:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:新竹科學園區設置之環境風險認知分析與價值評估
書刊名:建築與規劃學報
作者:胡志平 引用關係
作者(外文):Hu, Chich-ping
出版日期:2005
卷期:6:1
頁次:頁63-80
主題關鍵詞:外部成本意識調查環境風險特徵價格Box-cox函數轉換External costIdeology surveyEnviromental riskHedonic priceBox-cox transformation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:34
新竹科學園區的設置增加了新竹地區的就業機會、活絡地方經濟等外部效益;但是另一方面也因園區的設置,誘發不同的外部成本,這些負面效應主要是污染問題、及因污染對園區附近住民造成的外部成本負擔。 本文經由住民意識調查,以了解住民對於隱含在科學園區的環境風險的認知程度,並且利用非市場估價法之特徵價格函數,計算這些環境風險的價值。因此,本文以新竹市設籍的住戶爲問卷調查對象,實證結果顯示:住民對科學園區設置所引發的環境風險認知以「工業廢水」最高,風險期望值爲0.4823。其次,在特徵價格函數型態選擇上,本文透過Box-Cox。函數轉換,並應用計量軟體來校估相關變數的係數,依最大概似函數法,在μ=1、λ=0.8441時,所建立的特徵價格模式對房價有最佳解釋能力;最後,在特徵屬性對房價的影響方面,屋齡、樓地板面積、房間數、廳數與距離,對房價有顯著影響;而距離對房價的影響如下:平均每增加一公里,房屋價格減少23.21萬元。
Due to the establishment of RsinChu Science Park, locating at HsinChu, there had happened two main external effects around HsinChu area, including external benefits such as increases of employment and stimulating local economy on one hand, and external cost incurred on the other hand. The purpose of this paper is to interpret the residence's environmental risk perception by ideology survey as well as to calculate such environmental risk value from Science Park by means of Hedonic price model. Therefore the empirical study of surveying on the residences of HsinChu City shows that the item whose environmental risk expected value is the highest one is "discharged waste water", which is in accordance with met-empirical perception Secondly, for the purpose of function type selection, with Box Cox Transformation, the optimal type of function of hedonic price model is under the situation whose μ=1、λ=0.8441 by Maximum Likelihood estimation Finally, attributes including age of dwelling, floor area, the room amounts, the living room amounts, and distance from Science Park have strong significance with housing price. The relationship between distance from Science Park and housing price is that 232.1 thousand dollars declines with one more kilometer distant from Science Park.
期刊論文
1.Shabman, L.、Stephenson, K.(1996)。Searching for the Correct Benefit Estimate: Empirical Evidence for an Alternative Perspective。Land Economics,72(4),433-439。  new window
2.Michaels, R. G.、Smith, V. K.(1990)。Market segmentation and valuing amenities with hedonic models: the case of hazardous waste sites。Journal of Urban Economics,28(2),223-242。  new window
3.Kenkel, Donald S.(1991)。Health Behavior, Health Knowledge, and Schooling。Journal of Political Economy,99(2),287-305。  new window
4.Viscusi, W. Kip(1991)。Age Variations in Risk Perceptions and Smoking Decisions。The Review of Economics and Statistics,73(4),577-588。  new window
5.Slovic, Paul、Fischhoff, Baruch、Lichtenstein, Sarah(1982)。Why study risk perception?。Risk Analysis,2(2),83-93。  new window
6.Slovic, Paul(1987)。Perception of Risk。Science,236(4799),280-285。  new window
7.Goodman, Allen C.(1978)。Hedonic Prices, Price Indices and Housing Markets。Journal of Urban Economics,5(4),471-484。  new window
8.Rosen, Sherwin(1974)。Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition。Journal of Political Economy,82(1),34-55。  new window
9.Harrison, David Jr.、Rubinfeld, Daniel L.(1978)。Hedonic Housing Prices and the Demand for Clean Air。Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,5(1),81-102。  new window
10.林祖嘉、林素菁(1993)。台灣地區環境品質與公共設施對房價與房租影響之分析。住宅學報,1,21-45。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.曾明遜(1992)。不寧適設施對住宅價格影響之研究--以垃圾處理場為個案(碩士論文)。國立中興大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.翁淑貞(1992)。臺北都會區空氣污染對住宅價格影響之研究:應用特徵價格法(碩士論文)。國立中興大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.賴世培、丁庭宇、莫季雍(2000)。民意調查。臺北:國立空中大學出版中心。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.王健安、林秋瑾、張金鶚(1996)。房地產業對我國總體經濟活動之影響分析。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳凱俐(1997)。自然資源之經濟效率評估-以宜蘭縣蘭陽溪口為例。  延伸查詢new window
3.楊重信(2003)。基隆河流域洪災防治效益之評估-總計畫暨子計畫:特徵價格法之應用(II)。  延伸查詢new window
4.劉錦添(1992)。台灣地區民眾對環境風險的認知與面臨環境風險下的行為分析。  延伸查詢new window
5.Abelson, P. W.(1979)。Properties Prices and the Value of Amenities。  new window
6.Allman, W.(1985)。We Have Nothing to Fear。  new window
7.Anderson, G. D. and R. C. Bishop(1986)。The Valuation Problem。  new window
8.Bender, B., T. J. Gronberg, and H. S. Hwang(1980)。Choice of Functional Form and the Demand for Air Quality。  new window
9.Brookshire, D. S., M. A. Thayer, J. L., Schirhart, and W. D. Schultze(1985)。A Test of the Expected Utility Model: Evidence from Earthquake Risk。  new window
10.Cropper, M. L., L. B. Deck, and K. E. McConnell(1988)。On the Choice of Functional Form for Hedonic Price Equations。  new window
11.Driscoll, P., B. Dietz, and J. Alwang(1994)。Welfare Analysis When Budget Constraints are Nonlinear: the Case of Flood Hazard Reduction。  new window
12.Folland, S. and R. Hough(2000)。Externalities of Nuclear Power Plants: Further Evidence。  new window
13.Gamble, H. B. and R. H. Downing(1982)。Effects of Nuclear Power Plants on Residential Property Values。  new window
14.Griliches, Z.(1961)。Hedonic Price Indices for Automobiles: an Econometric Analysis of Quality Change。  new window
15.Halvorsen, R. and H. O. Pollaskowski(1981)。Choice of Functional Form for Hedonic Price Equations。  new window
16.Hsieh, C. R., L. L.Yen, J. T. Liu, and C. J. Lin(1996)。Smoking, Health Knowledge, and Anti- Smoking Campaigns: An Empirical Study in Taiwan。  new window
17.Johannson, P. O.(1987)。The Economic Theory and the Measurement of Environmental Benefits。  new window
18.Lopes, L. L.(1992)。Risk Perception and the Perceived Public。  new window
19.Nelson, J. P.(1978)。Residential Choice, Hedonic Price, and the Demand for Urban Air Quality。  new window
20.Nelson, J. P.(1981)。Measuring Benefits of Environmental Improvements: Aircraft Noise and Hedonic Prices。  new window
21.Palmquist, R. B.(1984)。Estimating the Demand for the Characteristics of Housing。  new window
22.Quigley, J. M.(1982)。Nonlinear Budget Constraints and Consumer Demand: an Application to Public Programs fro Residential Housing。  new window
23.Segerson, K.(1992)。The Media and Public Perceptions of Risk: How Journalists Frame Risk Stories。  new window
24.Slovic, P., B. Fischhoff, and S. Lichtenstein(1985)。Regulation of Risk: A Psychological Perspective。  new window
25.Smith, V. K., W. H. Desvousges, F. R. Johnson, and A. Fisher(1990)。Can Public Information Programs Affect Risk Perceptions?。  new window
26.Vaughan, R. J. and L. E. Huckins(1982)。The Cost of Urban Expressway Noise。  new window
27.Viscusi, W. K.(1990)。Sources of Inconsistency in Societal Responses to Health Risks。  new window
28.Viscusi, W. K. and C. J. O’Connor(1984)。Adaptive Responses to Chemical Labeling: Are Workers Bayesian Decision Makers?。  new window
29.Viscusi, W. K., W. A. Magat, and J. Huber(1987)。An Investigation of the Rationality of Consumer Valuations of Multiple Health Risks。  new window
30.Weinstein, N. D., P. Sandman, and N. E. Roberts(1989)。Communicating Effectively About Risk Magnitudes。  new window
31.Yen, L. L., H. W. Yen, and L. A. Li(1993)。A Study of Adults’ Smoking Behavior and their Perceptions of Cigarette Warning Labels, Cigarette Advertising, and Anti- Smoking Publicity in Taiwan。  new window
圖書論文
1.Randall, A.(1984)。Theoretical Bases for Non-Market Benefit Estimation。Valuation of Wild land Resources Benefit。Boulder, Co.:West view Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE