臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：婦權會到性別平等委員會的轉變：一個國家女性主義的比較觀點分析
書刊名：政治科學論叢
作者：楊婉瑩 引用關係
作者(外文)：Yang, Wan-ying
出版日期：2004
卷期：21
頁次：頁117-147
主題關鍵詞：國家女性主義；性別主流化；婦女運動；婦權會；性別平等委員會；State feminism；Gender mainstreaming；Women's movement；Committee for the promotion of women's rights；Committee for gender equality
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(15) 博士論文(3) 專書(1) 專書論文(2)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:15
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:86
　　　　　近年來婦女運動與國家機器之間的互動越趨頻繁，由政策方案的議題性合作轉向制度設計的常設性分工，婦女運動正逐漸進入國家體制。最明顯的例子是，受到國際潮流的影響以及政黨輪替的影響，在這一波的政府再造中，國內婦女團體連署要求成立中央專責專職的一級單位。傳統社會部門的運動方式有逐漸轉型、要求融入國家部門的操作的趨勢，這樣的實際經驗正在逐步累積與摸索嘗試中。 本研究主要針對性別平權機關的發展與轉變的探討。首先將比較其他國家的婦女政策部門建制的經驗，由比較研究所建立的評估觀點與分析架構的基礎上，本研究針對臺灣的婦女政策機構進行研究，檢驗臺灣婦女運動與國家機器之間的歷史性互動。具體而言，過去國民黨執政時期行政院婦女權益促進委員會的設立運作，與目前民進黨執政下婦女團體所推動的性別平等委員會，兩者其實是在不同的結構脈絡與政治機會中發展出來，也呈顯出不同的國家與性別關係。
　　　　　The increasing interactions between Women's movement and state government have transferred from the cooperation on policy project to the institutionalization of regular division of labor. Women's movement has gradually moved into state institution. The most distinguished case is the appeal of women's groups, influenced by the international tendency and the regime change, to install a central highest-level women's agency in the ongoing governmental reform project. And such experience accumulates gradually through trial and error. This research focuses on the development and transformation of the institution of gender equality. Essentially this is a comparative institutional study, therefore, I shall first compare other countries' experiences in building women's state agency. Based on the comparative analytical viewpoints and framework, I shall focus on Taiwan's case to examine the historical interaction between Taiwan women's movement and state organs. Specifically, I compare the founding and operation of the committee for the Promotion of Women's Rights under the KMT regime, with the promotion of the installation of the Committee for Gender Equality under the DPP regime by women's groups. They are, in fact, developed under different structural contexts and political opportunities, and reveal different relationships between state and gender.
期刊論文
1.Beveridge, F.、Nott, S.、Stephen, K.(2000)。Mainstreaming and the engendering of policy-making: A means to an end?。Journal of European Public Policy，7(3)，385-405。  new window
2.林芳玫(2002)。性別主流化--進入性別發展的新紀元。婦女新知通訊，245，4-7。  延伸查詢new window
3.Meyer, J. W.、Boli, J.、Thomas, G. M.、Ramirez, F.(1997)。World Society and the Nation-State。American Journal of Sociology，103(1)，144-181。  new window
4.True, Jacqui、Mintrom, Michael(2001)。Transnational Networks and Policy Diffusion: The Case of Gender Mainstreaming。International Studies Quarterly，45(1)，27-57。  new window
5.Chappell, L.(2002)。The 'Femocrat' Strategy: Expanding the Repertoire of Feminist Activists。Parliamentary Affairs，55，85-98。  new window
6.Friedman, E. J.(2000)。State-Based Advocacy for Gender Equality in the Developing World: Assessing the Venezuelan National Women's Agency。Women and Politics，21(2)，47-80。  new window
7.Squires, J.、Wickham-Jones, M.(2002)。Mainstreaming in Westminster and Whitehall: From Labour's Ministry for Women to the Women and Equality Unit。Parliamentary Affairs，55，57-70。  new window
8.Threlfall, M.(1998)。State Feminism and Party Feminism? Feminist Politics and the Spanish Institute for Women。European Journal of Women's Studies，1，78-79。  new window
會議論文
1.申蕙秀(2003)。性別平等與性別主流化－韓國的婦女國家機制簡介。2003年國際婦女論壇會議。臺北：財團法人婦女權益促進發展基金會。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.古允文、許雅惠(2001)。設立婦女權益及福利專責機關可行性研究。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.王孟甯(1998)。婦女運動與政府體制的結合－以臺北市婦女權益促進委員會為例，臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Mazur, A. G.(2002)。Theorizing Feminist Policy。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Stetson, Dorothy McBride、Mazur, Amy G.(1995)。Comparative State Feminism。Thousand Oaks, CA：Sage Publications, Inc.。  new window
3.Kingdon, John W.(1995)。Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies。Longman。  new window
4.MacKinnon, Catharine A.(1989)。Toward a Feminist Theory of the State。Cambridge, MA：London：Harvard University Press。  new window
5.Ragin, Charles C.(1987)。The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies。University of California Press。  new window
6.Chen, M. A.(1996)。Engendering World Conference: The International Women's Movement and the UN。NGOs, the UN, & Global Governance。United Kingdom。  new window
7.Collier, D.(1993)。The Comparative Method。Political Science: The State of the Discipline II。Washington, DC。  new window
8.Franzeway, D. C.、Cornnell, R. W.(1989)。Staking a Claim: Feminist, Bureaucracy and the State。Staking a Claim: Feminist, Bureaucracy and the State。London, UK。  new window
9.Ferguson, K. E.(1984)。The Feminist case Bureaucray。The Feminist case Bureaucray。Philadelphia, PA。  new window
10.Geddes, B.(1991)。Hoe the Cases You Choose Affect the Answers You Get: Selection Bias in Comparative Politics。Political Analysis, Vol. II。Ann Arbor, MI。  new window
11.McAdam, D.、McCarthy, J. D.、Zald, M. N.(1996)。Comparative Perspective on Social Movement, Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structuring, and Cultural Framing。Comparative Perspective on Social Movement, Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structuring, and Cultural Framing。Cambridge。  new window
12.Pringle, Rosemary、Watson, Sophie(1992)。'Women's Interests' and the Post-structuralist State。Destabilizing Theory: Contemporary Feminist Debate。Cambridge。  new window
13.Wilson, E.、Wilson, Elizabeth(1977)。Women and the Welfare State。Women and the Welfare State。London, UK。  new window
其他
1.行政院(2003)。游揆：政府落實兩性平等，贊成透過法制程序設立性別平等委員會，沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
2.徐佳青(2001)。婦權會為何功能不彰，沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.McIntosh, Mary(1978)。The State and the Oppression of Women。Feminism and Materialism。London：Routledge。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1117（臺灣：1103，外國：14） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1780212 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67587107
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上