:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:An Analysis of the Effects of Ability Grouping on Student Learning in University-Wide English Classes
書刊名:逢甲人文社會學報
作者:劉慧如
作者(外文):Liu, Hui-ju
出版日期:2008
卷期:16
頁次:頁217-249
主題關鍵詞:能力分班能力分級學習動機Ability groupingTrackingLearning motivation
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:12
  • 點閱點閱:141
本研究的興趣在分析大學生與英文教師對能力分班的態度,希望能更深入瞭解能力分班對學生學習外語的影響。本研究使用統計方法來研討下列三個問題:(1)針對不同問題,學生對於實施英文能力分班的態度為何?(2)學生們對於能力分班的態度是否會因不同的能力等級與年級而有顯著差異?(3)英文教師對實施能力分班所持的態度是正面或是負面?研究樣本包括582 位大葉大學的學生及 34 位英文老師。這些學生依不同英語能力被編入四個等級的班級,施測當時,他們或者即將完成第一年的英文必修課程,或者是第二年的英文必修課程。研究結果顯示大多數的學生與老師都明顯支持能力分班政策,能力等級與年級並無顯著的交互作用。但要注意的是,針對不同問題,每當年級存在有顯著效果,完成兩年英文課程的學生對能力分班的支持低於只完成第一年課程的學生,而當能力等級有顯著的效果時,初級班的學生比高級班的學生更強烈支持能力分班。
The aim of this study is to analyze college students’ and English teachers’ attitudes toward between-class ability grouping, and to gain more insight into the effects of homogeneous placement on learning a foreign language. Statistical methods are used to ascertain: (1) how students perceive the effects of ability grouping on learning English from various perspectives, (2) whether there are significant level effect and timing effect on students’ perceptions of ability grouping, and (3) whether teachers show more positive or negative attitudes to the grouping arrangement. Subjects included 582 college students and 34 English teachers from Da Yeh University. All the students were placed into four levels of classes according to ability. At the time the survey was conducted, they were either near the end of the first-year English program or the end of the second-year program. Research findings indicate that the majority of the students and teachers show evident support for ability-grouped class placement. The interaction effect between level and timing is found to be non-significant. It is important to note that whenever there is a significant timing effect, students in the second-year program hold less positive attitudes towards the effect of the homogeneous grouping arrangement than those in the first year. When a level effect is significant, lower-level students show stronger support for the grouping practice than those in the higher ability level.
期刊論文
1.Ireson, J.、Hallam, S.、Hurley, C.(2005)。What are the effects of ability grouping on GCSE attainment?。British Educational Research Journal,31(4),443-458。  new window
2.Liang, T. L.(2003)。Cooperative learning: An alternative to ability grouping。Journal of Paisa Humanities and Social Sciences,2,141-175。  new window
3.Rogers, K. B.(2002)。Grouping the gifted and talented: Questions and answers。Roeper Review,24(3),102-107。  new window
4.Slavin, R. E.(1988)。Synthesis of research on grouping in elementary and secondary schools。Educational Leadership,46(1),67-77。  new window
5.Slavin, R. E(1991)。Are cooperative learning and untracking harmful to the gifted。Educational Leadership,48(6),68-71。  new window
6.Slavin, R. E.(1993)。Ability grouping in the middle grades: Achievement effects and alternatives。Elementary School Journal,93(5),535-552。  new window
7.羅珮瑄(20051200)。Achievement Grouping and Students' Progress in Freshman English Classes at Feng Chia University。逢甲人文社會學報,11,253-279。new window  new window
8.許春滿、王佩玲(20060700)。A Case Study of Student Perceptions toward Between-class Ability Grouping in Freshman Practical English Class。高應科大人文社會科學學報,3,111-140。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Slavin, R. E.(1987)。Ability grouping and student achievement in elementary schools: A best-evidence synthesis。Review of Educational Research,57(3),293-336。  new window
10.Tsao, Chia-hsiu(20030500)。The Impact of Ability Grouping on Foreign Language Learners: A Case Study。Hwa Kang Journal of TEFL,9,79-102。  new window
11.Chen, M. H., Lin, Y. C.,、Feng, H. C.,(2004)。“Students’ and instructors’ perceptions of ability grouping in English listening learning。Journal of Chang Jung Christian University,Vol. 8, No.1,pp.107-123。  new window
12.Chien, C. N., Ching, H. L.,、Kao, L. H(2002)。“Study on a different leveling English instruction policy for ‘Freshman English’ in Chung Yuan Christian University.”。Chung Yuan Journal,Vol.30,No.4,pp.505-516。  new window
13.George, P. S.、Rubin, K.,(1992)。“Tracking and ability grouping in Florida: Educator’s perceptions.”。Florida Educational Research Bulletin,Vol.23, No.3-4,pp.1-52。  new window
14.Jaeger, R. M.、Hattie, J. A(1995)。“Detracking America’s Schools: Should we really care?”。Phi Delta Kappan,Vol.77, No. 3,pp.218-219。  new window
15.Kulik, C. -L. C.、Kulik, J. A(1982)。“Research synthesis on ability grouping.”。Educational Leadership,Vol.39, No.8,pp.619-621。  new window
16.Kulik, J. A(1991)。“Findings on grouping are often distorted: Response to Allan.”。Educational Leadership,Vol.48, No.6,p.67。  new window
17.Kulik J. A.(1993)。“An analysis of the research on ability grouping.”。NRC/GT Newsletter,pp.8-9。  new window
18.Reis, S. M(2007)。“No child left bored.”。School Administrator,Vol.64, No.2,p.22。  new window
19.Rogers, K. B(1993)。“Grouping the gifted and talented: Questions and answers.”。Roeper Review,Vol.16, No.1,pp.8-12。  new window
20.Slavin, R. E(1990)。“Achievement effects of ability grouping in secondary schools.”。Review of Educational Research,Vol.60, No.3,pp.471-499。  new window
21.Slavin, R. E(1995)。“Detracking and its detractors: Flawed evidence, flawed values.”。Phi Delta Kappan,Vol.77, No.3,pp.220-221。  new window
22.Tieso, C. L(2003)。“Ability grouping is not just tracking anymore.”。Roeper Review,Vol.26, No.1,29。  new window
23.Yu, C. F(1994)。“The assessment of ability grouping in the college lab program: The Soochow experience.”。Soochow Journal of Foreign Languages and Literature,No.10,pp.45-77。  new window
會議論文
1.Braddock, J. H.、Slavin, R. E.,(1992)。“Why ability grouping must end: Achieving excellence and equity in American education.”。  new window
2.Chang, B.Y.,(1987)。“A descriptive case report of TEFL program planning for non-English majors: The Fu-Jen experience.”pp.205-212。  new window
3.Chang, B. Y.,(1992)。“A study on the curriculum design of required English courses at universities.”pp.161-170。  new window
研究報告
1.Hoffer, T. B.、Gamoran, A(1993)。“Effects of instructional differences among ability groups on student achievement in middle-school science and mathematics.”。  new window
2.Hollifield, J.,(1987)。“Ability grouping in elementary schools.”。  new window
學位論文
1.Strech, L. L(1995)。“Ability grouping for elementary reading instruction and its relationship to the balanced literacy approach.”,Long Beach, CA。  new window
圖書
1.Kulik, J. A.(1992)。An analysis of the research on ability grouping: Historical and contemporary perspectives。Storrs, Connecticut:The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut。  new window
2.Oakes, J.(1985)。Keeping track: How schools structure inequality。Birmingham, NY:New Haven:Vail-Ballou Press:Yale University Press。  new window
3.Fiedler-Brand, E., Lange, R. E.,、Winebrenner, S.,(1992)。“Tracking, ability grouping and the gifted.”。Norristown, PA。  new window
4.Hopkins, G(200)。“Is ability grouping the way to go-or should it go away?”。Education World。  new window
5.Loveless, T(1988)。“The tracking and ability grouping debate.”。Washington, D.C。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
1. 從一所頂尖大學英文輔導班學生觀點初探英文能力分級教學之成效與影響
2. 以區別分析法探討影響科技大學學生英語學習成就
3. Conceptualisation of English Ability Grouping for Non-English Majors in Taiwanese Higher Education
4. A Study in the Effect of the Online Remedial Program at Soochow University
5. 科技大學學生對大一英文課程規劃的看法:以一所應用科技大學為例
6. An Exploratory Study on the Effects of an Online GEPT Simulated-test English Remedial Course
7. Effects of Ability Grouping and Development of English Graduation Benchmarks in a National Technological University in Taiwan
8. An Investigation into English Learning Strategies of Ability-Grouped Freshman Students in a National Technological University
9. Effects of English Proficiency Grouping in Freshman and Sophomore English Instruction: An Analysis of Teacher Perceptions
10. Tunghai Freshman English for Non-Major Program
11. Teachers’ Perceptions and Attitudes to the Educational Structure of Ability Grouping in Practical English Class
12. The Effects of an English Remedial Course in a Technical University--A Case Study of KUAS
13. Evaluation of Ability Grouping and Mixed-Ability Grouping Practices in Junior High English Class
14. A Case Study of Student Perceptions toward Between-class Ability Grouping in Freshman Practical English Class
15. Achievement Grouping and Students' Progress in Freshman English Classes at Feng Chia University
 
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE