:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:顏山農的心性問題
書刊名:哲學與文化
作者:潘玉愛
作者(外文):Pan, Yu Ai
出版日期:2004
卷期:31:8=363
頁次:頁59-76
主題關鍵詞:泰州學派顏鈞王艮制欲非體仁The taizhou schoolYen shan-nonWang GenThe suppression of desire is not to achieve ren
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:26
     本文將以四個論題探討之:首先,紹述顏山農的學思歷程,因多數思想史均略過其學思歷程,若能引薦,更能貼近其思脈;其次,探究其所主「自然與樂生」與「制欲非體仁」之論?再則,提出學者對其心性問題的疑難而深究;最後,析論其心性觀的困境。冀能以此文稍稍補足前之缺憾,並帶出其思想的獨特性與歧異之處,以公允的立場觀之,以觸發顏山農的心性中疑辨之處。
     This paper proceeds along four topics. First, we would summarize about the development of Yen Shan-non’s thought and doctrine. While most history of thought ignored his doctrine, we can get closer to the context of his thought if we could make a recommendation. Second, we explore his claims, “nature generates happiness,” and “the suppression of desire is not to achieve ren.” Third, we bring out and investigate Yen's doubts about the question of mind-nature. Finally, we analyze the predicament of his theory about mind-nature. With all this, we wish to fill in the missing part as well as show what's unique and different about his thought, in order to subject it to fair judgment and trigger doubts about Yen Shan-non’s mind-nature.
圖書
1.岡田武彥、吳光、錢明、屠承先(2000)。王陽明與明末儒學。上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.嵇文甫(1990)。左派王學。國文天地雜誌社。  延伸查詢new window
3.錢穆(1977)。宋明理學概述。臺灣學生書局。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(清)黃宗羲。明儒學案。  延伸查詢new window
2.明史。  延伸查詢new window
3.左傳。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top