:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國小教師的科學本質觀及其教學實踐個案研究
書刊名:國立臺北師範學院學報. 數理科技教育類
作者:劉振中熊召弟 引用關係
作者(外文):Liou, Jan-jongHsiung, Chao-ti
出版日期:2002
卷期:15
頁次:頁285+287-311+313-314
主題關鍵詞:科學本質教學信念教學實務The nature of scienceElementary science teaching
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:37
  • 點閱點閱:51
     本研究之目的,主要係透過一位任教國小六年級自然科的李老師教學信念及教學實務,來瞭解以科學本質為基礎的課程設計及教學成效。本研究運用教室觀察、訪談、凱利方格技術、文件分析等方式,配合問卷調查蒐集資料,藉多元資料描述教師的科學本質觀及以科學本質為基礎的教學實務。研究結果說明了李老師的科學本質觀較傾向於當代的科學本質觀,在科學方法本質向度上,認為科學研究始於問題的產生、研究方法具多元性、探究重視假設的形成、解決問題及減少誤差,而對科學知識的本質上,認為具實證性、暫時性、可複製性及公開性,最後在科學事業本質向度上,強調科學與生活相關,同時重視群體的合作與討論,李老師亦試圖將此理念應用在其教學方案中,並實踐之。根據發現與結果,本研究對於課程與教學、教育行政等分別提出建議,可作為科學教育研究與教學實務的參考。
     The purpose of this study, mainly through an elementary science teacher's (Mrs. Lee) conceptions and practical teaching, explored the effectiveness of the self-designed curriculum based on the nature of science. Techniques such as classroom observations, interviews, Kelly's repertoire grid, and document analysis, were widely applied in this study, as well as the questionnaires needed for collecting more data. Results showed that the Mrs. Lee's conceptions of the nature of science inclined to constructivist's perspective. Firstly, regarding to the dimension of the nature of science methods, she indicated that (1) the beginning of science research was initiated from raising questions, (2) multi-ways to solve problems, (3) emphasis on hypothesis formulation, (4) decreasing the errors from each experiment. Secondly, as the nature of science knowledge, she described it as experimental, temporary, replicable, and as becoming public knowledge. Thirdly, for the dimension of the nature of science enterprise, she believed that there was close relationship between science and life, and focused on the cooperative discussion among community. Mrs. Lee put all three conceptions into the science planning and classroom instruction. The study also provides the conclusions and suggestions for curriculum and instruction, educational administration and further research, and also functions as a valuable reference for the study on science education reform.
期刊論文
1.高強華(1994)。教師信念研究及其在學校教育革新上之意義。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所集刊,34,85-114。  延伸查詢new window
2.林陳涌、楊榮祥(19980600)。利用凱利方格晤談法探討教師對科學本質的觀點--個案研究。科學教育學刊,6(2),113-128。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.林陳涌(19960300)。「了解科學本質量表」之發展與效化。科學教育學刊,4(1),31-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Lederman, N. G.、Zeidler, D. L.(1987)。Science teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: Do they really influence teacher behavior?。Science Education,70(5),721-734。  new window
5.McComas, W. F.、Clough, M. P.、Almazroa, H.(1998)。The nature of science in science education: Rationales and Strategies。Science & Technology Education Library,5,3-39。  new window
6.Cornett, J. W.、Yeotis, C.、Terwilliger, Lori(1990)。Teacher personal practical theories and their influence upon teacher curricular and instructional actions: A case study of a secondary science teacher。Science Education,74(5),517-529。  new window
7.熊召弟(19960600)。建構者觀的自然科教學。科學教育研究與發展季刊,3,3-11。  延伸查詢new window
8.Nussbaum, Joseph(1989)。Classroom conceptual change: Philosophical perspectives。International Journal of Science Education,11(5),530-540。  new window
9.Abd-El-Khalick, Fouad、Bell, Randy L.、Lederman, Norman G.(1998)。The Nature of Science and Instructional Practice: Making the Unnatural Natural。Science Education,82(4),417-436。  new window
10.洪文東(1996)。科學的本質。屏師科學教育,3,2-9。  延伸查詢new window
11.McComas, W. F.、Almazroa, H.(1998)。The Nature of Science in Science Education: An Introduction。Science & Education,7,511-532。  new window
會議論文
1.鄭湧涇、周美雪、張麗珠(1989)。職前與在職生物教師對科學的本質的了解。臺北:行政院國家科學委員會。257-283。  延伸查詢new window
2.林顯輝(1991)。我國國中地球科學及國小自然科學教科書科學本質含量之分析。臺灣省第二屆教育學術論文發表會,233-255。  延伸查詢new window
3.Tuan, H.(1991)。The influence of preservice secondary science teachers' beliefs about science and pedagogy on their planning and teaching。Lake Geneva, WI。  new window
學位論文
1.黃瓊瑱(1996)。我國國小自然科學教科書之分析研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.翁秀玉(1997)。國小自然科教師傳達科學本質之行動研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.林千青(1996)。國小職前教師與在職教師對科學知識本質了解之研究(碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
4.丁嘉琦(1999)。花蓮縣國小教師科學本質觀點之研究(碩士論文)。國立花蓮師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
5.柯玉婷(2000)。台中地區國小職前與在職教師對科學本質之理解及其教學態度的研究(碩士論文)。臺中師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
6.許玫理(1992)。我國國民中學自然科學教師科學哲學觀點之調查研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.黃寶蓉(2000)。科學本質在教與學的意涵之研究,0。  延伸查詢new window
8.鄭淑妃(1999)。國小自然科教師科學本質觀之詮釋性研究,0。  延伸查詢new window
9.李暉(1993)。國中理化教師發展建構主義教學之個案研究,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.American Association for the Advancement of Science(1989)。Project 2061 Science for All Americans。American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)。  new window
2.張春興(1992)。教育心理學。臺北市:東華書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.Glynn, S. M.、Yeany, R. H.、Britton, B. K.、王美芬、熊召弟、段曉林、熊同鑫(1996)。科學學習心理學。臺北市:心理。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃政傑(1997)。教學原理。臺北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Wang, J. R.(1995)。A case study: an investigation of teachers' conceptions of the nature of science, science teaching and learning, classroom practices, and other contextual matters,0。  new window
2.Lederman, N. G.(1995)。Translation and transformation of teachers' understanding of the nature of science into classroom practice,0。  new window
圖書論文
1.歐陽教(1988)。教學的觀念分析。教學原理。台北市:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE