:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:酒後駕車行為決策之研究
書刊名:運輸計劃
作者:葉寶文傅祖壇 引用關係
作者(外文):Yeh, PowenFu, Tsu-tan
出版日期:2006
卷期:35:3
頁次:頁337-363
主題關鍵詞:酒醉駕車酒後駕車貝式學習過程執法強度認知意外事故的風險認知Drunk drivingDrinking drivingBayesian learning processEnforcement perceptionAccident risk perception
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:25
  • 點閱點閱:72
「酒後駕車行為決策之研究」主要目的在於建立一個實證模型,找出並判定影響個人酒後駕車決策之因素,並驗證Viscusi 的「貝式學習過程(Bayesian learning process) 」是否成立;即實證理性個人是否能利用其環境資訊,修正其先驗信念 (prior belief) ,以形成其事後認知 (posterior perception), 進而影響其個人之行為或決策。文中採用遞迴的聯立方程計量模型,利用民國90 年10 月間針對臺北縣、市地區、18 歲以上具有汽機車駕照之受訪者進行電話訪問的原始資料,作為本文實證分析之依據。我們的實證結果顯示,Viscusi 的「貝式學習過程」的確存在,而且個人酒後駕車與否,亦受事後的兩個主觀認知─即警察取締酒後駕車的執法強度與酒後駕車發生意外事故風險機率−−的影響。
This paper attempts to build an empirical model to find and judge the factors that affect a rational person’s decision making of drinking driving. To verify the Bayesian learning process of Visusi is true or not, we would like to prove a rational person whether modify their prior belief by using the environmental information to construct their posterior perception and affect their behavior and decision making. This paper adopts the recursive model and uses the telephone survey data of Taipei County and Taipei City during October of 2001. The results indicate that the Bayesian learning process of Viscusi indeed exists. Furthermore, personal behavior of drinking driving is indeed affected by two posterior subjective perceptions, that is, the enforcement perception and the accident risk perception.
期刊論文
1.Ruhm, Christopher J.(1996)。Alcohol Policies and Highway Vehicle Fatalities。Journal of Health Economics,15(4),435-454。  new window
2.Viscusi, W. K.(1985)。A Bayesian Perspective on Biases in Risk Perception。Economics Letters,17,59-62。  new window
3.傅祖壇、劉錦添、簡錦漢、賴文龍(20010300)。健康風險認知與香菸消費行為--臺灣的實證研究。經濟論文,29(1),91-118。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Liu, J. T.、Hsieh, C. R.(1995)。Risk Perception and Smoking Behavior: Empirical Evidence from Taiwan。Journal of Risk and Uncertainty,11,139-157。  new window
5.傅祖壇、陳信通(19990600)。風險性物品之消費行為 : 臺灣檳榔之實證。農業經濟叢刊,4(2),223-250。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Kenkel, Donald S.(1993)。Drinking, Driving, and Deterrence: The Effectiveness and Social Costs of Alternative Policies。The Journal of Law & Economics,36,877-913。  new window
7.Saffer, H.、Grossman, M.(1987)。Drinking Age Laws and Highway Mortality Rates: Cause and Effect。Economic Inquiry,25,403-417。  new window
8.Viscusi, W. K.(1991)。Age variations in risk perceptions and smoking decisions。The Review of Economics and Statistics,73,577-588。  new window
9.Becker, Gary S.(1968)。Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach。Journal of Political Economy,76(2),169-217。  new window
10.Phelps, C. E.(1987)。Risk and Perceived Risk of Drunk Driving among Young Drivers。Journal of Policy Analysis and Management,6(4),708-714。  new window
11.Mullahy, J.、Sindelar, J. L.(1994)。Do Drinkers Know When to Say When? An Empirical Analysis of Drunk Driving。Economic Inquiry,32(3),383-394。  new window
12.Sloan, F. A.、Reilly, B. A.、Schenzler, C.(1995)。Effects of Tort Liability and Insurance on Heavy Drinking and Drinking and Driving。The Journal of Law & Economics,38,49-77。  new window
13.Wilkinson, J. T.(1987)。Reducing Drunk Driving: Which Policies Are Most Effective?。Southern Economic Journal,54,322-334。  new window
14.Chaloupka, Frank J.、Wechsler, Henry(1996)。Binge Drinking in college: The Impact of Price, Availability, and Alcohol Control Policies。Contemporary Economic Policy,14(4),112-124。  new window
15.Chaloupka, F. J.、Saffer, H.、Grossman, M.(1996)。Alcohol Control Policies and Motor-Vehicle Fatalities。Journal of Legal Studies,22,161-186。  new window
16.Phelps, Charles E.(1988)。Death and Taxes: An Opportunity for Substitution。Journal of Health Economics,7(1),1-24。  new window
17.Garbacz, C.(1989)。Traffic Fatalities in Taiwan。Journal of Transport Economics and Policy,19,317-327。  new window
18.Peltzman, S.(1975)。The Effects of Automobile Safety Regulations。Journal of Political Economy,83,677-726。  new window
19.Greenfield, T. K.、Rogers, J. D.(1999)。Alcoholic Beverage Choice, Risk Perception and Self-reported Drunk Driving: Effects of Measurement on Risk Analysis。Addiction,94(11),1735-1743。  new window
20.Deery, H. A.、Fildes, B. N.(1999)。Young Novice Driver Subtypes: Relationship to High-Risk Behavior, Traffic Accident Record, and Simulator Driving Performance。Human Factors,41,628-643。  new window
21.Viscusi, W. Kip(1985)。Are Individuals Bayesian Decision Maker?。The American Economic Review,75,381-385。  new window
22.Kenkel, D. S.(1993)。Do Drunk Drivers Pay Their Way? A Note on Optimal Penalties for Drunk Driving。Journal of Health Economics,12,137-149。  new window
23.Kenkel, Donald S.(1996)。New Estimates of the Optimal Tax on Alcohol。Economic Inquiry,34,296-319。  new window
研究報告
1.Saffer, H.、Chaloupka, F. J.(1987)。Breath Testing and the Demand for Drunk Driving。  new window
2.Cook, P. J.、Moore, M. J.(1999)。Alcohol。0。  new window
學位論文
1.林妙芬(1993)。降低酒醉駕車肇事之政策探討:臺灣之實證研究(碩士論文)。國立中央大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.趙家皓(2000)。台灣酒後駕車行為的探討與分析(碩士論文)。輔仁大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳秀英(1987)。交通意外傷害之流行病研究,0。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Greene, W. H.(2000)。Econometric Analysis。New York:Macmillan。  new window
2.Viscusi, W. Kip(1992)。Smoking: Making the Risky Decision。New York:Oxford University Press。  new window
其他
1.(2004)。中華民國交通統計月報,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
2.行政院衛生署(2001)。中華民國臺閩地區公共衛生概況,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
3.內政部警政署(2001)。道路交通事故統計資料,0。  延伸查詢new window
4.(2004)。臺北市交通統計年報,臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE