:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:校園生物棲地物種指標建構之研究
書刊名:臺中教育大學學報. 數理科技類
作者:林明瑞 引用關係巫麗雯劉惠元李雅鳳
作者(外文):Lin, Ming-rayWu, Li-wenLiu, Hui-yuenLi, Ya-feng
出版日期:2008
卷期:22:1
頁次:頁59-91
主題關鍵詞:校園生物棲地物種指標指標建構Campus biotopeSpecies indicatorIndicator constructing
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:3
  • 點閱點閱:33
本研究爲能建立生物棲地物種指標,以提供教育行政單位及各校進行校園環境或生物棲地規劃之參考,先藉由網路蒐集全國北、中、南、東共146所校園動植物資料,實地探勘中部四縣市12所經營有成之校園,並深入訪談12位具有環境教育實務經驗之教師、主任及校長,以取得具有環境教育、生態關鍵性、污染程度高低意義之指標物種,再將上述所得資料,經過校園生物棲地環境領域、環境教育領域及生物與生態領域等12位專家,進行德懷術專家三次以上來回調查,建構出「校園生物棲地物種指標」,共分永續校園環境政策(13項)、水池(缸)、溪流(11項)、花圃(10項)、草地(4項)及樹林區(21項)五個面向,共計59項指標,其中生態系關鍵指標物種(指標A)有4項;污染程度高低指標物種(指標B)有3項;環境教育指標物種(指標C)有59項。五大面向中以樹林區面向之權重最大,佔24.7%,其次是永續校園環境政策面向之權重,佔20.4%。以本研究建構之物種指標審視所蒐集之網路資料得知,19種指標植物出現百分比例最高的是「耐污染樹種」指標,達93.1%;28種指標動物出現百分比例最高的是「蝴蝶」,達83.3%。依本研究之結果,建議有意進行校園生物棲地營造之學校,可由重要性高、應執行性高、物種存活率高且棲地營造容易之指標著手進行,如此,校園生物棲地營造成功率會較高,亦建議教師將本研究建構之物種指標融入相關學習領域中,如此將能更確實落實此指標。
This research aimed to set up the species indicators in biotopes, in order to offer reference for planning on the environment of campus or biotopes needed by educational administrators and every school. This research collected data by internet, on-site investigation and depth interview. Then based on collected data mentioned above, a Delphi questionnaire was compiled. Through three times of send out-recover-correct investigation, the species indicators for biotopes of campuses were set-up and categorized into <||>sustainable environmental policy for campus (13 indicators)<||>, <||>pond (tank) and brook (11 indicators)<||>, <||>flower nursery (10 indicators)<||>, <||>grass area (4 indicators)<||>, and <||>woods area (21 indicators)<||>, and summed up to 59 indicators. There were 4 ecological key-role indicator species (indicators A), pollution indicator species (indicators B), and environmental education indicator species (indicators C), which were included in the species indicators system. The weighting factor of woods area was about 24.7%, and the highest one among all five groups. The next one was <||>sustainable environmental policy for campus<||>, 20.4%. The data collected from internet were checked out by the species indicators system which was set-up by the study. The appearing percentage of 19 botanic indicator species, pollution enduring species, got to 93.1%. The appearing percentage of 28 indicators animals, butterfly, got to 83.3%. According to the result of this research, propose intending to carry on the school built in biotopes in the campus, can from importance high, the should carry outing high, species survival rate high and cache build easy indicator is it go on to set about, like this, biotopes in campus build success rate can relatively high. Advise teacher incorporate this species indicator relevant to study field also, can really implement this indicator even more so.
期刊論文
1.何健鎔(20011200)。螢火蟲棲地之維護與經營管理。自然保育季刊,36,14-18。  延伸查詢new window
2.林曜松(1999)。生物多樣性公約(一)保育國際化。大自然,65,92-97。  延伸查詢new window
3.徐堉峰(20070100)。臺灣蝴蝶大驚奇。科學發展月刊,409,6-10。  延伸查詢new window
4.Carol, R. K.、Boulton, P.(1995)。Children's Center:Support for Children and Families。Children Today,23(4),18-21。  new window
5.Chovance, A.、Waringer, J.(2001)。Ecological integrity of river/flood plain system-assessment by dragonfly surveys (Insecta: Odonata) Regulateal Rivers。Resource and Management,17,493-507。  new window
6.Chovanec, A.、Raab, R.(1997)。Dragonflies (Insecta: Odonata) and the ecological status of newly created wetlands--examples for long--term bioindication programmes。Limnologica,27,381-392。  new window
7.Gibbons, L. K.、Reed, J. M.、Chew, F. S.(2002)。Habitat requirements and local persistence of three damselfly species(Odonata: coenagrionidae)。Journal of Insect Conservation,6,47-55。  new window
8.Hermy, M.、Cornelis, J.(2000)。Towards a monitoring method and a number of multifaceted and hierarchical biodiversity indicators for urban and suburban parks。Landscape and Urban Planning,49,149-162。  new window
9.Schiemer, F.、Spindler, T.、Wintersberger, H.、Schneider, A.、Chovance, A.(1991)。Fish fry associations: Important indicators for the ecological status of large rivers。Verh. Internat. Verein. Limnol,24,2497-2500。  new window
10.林明瑞(19960600)。校園美化綠化之環保觀。環境教育季刊,30,52-61。  延伸查詢new window
11.汪靜明(20000900)。學校環境教育的理念與原理。環境教育季刊,43,18-34。  延伸查詢new window
12.林明瑞(19990500)。永續校園。環境科學技術教育專刊,16,26-42。  延伸查詢new window
13.林明瑞、葉茂森(20050300)。臺灣中部地區國小永續校園內涵之研究:以自然環境的觀點進行探討。環境教育研究,2(2),1-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.王佩蓮(20000400)。國小環境教育檢核表之探討。臺北市立師範學院學報,31,319-346。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.賴明洲(2003)。綠色生態工法:生態造林法於平地造林及植被復育之應用。2003 植物生物多樣性與植物資源永續利用研討會。臺中市:東海大學景觀學系。107-121。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.劉惠元、林明瑞(2006)。永續綠校園生物棲地的棲地環境及物種指標之建構研究 (計畫編號:NSC94-2511-S-142-010)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.張鎮陽(2003)。高雄地區人工溼地蜻蛉目物種組成及棲地選擇之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳文德(2001)。營造校園學習棲地進行校園環境教育之行動研究--以台北市溪山國小為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.吳加雄(2001)。東勢林場螢火蟲生態研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.吳勝斌(2005)。校園生物棲地環境指標建構之研究(碩士論文)。臺中師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳聰志(2007)。永續校園生物棲地環境指標適切性及現況之調查研究(碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.葉茂森(2003)。中部地區國小永續校園內涵之研究-以自然環境的觀點進行探討(碩士論文)。臺中師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
7.何晨瑛(2004)。台灣綠色小學校園生態環境現況解析之研究(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.內政部營建署高雄都會公園管理站(1999)。高雄都會公園導覽手冊。高雄市:內政部營建署高雄都會公園管理站。  延伸查詢new window
2.彭國棟(2003)。營造水生生態池。南投縣:行政院農業委員會特有生物研究保育中心。  延伸查詢new window
3.Gilbert, O. L.、Anderson, P.(1998)。Habitat Creation and Repair。UK:Oxford University Press。  new window
4.The World Banks(1995)。Monitoring environment progress, a report on work in progress。Washington D. C.。  new window
5.林憲德(1999)。城鄉生態。台北:詹氏書局。  延伸查詢new window
單篇論文
1.Nichols, D. R.(1990)。Tactual Environmental Interpretation: A Multisensory Approach(ERIC/EJ410308)。  new window
圖書論文
1.張子超(2003)。永續校園的理念與推廣。2003年永續教育理念與實務研習手冊。花蓮縣:花蓮縣教育局。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳超仁(2004)。永續校園生態環境。教育部永續校園環境規劃師北區培訓計畫研習手冊。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳世雄(2006)。從有機農業到生態校園的臺灣經驗。國際有機農業論壇。臺中市:國立中興大學。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE