文化資產，是一國文化傳承的主要脈絡。在台灣，私有古蹟保存所面臨的核心問題，在於私有古蹟公有化、大眾化時，所有權人的財產權保障及其限制的爭議。民國89年文化資產保存法（以下簡稱文資法）修正後，文化資產的種類增加了歷史建築一項，因此關於歷史建築的登錄與保存維護，勢必再度掀起與人民財產權保障的衝突。長久以來，私有古蹟保存所面臨的種種問題，一直是推動文化資產保存工作的實質阻力。尤其是建築文化資產所涉及的法規相當多樣，並且與都市計劃法特別密切，並涉及廣泛的公共政策層面，執掌機關亦呈現多頭馬車的情形。因此，本文擬從瞭解台灣文化資產保存政策與法規範體系出發，切入探討私有古蹟保存相關的行政法院判決，嘗試從理論政策面、法令規範面與文化行政面的綜合檢討，提出文資法的修法芻議，期待能對台灣私有古蹟保存的問題，貢獻一些心力。

Abstract Cultural capital is the expression of cultural transmission for a country. Certainly, the maintenance of cultural capital is also the historical context of cultural transmission. In Taiwan, the core problem in maintaining private ancient remains is the conflict between the development of public ownership and the protection in 2000, the maintenance of historical construction was added as a new item. Therefore, the coding and protection of ancient building must infringe the right of private ownership. In fact, the protection of private property has constricted the promotion of cultural capital of historical construction is subjected to different regulations, city planning, and public policies in Taiwan. Moreover, Taiwan government does not integrate the execution of cultural capital of historical construction very well. As a result, this study aims to understand the policy of cultural capital protection and the context of legal system.This study then investigates the conflict between private ancient remains and the protection of civil property based on the constitution. The verdict of a justice court regarding private ancient remains is also analyzed. This work hopes to provide an integrated direction in modifying the law of cultural capital in accordance with theoretical points, the level of policy, legal system, and cultural administration.Finally, the authors expect that the findings in this study can contribute a valuable literature to protection of cultural capital.