:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:女性研究者在田野中的性別處境與政治
書刊名:女學學誌:婦女與性別研究
作者:畢恆達謝慧娟
作者(外文):Bih, Herng-darShieh, Sally
出版日期:2005
卷期:20
頁次:頁93-129
主題關鍵詞:性別政治田野研究女性研究者Gender politicsField researchFemale researchers
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:8
  • 點閱點閱:49
儘管有很多證據顯示男性與女性研究者的田野研究經驗不同,但是質性研究方法的書籍仍然持續忽視田野研究的性別差異。近年來研究者受到鼓勵反省其在研究過程中的角色,然而研究者的性別與研究田野的互動卻仍然受到忽視。本研究的目的即是探討台灣女性研究者在田野中的性別處境與性別政治。   當研究者進入田野,田野中的人會試圖把研究者放入一個位置,給她定位,研究者也同時在找尋一個適合於她的位置。根據受訪者的陳述,田野對象給她的定位其實反映的就是一般社會的性別價值。雖說因著女性研究者的年齡、學術位置與穿著等而有些許差異,但是最常見的遭遇即是忽視女性研究者的專業角色,而把她們當作是一般傳統女人的角色,如視而不見、作為服務者,以及女性的身體成為關注的焦點。本文同時討論女性研究者因應的策略,以及在這樣的脈絡下,女性研究者如果順勢利用女性的優勢與田野對象互動,其後果為何?最後則分別討論研究者的性別理解如何影響其田野研究的進行,以及知識生產的結果。
Although many studies have shown that field experiences of male and female researchers generally vary, most qualitative research method textbooks still neglect to discuss the impact that gender issues have in the course of a field research. Thus, the aim of this study is to explore the ways in which gender politics may affect female researchers in their field work.   When a researcher begins her field work, informants often try to allocate her an appropriate position. In the meantime, the researcher herself strives to negotiate the new relationships in an effort to find her place. As the views expressed in this study’s interviews suggest, the ways female researchers are treated during their field work generally reflect the gender values shared by the larger society. Thus, informants often ignore female researchers’ professional roles, and instead expect them to assume traditional female roles, such as care-giving and emotional labor, or even treat them as sexual objects by focusing on their bodies.   Is sum, this paper discusses what strategies female researchers employ to negotiate such gender politics and how their gender consciousness affects the outcomes of their field research.
期刊論文
1.Easterday, L.、Papademas, D.、Schorr, L.、Valentine, C.(1977)。The making of a female researcher: Role problems in field work。Urban life,6(3),333-348。  new window
2.Gurney, J. N.(1985)。Not one of the guys: The female researcher in a male dominated setting。Qualitative sociology,8(1),42-62。  new window
3.Horn, R.(1997)。Not "One of the boys": Women researching the police。Journal of gender studies,6(3),297-308。  new window
4.Hunt, J. C.(1984)。The development of rapport through the negotiation of gender in field work among police。Human organization,43(4),283-296。  new window
5.嚴祥鸞(19970400)。訪談的倫理和政治--女性主義社會學者的自我反思。婦女與兩性學刊,8,199-220。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.唐筱雯(1999)。臺北市公娼之從業歷程及生活世界(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.林秀芬(2002)。絕處逢生--探討九二一地震喪偶女單親災變後之社會支持過程(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.齊力、林本炫(2003)。質性研究方法與資料分析。嘉義:南華大學教育社會學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.Bell, D.、Caplan, P.、Karim, W. J.(1993)。Gendered fields: Women, men and ethnography。New York:Routledge。  new window
3.Ellis, C.、Flaherty, M. G.(1992)。Investigating subjectivity: Research on lived experience。Newbury Park:Sage。  new window
4.Golde, P.(1986)。Women in the field: Anthropological experience。Berkeley:University of California Press。  new window
5.Harding, S.(1991)。Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from womens lives。Ithaca:Cornell University Press。  new window
6.Hobbs, D.、May, T.(1993)。Interpreting the field: Accounts of ethnography。Oxford:Clarendon Press。  new window
7.Jackson, B.、Ives, E. D.(1996)。The world observed: Reflections on the fieldwork process。Urbana:University of Illinois Press。  new window
8.Lewin, E.、Leap, W. L.(1996)。Out in the field: Reflections of lesbian and gay anthropologists。Urbana:University of Illinois Press。  new window
9.Lewis, O.(1951)。Life in a Mexican village: Tepoztlan restudied。Urbana:University of Illinois Press。  new window
10.Macdonald, N.(2001)。The graffiti subculture: Youth, masculinity and identity in London and New York。New York:Palgrave。  new window
11.Young, Michael E.(1979)。The Ethnography of Malinowski: The Trobriand Islands, 1915-1918。New York:London:RKP。  new window
12.Markowitz, F.、Ashkenazi, M.(1999)。Sexy sexuality, and the anthropologist。Chicago:University of Illinois Press。  new window
13.Mead, M.(1949)。Coming of age in Samoa: A psychological study of primitive youth for Western civilization。New York:New American Library。  new window
14.Redfield, R.(1973)。Tepoztlan: A Mexican village: A study of folk life。Chicago:The University of Chicago Press。  new window
15.Reinharz, S.(1984)。On becoming a social scientist。New Brunswick:Transaction。  new window
16.Smith, C. D.、Komblum, W.(1996)。In the field: Readings on the field research experience。Westport:Praeger。  new window
17.Warren, Carol A. B.(1988)。Gender issues in field research。Newbury Park:Sage。  new window
18.Warren, C. A. B.、Hackney, J. K.(2000)。Gender issues in ethnography。Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage。  new window
19.Wengle, J. L.(1988)。Ethnographers in the field: The psychology of research。Tuscaloosa:The University of Alabama Press。  new window
20.Wolf, D. L.(1996)。Feminist dilemmas in fieldwork。Westview Press。  new window
21.Malinowski, Bronislaw(1967)。A diary in the strict sense of the term。New York:Harcourt, Brace, and World。  new window
22.Freeman, D.(1983)。Margaret Mead and Samoa: The making and unmaking of an anthropological myth。Cambridge:Harvard Uvivrsity Press。  new window
23.謝臥龍(2004)。質性研究。臺北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
24.Shaffir, William B.、Stebbins, Robert A.(1991)。Experiencing Fieldwork: An Inside View of Qualitative Research。Newbury Park, CA:Sage Publications。  new window
25.Gadamer, Hans-Georg、Weinsheimer, Joel、Marshall, Donald G.(1989)。Truth and Method。Crossroad Publishing Corporation。  new window
26.潘慧玲(2004)。教育研究方法論:觀點與方法。臺北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
27.黃瑞琴(1994)。質的教育研究方法。臺北市:心理出版社股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
28.高敬文(2002)。質化研究方法論。台北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
29.Haraway, Donna Jeanne(1990)。Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature。Routledge。  new window
30.胡幼慧、姚美華(1996)。質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。巨流。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.(1980)。No academic matter: Unconscious discrimination in environmental design education。New space for women。Boulder, CO:Westview Press。  new window
2.Hsiung, P. C.(1996)。Between bosses and workers: The dilemma of a keen observer and a vocal feminist。Feminist dilemmas in fieldwork。Boulder:Westview Press。  new window
3.Reinharz, S.(1985)。Feminist distrust: Problems of context and content in sociological work。Exploring clinical methods for social research。Beverly Hills:Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE