臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：抗爭行為的集體行動邏輯：「反貪倒扁運動」之理性選擇分析
書刊名：人文及社會科學集刊
作者：王鼎銘
作者(外文)：Wang, Ding-ming
出版日期：2015
卷期：27:4
頁次：頁605-640
主題關鍵詞：反貪倒扁運動；抗爭行為；公共財；搭便車；計數資料模型；Anti-Chen movement；Protesting behavior；Public good；Free rider；Count data modeling
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:26
  • 點閱點閱:145
抗爭與投票不同，屬一種非典型的政治行為，本文歸納三種解釋這類行為的動機：怨懟理論、資源動員理論與理性選擇理論。透過計數資料統計分析，關於2006年民眾參與反貪倒扁運動有幾點發現：一、無法以傳統政治行為的角度來詮釋這項運動，特別是需要動員上街頭的抗爭，族群意識、省籍情結、乃至政黨認同皆難以發揮傳統的影響力。二、各理論僅理性選擇成功詮釋倒扁抗爭，並勾透出這種集體行動中的特殊公共財屬性。三、倒扁運動實際能產生巨大能量，主要得歸功百元捐款活動的規劃，它降低高風險高成本的抗爭本質，並減少了支持者搭便車的情況。
Protesting, unlike voting behavior, is a sort of nontraditional or unorthodox political behavior. There are three distinct theories explaining the motivation behind this action: Grievance Theory, Resource Mobilization Theory, and Rational Choice Theory. By estimating several count data regressions, this paper found many explanations for the reasons people joined the Anti-Chen Movement in 2006. First, it is not sufficient to explain this movement, especially those actions requiring people to take to the streets, through traditional voting perspectives such as party identification, race/group ideology, or provincialism. Secondly, of those three theories, only Rational Choice provided enough support to clarify the public good dilemma in this action. Thirdly, the reason this movement engendered so many followers and avoided the free rider problem is attributed to the NT$100 fund-raising activity. It significantly reduced the risk and cost of joining the protest action.
期刊論文
1.Tullock, Gordon(1971)。The Paradox of Revolution。Public Choice，11(1)，89-100。  new window
2.Jenkins, J. Craig(1983)。Resource Mobilization Theory and the Study of Social Movements。Annual Review of Sociology，9，527-553。  new window
3.Javeline, D.(2003)。The Role of Blame in Collective Action: Evidence from Russia。American Political Science Review，97(1)，107-121。  new window
4.Finkel, S. E.、Muller, E. D.(1998)。Rational Choice and the Dynamics of Collective Political Action: Evaluating Alternative Models with Panel Data。American Political Science Review，92(1)，37-49。  new window
5.Finkel, Steven E.、Opp, Karl-Dieter(1991)。Party Identification and Participation in Collective Political Action。The Journal of Politics，53(2)，339-371。  new window
6.Muller, Edward N.、Opp, Karl-Dieter(1986)。Rational Choice and Rebellious Collective Action。The American Political Science Review，80(2)，471-488。  new window
7.Opp, Karl-Dieter(1990)。Postmaterialism, Collective Action, and Political Protest。American Journal of Political Science，34(1)，212-235。  new window
8.Bean, C.(1991)。Participation and Political Protest: A Causal Model with Australian Evidence。Political Behavior，13(3)，253-283。  new window
9.Boschken, H. L.(1975)。The Logic of Protest Action。The Western Political Quarterly，28(1)，59-71。  new window
10.Canache, D.(1996)。Looking out My Back Door: The Neighborhood Contexts and Perceptions of Relative Deprivation。Political Research Quarterly，49(3)，547-571。  new window
11.Consul, P. C.、Jain, G. C.(1970)。On the Generalization of Poisson Distribution。Annuals of Mathematical Statistics，41(4)，1387。  new window
12.Dalton, R.、Sickle, A. V.、Weldon, S.(2010)。The Individual-Institutional Nexus of Protest Behavior。British Journal of Political Science，40(1)，51-73。  new window
13.Famoye, Felix、Singh, Karan P.(2003)。On Inflated Generalized Poisson Regression Models。Advances and Applications in Statistics，3(2)，145-158。  new window
14.Famoye, F.、Singh, K. P.(2006)。Zero-Inflated Generalized Poisson Regression Model with an Application to Domestic Violence Data。Journal of Data Science，4，117-130。  new window
15.Finkel, S. E.、Muller, E. N.、Opp, K.(1989)。Personal Influence, Collective Rationality, and Mass Political Action。The American Political Science Review，83(3)，885-903。  new window
16.Francisco, R. A.(1993)。Theories of Protest and the Revolutions of 1989。American Journal of Political Science，37(3)，663-680。  new window
17.Gibson, M.(1991)。Public Goods, Alienation, and Political Protest: The Sanctuary Movement as a Test of the Public Good Models of Collective Rebellious Behavior。Political Psychology，12(4)，623-651。  new window
18.Grumu, S.、Trivedi, P. K.(1996)。Excess Zeros in Count Models for Recreational Trip。Journal of Business and Economic Statistics，14(4)，469-477。  new window
19.Gupta, P. L.、Gupta, R. C.、Tripathi, R. C.(1996)。Analysis of Zero-adjusted Counted Data。Computational Statistics and Data Analysis，23(2)，207-218。  new window
20.Kim, Q.(1996)。From Protest to Change of Regime: The 4-19 Revolt and the Fall of the Rhee Regime in South Korea。Social Forces，74(4)，1179-1208。  new window
21.Loveman, M.(1998)。High-risk Collective Action: Defending Human Rights in Chile, Uruguay, and Argentina。The American Journal of Sociology，104(2)，477-525。  new window
22.McDonough, P.、Shin, D. C.、Moisés, J.(1998)。Democratization and Participation: Comparing Spain, Brazil, and Korea。The Journal of Politics，60(4)，919-953。  new window
23.Muller, Edward N.、Jukam, Thomas O.(1983)。Discontent and Aggressive Political Participation。British Journal of Political Science，13(2)，159-179。  new window
24.Opp, K.、Roehl, W.(1990)。Repression, Micromobilization, and Political Protest。Social Forces，69(2)，521-547。  new window
25.趙剛(20061200)。希望之苗：反思反貪倒扁運動。臺灣社會研究，64，219-265。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.Klandermans, B.(1984)。Mobilization and participation: Social psychological expansion of resource mobilization theory。American Sociological Review，49(5)，583-600。  new window
27.Meyer, David S.(2004)。Protest and Political Opportunities。Annual Review of Sociology，30(1)，125-145。  new window
28.Mullahy, J.(1986)。Specification and testing of some modified count data models。Journal of Econometrics，33(3)，341-365。  new window
29.Muller, Edward N.、Jukam, Thomas O.、Seligson, Mitchell A.(1982)。Diffuse Political Support and Antisystem Political Behavior: A Comparative Analysis。American Journal of Political Science，26(2)，240-264。  new window
30.Riker, William H.、Ordeshook, Peter C.(1968)。A Theory of the Calculus of Voting。American Political Science Review，62(1)，25-42。  new window
31.王鼎銘(20070300)。成本效益、公民責任與政治參與：2004年公民投票的分析。東吳政治學報，25(1)，1-37。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.蔡佳泓(20080600)。反貪倒扁運動的支持度之多層次貝式定理分析。政治學報，45，67-93。new window  延伸查詢new window
33.McAdam, D.(1988)。Micromobilization Contexts and Recruitment to Activism。International Social Movement Research，1(1)，125-154。  new window
圖書
1.Hogg, R. V.、Craig, A. T.(1995)。Introduction to Mathematical Statistics。Upper Saddle River, New Jersey：Prentice Hall。  new window
2.Gamson, William A.(1975)。The Strategy of Social Protest。Homewood, IL：The Dorsey Press。  new window
3.Agresti, Alan(2007)。An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis。John Wiley & Sons, Inc.。  new window
4.Winkelmann, R.(2000)。Econometric Analysis of Count Data。Berlin, New York：Springer。  new window
5.張福建(2009)。公民與政治行動：實證與規範之間的對話。臺北：中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
6.Allison, P. D.(2012)。Logistic Regression Using SAS: Theory and Application。Cary, NC：SAS Inc。  new window
7.Barnes, S. H.、Kaase, M.、Allerback, Klaus R.、Farah, Barbara、Heunks, Felix、Inglehart, Ronald、Kent, Jennings M.、Klingemann, Hans D.、Marsh, Alan、Rosenmayr, Leopold(1979)。Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies。Beverly Hills, CA：Sage Publication。  new window
8.Booth, J.、Seligson, M.(2009)。The Legitimacy Puzzle in Latin Amercia: Political Support and Democracy in Eight Nations。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
9.Consul, P. C.(1989)。Generalized Poisson Distribution: Properties and Applications。New York：Marcel Dekker Inc.。  new window
10.DeMaris, A.(2004)。Regression with Social Data: Modeling Continuous and Limited Response Variables。Hoboken, NJ：John Wiley & Sons。  new window
11.Hilbe, Joseph M.(2011)。Negative Binomial Regression。Cambridge University Press。  new window
12.Hilbe, J. M.(2014)。Modeling Count Data。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
13.Cameron, A. C.、Tnvedi, P. K.(1998)。Regression Analysis of Count Data。New York, NY：Cambridge University Press。  new window
14.Bratton, Michael、Mattes, Robert、Gyimah-Boadi, Emmanuel(2005)。Public Opinion, Democracy and Market Reform in Africa。New York, NY：Cambridge University Press。  new window
15.Oberschall, A.(1973)。Social Conflict and Social Movements。Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey：Prentice-Hall, Inc。  new window
16.Olson, Mancur(1965)。The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups。New York：Mcgraw-Hill College。  new window
17.Inglehart, Ronald(1977)。The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics。Princeton, NJ：Princeton University Press。  new window
18.Long, J. Scott(1997)。Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables。Sage Publications。  new window
19.Scott, James C.(1985)。The Weapon of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance。New Haven：Yale University Press。  new window
20.Gurr, Ted Robert(1970)。Why Men Rebel。Princeton, New Jersey：Princeton University Press。  new window
21.Verba, Sidney、Schlozman, Kay Lehman、Brady, Henry E.(1995)。Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics。Harvard University Press。  new window
22.Kornhauser, William(1959)。The Politics of Mass Society。Free Press。  new window
23.Campbell, Angus、Converse, Philip E.、Miller, Warren E.、Stokes, Donald E.(1960)。The American Voter。The University of Chicago Press。  new window
其他
1.江宜樺(20061229)。反貪運動確立基本政治價值。  延伸查詢new window
2.TEDS。台灣選舉與民主化調查，http://www.tedsnet.org， 2014/11/15。  延伸查詢new window
3.(20061115)。馬：和平靜坐才是保障對象，http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2006/new/sep/9/today-p1.htm。  new window
4.(2014)。Million Voices Against Corruption, President Chen Must Go，http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Million_Voices_Against_Corruption,_President_Chen_Must_Go， 2014/11/15。  new window
圖書論文
1.廖元豪(2006)。反貪腐如何成為公民運動。紅花雨。台北：南方家園文化事業公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳陸輝(20090000)。信任、效能與行動：解析民眾為何支持紅衫軍或挺扁運動。公民與政治行動：實證與規範之間的對話。臺北：中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.盛杏湲、鄭夙芬(2009)。台灣民眾的藍綠認同與紅衫軍運動的參與：一個框架結盟的解釋。公民與政治行動：實證與規範之間的對話。臺北：中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Kritzer, H. M.(1979)。A Theory of Unconventional Political Action: The Dynamic Confrontation。Repression and Repressive Violence。Amsterdam：Swets and Zeitlinger。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：745（臺灣：722，外國：23） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1430120 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67234475
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上