:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:研究發展外溢效果對廠商成本結構之影響--臺灣高科技產業之實證分析
書刊名:經濟論文叢刊
作者:蔡蕙安 引用關係陳致綱
作者(外文):Tsai, Diana H.Chen, Tze-gan
出版日期:2002
卷期:30:2
頁次:頁175-204
主題關鍵詞:研究發展外溢效果產業動態模型臺灣高科技產業R&DSpillover effectsIndustry dynamic modelTaiwan high-tech industry
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:35
  • 點閱點閱:35
     本文以臺灣1987-1995年製造業中電力電子機械業小分類(three-digit)之廠商資料為實証分析對象,利用動態要素需求模型檢視R&D及其外溢效果對廠商生產行為與產業結構之影響;同時,本文將外溢效果區分為產業間與產業內之外溢,以分析其影響之差異。實証結果發現:1.臺灣高科技產業之產業間與產業內R&D外溢效果皆十分顯著,並在樣本期間內有上升的趨勢;2.兩種型態之R&D外溢效果對廠商之成本結構與要素需求並未存在絕對性的影響,而是依其產業別不同而有差異;3.外生技術變動降低廠商對變動成本的需求,而增加準固定要素--資本與R&D之使用。
     This paper estimates the intra- and inter-industry R&D spillovers and exogenous technical change effects on cost structure and factor demands for the six top Taiwan high-technology industries. The empirical study is implemented using plant-level data for over 2300 plants over the period 1987-1995. Based on a dynamic factor demand model, estimates of the effects of intra- and inter-industry R&D, and exogenous technical changes on cost structure and estimates of spillover sources for Taiwan high-tech industries are obtained. The empirical evidence shows the following. 1)Both intra- and inter-industry R&D spillover effects are significant and show an increasing trend in Taiwan high-tech industries during 1987-1995. 2)The impact of R&D spillovers (both intra- and inter spillovers) on a firm's cost structure and factor demands differs depending on industry characteristics. 3)External technical change leads to a decrease in variable costs and an increase in quasi-fixed inputs- R&D and physical capital.
期刊論文
1.Suzuki, K.(1993)。R&D Spillovers and Technology Transfer Among and Within Vertical Keiretsu Groups: Evidence from the Japanese Electrical Machinery Industry。International Journal of Industrial Organization,11,573-591。  new window
2.Evenson, R. E.(1973)。Research and productivity in wheat and maize。Journal of Political Economy,81(6),1309-1329。  new window
3.Nelson, R. R.(1982)。The Role of Knowledge in R and D Efficiency。The Quarterly Journal of Economics,97(3),453-470。  new window
4.Griliches, Z.(1986)。Productivity, R&D, and Basic Research at the Firm Level in the 1970s。The American Economic Review,76(1),141-154。  new window
5.Spence, A. M.(1984)。Cost Reduction, Competition, and Industry Performance。Econometrica,52(1),101-122。  new window
6.Akira, Goto、Suzuki, Kazuyuki(1989)。R&D capital, rate of return on R&D investment and spillover of R&D in Japanese manufacturing industries。The Review of Economics and Statistics,71(4),555-564。  new window
7.蔡光第、楊浩彥(19960300)。多層次巢覆式R&D外溢效果與其對臺灣製造業不同科技部門之貢獻。經濟論文叢刊,24(1),29-59。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.莊奕琦、許碧峰(19990900)。研究發展對生產力的貢獻及產業間的外溢效果:臺灣製造業實證。經濟論文,27(3),407-432。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Griliches, Zvi(1979)。Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth。Bell Journal of Economics,10(1),92-116。  new window
10.Romer, Paul M.(1990)。Endogenous Technological Change。Journal of Political Economy,98(5, Part 2),S71-S102。  new window
11.Bernstein, J. I.、Nadiri, I. M.(1988)。Interindustry R&D Spillovers, Rates of Return, and Production in High-tech Industries。The American Economic Review,78(2),429-434。  new window
12.劉錦添、鄒孟文、Hammitt, J. K.(1999)。Export activity and productivity: evidence from the Taiwan electronics industry。Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv,135(4),675-691。  new window
13.Bernstein, J. I.(1988)。Costs of Production, Intra- and Interindustry R&D Spillovers: Canadian Evidence。The Canadian Journal of Economics=Revue canadienne d'Economique,21,324-347。  new window
14.Sargent, Thomas J.(1978)。Rational Expectations, Econometric Exogeneity and Consumption。Journal of Political Economy,86(4),673-700。  new window
15.Bernstein, J. I.、Nadiri, M. I.(1989)。Research and Development and Intraindustry Spillovers: An Empirical Application of Dynamic Duality。The Review of Economic Studies,56(2),249-269。  new window
16.蔡蕙安(1999)。靜態與非靜態預期下產業動態模型之研究:以臺灣電信業為例。亞太經濟管理評論,3(1),21-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Adams, J. D.(1999)。The Structure of Firm R&D, the Factor Intensity of Production, and Skill Bias。The Review of Economics and Statistics,81(3),499-510。  new window
18.Epstein, L. G.、Yatchew, A.(1985)。The Empirical Determination of Technology and Expectations: A Simplified Procedure。Journal of Econometrics,27,235-258。  new window
19.Prucha, I. R.、Madan, D. P.(1989)。A Note on the Estimation of Nonsymmetric Dynamic Factor Demand Model。Journal of Econometrics,42,275-283。  new window
20.Mamuneas, T. P.、Nadiri, M. I.(1996)。Public R&D Policies and Cost Behavior of the U. S. Manufacturing Industries。Journal of Public Economics,63(1),57-81。  new window
21.Mohnen, P. A.、Nadiri, M. I.、Prucha, I. R.(1986)。R&D Production Structure and Rates of Return in the U. S., Japanese and German Manufacturing Sectors。European Economic Review,30,749-771。  new window
22.Nadiri, M. I.、Prucha, I. R.(1986)。A Comparison of Alternative Methods for the Estimation of Dynamic Factor Demand Models Under Non-Static Expectations。Journal of Econometrics,33,187-211。  new window
23.Nadiri, M. I.、Prucha, I. R.(1990)。Dynamic Factor Demand Models, Productivity Measurement, and Rates of Return: Theory and Application to the US Bell System。Structural Change and Economic Dynamics,1(2),263-289。  new window
24.Bregman, A.、Fuss, M.、Regev, H.(1991)。High tech and productivity: evidence from Israeli industrial firms。European Economic Review,25,1199-1221。  new window
25.Mamuneas, T. P.(1999)。Spillovers from Publicly Financed R&D Capital in High-tech Industries。International Journal of Industrial Organization,17(2),215-239。  new window
會議論文
1.Branstetter, L.、Chen, J. R.(1999)。The role of technology transfer in the Taiwanese electronic industry: microeconometric analysis using plant-level data。Taiwan。  new window
研究報告
1.Nadiri, M. I.、Prucha, I. R.(1999)。Dynamic Factor Demand Models and Productivity Analysis。0。  new window
2.Bernstein, J. I.、Nadiri, M. I.(1991)。Product Demand, Cost of Production, Spillovers, and the Social Rate of Return to R&D。0。  new window
3.Bernstein, J. I.(1986)。Dynamic factor demand and adjustment costs: an analysis of Bell Canada's technology。0。  new window
4.Srinivasan, S.(1996)。Estimation of Own R&D, R&D Spillover and Exogenous Technical Change Effects in Some US High-technology Industries。0。  new window
5.Nadiri, M. I.、Prucha, I. R.(1989)。Dynamic Factor Demand Models, Productivity Measurement, and Rates of Return: Theory and an Empirical Application to the U.S. Bell System。0。  new window
圖書
1.Denny, M.、Fuss, M. A.、Waverman, L.(1981)。Substitution Possibilities for Energy: Evidence from U. S. and Canadian Manufacturing Industries。Measuring and Modeling Natural Resource Substitution。Cambridge, MA。  new window
2.Schankerman, M.、Nadiri, M. I.(1984)。Investment in R&D, Cost of Adjustment and Expectations。R&D, Patents and Productivity。Chicago, IL。  new window
其他
1.(1997)。中華民國科學技術統計要覽,沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃瑞萌,譚令蒂(2001)。Import technology and R&D in Taiwan electronic industry,沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Griliches, Z.、Mairesse, J.(1984)。Productivity and R&D at the Firm Level。R&D, Patents, and Productivity。Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE