998). Investigating formative assessment: teaching, learning and assessment in the classroom. Buckingham, Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Torrance, H. (1995). The role of assessment in educational reform. In H. Torrance, (Ed.), Evaluating authentic assessment: problems and possibilities in new approaches to assessment. (pp.144-156), Buckingham, Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Travis, K. R. (1991). Elementary student perceptions and beliefs about common school practices in grading and evaluation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oklahoma State University.
Treagust, D. F., Jacobowitz, R., Gallagher, J. L., & Parker, J. (2001). Using assessment as a guide in teaching for understanding: a case study of a middle school science class learning about sound. Science Education, 85(2), 137-157.
Tuan, H. (1991). The influence of preservice secondary science teachers'' beliefs about science and pedagogy on their planning and teaching. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in science Teaching (Lake Geneva, WI , April 7-10,1991) (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 332 871)
Tunstall, P. & Gipps, C. (1996). How does your teacher help you to make your work better? Children’s understanding of formative assessment. The curriculum Journal, 7, 2.
Weiner, B. (1990). History of motivation research in education. Journal of Education Psychology, 82(4), 616-622.
White, R. & Gunstone. R. (1996). Probing Understanding. NY: The Falmer Press.
Wiggins, G. P. (1993). Assessing student performance-exploring the purpose and limits of testing. California: Jossey-Bass.
Yung, R. H. W. (2002). Same assessment, Different Practice: professional consciousness as a determinant of teachers’ practice in a school-based assessment scheme. Assessment in Education, 9(1), 97-117.