:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:淡水地區大學生休閒運動參與及幸福感之研究
書刊名:大專體育學刊
作者:黃振紅 引用關係
作者(外文):Huang, Chen-hung
出版日期:2004
卷期:6:3
頁次:頁43-57
主題關鍵詞:淡水地區大學生休閒運動參與幸福感College students in Tamsui areaParticipation in leisure sportsWell-being
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(13) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:13
  • 共同引用共同引用:84
  • 點閱點閱:44
本研究旨在探討淡水地區三所大專院校學生參與休閒運動的差異情形,及與幸福感的相關程度。以淡江大學、真理大學、聖約翰技術學院等三校四年制日間都學生為對象,採問卷調查法,經分層隨機抽取2,110人,回收有效問卷1,694份,回收率為80.3%。依研究目的,採描述統計、項目分析、卡方檢定、單因子變異數分析、薛費法事後比較、積差相關考驗、迴歸分析等,進行資料分析,結果獲致結論如下:一、淡水地區大學生中,淡江大學其身體活動參與量傾向中、高度費力,而聖約翰技術學院和真理大學較傾向輕度費力或坐式生活。二、很喜歡參與休閒運動的學生,以聖約翰技術學院的22.1%最高;另不喜歡者,以真理大學的12.5%較高,並達顯著差異。三、學生參與休閒運動的意義體驗,以「生理價值」構面的體驗最高,且在「社交探索」與「自我實現」兩構面上,淡江大學和聖約翰技術學院分別大於真理大學,並達到顯著差異。四、學生參與休間運動在自覺勝任能力,以淡江大學最高,且大於真理大學,並達顯著差異。五、學生參與休閒運動以「個人責任」的阻礙最高,而各校在「身心方面」、「休閒資源、」、「個人責任」等三阻礙構面上,並沒有差異。六、學生對幸福成傾向於正面態度,但程度不強。另淡江大學在「人際適應」、「自主性」、「自我接受」等層面上均有較強的態度,且在「自我接受」構面上大於真正皇大學並達顯著差異。七、學生參與休閒運動對整體幸福感,在生理價值、社交探索、自我實現、勝任能力、熟練能力、喜歡程度等變項呈正相關;另在身心方面、休閒資源等阻礙變項呈負相關。八、學生整體幸福感的預測情形,在熟練能力、勝任能力、自我實現、身心方面阻礙、個人責任阻礙等變項達顯著水準,共有五回變項可以預測幸福感,聯合預測力達19%。
The purpose of this study was to explore the differences in college students' participation in leisure sports and to correlate information on participation with feelings of well-being. Students from three colleges, Tamkang University, Aletheia University, and St. John's & St. Mary's Institute of Technology (SJSMIT), participated in the study. The research was conducted via questionnaires, and 2110 students were selected by stratified random sampling; 1694 effective questionnaires were collected (80.3%). According to the aim of this study, descriptive statistics, item analysis, chi-square test, one-way ANOVA, Scheffe, product-moment correlation, and regression analysis were carried out for the processing of the collected information. Results were as follows: 1. For type of participation, students of Tamkang tended to participate in highly and moderately vigorous sports, while the students of SJSMIT and Tamkang tended to take part in somewhat vigorous sports or sedentary activities. 2. In terms of enjoying participating in leisure sports, SJSMIT had the highest percentage (22.1 %) of students who like to take part in leisure sports very much. Aletheia had the highest percentage (12.5%) of students who dislike leisure sports. This difference was significant. 3. For the values associated with leisure sports participation, the experience of "physiological value" was the highest. In "social interaction" and "self­realization," the experiences of the students at Tamkang and SJSMIT were significantly greater than those of the students of Aletheia, 4. For the self-efficacy capabilities in carrying out the leisure sports, the students of Tamkang were the highest. The students of Tamkang were significantly different from those of Aletheia in this respect. 5. "The greatest obstacle too the students participation in leisure sports was personal responsibilities. There were no significant differences among the students of the three colleges in the obstacles of "physical and mental aspects," "leisure resources," and "personal responsibilities." 6. The students tended to hold a positive but low degree attitude towards the feelings of well-being. The students of Tamkang had stronger attitudes in "interpersonal adaptation," "autonomy," and "self-acceptance," and had a significantly stronger attitude than the students of Aletheia in “seJf-acceptance."7. For total well­being in regards to participation in leisure sports, the college students in the Tamsui area had a significantly positive correlation for physiological value, social exploration, self-realization, self-felt capabilities, mastery of skills, and degree of interest. They had a significantly negative correlation for obstacles like physical and mental aspects and leisure resources. 8. The prediction of well-being toward the intercollegiate students in the Tamsui area reached a significant level in mastery of skills, self-felt capabilities, self-realization, physical and mental aspects, and personal responsibilities. There were five variables to predict the feelings of happiness, with a combined prediction power reaching 19%.
期刊論文
1.邢占軍(20020900)。中國城市居民主觀幸福感量表的編制。香港社會科學學報,23,151-189。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.李嵩義(20030700)。主觀幸福感理論初探及其對高齡者之啟示。成人教育,74,42-51。  延伸查詢new window
3.Browne, M. A.、Mahoney, M. J.(1984)。Sport Psychology。Annual Review of Psychology,35,605-625。  new window
4.蔡長清、蕭永福、鄭建民、宋靜宜(20011200)。大學校園休閒運動參與及價值認知之研究。高雄應用科技大學學報,31,511-544。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Iso-Ahola, S. E.、Jackson, Edgar、Dunn, Elaine(1994)。Starting, ceasing, and replacing activity over the life-span。Journal of Leisure Research,26(3),227-249。  new window
6.Roberts, B. L.、Dunkle, R.、Haug, M.(1994)。Physical, psychological, and social resources as moderators of the relationship of stress to mental health of the very old。Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences,49(1),35-43。  new window
7.楊瑪利(2003)。365種方法發現幸福。天下雜誌,266,130-158。  延伸查詢new window
8.柴松林(2004)。2004(第四屆)小朋友幸福大調查。講義,35,40-43。  延伸查詢new window
9.Bearon, L. B.(1989)。No great expectations: the underpinnings of life satisfaction for older woman。Gerontology,39,596-602。  new window
10.Argyle, Michael、Lu, Luo(1990)。Happiness and Social Skills。Personality and Individual Differences,11(12),1255-1261。  new window
11.Lu, Luo(2000)。Gender and conjugal differences in happiness。The Journal of Social Psychology,140(1),132-141。  new window
12.Ryff, Carol D.(1989)。Beyond Ponce de Leon and Life Satisfaction: New Directions in Quest of Successful Ageing。The International Journal of Behavioral Development,12(1),35-55。  new window
13.Raymore, L. A.、Godbey, G. C.、Crawford, D. W.、Von Eye, A.(1993)。Nature and process of leisure constraints: An empirical test。Leisure Sciences,15(2),99-113。  new window
14.Diener, Edward(1984)。Subjective well-being。Psychological Bulletin,95(3),542-575。  new window
15.Kujala, Urho M.、Kaprio, Jaakko、Sarna, Seppo、Koskenvuo, Markku(1998)。Relationship of leisure-time physical activity and mortality: The Finnish twin cohort。Journal of the American Medical Association,279(6),440-444。  new window
16.陸洛(19980100)。中國人幸福感之內涵、測量及相關因素探討。國家科學委員會研究彙刊. 人文及社會科學,8(1),115-137。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.劉影梅(2003)。國際身體活動量表監測系統的建立與國際合作。2003國際運動與健康研討會,國立臺灣師範大學(主辦) (會議日期: 2003/11/07-11/08)。  延伸查詢new window
2.蔡秀華(2001)。臺灣大學運動與體重管理課程修習學生之身體意象及運動行為研究。2001年國際高等教育體育學術研討會。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.內政部(2003)。102年[臺閩地區]國民生活狀況意向調查摘要分析。台北市:內政部。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.湯慧娟(2003)。高雄市老年人健康促進生活型態、休閒知覺自由與心理幸福滿足感之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.Baack, S.(1985)。Predictors of perceived freedom in leisure of Baptist church members(博士論文)。North Texas State University,Denton。  new window
3.Metzelaar, G. J.(1995)。The relationships among college satisfaction, leisure satisfaction, and life satisfaction in adult college students (adult students)(博士論文)。University of Maryland, College Park。  new window
4.巫雅菁(2001)。大學生幸福感之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
5.賴家馨(2002)。休閒阻礙量表之編製--以台北市大學生為例(碩士論文)。國立體育學院,桃園市。  延伸查詢new window
6.胡家欣(2000)。大學生的休閒認知、涉入與體驗:兼論人格特質的影響(碩士論文)。高雄醫學大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.張翠珠(2001)。高屏地區大學生休閒參與、休閒教育需求及其相關因素之研究(碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院,屏東市。  延伸查詢new window
8.張少熙(2003)。台灣地區中學教師參與休閒運動行為模式之研究(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.吳承典(2003)。雲林縣國小教師休閒運動參與及阻礙因素之研究(碩士論文)。國立雲林科技大學。  延伸查詢new window
10.張玉鈴(1998)。大學生休閒內在動機、休閒阻礙與其休閒無聊感及自我統合之關係研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
11.羅凱南(2001)。社會支持、人格特質、個人屬性對老年人心理幸福滿足感影響之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Strack, Fritz、Argyle, Michael、Schwarz, Norbert、Wong, Maria Mei-ha(1991)。Subjective well-being: An interdisciplinary perspective。Pergamon Press。  new window
2.林傑斌、劉明德(2002)。SPSS 11.0與統計模式建構。臺北:文魁資訊股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Lurie, Elinore(1984)。Predictors of emotional well-being in elderly after hospitalization。California:Counery of publication。  new window
4.Argyle, Michael(1987)。The psychology of happiness。New York:Routledge。  new window
5.Seligman, Martin E. P.(1975)。Helplessness: On Depression, Development, and Death。W. H. Freeman。  new window
6.Argyle, Michael、施建彬、陸洛(1997)。幸福心理學。臺北市:巨流圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.Deci, Edward L.(1975)。Intrinsic Motivation。Plenum Press。  new window
8.Campbell, Angus、Converse, Philip E.、Rodgers, Willard L.(1976)。The Quality of American Life: Perceptions, Evaluations, and Satisfactions。Russell Sage Foundation。  new window
其他
1.國立故宮博物院(2004)。中國的玉器,臺北:國立故宮博物院。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Wankel, L. M.、Berger, B. G.(1991)。Their personal and social benefits of sport and physical activity。Benefits of leisure。State College, PA:Venture Publishing。  new window
2.Wertz, S. K.(1991)。The nature of sport: Three conceptions。Talking a Good Game: Inquiries into the Principles of Sport。Dallas:Southern Methodist University Press。  new window
3.方進隆(1997)。提升體適能的策略與展望。教師體適能指導手冊。臺北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE