The publication quality in universities becomes one of the most important criteria for the recuitment and promotion of faculty. The study aims to evaluate and rank the quality perceptions of Taiwan’s management journals though surveys and cross citation impact. The survey instruments were designed to solicit subjective assessment of journal quality perception by selected peer researchers and cross citation impact was evaluated by the number of cross references made among journals to be ranked. The result shows that Journal of Management, Sun Yat-Sen Management Review, NTU Management Review, Management Review, and Chiao Ta Management Review have higher rankings in subjective evaluation; however, the ranking results varied by specialty fields. Furthermore, Journal of Management, International Journal of Accounting Studies, Review of Securities and Futures Markets, Management Reivew and Sun Yat-Sen Management Review have relatively high influences in citation. However, Taiwan’s management journals cite more from unpublished master and doctoral theses.