臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：運動與學術雙向結合：臺灣性別研究發展之跨學門比較
書刊名：女學學誌：婦女與性別研究
作者：黃淑玲／謝小芩 引用關係
作者(外文)：Hwang, Shu-ling／Hsieh, Hsiao-chin
出版日期：2011
卷期：29
頁次：頁173-231
主題關鍵詞：婦女研究；性別研究；女性主義；婦女運動；Women's studies；Gender studies；Feminist scholarship；Women's movement
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:240
  • 點閱點閱:66
本研究檢視1990年至2007年間，台灣的西方文學／文化研究、社會學及教育學等三學門主流學術期刊的性別研究論文，考察其出版數量、理論觀點、研究方法與研究主題，藉以評估性別研究在這三種學門中的主流化程度。本文提出一個包括兩組因素─學科特質與研究社群的女性主義認同─的分析架構，來解釋性別研究在三種學門不同的主流化程度與女性主義理論的影響力。本研究有兩項主要發現：第一，在此三學門中，性別研究都被視為「女性的」學術領域，處於被邊緣化、區隔化的位置；由此可見，女性主義並未成為此三學門的主流理論典範。第二，三種學門性別研究的發展步伐不一：西方文學／文化研究勇於接受新興思潮，性別研究發展最早，但2000年後卻急速萎縮；我們認為主因之一是該學門的研究社群對女性主義的認同及婦運實踐都偏低。在教育學門，雖然婦運學者推動性別平等教育的立法，但主流教育學者吸收女性主義思想的速度相對較慢，且性別研究學者亦較少在主流期刊發表研究成果，致使性別研究主流化程度顯得最低。社會學門部分，作者群的婦運實踐力最強，女性主義理論亦已成為社會學性別研究的主流範式。本文的結論是，雖然婦運與學術雙向結合是啟動與持續台灣性別研究發展之動力引擎，但這項獨特的學科特質只有在社會學門表現最亮眼。
This study examines the incorporation of gender and feminist scholarship into Taiwan's mainstream scholarship, with a focus on three fields: Western literature and culture studies, sociology, and education. The current work proposes an analytical framework consisting of two sets of factors to explain the level of integration of feminist scholarship into the mainstream. These factors include the distinctive features of each discipline and the researcher's identification with feminism.To assess how well feminist scholarship has been accepted and how well the field of gender studies has made its way into the academic mainstream, this study investigates the number of women's and gender studies articles published in core journals of these three fields from 1990 to 2007 and explores the theoretical perspectives, research themes, and methods of these articles. The findings indicate that gender studies is identified as a "women's field" and has been marginalized and segregated in the mainstream academics. The number and percentage of feminist articles in core journals of the three disciplines also vary. In the field of western literature and culture studies, the number of articles peaked in the 1990s, but rapidly decreased in the new millennium. In education, both figures are the lowest, compared to the other two disciplines. Only in the sociology core journals have feminist articles taken a relatively significant position. These findings are discussed with our analytical framework. In conclusion, we suggest that the mutual engagement of social activism and academic research have been the engine driving the expansion of gender studies across all three disciplines. However, only feminist scholars in sociology have embodied a commitment to this unique facet of gender studies.
期刊論文
1.劉亮雅(20050900)。Queer Theory and Politics in Taiwan : The Cultural Translation and (Re)Production of Queerness in and Beyond Taiwan Lesbian/Gay/Queer Activism。NTU Studies in Language and Literature，14，123-153。new window  new window
2.張玨、吳燕秋(20020300)。臺灣各大學婦女研究與兩性平等教育。應用心理研究，13，73-107。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.游美惠、黃馨慧、潘慧玲、謝小芩(2004)。從性別盲到性別敏感的教育研究：以婦女成人教育與性教育研究的文獻回顧為例。通識教育季刊，11(1/2)，1-38。  延伸查詢new window
4.楊婉瑩(20040900)。婦權會到性別平等委員會的轉變：一個國家女性主義的比較觀點分析。政治科學論叢，21，117-147。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.黃淑玲(20080800)。性別主流化--臺灣經驗與國際的對話。研考雙月刊，32(4)=266，3-12。  延伸查詢new window
6.潘慧玲、梁文蓁、陳宜宣(20000400)。臺灣近十年教育領導碩博士論文分析：女性主義的觀點。婦女與兩性學刊，11，151-190。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Stacey, J.、Thorne, B.(1985)。The missing feminist revolution in sociology。Social Problems，32，301-316。  new window
8.Burawoy, Michael(2005)。For Public Sociology。American Sociological Review，70(1)，4-28。  new window
9.Thompson, L.、Walker, A. J.(1995)。The place of feminism in family studies。Journal of Marriage and the Family，57(4)，847-866。  new window
10.林芳玫(20081200)。政府與婦女團體的關係及其轉變：以臺灣為例探討婦女運動與性別主流化。國家與社會，5，159-203。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.顧燕翎(19960800)。從移植到生根：婦女研究在臺灣(1985-1995)。近代中國婦女史研究，4，241-268。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.West, Candace、Zimmerman, Don H.(1987)。Doing gender。Gender & Society，1(2)，125-151。  new window
13.陳佩英(20040600)。意識與行動：臺灣婦女/性別研究建制化歷程之探討。通識教育季刊，11(1/2)，39-72。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.方念萱(2009)。我如是研究、如是研究我。中華傳播學刊，16，25-34。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.林昱瑄(2009)。國内性別研究前瞻與熱門議題--教育學期刊。婦研縱橫，91，81-86。  延伸查詢new window
16.楊芳枝(2009)。國内性別研究前瞻與熱門議題--傳播/文化研究/文學類期刊。婦研縱橫，90，41-54。  延伸查詢new window
17.蘇芊玲(2002)。創造草根與體制的雙赢策略。應用心理研究，14，30-33。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.Albelda, R.(1995)。The impact of feminism in economics: Beyond the pale? A discussion and survey results。The Journal of Economic Education，26(3)，253-273。  new window
19.張晉芬(1999)。社會學的性別研究。婦女與兩性研究通訊，50，1-4。  延伸查詢new window
20.Chafetz, J. S.(1997)。Feminist theory and sociology: Underutilized contributions for mainstream theory。Annual Review of Sociology，23，97-120。  new window
21.Elfman, L.(2009)。A‘second wave of feminism’: as women’s studies programs mature, they are incorporating issues of race and sexuality。Diverse Issues in Higher Education，26(2)，10-11。  new window
22.Hart, J.(2006)。Women and feminism in higher education scholarship: An analysis of three core journals。The Journal of Higher Education，77(1)，40-61。  new window
23.Hayes, E.(1992)。The impact of feminism on adult education publications: An analysis of British and American journals。International Journal of Lifelong Education，11(2)，125-138。  new window
24.Acker, J.(2006)。Introduction:‘The missing revolution’symposium。Social Problems，53(4)，444-447。  new window
25.Angelique, H. L.、Culley, M. R.(2003)。Feminism found: An examination of gender consciousness in community psychology。Journal of Community Psychology，31(3)，189-209。  new window
26.Rupp, L. J.(2006)。Is the feminist revolution still missing? Reflections from women’s history author(s): Source。Social Problems，53(4)，466-472。  new window
27.Williams, C.(2006)。Still missing? Comments on the twentieth anniversary of the missing feminist revolution in sociology。Social Problems，53(4)，454-458。  new window
28.Blaxter, L.、Hughes, C.、Preston, R.、Martin, J.(2000)。Editorial。Gender and Education，12(4)，413-418。  new window
29.Brown, W.(1997)。The impossibility of women’s studies。Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies，9(3)，79。  new window
30.Burawoy, M.(1996)。The power of feminism。Perspectives: The ASA Theory Section Newsletter，18(3)，4-7。  new window
31.Ingraham, C.(1996)。You’ve come a long way baby... or the revolution will not be televised。Perspectives: The ASA Theory Section Newsletter，18(3)，8-10。  new window
32.Ray, R.(2006)。Is the revolution missing or are we looking in the wrong places?。Social Problems，53(4)，459-465。  new window
33.Orr, C.、Lichtenstein, D.(2004)。The politics of feminist locations: A materialist analysis of women’s studies。NWSA Journal，16(3)，1-17。  new window
34.Stacey, J.(2006)。Feminism and sociology in 20052005: What are we missing?。Social Problems，53(4)，479-482。  new window
35.Rosenberg, K.、Howard, J. A.(2008)。Finding feminist sociology: A review essay。Signs，33(3)，675-696。  new window
36.Stacey, J.、Thorne, B.(1996)。Is sociology still missing its feminist revolution?。Perspectives: The ASA Theory Section Newsletter，18(3)，1-3。  new window
37.Tetrault, M. K. T.(1985)。Feminist phase theory: An experience-driven evaluation model。Journal of Higher Education，56(4)，363-384。  new window
38.Thorne, B.(2006)。How can feminist sociology sustain its critical edge?。Social Problems，53(4)，473-478。  new window
39.Townsend, B. K.(1993)。Feminist thought in core higher education journals。The Review of Higher Education [Fall]，21-41。  new window
40.Waller. D. V.、Dunn, D.、Watson, J.(1998)。The incorporation of gender scholarship into sociology。The American Sociologist，29(3)，43-58。  new window
會議論文
1.謝小芩、楊佳羚(1999)。教育研究中的性別論述：解嚴以來台灣性別與教育的文獻回顧。  延伸查詢new window
2.謝小芩(2004)。台灣的婦女運動與婦女/性別研究發展。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.張苙雲、林萬億、曾嬿芬、傅仰止、鍾蔚文(2007)。社會學門「熱門及前瞻學術研究議題調查」 結案報告。  延伸查詢new window
2.張小虹(1996)。性別的美學/政治 : 西方女性主義文學批評與當代台灣文學研究。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.張小虹(19980000)。性／別研究讀本。臺北：麥田。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.王雅各(19990000)。臺灣婦女解放運動史。臺北：巨流。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.謝國雄(20080000)。群學爭鳴：臺灣社會學發展史，1945-2005。臺北：群學。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.DuBois, E. C.、Kelly, G.、Kennedy, E.、Korsmeyer, C.、Robinsho, L.(1985)。Feminist scholarship: Kindling in the groves of academe。Urbana and Chicago:。  new window
5.Eisenstein, H.(1996)。Inside agitators: Australian femocrats and the state。Philadelphia, PA。  new window
6.Ferree, M. M.、Khan, S. R.、Morimoto, S. A.(2007)。Assessing the feminist revolution: The presence and absence of gender in theory and practice。Sociology in America: A history。Chicago。  new window
7.Kantola, J.、Outshoorm, J.(2007)。Changing state feminism。Changing state feminism \\ J. Outshorm ; J. Kantola (Eds.)。New York。  new window
8.Messer-Davidow, E.(2002)。Disciplining feminism: From social activism to academic discourse。Durham。  new window
9.藍佩嘉(2008)。性別社會學在台灣：從隱晦微光到建制深耕。群學爭鳴：台灣社會學發展史1945-2005 \\ 謝國雄 (編)。  延伸查詢new window
10.Robinson, J.(2002)。From politics to professionalism: Cultural changes in women’s studies。Women's studies on its own \\ R. Wiegman (Ed.)。Durham, NC。  new window
11.Wolf, D.(1996)。Feminist dilemmas in fieldwork。Boulder, CO。  new window
12.張小虹(1997)。性別的美學/政治 : 當代臺灣女性主義文學研究。女性主義與中國文學。臺北：里仁。  延伸查詢new window
13.Kaplan, C.、Grewal, I.(2002)。Transnational practices and interdisciplinary feminist scholarship: Refiguring women’s and gender studies。Women's studies on its own: A next wave reader in institutional change \\ R. Wiegman (Ed.)。Durham, NC。  new window
14.Scott, J.(2008)。Introduction: feminism’s critical edge。Women’s studies on the edge \\ J. Scott (Ed.)。Durham and London。  new window
15.Zimmerman, B.(2002)。The past in our present: Theorizing the activist project of women’s studies。Women’ studies on its own \\ R. Wiegman (Ed.)。Durham, NC。  new window
圖書論文
1.黃長玲(2007)。彼此鑲嵌，互相形構：轉變中的國家與社會關係。自由主義與新世紀臺灣。臺北：允晨。  延伸查詢new window
2.何春蕤(1988)。女性主義文學批評的死胡同。風起雲湧的女性主義批評。谷風出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：930（臺灣：921，外國：9） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1586744 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67403238
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上